Search This Blog

De Omnibus Dubitandum - Lux Veritas

Showing posts with label Melinda Gates. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Melinda Gates. Show all posts

Tuesday, February 13, 2024

Mrs. Gates and Mrs. Jobs Make a Racism Movie

By@ Sultan Knish Blog

Origin, the movie, claims to be about the origin of racism in America, but its own origin story lies with the Ford Foundation, Laurene Powell Jobs, the widow of Steve Jobs, the Apple guru, and Pivotal Ventures, the nonprofit started up by Melinda French Gates after she dumped Bill Gates, which provided much of the money needed to fund the $38 million smear of the United States. What kind of movie would two wealthy woke white women fund? A pop history take on racism.

Origin is based on Caste: The Origins of Our Discontents, another one of those 2020 books about a racial reckoning of the kind that Mrs. Jobs and Mrs. Gates would have encountered in book clubs and while browsing The Atlantic (Mrs. Jobs owns it) or Slate (Bill Gates used to.)

Isabel Wilkerson, the protagonist of book and film, is another one of those critical race theory ‘public intellectuals’ with a media platform, a former New York Times bureau chief, who stars in it because it follows her deep thoughts about race which unroll with the depth and sophistication of a college freshman browsing Wikipedia while pulling an all-nighter to turn in a midterm paper.

Like Between the World and Me by Ta Nehisi Coates or Ibram X. Kendi’s How to be an Anti-Racist, Caste tried to pretend that its familiar and simplistic premise, (‘America is racist’) had some kind of depth by inappropriately linking it to other people’s historical experiences, the Holocaust and the caste system in India, while filtering it all through Wilkerson’s deep thoughts.

Trayvon Martin, Wilkerson’s personal life and Nazis goose stepping through Berlin all get mixed up in some intersectional tangle of narrative oppressions in both book and movie. Wilkerson taking plane trips to Germany or India allows her to bag up and appropriate two very different sets of histories to bolster her own feelings of oppression as a New York Times bestselling author.

The premise was thin enough in book form, but it’s downright absurd to make a writer into the protagonist of a movie because she’s reading about things that happened to other people and then flying off to other countries to study and listen to things that happened to other people..

And then makes it about herself.

What makes a New York Times bureau chief married to a white man into a victim? Wilkerson’s secondary trauma comes from listening to tapes of the Trayvon Martin case. What a violent encounter between a Latino man and a black teen has to say about racism in this country is dubious already, and even more dubious when it’s someone entirely unrelated to the case writing about dealing with the trauma of hearing about it.

But Caste, the book, like most literature of this kind, is about feelings, not facts, and Origin, the movie, adds yet another layer to this palimpsest in which we are seeing an actress portraying a writer who is writing about something that she did not see and was not even witness to. Origin might have dropped the baffling hall of mirrors and just cut to a documentary clumsily tying together disparate historical events in Germany and India, or in Wilkerson’s own memories, but this is an Ava DuVernay project and the Selma director clearly wanted to make a movie.

While the premise may be absurd, the contents are even more so. Only using Wilkerson as the ‘My Truth’ focus holding the narrative together makes it seem like it has any credibility. A good storyteller can weave together different stands to make them seem like they hold together, while a bad one compensates for her failings with special pleading and calls for sympathy.

Wilkerson, who has spent a whole lot of time in the company of the kinds of woke white women who would buy her books and fund the film, understood that what they really wanted was her emotional journey and the history would always matter less than her pain. And she delivers it. Her mother is dying, her husband is dying and she’s writing about racism in America.

That the subjects of her personal pain have nothing to do with her indictment of America is besides the point. The point of ‘My Truth’ narratives is that anecdotes trump history and that the only meaningful currency in a woke society is the emotional unburdening of personal suffering.

Caste was already bad history. The book promoted the idea that the Holocaust was a result of American racism because the Nazis had gotten some ideas from racial eugenicists in this country. While that’s passingly true, German antisemitism had a long history before America even existed. The Nazis put together a grab bag of ideas all over the place, including Marxists, pagan folklore and the Thule Society which believed that there was a secret inner world inside a hole in the planet, not to mention appropriating a Buddhist symbol for their swastika because they were obsessed with Tibet and the secret origins of the Aryans over in that part of the world.

Long before intersectionality, the Nazis were the original intersectionalists, gluing together random pieces of history, economics, politics and myth into an intellectually inconsistent mess that served their political purposes. That is also the shape of Origin’s scrambled eggs history.

Wilkerson’s misreading of the role of caste in India, the thing that gives her book its title, is equally wrong, but, like the Holocaust, all of human history is just a grab bag of oppression narratives to build to the conclusion that racism in this country is a permanent institution with deep roots in history, rather than an ugly accident from an era where everyone who was at all different was viewed with prejudice overlapping with the temporary export of the ruinous practice of slavery, which had been long suppressed in Europe from Africa and the Middle East.

Racism in America is not a permanent institution, but that the Left has labored to make it one.

The essence of critical racial theory or anti-racism is the idea that racism is inescapable and that it permeates everything, an “original sin”, as Obama put it, that we cannot escape except by adopting the leftist ideology and policies of Mrs. Gates, Mrs. Jobs and the Ford Foundation..

Caste and Origin provide false historical props that misattribute the true origins of the persistence of racism in America. It’s not white racists who cling bitterly to a caste system, but the DEI industry and its voluntary beneficiaries who mandate the caste system and oppose any efforts, such as the Supreme Court decision striking down affirmative action, to end it.

It’s no coincidence that the title of the movie was changed from emphasizing Caste (an insulting idea) to Origin. From the 1619 Project, another work of historical revisionism from another New York Times reporter, to ‘Stamped from the Beginning: The Definitive History of Racist Ideas in America’, the book that first made Ibram X. Kendi famous, there is an obsession with creating a revisionist origin story of racism to justify the myth that things are just as bad as they ever were.

Origin lacks the bleakness and malicious racial antipathy of Between the World and Me and How to be an Anti-Racist, the former so defined by its hatred of white people that Coates actually wrote that the police officers and firefighters who died on September 11 “were not human to me. Black, white, or whatever, they were menaces of nature; they were the fire, the comet, the storm, which could — with no justification — shatter my body”.

There are moments of understanding and hope in Caste even if they are based on the author’s insistence on her own victimhood. In the movie, Nick Offerman, a liberal Democrat who ever since playing Ron Swanton on Parks and Recreation built a career playing a liberal’s idea of a right-winger, shows up as a rude plumber in a MAGA hat only to open up to Wilkerson.

That condescending otherness is still more open to the humanity of others than much of the critical race theory which insists on the absolute evil of white people and ‘whiteness’.

America is not defined by racial castes and the invocation of a MAGA plumber reveals far more about Wilkerson’s actual caste and her perception of working class white conservatives. It’s not a racial prejudice, but a class one, that she shares with the wealthy woke white women who read over her volume in their book clubs, and will flock to indie theaters to catch the movie.

The country’s true caste system is that of coastal, urban and suburban laptop elites who condescend to the rest of the country. Its origins are too complicated and messy to fit in an easy pop history template like the 1619 Project or Caste, but they reflect displacement, economic turmoil and a seizure of power in the name of ideology that comes with personal benefits.

Those benefits include New York Times bestsellers and movie deals, and when Hollywood won’t fund a movie, a few nonprofits flush with money from dubious fortunes, will pay the bill.

To find the real caste system, don’t look at race, look to the wealthy woke institutions that dominate the high ground of American culture and media.

Daniel Greenfieldis a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the David Horowitz Freedom Center. This article previously appeared at the Center's Front Page Magazine. Click here to subscribeto my articles. And click here to support my work with a donation.Thank you for reading.

Thursday, May 13, 2021

The Love Song of Bill and Melinda

May 11, 2021 @ Sultan Knish Blog

In 1993, Bill proposed to Melinda: an executive at his company. In 1994, they were married. In 1995, Melinda debuted Microsoft Bob. Microsoft Bob treated computer users like idiots who were too stupid to be allowed to use their computers without a lot of handholding.

Condescending handholding was also what the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation offered the world as one of the industry’s most notoriously miserable human beings decided to become a philanthropist and save the world from all the people who weren’t running it properly.

In 2000, Gates stepped down as CEO of Microsoft, left his day-to-day role in 2008, and departed as chairman of the board in 2014. He also jettisoned 8 million shares of the company.

Forget CEO of Microsoft, Bill would use his vast wealth to become the CEO of the world.

Each of Bill’s resignations followed another ‘Microsoft Bob’, another failed Microsoft project, from Windows 2000, to Windows Vista in 2006, and most infamously, Windows 8 in 2014.

Every time Microsoft screwed up badly, Bill Gates seemed to decide that he should spend less time trying to make the company that had temporarily made him the richest man in the world succeed, and more time trying to run the world. Running the world hasn’t gone well for Gates.

Ever since Bill and Melinda got away from making bad software and began building a bad non-profit, the country and the world have been treated to the thoughts and wishes of the godmother of Microsoft Bob. The only thing more infuriating than having to endure the hectoring of a soulless nerd who thinks he can solve the world’s problems is taking it from his trophy wife.

In 2019, Melinda released the obligatory feminist tract that female dot com tycoons were putting out at the time, titled, “The Moment of Lift: How Empowering Women Changes the World.”

There was no sense of irony in a woman who was only rich, famous, and powerful because she had caught the eye of an obnoxious tech tycoon writing about empowering women.

The release of Melinda’s book came at an awkward time when female employees at Microsoft, who weren’t married to Bill, were complaining about sexual harassment. In one of those complaints, a woman who worked at Microsoft claimed that a contractor "threatened to kill her if she did not perform implied sexual acts" and her manager told her it was just flirting.

Empowering.

The happy couple, Bill and Melinda (not the Microsoft employee and her potential rapist and killer), spent some $53 billion from Bill’s wealth obtained by chaining companies and users to a bad operating system and its bad satellite software on their ‘philanthropy’. When people think of philanthropy, they imagine money going to people, but a lot of the Gates fortune went into policy. Instead of funding people, they funded assorted political agendas up their alley.

A ton of money from the college dropout tycoon and his trophy wife went into education where the duo managed to trash everything from K-12 schooling to the SATs. Meanwhile politicians, the experts they funded, and the media hailed them as visionaries even though they had no idea what they were doing. And what they did do was make American education even worse.

After years of giving talks and speeches to their own organizations about the amazing progress being made, Bill and Melinda made a different sort of statement last year with their letter.

“Why We Swing for the Fences”, issued in 2020, had one of those ubiquitous mantra titles that Big Tech companies use to spin their momentous failures as aspirational victories.

Featuring a photo of Bill and Melinda, maskless, leering down at a skeptical black woman in a mask, the letter admitted to its "share of disappointments, setbacks, and surprises".

“When it comes to U.S. education, though, we’re not yet seeing the kind of bottom-line impact we expected. The status quo is still failing American students,” Melinda argued.

But the status quo is the common core and equity nightmare they helped create.

There’s plenty of bottom-line impact from the Gates money. It’s just bad.

After two decades of doing this, Melinda admitted that, "one thing that makes improving education tricky is that even among people who work on the issue, there isn’t much agreement on what works and what doesn’t."

Maybe they should have considered that admission of ignorance before they used their vast fortune to force their ideas on millions of parents and children around the country?

“Are charter schools good or bad? Should the school day be shorter or longer? Is this lesson plan for fractions better than that one?” they wrote. “It’s also hard to isolate any single intervention and say it made all the difference.”

That momentary admission that they had no idea what they’ve been talking about for two decades after upending the country’s education system didn’t stop them from continuing to push their preferred policies anyway.

Only a massive divorce might be able to do that.

The shattering of the great corporation of Bill and Mel will mean potentially dividing up a quarter-million-acres of farmland, an estate known as Xanadu 2.0 near Seattle, a 229-acre horse farm near San Diego, another horse farm in Florida, a ranch in Wyoming, and a ski club in Montana. But it will also mean splitting up their vast philanthropic enterprise.

Bill will have to take India, while Melinda will have to take Africa.

The divorcing billionaires will have to decide which of them gets to run which parts of the world, country by country, and state by state.

Melinda will set educational policy in Colorado, while Bill will call the shots in Arizona schools. One will take South Dakota and the other will take North Dakota. Bill will get everything in California north of Los Angeles, while Melinda will control the schools below the divorce line.

In their fence-swinging letter, Bill and Melinda claimed that they were already focusing on separate monogrammed issues: “climate change” for him and “gender equity” for her.

Considering Bill’s massive estates, including a $43 million oceanfront beach house in San Diego County, and Melinda’s fortune by way of marriage and then divorce, global warming and gender equity seem like the perfect causes for them to virtue signal their hypocrisy.

A cockeyed optimist might hope for a wake-up call in which Bill and Melinda finally realize that they can’t run their own lives, or Microsoft, and so they probably shouldn’t be running the world.

There’s also a lesson in humility there for their younger peers like Facebook’s Mark Zuckerberg and the rest of the industry in which college dropouts make a fortune from a product, and decide that hitting a niche at the right time makes them superior beings qualified to run the world.

The Gates divorce may be bad news for the couple, but it’s good news for local communities, parents, and reformers who actually want to be able to run their own school systems. And everyone in any field, from health care to education to energy, who was tired of being dictated to by a power couple and their vast organization and fantastic wealth, is breathing a sigh of relief.

The divorce is likely to weaken the Gates machine. It won’t destroy its hold over our daily lives, but as the two sets of lawyers circle each other, it may give us some breathing room.

And that’s a good thing.

Microsoft Bob went away, but it spawned the Comic Sans font. Like Bob, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation is likely to be history, but it will continue to haunt us anyway.

Daniel Greenfield is a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the David Horowitz Freedom Center. This article previously appeared at the Center's Front Page Magazine.

Click here to subscribe to my articles. 

Thank you for reading.

Tags: ,  

Author Image

About Daniel Greenfield
Daniel Greenfield is a journalist investigating Islamic terrorism and the Left. He is a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the David Horowitz Freedom Center

 

Sunday, June 10, 2018

The Demonization of Whites by Mrs. Bill Gates and Other Dangerous Idiots

Ilana Mercer, American Renaissance, June 9, 2018

She will invest in start-ups with an eye to race and sex rather than ability. Melinda Gates, a silly woman with an enormously wealthy husband, has decided to reinvent herself as a venture capitalist. With a difference. With her husband’s billions, Mrs. Gates announced her intention to venture into funding start-up companies that are likely to fail.

In an interview with Fortune Magazine, Gates “bashed ‘white guys,’” and vowed to favor women and people of color in her investment choices. Using pigment and gender as criteria in allocating her abundant resources is hardly a prudent investment strategy. But Mrs. Gates can afford to lose money. Her husband is Bill Gates, a lily-white billionaire (with lots of liver spots).

From the vertiginous heights of ignorance, Mrs. Bill Gates has scolded the venture-capital industry:
“Enough with your love for ‘the white guy in a hoodie’” (whatever that means).
Thanks to her husband’s vast riches, Melinda’s son, Rory John Gates, will remain insulated from discrimination visited on white men, by vindictive women like Mommy Dearest, in the name of “white privilege” (whatever that means)............. Notice how that’s phrased. A problem is something good people get rid of, solve. “The Problem of Whiteness.” “The Jewish Problem.” See where this might lead?  Note the linguistic similarities between the language of white haters and Jew killers.............. It so happens that whites are fair game. No other group would tolerate being blackened. Yes, profound stupidity is involved.........To Read More....

My Take - If you look Melinda Gates’ biography it becomes clear she's an intelligent person. She was a top student during all her educational years. But, so was Hillary Clinton.

We need to get past this idea well educated people are smart. I find all too often so many of them are over educated and under smart. They all seem to be caught in an intellectual loop they can't fix. Why? Because they're arrogant!

What is the difference was between arrogance and self-confidence? A self-confident person wants to be right because they are right. And they’re willing to accept correction from others in order to actually be right.

An arrogant person IS right and accepts no correction from anyone. Let the world be wrong but they MUST be right and all others MUST be wrong.

Arrogance is a form of insanity, just like leftism. One of the reasons I find leftists to be so stunningly arrogant, they all have mental problems. They also have an aversion to reality, history, truth and respect for others.

We now know Melinda Gates falls into that category. The fact she and her husband are doing some good in Africa is immaterial and doesn't give either of them a pass on the rest of life.

Also, I think I know who wears the pants in that family. He does, and she tells him which to put on.