Clinton Projection Syndrome

Victor Davis Hanson May 02, 2019

Hillary Clinton recently editorialized about the second volume of special counsel Robert Mueller's massive report. She concluded of the report's assorted testimonies and inside White House gossip concerning President Trump's words and actions that "any other person engaged in those acts would certainly have been indicted."

Psychologists might call her claims "projection." That is the well-known psychological malady of attributing bad behavior to others as a means of exonerating one's own similar, if not often even worse, sins.............

The Russians rightly assumed that Steele would lap up their fantasies, seed them among Trump-hating officials in the Barack Obama administration and thereby cause hysteria during the election, the transition and, eventually, the Trump presidency. Russia succeeded in sowing such chaos, thanks ultimately to Clinton, who likely had broken federal laws by using a British national and, by extension.......... Given the Steele travesty and other past scandals, it is inexplicable that Clinton has not been indicted.

Her lawlessness first made headlines 25 years ago, when she admitted that her cattle futures broker had defied odds of one in 31 trillion by investing $1,000 from her trading account and returning a profit of nearly $100,000...........The reason that foreign oligarchs are no longer donating millions of dollars to the Clinton Foundation, and that Bill Clinton is not being offered $500,000 for speaking appearances in Moscow, is simply because Hillary Clinton is not secretary of state.............As secretary of state, Clinton also sidestepped the law by setting up a home-brewed email server............

In truth, Clinton was at the heart of the entire Russian collusion hoax................For much of her professional life, Hillary Clinton had acted above and beyond the law on the assumption that as the wife of a governor, as first lady of the United States, as a senator from New York, as secretary of state and as a two-time candidate for the presidency, she could ignore the law without worry over the consequences........To Read More....

My Take -  To quote Clinton: "any other person engaged in those acts would certainly have been indicted."  And yet the media screams the President isn't cooperating with Nadler, Schiff and the rest of the leftist loons in Congress.  They demand all sorts of documents and testimony for the purpose of finding something to promote impeachment.  It takes a court order to obtain private information, and that order has to be based on a crime that's been committed.  They have yet to demonstrate there's any evidence Trump has committed a crime.  Yet here we have Hillary and her whole cabal of traitors with known and provable crimes and they're completely ignoring those actual and provable crimes.

It's my belief the House will turn over again after the 2020 election, and then the investigation about real crimes will begin, if they've not already begun.