If someone proposes a solution to an "existential problem" that has no chance of success, should we be forced to take the problem seriously? If the climate alarmists truly believe there is a climate emergency, then they should be able to answer the first basic question about "the plan." Are the numbers in the plan even remotely achievable? Remember: based on their screeching, we have only twelve years before we all die from "man-made climate change."
To answer that question, let's break part of the plan into the most basic math problem: can we replace 25%, 50%, or 75% of the cars on the road in ten years? To understand the theoretical possibility, we will simplify this to how many years will it take to replace all vehicles on the road in the U.S...........
Unserious people, who can't do this basic math, definitely cannot
comprehend the complex science involved in studying the climate. The
numbers don't lie. Their solution will not solve the "man-made climate
problem" without a magic wand to replace every vehicle in the U.S. in
one or even two generations. .......To Read More...
No comments:
Post a Comment