Search This Blog

De Omnibus Dubitandum - Lux Veritas

Tuesday, March 1, 2022

American Law Schools: Becoming More and More Dysfunctional

“From law school professors to the ABA, the legal profession in this country is actively promoting leftist ideology. This will only further inflame radical law students and eventually undermine the neutrality of the judiciary.” ~ George Leef

George LeefGeorge Leef – February 27, 2022

Law school in The United States used to be merely a needless barrier to entry into the market for legal services, helping to keep down competition. Starting back in the 1920s, the American Bar Association started flexing its muscles to prevail upon states to forbid anyone from taking the bar exam who hadn’t graduated from an ABA-accredited law school. The ABA insisted that law school take three years. Prior to that time, many lawyers attended shorter law school programs or learned what they needed to know on the job without going to law school at all.

The simple fact of the matter is that there is no piece of knowledge or skill that can only be learned sitting in a law school classroom. The mandatory three years of that is entirely unnecessary. (I have been making that argument for a long time; see, e.g., this 1997 article in Regulation magazine.)

Then, starting in the 1970s, the academic left began infiltrating law schools with courses and programs intended to turn out “progressive” radicals, as Professor Charles Rounds explained in a 2010 article for the James G. Martin Center, “Bad Sociology, Not Law.”.............To Read More.....

The confirmation process of Ketanji Brown Jackson to the Supreme Court is an opportunity for the GOP - By Rajan Laad -  Last month, Joe Biden pledged to nominate "the first Black woman ever to the United States Supreme Court." This followed Justice Stephen Breyer’s announcement that he was retiring at the end of the current term, 28 years after being appointed by President Clinton. This could be construed as an insult to the candidate because the implication is that she wasn’t necessarily the best choice, merely the best among a double-restricted group (Blacks, women) that amounts to a little over 9 percent of the entire population male and female population of all races, and half that number subtracting the under-18s component. In other words, 4.5%. Ideally, any self-respecting candidate should have rejected the offer because of the inherent condescension of the criteria.  However, last week Joe Biden nominated Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson of the federal appeals court to replace Justice Breyer. ........

Former AG Bill Barr outs himself as an establishment swamp creature - By Andrea WidburgWhen I think of former Attorney General William Barr, I think of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde. Part of him is an upstanding figure who respected constitutional limitations; another part of him is a loyal swamp creature who desperately wanted to serve a milquetoast George W. Bush (or George H.W. Bush) only to find himself working for a vigorous, aggressive Donald J. Trump. Both those aspects of his personality apparently come through loud and clear in a new 600-page book (and doorstop) in which he narrates his stints as U.S. Attorney General under both George Bush, Sr., and Donald Trump.  I have not read One Damn Thing After Another, and do not intend to. Everything in this short essay is based upon the New York Post’s article about the book. First, the part of the article that reflects well on Barr’s relatively short stint as Trump’s AG:........... 

My Take - Again, it's time for a 28th Amendment to impose term limits on the federal judiciary, and to make it easier to unfrock them, as is outlined in my article.

No comments:

Post a Comment