By Daniel Greenfield @ Sultan Knish Blog
The
Lincoln Project, the crown jewel of the Never Trump movement, raised
$67 million meant to swing Republicans toward the Democrats in the 2024
election. Instead, Kamala’s share of the Republican vote dropped from
Hillary’s 7% and Biden’s 6% all the way down to 5%.
The Lincoln
Project had been co-founded by McCain’s manager who had overseen a
campaign where Obama had won 9% of Republican votes. Trump not only
performed better (94%) with Republicans than McCain had (90%), but
Kamala’s share of the Republican vote was a little over half what it had
been under Obama despite spending $67 million on Republicans.
That
$67 million was only a part of the money spent by Democrats and
leftists on the Never Trump movement even though there was never any
reason to think that it was working.
Defending Democracy
Together, Bill Kristol’s operation, partnered with the Lincoln Project
to become the largest ‘dark money’ spender in 2020 and after blowing
through $35 million, had nothing to show in the exit polls except
another single digit drop in Republican support for its chosen
candidate. Every presidential election cycle that Never Trump has
intervened in, Republican support for Democrats has not only failed to
go up, but actually went down.
During 2020 and 2024, when Never
Trump’s political operation was most active, CNN exit polls showed
Trump’s share of the Republican vote rose from 88% in 2016 to 94%. The
only thing that Never Trump seemed to accomplish was to unify
Republicans around Trump.
Kristol’s Defending Democracy Together
Institute and its various projects like The Bulwark and Lyceum Labs have
taken in millions of dollars annually with nothing to show for it
except gathering up various useless political operatives and staffers
like Romney’s former counsel and policy director, a former Dick Armey
staffer and Beto O’Rourke’s South Carolina staff director.
This
Never Trump political cruft was funded by leftist billionaires like
Persian eBay founder Pierre Omidyar and foundations, including $500,000
from the liberal Hewlett Foundation (Lyceum’s director Daniel Stid
conveniently also ran Hewlett’s Democracy Program).
The Hewlett
Foundation along with Soros, the Rockefeller Foundation, Illinois
Governor J.B. Pritzker’s family foundation, and assorted liberal
foundations, also funds the Niskanen Center, a pre-Trump hub for liberal
Republicans and libertarians which responded to Trump’s win by
insightfully blaming it on the lack of public school integration. And it
only got worse from there.
The Bulwark, the Substack magazine of
Kristol’s movement, funded by Omidyar, is largely indistinguishable
from Slate or MSNBC, and has nothing to offer to anyone who isn’t
already obsessed with hating Trump, analyzing his connections to
Vladimir Putin and fuming at the media including ABC News, the LA Times
and the Wall Street Journal (WSJ Isn’t a Serious Publication Anymore.
Just another Fox News!) for not being sufficiently anti-Trump.
The
Bulwark’s Jonathan V. Last responded to Trump’s victory by urging that
“Democrats should not try to save America from itself” and proposed that
Democrats should not fight deportations of illegal aliens because
Latinos voted for Trump. “Democrats should spend exactly zero political
capital stopping any Trump deportation efforts,” he broadcast. “It is
madness to spend capital trying to help people who are no longer a major
part of your electoral coalition.”
While professional Never
Trumpers shot further down the radicalization rabbit hole, Bret Stephens
at the New York Times headlined his column, “Done With Never Trump”
dismissing the “heavy moralizing and incessant doomsaying that typified
so much of the Never Trump movement”, conceding that the Russiagate
“collusion allegations were a smear” and that “Trump’s Russia policy —
whether it was his opposition to the Nord Stream 2 pipeline or his
covert aid to Ukraine — was much tougher” than Obama’s or Biden’s had
been or would be.
Stephens wrote about the hypocrisy of Trump’s
critics asking “why were the same people who demanded investigations
into every corner of the Trump family’s business dealings so incurious
about the Biden family’s dealings, like the curiously high prices for
Hunter’s paintings?” and argued that ” as much as we fear Trump could
wreck some of our institutions, whether it’s higher education or the
F.B.I., many of those institutions are already broken and may need to be
reconceived or replaced.”
The reactions from The Bulwark and Stephens typify the two poles of Never Trumperism.
Serious
adults like Stephens proved capable of reevaluating their positions in
the face of a landslide election and a major shift in public sentiment
while professional Never Trumpers doubled down on trying to out-MSNBC
the actual MSNBC in the fanatical fashion of past defectors from the
conservative movement like Media Matters guru David Brock.
But
they’re imitating a model that may be dead. MSNBC’s ratings are
struggling and from the Washington Post to the Los Angeles Times, the
media’s Trump-baiters are rethinking their offerings. The liberal base
is tired of rants about Trump and has been tuning out. And after three
election cycles of failure, the big liberal foundations may grow weary
of funding the vanity projects of Never Trumpers which have never been
anything other than a social club for political operatives who had found
a way to use the rise of Trump to make money from his enemies.
‘Never
Trump: The Revolt of the Conservative Elites’, a book funded in part by
the movement, warned that Never Trump’s “funding has come from
left-of-center sources including Democracy Fund Voice, an initiative
solely sponsored by tech entrepreneur Pierre Omidyar, and the Hewlett
Foundation.” Will the money keep on coming especially with Trump in his
final term in office?
Never Trump built its movement around
opposing one man who has won his last election. What are they going to
do for a next act? Rebrand around opposing the next GOP candidate?
When
the money dries up, the campaign consultants who were the real force
behind Never Trumperism will move on and the handful of intellectuals
who lent their name to this facade will have to do likewise. And that
may end up happening even sooner than anyone expects.
The Lincoln
Project, like the rest of the Never Trump movement, proved to be a
political dead end, but enormously profitable for those connected with
it. Its operatives failed to elect Kamala, but by diverting millions in
Democrat funds, they may have helped to reelect Trump.
Daniel Greenfield is a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the David Horowitz Freedom Center. This article previously appeared at the Center's Front Page Magazine. Click here to subscribe to my articles. And click here to support my work with a donation. Thank you for reading.
No comments:
Post a Comment