Question for Gillibrand: Was it "racist" when you held all of the same immigration positions as Trump?

Allahpundit January 21, 2019

She is so, so bad. So bad.

Read Friday’s post for a quick-and-dirty summary of her immigration “evolution” over the years, which wasn’t an evolution at all and certainly didn’t take years. It happened so quickly and dramatically after she was appointed to the Senate, from Trump-style border hawk to pitiful liberal bleeding heart in the blink of an eye, that Fox News’s Kennedy wondered on air today whether that sort of sudden ideological lunge amounts to mental illness. It does have a whiff of sociopathy to it inasmuch as sociopaths are ruthlessly directed towards their own self-interest. What was in Kirsten Gillibrand’s electoral self-interest on the subject of immigration when she was representing a conservative-ish House district in upstate New York? And what was in Kirsten Gillibrand’s electoral self-interest on immigration the moment she was suddenly accountable to a very liberal statewide electorate in New York? ..........To Read More....

My Take - Scuttlebutt is she's talked about running for POTUS, and like every other Democrat who's running, she's flipped, flopped, lied and spun her "views" just like a snake twisting and turning.  But like every other Democrat running - She's passionate, she's self-righteous, she's indignant ........She Believes!

We just can't tell what it is she believes, and if she could articulate it clearly and concisely, that can change tomorrow.  Of course the real problem is that babbling isn't belief.  Babbling is the new leftist craze started by Ocasio-Cortez that I call the Leftist Nitwit.  To qualify to be part of this new form of leftism you must be able to babble incoherently for ten minutes. Oh, wait.....it just occured to me.  Ocasio-Cortez didn't invent being a Leftist Nitwit, she just exposed it and leaves us with this question: Is there any leftist out there that wouldn't qualify?