Deep State Corruption, Death and the Information Quality Act

By Rich Kozlovich 

As a former owner of a pest control company, for 30 years I was involved in my industry's affairs dealing with legislative and regulatory matters.  For over 25 years I published articles defending our use of chemistry, and the way we use it.  Which meant I had to attack prominent scientists in and out of government.  Being the heterodox to an industry isn't the popular thing to do, and I wasn't popular.  But it was an adventure, and I wouldn't have changed one minute of that.

I will say this, with all the modesty I can possibly muster, which isn't much, I was right then and I'm still right, and that includes every position I've taken against junk science, whether it's been about chemistry, scientific testing, or all the lies and corruption surrounding Fauci and this false pandemic.  

I had a lot of friends in science before this pandemic hysteria, and what did bother me was in the beginning these science friends, who were always in agreement with me, ended up in opposition to my views on this false pandemic.   The mortality rate, the infection rate, and especially the vaccination mandates.  They were wrong!   Since I no longer correspond with them, I often wonder what must be going on in their minds as all the evidence has come out supporting my position.   

This brings me to the point at hand.  My friend Paul Driessen sends me articles he feels need to be shared as broadly as possible, which I happily publish.  Last week he sent this article, "Restoring trust in government by using the IQA",  by William L. Kovacs saying: 

The Federal government has left citizens living in information confusion, misinformation and conspiracy theories. Information clutter helps explain why only two in ten Americans trust Washington to do the right thing. But distinguishing between good and bad quality information should never be difficult when the information comes from our government. 

He went on to say the IQA was designed to generate trust from the public, but in point of fact, it's a toothless tiger.  From it's inception the government has failed, deliberately failed, to implement this law, and if they had, all the insane covid pandemic hysteria would have been stopped.  

When Paul sends me these article he usually prefaces with his comments:

The Information Quality Act defines government information as “any communication or representation of facts or data, in any medium or form.” It requires that government-disseminated information be accurate, useful and reproducible; that it have integrity; and that opinions be clearly identified as opinions, and not be disguised as facts. 

This seems logical, straightforward, and essential to the proper functioning of government and society. After all, if any of us lied or misrepresented salient facts to the government, we’d likely be fined or jailed. The same standards should certainly apply to government agencies and officials. 

The glaring problem is that federal government agencies have simply refused to abide by or follow the act’s clear and unequivocal mandates. Perhaps worse, federal courts have let them get away with this arrogant refusal to obey the law. The impacts on our health, welfare, jobs and economy should be obvious to anyone who has encountered the increasingly pervasive impacts of government on our lives.

Epidemiology alone isn't science because epidemiology is statistics and statistics alone cannot prove the existence or absence of risk.  Often these "statistics" epidemiologists spout out are nothing more than computer modeling.  That's how they come up with these insane predictions.  Also, mice aren't little people. The results of tests on laboratory animals do not necessarily pertain to humans. Mice aren't little rats either. Very often reactions to a substance that occur in mice do not occur in rats and vice versa.   

This has been the case forever.  In 2005 the America Council on Science and Health petitioned the EPA to stop declaring something was carcinogenic based solely on rodent testing. alone because that violated the principles outlined in the Information Quality Act.  They weren't opposed to rodent testing, but that's supposed the first step, not the final step in testing.  And certainly not the only step in declaring something carcinogenic.

Finally, after giving themselves extension after extension, five months later, the EPA replied with this dodge.  The EPA claimed:

".......their Risk Assessment Guidelines are not statements of scientific fact -- and thus not covered by the IQA -- but merely statements of EPA policy.”

One would think that any kind of risk assessment policy would be based on science, so if it isn't we must ask; just what are their policies based on?  We find this same cavalier attitude in every department of government and the federal judiciary, both of which need to be purged.  Starting by eliminating whole departments and agencies, including the EPA, and passing term limits for the federal judiciary. 

We absolutely know everything touted by Fauci and his followers was blatantly false.  How many lives could have been saved if someone in the federal government had one ounce of courage to put the nation, the people, and especially the children, ahead of themselves and these corrupt entrenched bureaucrats?

Now, who will answer?  When government officials deliberately ignore the laws of the land, and that malfeasance causes harm and damage, including deaths,  shouldn't they be held accountable?