I can recall John Kerry, Obama’s Secretary of State, from
the days he testified to a congressional committee and slandered his fellow
soldiers as the spokesman for Veterans Against the Vietnam War in 1971. I was
appalled then and my opinion of the man has not changed since those days. I
opposed the war, too, but I did not blame it on the men who were conscripted to
fight it, nor did I believe the charges he leveled against some of them.
These days Kerry is engaged in securing an agreement with
the Iranians, if not to stop their program to make their own nuclear weapons
than to slow it to a later date. Never mind that the Iranian government is
listed by our own government as a leading sponsor of terrorism worldwide or
that they have signed such agreements in the past and then tossed out the
inspectors.
Kerry is convinced that the Obama administration can get
an agreement that is, in his own words, “not legally binding”, nor is it a
treaty that the U.S. Senate would have to vote for or against. In point of
fact, President Obama can make the deal—sign the agreement—just as Presidents
have done for over two hundred years. It can then be abrogated by whoever the
next President will be.
Why Obama and Kerry are doing this defies my
understanding. It gives the Iranians more time to reach nuclear capability. It
is opposed by every nation in the Middle East. It puts every nation within
reach of Iran’s missiles at risk and it virtually guarantees the destruction of
Israel, a goal of Iran’s Islamic Revolution from the day it was born. Kerry is
negotiating with people who took our diplomats hostage in 1979 and have played
a role in the deaths of many Americans since then.
Is John Kerry a moron? I think so.
I asked myself this question in regard to another area of
U.S. policy which the Secretary of State is also championing even if millions
around the world have concluded otherwise.
On March 2nd,
Kerry addressed the Atlantic Council in Washington, D.C, telling them what he
has been saying in many forums. Let us understand that “climate change” is the
name being used to replace “global warming”, because the Earth has been in a
cooling cycle for the past 18 years or so. And let us understand that “climate
change” has been happening for 4.5 billion years.
Kerry said, “So when science tells us that our climate is
changing and human beings are largely causing that change, by what right do
people stand up and just say, ‘Well, I dispute that’ or ‘I deny that elementary
truth’?”
The problem with this is that human beings are not
causing the planet’s climate change. Forces far greater than humans are
involved, not the least of which is the Sun.
As for science, its most fundamental methodology is to
constantly challenge the various ‘truths’ put forward as theories until they
can be proved to be true by being independently reproduced. Nothing about the
“global warming” theories has been true. All of the computer models on which it
was based have been proven inaccurate. In some cases, they were deliberately
rigged.
On television meteorologists remind us that every day,
indeed, from morning to night, the temperatures of the area about which they
are reporting are in a constant state of change. They show us satellite
photography and mapping that demonstrates how dynamic the weather is on any
spot on Earth. The climate, however, is measured in decades and centuries.
Every one of the doomsday predictions of the global warming “scientists” and
propagandists have been wrong.
The enemies of the use of energy to enhance and improve
the lives of the residents of Earth began to claim in the 1970s and 80s that
carbon dioxide (CO2) was threatening the climate.
At best, CO2 is a very minor element of the Earth’s
atmosphere, about 0.04%, which gets it rated as “a trace gas.” As such, it
plays no role with regard to the climate.
Kerry asserted that climate change is “one of the biggest
threats facing our planet today” and should be ranked with terrorism,
epidemics, poverty and nuclear proliferation…” Oh, wait! Isn’t this the same
Secretary of State negotiating with Iran to allow it to become a nuclear power?
Fossil fuels have made the difference between modern life
and burning cow dung to cook dinner. A billion people on Earth still do not
have electricity.
Less obvious, but significantly more threatening is the
White House effort to get the U.S. signed up for the United Nations Framework
Convention on Climate Change and its International
Climate Justice tribunal. This is a follow-up to the 1977 Kyoto
Protocol that was unanimously rejected by the U.S. Senate. Why? Because such
treaties threaten the sovereignty of the U.S. and, just as importantly, because
the entire United Nation’s climate program is a huge fraud.
This is what John Kerry wants the U.S. to agree to, just
like the Iran deal, and just to be sure the U.S. Senate, as mandated by the
U.S. Constitution, doesn’t have a say in it, he and the President are calling
these deals anything other than a treaty.
Is John Kerry a moron? Maybe not as dumb as he seems to
be, but surely cynical and devious.
Unfortunately, he is the Secretary of State.
© Alan Caruba, 2015
Editor's
Note: My friend Alan Caruba passed
on June 15, 2015. Alan's work is insightful, logical, factual, and has a
timeless about it. Alan had given me blanket permission to publish his work
when he was alive. I had intended to archive many of his articles, but like
most of us, I got caught up in life. Well, that effort is long overdue, so
every week I intend to publish one or more of of his old articles from Warning Signs
starting from the last one published as a tribute to my friend, Alan Caruba.
Please enjoy Caruba's Corner!
No comments:
Post a Comment