Paul Driessen
Senator Sheldon Whitehouse recently had a Huff-Po tantrum. The Rhode Island Democrat was miffed that
people criticized him and equally liberal Senate colleagues Barbara Boxer (CA)
and Ed Markey (MA) for attacking skeptics of dangerous manmade climate change like
Spanish Inquisition tormentors.
He says the skeptic community’s “overheated” response mischaracterized their motives and muddled their
important messages: Global warming is the most serious threat we face today. Financial
incentives can affect behavior, which is why the public and Congress need to
know who funded the skeptics’ research. And companies that produce harmful
products want to foment uncertainty about well-established health and safety
risks: fossil fuel interests and climate chaos skeptics are just like the
tobacco industry.
These senators are abusing their power of office to
threaten and silence honest scientists, and destroy their funding, reputations
and careers. It’s pure Saul Alinsky, as practiced by Greenpeace, Harry Reid and
the other White House: “In a fight almost anything goes. Pick the target,
freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it.” And the vilified scientists and
their friends are just supposed to take it, the senators seem to think.
In reality, the only thing overheated is Mr. Whitehouse’s
temper – and the increasingly preposterous rhetoric about an overheating
planet. Climate change is altering our music. A 0.1 degree Celsius change in ocean
temperatures has caused whales to migrate a month earlier than 30 years ago.
Warming oceans will mean the end of fish and chips! Lord knows what other “disasters” await –
all because of fossil fuels.
The absurdity of this fraudulent fear mongering and its total irrelevance to our daily lives
explains why Americans consistently put climate change at the bottom of every
list of concerns. The very idea that governments can decree an idyllic climate
is equally crazy; that has happened only once
in human history.
No wonder Mr. Obama is repackaging the climate issue
under the equally false and ridiculous mantras of “ocean acidification,” and “carbon pollution” causing allergies and asthma. Our oceans are not becoming acidic.
It’s not “carbon” – it’s carbon dioxide, the miracle molecule that makes all life on Earth possible. And
neither CO2 nor planetary warming has anything to do with allergies or asthma.
Climate science was supposed to examine the effects that
humans might be having on Earth’s climate. But anti-fossil fuel activists
turned it into the notion that only humans affect the climate – and that
the powerful natural forces that caused countless, sometimes devastating
climate fluctuations in the past no longer play a role. Climatology was also
supposed to be about the scientific method:
Pose a hypothesis to explain how nature works. Test the
hypothesis and its predictions against real-world evidence and observations. If
the premise is valid, the evidence will back it up. If the data and evidence
are out of synch with the carbon dioxide/greenhouse gas thesis, come up with
another hypothesis.
By now, it’s obvious that the “dangerous manmade global
warming” thesis, and computer models based on it, do not explain what is
happening in the real world. The planet stopped warming 18 years ago, despite
rising fossil fuel use and CO2 emissions. The models don’t work; their
predictions are completely out of whack with reality. Instead of more
hurricanes, no Category 3-5 has hit the USA since late 2005.
So the alarmists changed their mantra to “climate change”
and “weather disruption.” But this is bogus: it tries to blame every change and
event on fossil fuels. The thesis can never be proven or disproven, which means
it’s a religious tract, not a scientific analysis. Alarmists don’t have a leg
to stand on scientifically.
That’s why they refuse to debate the science; why they
vilify climate crisis skeptics. It’s why Democrats became so frustrated with
Dr. Judith Curry’s expert testimony at a recent House Science Committee
hearing that they left the room. They couldn’t stand it when she said the
“central issue” is the extent to which recent (and future) planetary warming or
other climate changes are driven by manmade greenhouse gas emissions,
“versus natural climate variability caused by variations from the sun, volcanic
eruptions, and large-scale ocean circulations.” And they really couldn’t
tolerate her noting that President Obama’s pledge to slash U.S. emissions by
28% will reduce warming by just 0.03 degrees Celsius by 2100.
Climate change and extreme weather risks are real, but
carbon dioxide doesn’t cause them today any more than throughout history. Aside
from Pleistocene-style ice ages, we can adapt or respond to events – including storms,
droughts, heat waves and extreme cold – if we have affordable, reliable energy,
strong economies and modern technologies. The real threats to jobs, health,
welfare and lives come from anti-fossil fuel policies imposed on the pretense
that they will stabilize weather and climate. Forecasting future climate
changes will be equally impossible if we remain fixated on carbon dioxide, and
ignore the solar, ocean circulation, cosmic ray and other powerful natural
forces that actually affect Earth’s climate.
Senator Whitehouse’s suggestion that climate chaos
skeptics should be tarred and feathered with tobacco industry apologists is
despicable demagoguery. So are his comments about funding realist research.
The skeptics’ funding was never secret. It was always an
open book, available to anyone who cared to look. But since he brought up the
money issue, let’s look at a few aspects that he studiously ignores.
Alarmist research is all about carbon dioxide, greenhouse
gases and fossil fuels – precisely because financial incentives can and do
affect behavior. Alarmists get a thousand times more money than skeptics. Climate Crisis, Inc. received hundreds of billions
of dollars in government, industry, foundation and other money during the past
couple decades. The US government alone spent over $186
billion in tax dollars on climate, “clean energy” and renewable energy
projects from 2009 through 2014. Applicants know they won’t get grants if their
theses and conclusions do not support climate alarmism and regulatory agendas.
Billions more went to government agencies that coordinate
these programs and develop anti-hydrocarbon regulations. These bureaucrats
don’t merely search health and scientific files to cherry-pick papers that
support their agenda. They deliberately hunt only for supportive
documents (many of which they pay for) and actively ignore, suppress and vilify
research that focuses on (or even just discusses) natural forces.
Then the EPA and other agencies pay the American Lung Association, scientific
advisory committees and other activists millions of dollars a year to
rubberstamp their regulatory decisions. Even more destructive of our scientific
method and political process, countless millions are also being funneled to
climate chaos researchers and Big Green pressure groups via secretive foundations,
laundered through front groups from Russian oil
interests, and employed to further enrich billionaires like Warren Buffett.
The scandalous system has turned hardcore
environmentalism into a $13.4-billion-per-year operation and represents an
unbelievable abuse of our hard-earned tax dollars and the tax-exempt status of
numerous foundations and activist groups. Cooperate and get rich; resist, and
get the Whitehouse inquisition.
As a result, instead of science, we get opinion,
propaganda, spin, pseudo-science and outright fraud – all designed to advance a
anti-fossil fuel, pro-renewable energy agenda, that kills jobs and economic growth,
endangers human health and welfare, and puts radical regulators and pressure
groups in control of our lives, livelihoods and living standards. It also
further corrupts our political system.
These Big Green companies, foundations, pressure groups and
government unions give our politicians millions of dollars in campaign cash and
in-kind help, to keep them in office and the gravy train on track.
The League of Conservation Voters collected $90 million
in foundation grants 2000-2013; the LCV Education Fund pocketed $71 million
more. The LCV, Sierra Club, NRDC, SEIU, AFSCME, Kleiner Perkins and allied
groups are all big Whitehouse (and Obama White House) campaign donors.
Do Senators Whitehouse, Boxer and Markey plan to
investigate those financial incentives and abuses?
Concerned citizens should ponder all of this on Earth
Day, April 22 – and the next time they vote.
Paul Driessen is senior policy analyst for the Committee For A
Constructive Tomorrow (www.CFACT.org),
coauthor of Cracking Big Green: Saving the world from the Save-the-Earth
money machine, and author of Eco-Imperialism: Green power - Black death,
Climate Hype Exposed and Miracle Molecule: Carbon dioxide.
No comments:
Post a Comment