Leaked Dept. of Defense Document Reveals Evidence of Widespread VACCINE FAILURE
October 6, 2021 By Mychal Massie @ Daily Rant
A leaked Department of Defense document first reported on by
attorney Tom Rentz reveals high rates of “breakthrough” infections (4%
of which died) and hospitalizations within a cohort of 5.6 million
Medicare beneficiaries all of whom were fully vaccinated.
An astounding PowerPoint document posted on the Humetrix company website, titled “Waning Effect of COVID-19 Vaccines in 5.6M U.S. Study Cohort, Weekly Update 9/28/2021,” stamped by the Department of Defense JOINT ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE CENTER’s Project Salus (an
AI driven analytics platform named after the Roman goddess of safety
and well-being), reveals that the COVID-19 vaccines are clearly not
living up to their stated promises of being highly effective — something
that should be obvious to anyone watching the aggressive push to add
regular “boosters” on top of a failing two-dose regimen.
Within a cohort of 5.6 million Medicare beneficiaries aged 65
and older who received two doses of the COVID-19 vaccines (2.7 million
Pfizer and 2.9 million Moderna), there was still a cumulative
breakthrough rate (i.e., vaccine failure rate) of 2.9%, along
with a 21% hospitalization rate in “breakthrough infections.” Among
breakthrough hospitalizations, 31% required ICU care, and there was a 4%
death rate overall among “breakthrough infections.”
This data clearly proves that the official narrative claiming
the vaccines are unequivocally “effective,” with no questions allowed
to be asked, is patently false.
Are Vaccine Side Effects Being Labeled ‘Breakthrough Infections’?
On first glance, it appears that the incontrovertible evidence of
widespread vaccine failure described in this document are being driven
by the so-called vaccine resistant “delta variant,” taking the focus off
the clearly ineffective vaccines themselves, and perhaps setting the
public up for endless “boosters.” But there is another possibility which
you will not hear discussed elsewhere but is worth considering…
It is quite possible that the tremendous side effects known to be
caused by these experimental mRNA vaccines are being knowingly or
unknowingly misidentified, misclassified or otherwise relabeled as
“breakthrough infections,” generating the illusion that a new or old
variant of a novel coronavirus is responsible for the symptoms caused by the vaccines’ side effects;
side effects that, as of yet, neither world governments, the global
media nor the medical industrial establishment will acknowledge even
exist, despite overwhelming evidence from government databases such
as the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) or Vigibase that this vaccine (arguably more a gene therapy than a vaccine) is causing unprecedented harms and deaths among those who take them and who have been deprived of any semblance of informed consent, a mandatory medical ethical principle.
According to slide 7 of 17, titled “Total & Breakthrough Cases in
the 65 Years and Older Salus Cohort,” in the 65 and older population
where the fully vaccinated rate is 80% “an estimated 71% of COVID-19 cases occurred in fully vaccinated individuals.”
There are a number of ways to interpret this data. Either the
vaccines do not work in the majority of those who receive them, or,
worse, they suppress innate immunity against COVID-19 or any of its
supposed variants, or, as I refer to above, the vaccines’ adverse events
(which include classical symptoms of influenza-like illness and/or
those attributed to COVID-19) are being misidentified and miscategorized as new “breakthrough” cases or the “delta variant.”
This latter explanation becomes all the more plausible when you
consider that the “gold standard” tool for identifying COVID-19 cases
are PCR test, which are not capable of diagnosing replication-competent
viruses or viral infections. Kari Mullis, the technology’s inventor
himself, made this clear. You can learn more about Mullis’ views, work
and the problem with PCR tests here.
The Underlying Reason Why the Vaccines Are Failing?
As a quick aside, I think it is important to explain that when a cell
is damaged, it releases nucleic acids (e.g., apoptotic bodies, necrotic
bodies, exosomes), some of which end up in the plasma and can be
mistaken as exogenous viral sequences by a PCR test.
Vaccines can cause profound damage to the integrity of the cell,
which generates the illusion of an elevated “viral load,” when, in fact,
the markers for elevated exogenous or “foreign” nucleic acids are
coming from the body’s natural responses (i.e., attempts to survive and
heal) to the exogenous and xenobiotic toxicants and/or autoimmune
generating effects of the vaccinations themselves.
While this slide kit does not address this possibility, it may help
explain the underlying reason why the vaccines are clearly failing (as
well as the unprecedented signals of harm associated with them) without
falling prey to the “escape variant” or “delta variant” narrative, which
is being used to argue for boosters, further pharmaceutical drug
intervention and, ultimately, to further consolidate and weaponize the
narrative that there is an extremely dangerous set of viruses out there
that require unconstitutional executive orders to completely suspend our
basic human, civil and constitutionally backed rights.
View the entire 17 slide presentation on Scribd.
Slide 8 of 17, titled “Is mRNA Vaccine Effectiveness Against Delta
Infection Waning Over Time in 65 Years and Older Salus Cohort?,” details
how “Breakthrough infection rates 5-6 months post vaccination are twice as high as 3-4 months post vaccination.” In other words, the longer the duration after vaccination the weaker their immunity and poorer their health becomes.
This, for me, is an indication that the mRNA technology is creating
an overall downward trend in the recipient’s health, which is an
explanation consistent with the alarming signals of harm associated with
the vaccines, as evidenced by multiple government database sources,
such as the U.S. government’s VAERS and the World Health Organization’s VigiBase. A recent estimate by Steve Kirsch presented at an FDA hearing proposes that about 200,000 Americans have died from COVID-19 vaccines thus far. Watch his presentation here.
View the entire 17 slide presentation on Scribd.
In slide 12 of 17, titled “Total & Breakthrough Hospitalizations in the 65 Years and Older Cohort,” the slide proposes, “As
Delta variant surged to over 50% in June, COVID-19 hospitalizations
more than doubled, reversing the prior trend of decreasing
hospitalizations since April.”
Once again, this explanation is suspect given that there is little to
no evidence that a Delta variant is driving hospitalizations, whereas
we know that the hundreds of adverse events listed in the VAERS database
related to the vaccines’ effects can indeed be life-threatening and
do drive people to the hospital, despite the fact that as few as 1% of
these events are reported by hospitals to the government.1
This Tennessean article is one of many investigative reports that have concluded a Delta variant test does not exist yet for the public.
The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention admits that it only does about 700 Delta variant tests per week, and this is assuming we can trust them to tell the public the truth — see the proposed Federal Grand Jury investigation of the CDC for violating federal law by hyperinflating COVID-19 death stats here).
The CDC then extrapolated the data to “estimate” what it says is
affecting the public at large, which the media promulgates as
unquestionable truth. And so, one could rightfully interpret their
statement, “As Delta variant surged to over 50% in June … ,” to mean,
“As Vaccine Adverse Events surged … in June.”
The slide also states, “In this 80% vaccinated 65+
population, an estimated 60% of COVID-19 hospitalizations occurred in
fully vaccinated individuals in the week ending August 7th.”
Again, this could mean that the COVID-19 vaccines caused
hospitalizations that were wrongly attributed to COVID-19 and/or its
“variants,” because we know that all it requires for someone to be
labeled a COVID-19 case, or even to be pronounced dead by a coroner or
medical examiner “by COVID-19,” is suspicion of infection, thanks to
the WHO changing the ICD emergency use codes early in 2020, and the CDC following suit and doing the same in March 2020.
We also know that the medical industry, the government and the media
are actively censoring and suppressing any link between the vaccines and
the hundreds of known serious side effects associated with them, making
it virtually impossible for official accounts of vaccine reactions to
be openly linked back to the vaccines, much less discussed. It’s much
easier to blame “COVID-19” or “the Delta variant.”
View the entire 17 slide presentation on Scribd.
Slide 17 of 17, titled “Risk Model for Breakthrough Hospitalization,” contains two important observations:
- “Risk of breakthrough hospitalization increases with time
elapsed since mRNA vaccination with odds ratio increasing to 2.5 at 6
months post vaccination.” Is it the “breakthrough” virus or
viruses driving these hospitalizations or the vaccines’ many known side
effects? This is the important question that the slide kit creators do
not ask.
- “Prior COVID-19 infection has a major protective effective against breakthrough infection.” In
other words, NATURAL IMMUNITY protects against going to the hospital
even among those already vaccinated. Phrased differently: contracting
COVID-19 (or what might be mistakeningly labeled COVID-19 but is
actually influenza-like illness) and surviving it is the best protection
against hospitalization, confirming what we already know and believe as
natural health advocates.
Help Spread the Truth
This remarkable document should be shared widely. Considering
the widespread censorship of information like this, we hope that you
will continue to be brave with us and get the word out.
Documents like these come directly from the government and cannot be
easily written off as conspiracy theory. The more people who wake up to
the fact that the vaccines do not work as advertised and are not nearly
as safe as we are told, the greater chance we have of preserving our
right to informed choice when it comes to our bodies.
Take action and share this!
About the Author
Mychal S. Massie is an ordained minister who spent 13 years in
full-time Christian Ministry. Today he serves as founder and Chairman
of the Racial Policy Center (RPC), a think tank he officially founded in
September 2015. RPC advocates for a colorblind society. He was founder
and president of the non-profit “In His Name Ministries.” He is the
former National Chairman of a conservative Capitol Hill think tank; and a
former member of the think tank National Center for Public Policy
Research. Read entire bio here
';;;;
