As the culture wars intensify in America, let’s consider
some of the roots of these contentious conflicts.
With the “Age of Enlightenment” of the 17th and 18th
centuries, a “modern” narrative was invented to explain the history of the
West, the wider world, and humankind’s place in the universe. This narrative
claimed that liberty, democracy, republicanism and religious tolerance could
only be achieved through an “Enlightenment project” of secularism taking
control of both the public square and the commanding heights of society and
that the abandonment of metaphysics and religious tradition were essential for human
progress.
Proponents of this narrative then included Denis Diderot, Voltaire,
Jean-Jacques Rousseau, Edward Gibbon, and David Hume, and in the 19th century
such writers as John Draper and Andrew Dickson White. With some exceptions,
this worldview came to dominate western elite and popular thinking. However many
historians have since increasingly challenged this narrative as fundamentally
fallacious. Such historians as J.G.A. Pocock, Dale Van Kley, Derek Beales,
and Jonathan Israel have discarded the claim of an exclusively secular
“Enlightenment” and shown that there have been multiple and far more causal
Enlightenments, based in various Catholic, Protestant and Jewish traditions. In
addition and since the 1970s, historians of science Ronald L. Numbers, David V.
Lindberg, and James R. Moore have refuted the
erroneous and indeed propagandistic, secular claims of Draper and White
that Christianity and science are adversarial……To Read More…..
No comments:
Post a Comment