Daniel Greenfield November 04, 2022 @ Sultan Knish Blog
Miguel De La Torre, a former president
of the Society of Christian Ethics, showed up at a small Catholic
university, telling students that minorities can be white, but that they can also be saved.
“Those
of us who are colored, some of us can also be white," the professor of
Latinx Studies at the Iliff School of Theology assured all races
suffering from whiteness. "But the good news is there is salvation."
The lecture by De La Torre, who is also an ordained minister, claimed that
minorities "with colonized minds seek to assimilate to a Euroamerican
version of Christianity" and proposed a post-colonial alternative based
"on the revolutionary activities of the Young Lords".
Students at
Carlow University, founded by the Sisters of Mercy, could look forward
to abandoning "EuroAmerican Christianity" for the much more authentic
theology of a racist Puerto Rican street gang.
Much of this
material already showed up in De La Torre's books, “Burying White
Privilege: Resurrecting a Badass Christianity” and "Decolonizing
Christianity: Becoming Badass Believers".
"A White Christian
worldview can be advocated by those who are black or brown, Jew or
Muslim, queer or heteronormative, atheist or humanist," De La Torre
argued in “Decolonizing Christianity”.
In the woke professor's excitingly inclusive world, anyone can be a white supremacist.
All you have to do is believe.
Or
defend the current "political, economic, and social structures" and
"embrace white philosophical and theological paradigms." That could
potentially encompass the Bible and the entire western canon. Not to
mention notions such as private property and the nuclear family.
But what does the “badass believer” believe in?
“I don’t know if there is a God or not; and quite frankly I really don’t care,” De La Torre told them.
Instead he urged students to, "crucify whiteness".
To be a truly badass believer is to believe in nothing except your own impassioned rhetoric.
De
La Torre claims that he’s not a theologian, but he’s quite interested
in “Liberation Theology”, just not the actual kind. His theology is
reducible to the familiar leftist formulas of power relations and the
eternal Marxist Manichean struggle of the oppressor and the oppressor.
Thus,
he writes that, "to read Genesis is to read the testimonies of illegal
aliens", but also that "one of the book's purposes is to provide moral
justification for the eventual genocide of the promised land's original
indigenous inhabitants."
The Bible can be mined for social justice purposes, but is ultimately evil.
“The
decolonization of the minds of people of color begins with the total
rejection of the dead white God and the dead white Jesus. And let the
dead bury the dead,” he argues elsewhere.
What better message could there be for the Catholic Carlow University and his own Methodist Iliff School of Theology?
The
salvation of minorities from Euroamerican Christianity is De La Torre’s
business. The child of Santeria worshipers, De La Torre joined the
Young Republicans and became a born-again Christian. After getting into a
conflict with conservative Christians, he was reborn as a leftist
“Baptecostal Catholic Santero” and constantly retells his own wokeness
conversion story.
"It took years of decolonizing my mind of the
subtle white supremacy I was taught," he writes in an article attacking
the Southern Baptist Theological Seminary.
By "decolonizing" his mind, De La Torre actually colonized it with unsubtle racial supremacism.
The
best way to understand the true meaning of a leftist term is to invert
it. Decolonization, colonizes. Liberation theology, enslaves. Social
justice is individual oppression. Radical love is traditional hate.
In
the introduction to Decolonizing Christianity, De La Torre, a white
Euro-American man of Cuban origin who identifies as an oppressed
minority, declares that it's "not written for Euro-Americans in the
futile hope of shaming or encouraging them to do the right thing. For
almost 250 years, white Christian terrorism has been the legitimized law
of the land."
Could there be anything more Christian than writing off millions of people because of their race?
The
paradox of leftist radicalism is that it is an inverse faith, defined
by the negative dark images it projects onto others, while lacking any
meaning or substance of its own.
Leftism is a void cloaked in
outrage. Its ravenous desire to be angered by the stories of victims is
used to disguise the hubris of its appetites. Leftists don’t believe in
God, because they want to be gods. Yet they’re incapable of creating,
only destroying. What does that make them?
That is why leftists always accuse others of their own sins.
Suffering
from racism, they campaign against it. And they prescribe their nobler
social justice racism, rooted in intersectionality, post-colonial
analysis and fifty academic texts, as the answer.
Liberation
Theology, like its Tikkun Olam counterpart in Judaism, and all the
various social justice theologies, are obsessed with evil, but incapable
of envisioning good apart from it.
And thus, in keeping with another of his books, De La Torre told students to choose “hopelessness.”
“I fight for justice not because I am going to win,” he said, “I am not."
Leftists
never claim to have won. Winning would involve accepting responsibility
and accountability. The Communists took over the Soviet Union, but
would never admit to having won, instead blaming all their problems on
the Czarist regime or on domestic subversion. A Biden administration
that admitted to having won would have to take responsibility for the
economic crisis, instead of playing the victim and blaming corporations,
or Putin.
A movement of perpetual victims who seek absolute
power, yet claim to be powerless, is at the dark heart of leftist
narcissism. Leftists, if you believe them, are always the underdogs,
always oppressed, even when they have all the wealth and power. They are
always abused, even and especially when they’re the ones doing the
abusing.
Consider the spectacle of the Washington Post’s Taylor
Lorenz, backed by the wealth of Amazon’s former CEO, claiming that any
criticism of her is harassment, only to then stalk and doxx another
woman because she disagreed with her political views on Twitter.
The
Left demands the total inversion of truth as a precondition of
belonging to its movement. Its mysteries are rooted in its hypocrisies.
It multiplies absurdities until it even inverts itself. It seeks new
enemies to fight until, but without those enemies, which require its
followers to destroy parts of themselves, those men and women have no
idea who they even are anymore.
"As a committed
liberationist-leaning Christian, I may have no choice but to say the
Shahada and convert to Islam if I wish to be faithful to my beliefs," De
La Torre insists at one point.
Having thoroughly decolonized himself, De La Torre is ready to be colonized all over again.
Since
the cult of social justice is the search for the greatest gold mine of
victimhood, what else is there for a Baptecostal Catholic Santero to do
except become a Muslim?
If you don’t believe in God, you may as well not believe in Allah.
Daniel Greenfield is a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the David Horowitz Freedom Center. This article previously appeared at the Center's Front Page Magazine. Click here to subscribe to my articles. Thank you for reading.
No comments:
Post a Comment