By Rich Kozlovich
This series of articles are meant to drive home this one
incontrovertible fact - everything the left promotes and implements are
irrational, misanthropic and morally defective – a reality that's hidden by
seemingly humanitarian rhetoric. The left keeps changing itself into an
angel of light, but the proof of who they are and what they do is in the
outcome.
We have over two hundred and twenty five years of
history, starting with the French Revolution, to show just how monstrously
insane the left is. The outcome of all leftist policies has been a
disaster for humanity, and the hated western world founded on Judaic/Christian
principles of individual rights and responsibilities is the left’s primary
target.
We need to understand this once and for all: The
left will adopt any philosophy that will gain them power! Why?
Because unlike the Judaic/Christian world the left has no moral foundation
giving them the ability to shift directions 180 degrees if it gains them power
and money. The end consequence to those they previously and
supposedly supported are immaterial to the left, whether those policies
involved race, intolerance, the environment, justice or economics. They
use whatever or whomever they can to gain the one thing that is their one and only
morality – gain power at any cost – while using our own values against us!
The socialist monsters of the 20th century, including
Mao, Stalin, Castro, Hitler, Pot Pol and others murdered over 100 million
innocent people in the 20th century. The spear point of modern socialism
since the fall of the Soviet Union has been environmentalism, and an argument
can easily be made they've killed over 100 million innocent people in the world
via their anti-pesticide policies alone. That doesn't even count the numbers
of people who've suffered due to their policies on climate change, genetically
modified foods and a host of other positions.
Dystopia follows the left - in all of
it's manifestations - like the plague follows rats. The left
is insane and Obama is the foremost example of that insanity.
The Obama administration wants
to let in a large number of Syrian refugees. It varies from 10,000 to
100,000, but since the truth is not in our president, those are probably just
waypoints to an unlimited migration from the Middle East – i.e., the numbers
are gruberfacts, chum for the chumps. Liberals, which means the Democratic
Party, are wailing about the responsibility America has to welcome these
refugees, driven from their homes by the winds of war. We are a nation of
immigrants, and it is our duty to welcome this next wave. If we don't, we
are bigots. We know a lot about liberals. They give things away.
They are so concerned with whatever problem they identify that they are
passionate about giving away what you have built to, as they think, deal
with it…… They never expect to see any of these refugees. They are going
to be somewhere else while they congratulate themselves on their
open-mindedness……. Liberalism can liquidate a society. It cannot build
one…….[the West’s culture has been built on] 3,500 years in terms of Judaism –
i.e., the Ten Commandments;over 2,000 years in terms of Christianity;………Islam
is alien to that culture. It is based on dominance, not equality,
within society and aggression toward and death for nonbelievers……
On Friday, the U.S. Justice Department filed a 35-page petition asking the U.S. Supreme
Court to review Texas v. U.S., the case filed by 26 states against
President Obama’s immigration amnesty plan. The government is appealing a
preliminary injunction that stopped implementation of Obama’s amnesty plan,
which was issued by a federal district court and upheld by the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals on
Nov. 9....
The United States under the
leadership of this President has lost the will to win. Instead we are giving in
to the political correctness of those in leadership positions, allowing Islamic
terrorism to spread and gain footholds in many different areas of the world
including our own country. This administration has ignored this spread, leaving
an opening to the vulnerability of attacks here in our country. Not being
willing to take on the Islamic State and all other organizations of radical
Islamic terrorism has lead to the expansion of radical Jihad, and allowed
recruiting to expand because they know that the United States who should be a
world leader is “leading from behind” which means no leadership at all. By our
actions we are condoning the premise that Islamic Terrorism is a form of
political expression, and that our nation under this President will continue to
make excuses for the deaths of innocent citizens. It will come here, and it
will be caused by the ideological shortcomings of this President and this
Administration……
Nonie Darwish:
Will Obama Go Away After the 2016 Elections?
President Obama started his presidency with a lack of confidence in America as
an exceptional nation bringing hope and goodness to the world. He mocked
Christians, the Bible and those who support the Second Amendment even as far
back as 2006. In the meantime, he shamelessly defended Islam with every fiber
of his being, even after horrific acts of Islamic terrorism on Americans. Both
abroad and internally, Obama never demanded an apology from his attorney
general, Erick Holder, when he reprimanded America as “a nation of
cowards.” The feelings of lack of confidence are now mutual, not only on
Obama’s side towards..
List of Refugee
Jihadis Secretly Arrested in America, By Pamela Geller Obama’s
immigration jihad to expedite Muslim refugees from jihad wars has gone into
high gear in the wake of the Paris Islamic attacks. Mind you, there was
no urgency for the hundreds of thousands of Christians who were subsequently
slaughtered by devout Muslims in their war to impose Islam across Syria, Iraq,
Lebanon etc. At the end of 2011, the international arm of my organization,
SION, called for emergency asylum for Christians and religious minorities
trying to escape Islamic supremacists genocide. Nothing was done. Obama stood
by while wholesale slaughter took place.Now he wants to bring the perps of
genocide.Obama deceitfully accuses the GOP of giving refugees a “religious
test.” It was the jihadists that gave..
US government officially closes its eyes to genocide
against ME Christians, By Carol Brown
The Obama administration is pulling out all the stops to deny Christians in the
Middle East any relief from their horrific plight. The door to the United
States has been closed using an obscure bureaucratic angle that withholds recognition of
official refugee status for Christians fleeing ISIS. And now an unnamed State
Department representative has signaled that Middle Eastern Christians may be
excluded from an official declaration of genocide. Per a report at NRO, Yazidis will be officially
recognized as victims of genocide. And rightfully so. But Christians are not
slated to be. And while this may seem like meaningless bureaucratic garbage
compared to the reality that is unfolding in the Middle East, the implications
are significant. First, it would continue to render invisible the
genocide that is being committed against Christians in the Middle East. There
are no words to describe this disgrace, but sin comes to mind. For an overview
of the savagery that has been, and continues to be, inflicted upon Christians
in the Middle East, see the short summary of part of NRO article, below…..
Muslims have driven Christians
out of their lands. Enslaved them. Forcibly converted them to Islam. Murdered
them. But the Obama administration’s anti-Christian animus is so deep and thoroughgoing
that Obama has refused to meet with victims of the Muslim persecution of
Christians, and now the administration refuses to designate this persecution of
Christians a genocide. “This is not an academic matter. A genocide designation
would have significant policy implications for American efforts to restore
property and lands taken from the minority groups and for offers of aid,
asylum, and other protections to such victims
. Worse, it would mean that, under the Genocide Convention, the United States
and other governments would not be......
Bill limiting Gitmo transfers may be unconstitutional,
Obama says, By Pamela Geller
President Obama on Wednesday argued that
legislation that sets limits on his ability to transfer detainees from the
detention facilities in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, may violate the Constitution, and
indicated he may have to implement certain provisions of the bill differently
than Congress intended.
Sweden. The ‘(Humanitarian) Superpower’, Overwhelmed, by Andrew Stuttaford
Sweden’s
political elite have liked to boast that their country is a ‘humanitarian
superpower’, a boast that has quite a bit to do with years of immigration
policies that have made no sense to anyone with the slightest sense of how the
world works. Reality is now biting. Hard,…… Meanwhile, some polls have shown
that the SD, a party with barely more than a handful of supporters a decade
ago, is now Sweden’s largest. Maybe, maybe not, but even Sifo, probably
Sweden’s best-known pollster is giving them 17.6 percent, a figure that,
because of respondents’ unwillingness to admit to SD sympathies, may understate
the ‘real’ total. To the south, the dangerously irresponsible (or, as The
Economist puts it, “indispensable”) Angela Merkel continues to dig a deeper hole
both for her country and, if she is allowed to get away with it, the Eu…...
For
years on end, we’ve heard about “white privilege.” If you’re white in America,
your life is supposed to be nothing but cotton candy, pretty prom dates,
glowing health, and riches. A cloud never crosses your sky. In recent weeks,
the cries of “White privilege!” have grown louder. True, it’s easier to belong
to a racial majority than to a racial minority — or at least it is in most
cases. Black people have coped with any number of obstacles and slights in this
country, well after Jim Crow (to say nothing of slavery)…….. But lives are
lived individually, aren’t they? Rather than in groups? Years ago, I worked
briefly for a man who seemed to be a classic one-percenter. He was employed in
a prestigious law firm and had been to the best schools: Princeton, Oxford, and
Harvard, I believe, and in that order. One day, I asked him about his earlier
life. And my eyes widened as he talked…….
Molenbeek: A
Troubled Neighborhood in a Failing State, by Andrew Stuttaford
In
the course of a post last weekend, I linked to a bleak piece in Politico about
Molenbeek, a Brussels neighborhood that has come into sharp focus after it
emerged that some of the Paris attackers came from there.……I witnessed the
neighborhood become increasingly intolerant. Alcohol became unavailable in most
shops and supermarkets; I heard stories of fanatics at the Comte des Flandres
metro station who pressured women to wear the veil; Islamic bookshops
proliferated, and it became impossible to buy a decent newspaper. With an
unemployment rate of 30 percent, the streets were eerily empty until late in
the morning. Nowhere was there a bar or café where white, black and brown
people would mingle. Instead, I witnessed petty crime, aggression, and
frustrated youths who spat at our girlfriends and called them “filthy whores.”
If you made a remark, you were inevitably scolded and called a racist. There
used to be Jewish shops on Chaussée de Gand, but these were terrorized by gangs
of young kids and most closed their doors around 2008. Openly gay people were
routinely intimidated, and also packed up their bags.……Brussels’ Socialists
were beginning to pay attention to the city’s Muslim community. Noting that
half of the Socialist Party’s 26-member slate in the city’s 75-seat parliament
was then Muslim, I wrote as follows:
There’s nothing wrong with that in
principle (in fact as a measure of integration it can be seen as encouraging),
but to read this sentence is to wonder who, exactly, is integrating whom: “ In
the commune of Molenbeek, longstanding Socialist mayor Philippe Moureaux has
made Halal meals standard in all schools; police officers are also barred from
eating or drinking on the streets during Ramadan.” Fast forward nine years, and
Teun Voeten, the cultural anthropologist and war photographer who is the author
of the Politico piece, wrote this:……..
Belgium is not that much of a
nation……it is both host and, in some senses, prototype for the post-national EU
is both appropriate and a warning.
