By Daniel Greenfield April 23, 2023 @ Sultan Knish Blog
Identity
politics is best understood as a moral caste system. Buying into
variants such as critical race theory means accepting that your actions
matter less than your race, gender or sexuality. The promised liberation
of identity politics imposes the collectivist understanding that
nothing you do truly matters outside the constraints of your caste. Who
you were born is who you are.
It’s
difficult to think of a dogma that is more at odds with the
philosophical worldview of the Founding Fathers or the Judeo-Christian
theology of America. Identity politics violates the political and
religious foundations of this country. These ideological assaults are
bolstered by the conviction that personal redemption through economic
strivings or repentance are conspiracies to fool people into believing
that change comes through individualism rather than collectivism.
And
yet the damage to the national fabric is almost secondary to the moral
damage that identity politics inflicts on individuals. The
Judeo-Christian moral revolutions came from the conviction that each
individual had free will, personal responsibility and a relationship
with his creator. Dispense with individual free will and individual
conscience goes with it. In its place are the rioting mobs of Black
Lives Matter for whom, like the Nazis, morality is group warfare. The
only individual actions that matter are membership in a group whose
moral nature is innately coded at birth. To be white is to be a sinner
and to be black is to be sinned against.
The essence of identity
politics is its conviction that individuals can have moral standing only
in relation to their group. Understanding morality without awareness of
group membership is the equivalent of atheism for wokes. That is why
they are unable to grasp literature whose protagonists lack clear racial
or sexual markers. Diversity markers in movies, television and novels
are not just elements of political correctness, they are vitally
necessary signifiers for a woke population that can only see moral drama
through the lens of identity politics.
Identity politics tricks
people into believing that nothing they do can influence the moral
balance nearly as much as the group into which they were born or were
selected. The moral relationship of a murderer and murder victim is
secondary to the groups that they belong to. This is not the exciting
new idea that wokes think that it is. It’s the default state of affairs
in most of the world where caste, tribe, clan and family relationships
are primary and moral choices are secondary.
A justice system
responding to a murder in most of the non-western world is primarily
aware of the groups that the victim and the perpetrator belonged to.
Morality is not universal, but caste-based. Murder is more wrong in some
intersectional power relationships than others. And in some, as with
the victims of honor killings, it’s downright understandable. Asking,
“Who is the victim” is not an attempt to solve a crime, but to measure
morality through social status.
Identity politics claims that
it’s a form of liberation, but liberation begins by taking power from a
group and handing it to the individual. Identity politics takes power
from the individual and hands it to the group. Identity politics begins
by denying individual morality and concludes by denying individual
rights. Rather than liberation, it offers total and overwhelming
repression.
Cancel culture is not an accidental byproduct of
identity politics: it is identity politics. It attacks membership in a
group, that of peers, employees, family and friends, students and the
larger culture, reinforcing the message that group membership is
conditional on abandoning individual views. The members of the lynch
mob, individually weak, show the supremacy of collectivism by targeting
individuals as components of a mob. The tactics of cancel culture also
relay its fundamental message that group membership is superior to
individuality. And that those individuals who resist are easily crushed
by a mobilized group.
The act of cancelation is a microcosm of
identity politics. The group brutalization escalates from online
harassment to mob violence, from ritual humiliation to violent assaults
and murder. From anonymous trolls to antifa assaults, the virtual scales
to real life. Online hate is a training ground for riots, terrorism and
a civil war. What makes all of it possible is the conscious abandonment
of individual morality for identity politics. The moral code of
identity politics is that there are no universal moral codes that apply
equally, only the political death struggle of “us” and “them”.
Woke
syntax moralizes its amorality by depicting it as “punching up” or
“punching down”. Intersectionality pretends to draw moral lines by
defining who is and isn’t fair game based on group membership. What the
higher moral logic of identity politics embraced by leftist intellectual
elites really means is Shiites against Sunnis, one African tribe
against another, a perpetual war of identity until extinction.
Moral
exhaustion is part of the appeal of identity politics. The liberation
that collectivist movements offer is the freedom from personal
responsibility and conscience. In all its tribal ugliness, identity
politics offers simple answers with no need for soul searching. To
accept critical race theory is to know whether you are good or evil
through the simple expedient of glancing in the mirror. You may be on
one or the other, but you had little to do with it.
The moral
demands of modernity are more exhausting than ever and without religion,
the upper middle class westerner is less able to navigate the ethical
ambiguities of a changing world. Like all totalitarianism, identity
politics offers simple solutions to unsolvable problems. Coming after
the wreckage of liberalism, globalism, multiculturalism and all the
failed isms of the last century, it offers a return to savagery, the
simplicity of the hatred of the other, wrapped in sophistry.
Identity
politics is a rebellion against every civilizational development for
thousands of years. That is the source of its appeal. This is the grim
genocidal vision for which liberals have exchanged the Enlightenment.
That is what they want to indoctrinate at every level from kindergarten
to the corporate workplace. That is what they want for America.
Daniel Greenfield is a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the David Horowitz Freedom Center. This article previously appeared at the Center's Front Page Magazine. Click here to subscribe to my articles.
Thank you for reading.
No comments:
Post a Comment