From Ohio Watchdog!

Hello all:

Our database of phantom voters who could be impersonated at the polls provoked more of a reaction than we expected, with Plunderbund and Daily Kos calling for criminal investigations.

 Here are the three parts to the story:

Get your voter fraud kit here

Ohio’s voter rolls are swollen by hundreds of thousands of non-voters, presenting an opportunity for massive elections fraud, a Watchdog analysis reveals. We publish a database of 306,152 registered voters who've never actually voted and should have been scrubbed from the rolls.

Does Plunderbund believe in free speech?

We have a little fun with so-called progressives who would sell out free speech cheaply; then we argue with a longtime Plunderbund contributor in the comments.

Plunderbund lawyer calls for new limits to free speech

Is voter fraud imminent and likely? You'd think a liberal would have a quick answer, but the Plunderbundies refuse to say.

Best,

Ohio Watchdog

My Take – Well, they are ticking off the right people.  They must be doing something right.  Please take a look at this post.  

“This is blatant voter intimidation,” says Councilwoman Cleveland. “A direct attack in the heart of African American community meant to scare people and keep them from exercising their right to vote.”

 I have a question.  How is this intimating African American voters and student voters?  Are we to assume the writer thinks that these voters are voting illegally? 

Now, you can rationally accuse those who posted the billboard of thinking that, especially when you consider where they put the sign, but that isn’t what they are accusing them of.   They are accusing the people who paid for this sign of “voter intimidation”!  

I would presume that the only people who would be intimidated by this sign would be those attempting to commit voter fraud.  Right?   

If that is the case, then wouldn’t an honest politician (I know, I know, that is an oxymoron) want them intimidated?  Otherwise; why would anyone care?  Unless of course this woman is in effect “accidently” inferring that she believes that her constituent voters are not really legal voters in the first place?   Does anyone see the logical fallacy in all of this besides me? 

Let’s face it.  The only reason to be against taking rational steps to prevent voter fraud by a politician is because they know it exists, and it’s working it their favor.  And when they claim that the “right”, or conservatives, are the ones who are really guilty of it; yet demand that the "right" stop attempting to prevent it; you have to wonder what is wrong with the logic centers in their brains.