(Editor's Note: First of all, in principle, I like open trade, but this issue regarding trade is one area I disagree with Dan, and just about all libertarians, on a regular basis. This isn't about free trade, it's about fair trade. I keep asking the same question. If trade barriers and protectionism is so bad, why do all our competitors do it? Because we've been suckers to globalism. It's this free trade thinking of leftists and neo-cons that made China the threat they are now. We're funding our own destruction. RK)
Way back in early 2017, I warned in an interview that Trump would be a big spender (sadly, I was right). But I wasn’t being reflexively anti-Trump. Here’s a clip from that same program where I speculated that Trump might have the political skill to win support from private-sector union workers.
In honor of Labor Day, let’s elaborate on this topic.
I’ll start with the political observation that Trump seems to do much
better than other Republicans at getting support from working-class
voters. Even workers who belong to unions (much to the dismay of their
left-leaning leadership) appear to be disproportionately sympathetic.
Though it’s important to emphasize, as I said in the interview, the distinction between government bureaucrat unions and private-sector unions.
The unions that represent government employees have an incentive to lobby for bigger government since that means more lavishly paid members paying more dues. So those unions reflexively support higher taxes, more spending, and additional red tape.
Yet those are the policies that undermine private-sector job creation and reduce the competitiveness of companies operating in America. And that’s bad for all private workers – including those that belong to unions.
Which is why I speculated in the interview whether Trump would have the “political cunning” to convince those private-sector union members that their interests are not the same as those of bureaucrats.
I guess we’ll see on election day.
By the way, I have very mixed feelings on Trump’s strategy. Some of his policies are good (lower taxes and less red tap), but he also tries to appeal to union workers with policies that are bad (most notably, protectionism).
P.S. Feel free to enjoy some good cartoons mocking unionized bureaucrats by clicking here, here, here, and here.
P.P.S. I often tell my Republican friends that they’ll have more success appealing to private-sector union members if they come across as pro-market (which implies neutrality between employers and employees) rather than pro-business (which implies siding with employers).
I’ll start with the political observation that Trump seems to do much
better than other Republicans at getting support from working-class
voters. Even workers who belong to unions (much to the dismay of their
left-leaning leadership) appear to be disproportionately sympathetic.Though it’s important to emphasize, as I said in the interview, the distinction between government bureaucrat unions and private-sector unions.
The unions that represent government employees have an incentive to lobby for bigger government since that means more lavishly paid members paying more dues. So those unions reflexively support higher taxes, more spending, and additional red tape.
Yet those are the policies that undermine private-sector job creation and reduce the competitiveness of companies operating in America. And that’s bad for all private workers – including those that belong to unions.
Which is why I speculated in the interview whether Trump would have the “political cunning” to convince those private-sector union members that their interests are not the same as those of bureaucrats.
I guess we’ll see on election day.
By the way, I have very mixed feelings on Trump’s strategy. Some of his policies are good (lower taxes and less red tap), but he also tries to appeal to union workers with policies that are bad (most notably, protectionism).
P.S. Feel free to enjoy some good cartoons mocking unionized bureaucrats by clicking here, here, here, and here.
P.P.S. I often tell my Republican friends that they’ll have more success appealing to private-sector union members if they come across as pro-market (which implies neutrality between employers and employees) rather than pro-business (which implies siding with employers).
No comments:
Post a Comment