Question: What did this Central Russia Woman Do Wrong? By Jim Beers
It must have been the (unarmed by law) woman’s fault! She must have “looked it in the eye”; or “failed to puff up”; or “turned to run”. What else could it be, unless the wolf had a “deformed brain” (like we used to see in those cheesy 1950’s science fiction movies that were also unbelievable)?
This is why it is such a travesty and criminal act in the USA that federal and state bureaucrats, and all those “greenie”/”environmental”/animal “rights” activists that forced these wolves back upon us will have much to answer for when they approach the “Pearly Gates” despite an amoral government that tells us that wolves like so many other sinful and deadly things are supposedly no longer deadly to others that we force them on. Also to you readers that have been so obsessed about my ignorance about wolves in the past; please note the age of this lady.
Pensioner eaten by wolf just 50 metres from her home - The beast is now being hunted by armed police after the 77 year old was found in a pool of blood 'Living in fear': Neighbours say they want police to act quickly A pensioner eaten by a WOLF was just 50 metres from her home when she was savaged by the beast. The half-eaten remains of Lima Ankudinova, 77, were discovered in a pool of blood by horrified neighbours. The elderly woman was making her way home through thick snow when she was attacked by the animal, which is now being hunted by armed police……."What matters is that it now has a taste for human blood and could come back for more. "People can’t run as fast as wolves and we, especially the children around here, are easy targets……
________________________
Rural America in the Crosshairs – Federal Corruption & State Complicity
David Rabon - USFWS Red Wolf Program Coordinator Quote - February 2014:
"Relief for landowners depends on what they expect,” said USFWS Red Wolf Recovery Coordinator, Dave Rabon.” Canids of some kind, whether wolves or coyotes, will always be in the area. With Mr. Ferebee,” he said, “we’ve been very successful removing animals from his property when he’s called us. But it’s temporary. They’re going to come back."
"Relief for landowners depends on what they expect,” said USFWS Red Wolf Recovery Coordinator, Dave Rabon.” Canids of some kind, whether wolves or coyotes, will always be in the area. With Mr. Ferebee,” he said, “we’ve been very successful removing animals from his property when he’s called us. But it’s temporary. They’re going to come back."
Director Ashe
How will the
wolves come back if they are returned to CAPTIVITY AS PROMISED?
I expected USFWS to obey the law.
This is what I expected and I am quoting from your very own ESA Rules for this nonessential - experimental "wolf" population:
I expected USFWS to obey the law.
This is what I expected and I am quoting from your very own ESA Rules for this nonessential - experimental "wolf" population:
"It is anticipated that, because of the size and habitat
characteristics of the reintroduction area, animals will remain within the
boundaries of the refuge and adjacent military lands. The public will be
instructed to immediately report any observation of a red wolf off Federal
lands to the refuge manager. The Service will then take appropriate actions to
recapture and return the animal to the refuge".
"The Service will make every effort to keep red wolves on the refuge, but if an animal leaves the refuge / bombing range area, the Service intends to capture it and return it to captivity"
"The Service currently plans to limit releases to no more than 12 animals"
"Take of animals by the public will be discouraged by an extensive information and education program and by the assurance that all introduced animals will be radio-collared and, thus easy to locate if they leave the refuge. The public will be encouraged to cooperate with the Service in attempts to maintain the animals on the release site".
"The Service will make every effort to keep red wolves on the refuge, but if an animal leaves the refuge / bombing range area, the Service intends to capture it and return it to captivity"
"The Service currently plans to limit releases to no more than 12 animals"
"Take of animals by the public will be discouraged by an extensive information and education program and by the assurance that all introduced animals will be radio-collared and, thus easy to locate if they leave the refuge. The public will be encouraged to cooperate with the Service in attempts to maintain the animals on the release site".
Director Ashe,
I did not expect to capture 5 wolves, 2 "placeholder coyotes" and 11 fertile coyotes/hybrids in 30 days on my farm in January/February 2014, while your Red Wolf Coordinator was doing the above February interview praising himself for being so successful in removing wolves from my farm.
More importantly, I certainly did not expect this:
- 64 wolves, almost half of the total releases, were ILLEGALLY released on private land (remember "The Service will make every effort to keep red wolves on the refuge").
Released on private land? Where was this in the deal? Obviously there are two "Services". One that tells us what we want to hear at public hearings and another one that does whatever they so desire.
How did this happen in a program to be managed on Federal lands only?
Through willful and intentional fraud, misrepresentation and illegal activities by USFWS personnel. USFWS had no authority to release wolves outside of the refuge system on private land, even your own solicitors have confirmed this fact. USFWS had no authority to ignore private landowner removal requests.
The following is a list of illegal releases made on private land by USFWS personnel; the whole time, USFWS was promising through public hearings, ESA special rules and Section 7 Consultations to operate the wolf program on Federal lands ONLY!
You (USFWS) will never be believed again!
Every below illegal release was in direct violation of the public hearings, ESA special rules, and ESA Section 7 Consultations for the red wolf recovery program.
SPECIES ID # BIRTH DATE BL RELEASE DATE COUNTY LAND OWNERSHIP
WOLF 10304 06-May-86 C 17-Sep-90 DARE PRIVATE
WOLF 10327 12-May-87 C 17-Sep-90 DARE PRIVATE
WOLF 10397 09-Apr-90 C 17-Sep-90 DARE PRIVATE
WOLF 10398 09-Apr-90 C 17-Sep-90 DARE PRIVATE
WOLF 10399 09-Apr-90 C 17-Sep-90 DARE PRIVATE
WOLF 10426 02-May-90 C 03-Oct-90 HYDE PRIVATE
WOLF 10427 02-May-90 C 03-Oct-90 HYDE PRIVATE
WOLF 10430 02-May-90 C 03-Oct-90 HYDE PRIVATE
WOLF 10464 26-Apr-91 C 23-Aug-91 DARE PRIVATE
WOLF 10382 14-May-89 I 03-Aug-92 HYDE PRIVATE
WOLF 10517 14-Apr-92 C 03-Aug-92 TYRRELL PRIVATE
WOLF 10518 14-Apr-92 C 03-Aug-92 TYRRELL PRIVATE
WOLF 10519 14-Apr-92 C 03-Aug-92 TYRRELL PRIVATE
WOLF 10523 14-Apr-92 C 03-Aug-92 HYDE PRIVATE
WOLF 10408 10-Apr-90 C 23-Aug-93 DARE PRIVATE
WOLF 10586 18-Apr-93 C 23-Aug-93 DARE PRIVATE
WOLF 10587 18-Apr-93 C 23-Aug-93 DARE PRIVATE
WOLF 10588 18-Apr-93 C 23-Aug-93 DARE PRIVATE
WOLF 10589 18-Apr-93 C 23-Aug-93 DARE PRIVATE
WOLF 10590 18-Apr-93 C 23-Aug-93 DARE PRIVATE
WOLF 10591 18-Apr-93 C 23-Aug-93 DARE PRIVATE
WOLF 10383 14-May-89 I 15-Sep-93 TYRRELL PRIVATE
WOLF 10445 24-Apr-91 C 15-Sep-93 TYRRELL PRIVATE
WOLF 10633 02-May-93 C 15-Sep-93 TYRRELL PRIVATE
WOLF 10634 02-May-93 C 15-Sep-93 TYRRELL PRIVATE
WOLF 10448 24-Apr-91 C 02-Feb-94 TYRRELL PRIVATE
WOLF 10465 26-Apr-91 C 02-Feb-94 TYRRELL PRIVATE
WOLF 10593 18-Apr-93 S 06-Apr-95 TYRRELL PRIVATE
WOLF 10771 10-May-94 I 27-Jan-99 HYDE PRIVATE
WOLF 11088 15-Apr-00 C 26-May-00 TYRRELL PRIVATE
WOLF 11061 26-Apr-00 C 02-Jun-00 WASHINGTON PRIVATE
WOLF 11062 26-Apr-00 C 02-Jun-00 WASHINGTON PRIVATE
WOLF 11063 26-Apr-00 C 02-Jun-00 WASHINGTON PRIVATE
WOLF 11064 26-Apr-00 C 02-Jun-00 WASHINGTON PRIVATE
WOLF 11076 26-Apr-00 C 02-Jun-00 WASHINGTON PRIVATE
WOLF 11077 26-Apr-00 C 02-Jun-00 WASHINGTON PRIVATE
WOLF 11078 26-Apr-00 C 02-Jun-00 WASHINGTON PRIVATE
WOLF 10982 01-May-98 I 29-Sep-00 HYDE PRIVATE
WOLF 11053 01-May-98 I 04-Oct-00 HYDE PRIVATE
WOLF 11165 01-May-01 I 21-Jan-03 HYDE PRIVATE
WOLF 11356 01-May-04 I 28-Sep-05 HYDE PRIVATE
WOLF 11463 01-May-05 I 28-Oct-06 TYRRELL PRIVATE
WOLF 11547 01-May-05 I 01-Nov-06 HYDE PRIVATE
WOLF 11658 01-May-07 I 04-Aug-08 TYRRELL PRIVATE
WOLF 11727 01-May-08 I 13-Apr-09 HYDE PRIVATE
WOLF 11199 4/21/02 C 5/5/02 TYRRELL PRIVATE
WOLF 11202 4/21/02 C 5/5/02 TYRRELL PRIVATE
WOLF 11357 4/17/04 I 5/4/04 TYRRELL PRIVATE
WOLF 11358 4/17/04 I 5/5/04 TYRRELL PRIVATE
WOLF 11466 5/1/06 C 5/15/06 TYRRELL PRIVATE
WOLF 11469 5/1/06 C 5/15/06 TYRRELL PRIVATE
WOLF 11470 5/1/06 C 5/15/06 TYRRELL PRIVATE
WOLF 11471 5/1/06 C 5/15/06 TYRRELL PRIVATE
WOLF 11578 4/15/07 C 4/25/07 BEAUFORT PRIVATE
WOLF 11579 4/15/07 C 4/25/07 BEAUFORT PRIVATE
WOLF 11737 4/24/09 C 5/1/09 HYDE PRIVATE
WOLF 11739 4/24/09 C 5/1/09 TYRRELL PRIVATE
WOLF 11740 4/24/09 C 5/1/09 TYRRELL PRIVATE
WOLF 11741 4/24/09 C 5/1/09 TYRRELL PRIVATE
WOLF 11788 4/17/10 C 4/30/10 TYRRELL PRIVATE
WOLF 11796 4/17/10 C 4/30/10 TYRRELL PRIVATE
WOLF 11911 4/20/12 C 4/27/12 TYRRELL PRIVATE
WOLF 11912 4/20/12 C 4/27/12 TYRRELL PRIVATE
WOLF 11993 4/21/13 C 5/1/13 TYRRELL PRIVATE
Director Ashe,
The mismanagement and misrepresentation of the red wolf program by your agency is the biggest threat to the red wolf species if indeed there is such a species. The stocking of an Endangered Species on private land is and always was an illegal act.
Had USFWS presented a rule to the public stating it would release wolves throughout the five county area on private land, it never would have passed. There is a big difference between claiming you will release wolves on a refuge site with a military bombing range to buffer it from private land vs releasing wolves throughout five counties on private land.
When are you going to come remove your 64 illegal wolves as requested by the NC Wildlife Resources Commission?
When are you going to come remove the wolves as requested in writing by 514 private landowners in eastern North Carolina?
Remember Director Ashe, if you can't remove these wolves, the Federal rules state you must issue take permits for all these wolves. Do not make the wolves die because you will not do what is right and will not follow through on what USFWS agreed to do. For once, obey the law and remove your wolves now!
Trap them up and send the "humanly constructed" coywolves back to their only true historic range, the Point Defiance Zoo in Tacoma, Washington. Your "selectively bred" zoo coywolves were never native to our State.
The USFWS has now lost absolutely all credibility and should never be trusted again by the private landowners, whom USFWS claims are so very critical to the success of all future ESA "reintroduction" efforts.
Fool me once, shame on me. Fool me twice...forget it Dan.
Sincerely,
Jett Ferebee
I did not expect to capture 5 wolves, 2 "placeholder coyotes" and 11 fertile coyotes/hybrids in 30 days on my farm in January/February 2014, while your Red Wolf Coordinator was doing the above February interview praising himself for being so successful in removing wolves from my farm.
More importantly, I certainly did not expect this:
- 64 wolves, almost half of the total releases, were ILLEGALLY released on private land (remember "The Service will make every effort to keep red wolves on the refuge").
Released on private land? Where was this in the deal? Obviously there are two "Services". One that tells us what we want to hear at public hearings and another one that does whatever they so desire.
How did this happen in a program to be managed on Federal lands only?
Through willful and intentional fraud, misrepresentation and illegal activities by USFWS personnel. USFWS had no authority to release wolves outside of the refuge system on private land, even your own solicitors have confirmed this fact. USFWS had no authority to ignore private landowner removal requests.
The following is a list of illegal releases made on private land by USFWS personnel; the whole time, USFWS was promising through public hearings, ESA special rules and Section 7 Consultations to operate the wolf program on Federal lands ONLY!
You (USFWS) will never be believed again!
Every below illegal release was in direct violation of the public hearings, ESA special rules, and ESA Section 7 Consultations for the red wolf recovery program.
SPECIES ID # BIRTH DATE BL RELEASE DATE COUNTY LAND OWNERSHIP
WOLF 10304 06-May-86 C 17-Sep-90 DARE PRIVATE
WOLF 10327 12-May-87 C 17-Sep-90 DARE PRIVATE
WOLF 10397 09-Apr-90 C 17-Sep-90 DARE PRIVATE
WOLF 10398 09-Apr-90 C 17-Sep-90 DARE PRIVATE
WOLF 10399 09-Apr-90 C 17-Sep-90 DARE PRIVATE
WOLF 10426 02-May-90 C 03-Oct-90 HYDE PRIVATE
WOLF 10427 02-May-90 C 03-Oct-90 HYDE PRIVATE
WOLF 10430 02-May-90 C 03-Oct-90 HYDE PRIVATE
WOLF 10464 26-Apr-91 C 23-Aug-91 DARE PRIVATE
WOLF 10382 14-May-89 I 03-Aug-92 HYDE PRIVATE
WOLF 10517 14-Apr-92 C 03-Aug-92 TYRRELL PRIVATE
WOLF 10518 14-Apr-92 C 03-Aug-92 TYRRELL PRIVATE
WOLF 10519 14-Apr-92 C 03-Aug-92 TYRRELL PRIVATE
WOLF 10523 14-Apr-92 C 03-Aug-92 HYDE PRIVATE
WOLF 10408 10-Apr-90 C 23-Aug-93 DARE PRIVATE
WOLF 10586 18-Apr-93 C 23-Aug-93 DARE PRIVATE
WOLF 10587 18-Apr-93 C 23-Aug-93 DARE PRIVATE
WOLF 10588 18-Apr-93 C 23-Aug-93 DARE PRIVATE
WOLF 10589 18-Apr-93 C 23-Aug-93 DARE PRIVATE
WOLF 10590 18-Apr-93 C 23-Aug-93 DARE PRIVATE
WOLF 10591 18-Apr-93 C 23-Aug-93 DARE PRIVATE
WOLF 10383 14-May-89 I 15-Sep-93 TYRRELL PRIVATE
WOLF 10445 24-Apr-91 C 15-Sep-93 TYRRELL PRIVATE
WOLF 10633 02-May-93 C 15-Sep-93 TYRRELL PRIVATE
WOLF 10634 02-May-93 C 15-Sep-93 TYRRELL PRIVATE
WOLF 10448 24-Apr-91 C 02-Feb-94 TYRRELL PRIVATE
WOLF 10465 26-Apr-91 C 02-Feb-94 TYRRELL PRIVATE
WOLF 10593 18-Apr-93 S 06-Apr-95 TYRRELL PRIVATE
WOLF 10771 10-May-94 I 27-Jan-99 HYDE PRIVATE
WOLF 11088 15-Apr-00 C 26-May-00 TYRRELL PRIVATE
WOLF 11061 26-Apr-00 C 02-Jun-00 WASHINGTON PRIVATE
WOLF 11062 26-Apr-00 C 02-Jun-00 WASHINGTON PRIVATE
WOLF 11063 26-Apr-00 C 02-Jun-00 WASHINGTON PRIVATE
WOLF 11064 26-Apr-00 C 02-Jun-00 WASHINGTON PRIVATE
WOLF 11076 26-Apr-00 C 02-Jun-00 WASHINGTON PRIVATE
WOLF 11077 26-Apr-00 C 02-Jun-00 WASHINGTON PRIVATE
WOLF 11078 26-Apr-00 C 02-Jun-00 WASHINGTON PRIVATE
WOLF 10982 01-May-98 I 29-Sep-00 HYDE PRIVATE
WOLF 11053 01-May-98 I 04-Oct-00 HYDE PRIVATE
WOLF 11165 01-May-01 I 21-Jan-03 HYDE PRIVATE
WOLF 11356 01-May-04 I 28-Sep-05 HYDE PRIVATE
WOLF 11463 01-May-05 I 28-Oct-06 TYRRELL PRIVATE
WOLF 11547 01-May-05 I 01-Nov-06 HYDE PRIVATE
WOLF 11658 01-May-07 I 04-Aug-08 TYRRELL PRIVATE
WOLF 11727 01-May-08 I 13-Apr-09 HYDE PRIVATE
WOLF 11199 4/21/02 C 5/5/02 TYRRELL PRIVATE
WOLF 11202 4/21/02 C 5/5/02 TYRRELL PRIVATE
WOLF 11357 4/17/04 I 5/4/04 TYRRELL PRIVATE
WOLF 11358 4/17/04 I 5/5/04 TYRRELL PRIVATE
WOLF 11466 5/1/06 C 5/15/06 TYRRELL PRIVATE
WOLF 11469 5/1/06 C 5/15/06 TYRRELL PRIVATE
WOLF 11470 5/1/06 C 5/15/06 TYRRELL PRIVATE
WOLF 11471 5/1/06 C 5/15/06 TYRRELL PRIVATE
WOLF 11578 4/15/07 C 4/25/07 BEAUFORT PRIVATE
WOLF 11579 4/15/07 C 4/25/07 BEAUFORT PRIVATE
WOLF 11737 4/24/09 C 5/1/09 HYDE PRIVATE
WOLF 11739 4/24/09 C 5/1/09 TYRRELL PRIVATE
WOLF 11740 4/24/09 C 5/1/09 TYRRELL PRIVATE
WOLF 11741 4/24/09 C 5/1/09 TYRRELL PRIVATE
WOLF 11788 4/17/10 C 4/30/10 TYRRELL PRIVATE
WOLF 11796 4/17/10 C 4/30/10 TYRRELL PRIVATE
WOLF 11911 4/20/12 C 4/27/12 TYRRELL PRIVATE
WOLF 11912 4/20/12 C 4/27/12 TYRRELL PRIVATE
WOLF 11993 4/21/13 C 5/1/13 TYRRELL PRIVATE
Director Ashe,
The mismanagement and misrepresentation of the red wolf program by your agency is the biggest threat to the red wolf species if indeed there is such a species. The stocking of an Endangered Species on private land is and always was an illegal act.
Had USFWS presented a rule to the public stating it would release wolves throughout the five county area on private land, it never would have passed. There is a big difference between claiming you will release wolves on a refuge site with a military bombing range to buffer it from private land vs releasing wolves throughout five counties on private land.
When are you going to come remove your 64 illegal wolves as requested by the NC Wildlife Resources Commission?
When are you going to come remove the wolves as requested in writing by 514 private landowners in eastern North Carolina?
Remember Director Ashe, if you can't remove these wolves, the Federal rules state you must issue take permits for all these wolves. Do not make the wolves die because you will not do what is right and will not follow through on what USFWS agreed to do. For once, obey the law and remove your wolves now!
Trap them up and send the "humanly constructed" coywolves back to their only true historic range, the Point Defiance Zoo in Tacoma, Washington. Your "selectively bred" zoo coywolves were never native to our State.
The USFWS has now lost absolutely all credibility and should never be trusted again by the private landowners, whom USFWS claims are so very critical to the success of all future ESA "reintroduction" efforts.
Fool me once, shame on me. Fool me twice...forget it Dan.
Sincerely,
Jett Ferebee
9 April 2015
If you found
this worthwhile, please share it with others. Thanks.
Jim Beers is a
retired US Fish & Wildlife Service Wildlife Biologist, Special Agent,
Refuge Manager, Wetlands Biologist, and Congressional Fellow. He was stationed
in North Dakota, Minnesota, Nebraska, New York City, and Washington DC. He also
served as a US Navy Line Officer in the western Pacific and on Adak, Alaska in
the Aleutian Islands. He has worked for the Utah Fish & Game, Minneapolis
Police Department, and as a Security Supervisor in Washington, DC. He testified
three times before Congress; twice regarding the theft by the US Fish &
Wildlife Service of $45 to 60 Million from State fish and wildlife funds and
once in opposition to expanding Federal Invasive Species authority. He resides
in Eagan, Minnesota with his wife of many decades.
Jim Beers is
available to speak or for consulting. You can receive future articles by
sending a request with your e-mail address to: jimbeers7@comcast.net
No comments:
Post a Comment