Adam Schiff, the fanatic who from the beginning launched probe after probe of President Trump, is about to see the 2017–2018 Russia collusion transcripts he's been sitting on all these months released to the public, all 6,000 pages, with 73 witnesses stating there was no Russian collusion in 53 transcripts.
National Intelligence director Richard Grenell did the job Schiff wouldn't do, releasing the transcripts, and now Schiff is expected to be looking more bug-eyed than usual.
According to Fox News:...............
Those would be the original Russia collusion transcripts, released after a House investigation he called for, after claiming he had proof positive that President Trump colluded with the Russians to steal the election from Hillary Clinton.
Schiff, recall, had been making statements like this to a fawning press in 2017:................... Schiff later claimed he had "direct evidence" of collusion in fact, stating in 2019:............... And this drumbeat of fanciful claims that the transcripts would indicate he knew was false expose him now as telling "l ie after lie after lie,"as House ranking intelligence committee member Devin Nunes put it.
"Look for witnesses who were not so truthful," he told Fox Business. If so, there must be some doozies..........To Read More.....
My Take - Did he lie while serving on the committee? Apparently he did. Did he lie while under any kind of oath? Not that I know of. But the fact of the matter is he lied in his official capacity as the Chairman of a House Committee dealing with intelligence. All in order to destroy people he disagreed with politically. People who were guilty of no crimes.
The fact is, he lied, no matter the circumstances, and those lies impacted the nation and the lives of individuals. He's guilty of high crimes, meaning he took a oath when he took office that says:
That makes him guilty of "high crimes", meaning a crime of high office, which includes failiing to fulfill the duties sworn to in his oath of office."I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter: So help me God."
- Did he support the Constitution in his actions? Clearly he actually undermined the Constitution.
- Did he bear true faith and allegiance to the Constitution? Clearly he didn't.
- Did he use his office for the purpose of evading the truth? Absolutely!
- Is he guilty of high crimes. You bet you butt he is!
- What will the House do about it? Nothing, so long as it's run by Pelosi and her corrupt gang.
No comments:
Post a Comment