"The Question: How can you support, and defend, the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic? Answer: You investigate. If there are claims that there is a threat, even if you don't believe there is a threat, you investigate. How else can you determine if there is a threat unless you investigate? You can't. Were there claims of a threat to the Constitution? Yes. Where did these serious claims come from? 100 members of Congress. What was the threat? That there were enemies of the Constitution who successfully rigged the 2020 election. Is this lawsuit about a rigged election? No, it's about the members of Congress who voted AGAINST the investigation thereby thwarting the investigation. Was this a clear violation of their oath? YES."
—Question of Law in the Supreme Court case known as Brunson v. Alma S. Adams; et al. (Biden, Harris, Pence & 385 Members of Congress)
They Broke Their Oaths
Loy, Raland, Deron, and Gaynor Brunson all witnessed what they believed to be the theft of the 2020 election and decided to file suit. However,
the interesting approach that they have taken is not to make a formal
complaint that the election was stolen; instead, they have chosen to sue
members of the U.S. Congress who voted not to investigate whether any
election irregularities may have occurred that could have affected the
outcome. In other words, the Brunson Brothers were motivated to sue
because these elected officials broke their oaths to protect the Constitution of the United States.............Might the Supreme Court grant relief, not
only to the Brunson Brothers, but to millions who are weary of being
characterized as "election deniers" simply for wanting investigations to
take place? Is it possible that some, or all, of those named in the
lawsuit might be removed from office? Keep an eye on this one...........To Read More.....