Daniel Greenfield October 26, 2020 @ Sultan Knish Blog
Long
before, “In Soviet Russia, television watch you” became a staple of
Cold War comedy routines, George Orwell’s 1984 novel had telescreens
that broadcast propaganda and watched their citizens. Behind the satire
is the core question of the struggle against Big Tech today.
Is technology going to be a tool of individual choice or social control?
Facebook
and Twitter’s desperate attempts to block a damaging story about Joe
and Hunter Biden is the culmination of four years of work to transform
social media into the media. Under the guise of false claims about
disinformation, foreign election interference, bots, networks,
deepfakes, public health risks, and assorted tech paranoia, free speech
died on the internet.
The
moment when the White House Press Secretary had her account locked for
tweeting a damaging news story about Joe Biden brought home the Big Tech
reality to most Republicans.
Just like the media, Big Tech is
the Democrat Party, and the Democrat Party is Big Tech. But, unlike the
media, Big Tech controls the marketplace of ideas to an unprecedented
degree.
Facebook controls 80% of social media and Google controls 80% of internet search traffic.
And
that’s bad news because Democrats see the internet in the same terms as
Xi, Putin, or your average dictator just about anywhere in the world,
as a dangerous system spouting disinformation, damaging social ideas,
and disruptive political rhetoric that must be controlled using a
combination of economic and social pressures, along with government
regulation.
Republicans and Democrats are both unhappy with the
internet. Republicans are upset because there’s too much censorship and
Democrats are upset because there isn’t enough censorship.
That
Democrats, who once championed a free internet, now view it the same way
all totalitarians do, speaks volumes not only about the death of
liberalism but also about the transformation of the internet from a vox
populi to a walled garden controlled by a handful of Big Tech monopolies
whose cultural views and politics closely align with those of the
Democrats.
‘Bigness’ has its own political and economic gravity.
Big cities are more likely to have big governments and their inhabitants
are more likely to vote for big government policies. They’re also more
likely to use and generate the core companies and cultures that make up
Big Tech.
The old political alignments based on questions of
philosophy are being tossed aside and replaced with a new alignment
based on the primevally simple questions of size and power.
The struggle is less defined by abstractions, than by the question of how much power you have.
In
the Trump era, the more proximity to power you have, the more likely
you are to be a Democrat, and the less proximity to power you have, the
more likely you are to be a Republican.
The most striking thing
about the Never Trumpers and the Rust Belt and Southern Democrats voting
for Trump is how much power the former have and how little power the
latter do.
Politics is being reduced to naked power.
Democrats
shifted their stance on the internet because they gained control of
core national institutions, in no small part through the growing
fortunes pouring out of Silicon Valley which have tilted elections,
financed political movements, and transformed public perspectives on
social issues. And they are using their newfound power to do what the
powerful always do, dismantle the safeguards of an open society so that
there are no more threats to their power.
They’re doing this
under the guise of fighting for equality and justice, and of waging a
revolution for the oppressed, but so did most modern tyrants from Stalin
to Hitler to Mao.
The Democrats are no longer interested in a
free internet, for the same reason that they’ve tossed away free speech,
the filibuster, or any institution or procedure that isn’t serving
their interests this very minute. This isn’t due to a new progressive
enlightenment, Republican obstinacy, grave new threats to democracy, or
any of the other talking points they serve up.
The simple answer is that they won.
The
Democrats of the 90s who welcomed an open internet were waging an
uphill struggle against the open institutions of a generally
conservative country. The country is now much less conservative, the
institutions are much less open, and every major institutional force,
from the biggest companies to the media, is unreservedly and
uncritically backing them every step of the way, while suppressing any
suggestion that they shouldn’t rule unopposed for all eternity.
All that’s left is collecting their winnings by shutting down the opposition.
Support
for free speech is a matter of principle and practical politics.
America was built on principle, but the Founding Fathers had a
common-sense assessment of human nature. Free societies may be built on
principles, but they survive through a balance of power. Every major
faction must go on believing that it is in its interest to maintain free
speech, checks and balances, and other protections against tyranny
because it might end up needing them.
The Democrats have
accumulated enough power that they no longer think that they need
firewalls because if they play their cards right, the future, the right
side of history, is their own.
That’s the fundamental development
that explains the current crisis, not only of free speech, but of free
elections, and a free country. The internet, like any society’s
marketplace of ideas, is a symptom. Free countries have a robust
marketplace of ideas. Unfree ones are obsessed with censoring speech and
monitoring their citizens, all the while spinning paranoid fantasies
about foreign interference, the threat of dangerous ideas, and the risk
to political stability from speech.
Anyone who came out of a coma
and spent an afternoon listening to CNN (owned by AT&T), reading
the Washington Post (owned by the CEO of Amazon), and perusing the
latest round of Democrat complaints about election interference and
disinformation would know what we are.
The problem isn’t simply radicalism. It’s power.
Democrat
radicalism isn’t being driven by the powerless, but by the powerful.
That’s why Democrats with PhDs are more radical than those with a high
school diploma. The problem of Big Tech can’t be separated from the
problem of a political movement with too much power.
The culture
of political censorship isn’t merely radical, it’s powerful. Cancel
culture by college students or Big Tech censorship aren’t disparate
phenomena, they’re the same phenomenon, often practiced on the same
platforms by members of the same inbred ruling class.
America has
been reconstructed to favor some classes at the expense of others. This
new machine combining political institutions, activist groups, and
corporations controls public life.
Conservatives can combat it or, like Soviet citizens, make jokes, and wait for it to collapse.
Big
Tech is at the nexus of the political, economic, and cultural power of
this new machine. That’s why breaking its power must be the objective of
any winning conservative movement.
The massive monopolies
control political discourse and as they tighten the noose around
conservatives, political speech on the internet will consist of media
narratives, a few tame conservatives, and little else. Imagine the high
point of media dominance with no talk radio or cable conservative news.
That’s the future. And it’s not going to arrive a year from now, it may
already be here by Election Day. And if not, certainly when the next
presidential election arrives.
But Big Tech also holds the key to
the radical money machine. AOC and the Squad wouldn’t exist without a
founding engineer from Stripe. The founder of eBay is responsible for
everything from The Intercept to The Bulwark, the former is the media
arm of the Sanders campaign and the latter of the Never Trumpers. The
Washington Post was transformed from a fussy government paper into a den
of furious radicals by the CEO of Amazon. Google money financed the
Bernie Sanders campaign. Big Tech has poured a massive fortune into
Black Lives Matter, from Steve Jobs’ widow, to Jeff Bezos’ ex-wife, to
Jack Dorsey, the founder of Twitter.
And that’s the tip of the iceberg considering Facebook’s Chan-Zuckerberg Initiative.
The
cultural power of Big Tech is even vaster. Google and Facebook
determine what most people see on the internet. Amazon and Netflix are
swallowing the entertainment industry. In a decade, a handful of vast,
mostly, tech companies, Apple, Amazon, AT&T, Disney, Google,
Netflix, and Verizon will control the culture far more than the old
entertainment industry ever did.
By then it will be much too late
to do anything except huddle in a few dark web outposts and mutter hate
speech like the controversial words of the First Amendment.
If conservatives don’t fight Big Tech now, they will lose. And they will lose everything.
Big
Tech’s power is growing exponentially, but it’s still vulnerable. The
companies that will become immovable oligarchies in a decade can still
be brought down and broken up. The internet and the marketplace of ideas
can rise again from the ruins of those monopolies.
Now is the time. If we don’t fight Big Tech now, America has no future.
No comments:
Post a Comment