Search This Blog

De Omnibus Dubitandum - Lux Veritas

Wednesday, October 2, 2013

Examiner Editorial: Traditional media let Obama stonewall and taunt GOP

By Editorial | Oct 1, 2013  
Only in the Obama era are the guys who say they will negotiate criticized as blind ideological zealots, while those who repeatedly and acidly refuse to negotiate are hailed as heroes. That is exactly what has been happening as Washington headed into shutdown mode. Consider events just since Sunday's round of television news interviews. On "Fox News Sunday with Chris Wallace,” House Majority Whip Kevin McCarthy of California said, "We will not shut the government down. If we need to negotiate a little longer, we will negotiate."
McCarthy was describing what he expected would happen in the likely event the Senate Democratic majority rejected a continuing resolution approved by the House that funded the government through Dec. 15 while delaying Obamacare for a year and killing the health care reform program’s medical device tax. House GOPers could then pass the same CR again, McCarthy said, but make it effective for only a few days to give negotiators between the Senate and House additional time to work out their differences.
The response from leading Democrats essentially was “Hell, no!” And it was followed by another deluge of vicious attacks on the GOP…..To Read More…..

From Benny Peiser's Global Warming Policy Foundation

IPCC Stands Accused Of Misleading World Leaders & The Public
Did The IPCC 'Fix The Facts'?

The full text of the IPCC’s Fifth Assessment Report has been out for less than 24 hours and the tales of malfeasance are flowing already. Steve McIntyre has already blogged about some misleading behaviour by senior scientists involved in the review, but his post this morning is amazing, revealing how the discrepancy between climate models and observations was systematically hidden between the final review of the draft and the report issued to the public. --Andrew Montford, Bishop Hill, 1 October 2013

For the envelopes from the first three IPCC assessments, although they cite the same sources as the predecessor Second Draft Figure 1.4, the earlier projections have been shifted downwards relative to observations, so that the observations are now within the earlier projection envelopes. You can see this relatively clearly with the Second Assessment Report envelope: compare the two versions. At present, I have no idea how they purport to justify this. None of this portion of the IPCC assessment is drawn from peer-reviewed material. Nor is it consistent with the documents sent to external reviewers. --Steve McIntyre,
Climate Audit, 30 September 2013

Since 1997, there has been no significant increase in global average surface temperature, and some areas — notably the Northern Hemisphere — have actually cooled. The U.N.’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has limited the hiatus to 10-15 years. Anastasios Tsonis, distinguished professor at the University of Wisconsin – Milwaukee, believes the pause will last much longer than that. He points to repeated periods of warming and cooling in the 20th century. “Each one of those regimes lasts about 30 years … I would assume something like another 15 years of leveling off or cooling,” he told Fox News. --John Roberts,
Fox News, 30 September 2013

[At the Stockholm IPCC meeting] participants debated extensively the SPM text dealing with simulated and observed trends in global mean surface temperature in the long and short term. Co-Chair Stocker emphasized the need to address discussions currently taking place among policy makers regarding the past 10-15 years and said that “now is the time for the IPCC to make a statement to the outside world.” The US said that a period of 10-15 years is too short for model evaluation. The most contentious point concerned differences between simulated and observed short-term trends. The US, Austria, Saudi Arabia, the Russian Federation, Germany, Belgium and others supported reference to 10-15-year periods in general. China maintained that reference should only be made to the past 15 years. On the explanation of the observed reduction in the surface warming trend over the period 1998-2012, Saudi Arabia strongly urged incorporating language from the Technical Summary on models overestimating the warming trend. The CLAs advised against including this statement in the SPM, noting that: the research is currently inconclusive; overestimation of the models is too small to explain the overall effect and not statistically significant; and it is difficult to pinpoint the role of changes in radiative forcing in causing the reduced warming trend, with Co-Chair Stocker referring to this issue as an “emerging science topic.” --
Earth Negotiations Bulletin, 29 September 2013

An Obstinate Senate

By Alan Caruba
 
This appeared here and I would like to thank Alan for allowing me to publish his work.  RK

Congress was not designed to operate in this fashion. In practice, the Senate is supposed to conference with the House to arrive at a compromise solution.

“The Senate voted 54-46 to reject a motion to go to conference with the House on the issue of funding the government, marking the third time in 24 hours the Senate has rejected an overture from the House related to avoiding a government shutdown. Senate Democrats have insisted they will accept from the House only a six-week funding bill with no provisions related to Obamacare.” – www.politico.com, Tuesday, October 1.   In a history of the Senate, “The Most Exclusive Club”, published in 2005, Lewis l. Gould noted that “For most members, as the 1990s began, it was more business as usual. That process led to another ten-year period when the Senate slipped further in public esteem and failed to meet its political responsibilities. By the end of the century, civility and a sense of common purpose had vanished from much of what the Senate did.”

Gould is the Centennial Professor Emeritus of History at the University of Texas. “Political oratory has been in steady decline over the course of the past century, if the Senate is any indication. Most Senators read speeches that staff has written for them. In hearings members often rely on questions that staff has prepared…Few modern Senators can think on their feet or make a sustained argument without supporting information or props. ’We’re just no longer a debating forum,’ said Robert C. Byrd in October 2004.”

“It is hard to overstate this loss to American political life,” said Gould. “The Framers of the Constitution envisioned a Senate that would function as a wise and judicious check on both executive power and the House of Representatives. They did not imagine a body that would act as a rubber stamp for an incumbent president.”

The recent marathon speeches by Senators Rand Paul (KY) and Ted Cruz (TX), both Republicans and both elected with Tea Party movement support, have invigorated what little passes for debate.

The current membership of the Senate is 53 Democrats, 45 Republicans, and 2 independents.

Each State has two Senators for a total of 100. They are elected for terms of six years.

In practice, the members of the Senate have generally regarded the members of the House with a bit of disdain, given that they must hustle to be reelected every two years and tend to the constituency of a particular district. This attitude was reflected in the way the Senate went home for the weekend while the House stayed in session to address the possibility of a shutdown.

How long the impasse will continue is anyone’s guess, but the cause is the growing public concern over the Affordable Care Act otherwise known as Obamacare. It is so abundantly a disaster that the Democrats have decided to brazen their way toward its full implementation while the Republicans are reflecting the outcry from tens of thousands of telephone calls, email, and all other manner of communication.

In short, the Republicans are doing what is expected of politicians while the Democrats are expressing their contempt for the voters. It is the same contempt that led to the near-midnight, 2009 party line vote in the Senate that passed Obamacare. None of the Senators had read the huge bill that is filled with many new taxes and puts the government in charge of one sixth of the nation’s economy and, in effect, the entire healthcare system. Its impact is already being felt as large companies lay off more and more workers while smaller ones put them in a part-time status, reducing the number of hours with which they can earn a living.

“We had to pass it to find out what was in it,” said the then-Speaker of the House, Nancy Pelosi. Significantly, no Republican in either the House or Senate voted for Obamacare.

The intransigence of Sen. Harry Reid (D-NV), the Majority Leader of the Senate, reflecting the same view as President Obama, is the reason why the shutdown has occurred. There is much more to this than just politics, though obviously both parties are rolling the dice as to the outcome of the 2014 midterm elections.

To their credit, I think the Republicans have the high ground. Despite the criticisms, they have shown a united front in their effort to delay Obamacare’s implementation for a year, strip out the taxes on medical instruments, and require that members of Congress and their staffs enroll in the program in the same way everyone else must.

Ultimately, it is the Tea Party movement that will get the credit for resisting Obamacare and it should surprise no one that the White House and Harry Reid keep calling them terrorists, anarchists, extortionists, and other names.

It will be interesting to watch President Obama say whatever he can to affect the outcome of the shutdown. With nearly five years in office and with a thick volume of lies he told about Obamacare to get its passage, he is likely to suffer a significant injury to his power to influence events in the days and years ahead.

The shutdown is a good thing. Enjoy it.

© Alan Caruba, 2013

Who is Kathleen Sebelius?

U.S. Secretary of Health and Human Services charged with implementing the Patient Protection Affordable Care Act in 2010 Has expressed her support for a “single payer” healthcare system Kathleen Sebelius was born on May 15, 1948, in Cincinnati, Ohio. She is the daughter of John Joyce Gilligan, a Democrat who served as a U.S. congressman from 1965-67 and as governor of Ohio from 1971-75.
Holding a bachelor’s degree in political science from Trinity College and an MPA from the University of Kansas, Sebelius the executive director (and leading lobbyist) of the Kansas Trial Lawyers Association from 1977–86; a member of the Kansas House of Representatives from 1987-94; Kansas insurance commissioner from 1995-2003; and Kansas governor from 2003-09.
During her tenure as governor, Sebelius spent years fighting against transparency motions related to Republican state attorney general Phillip Kline's effort to determine whether the Planned Parenthood Federation of America had committed felonies by: (a) falsifying the records of patients who underwent illegal late-term abortions in Kansas, and (b) failing to report many cases of child rape. Though two Kansas district judges found probable cause of criminality in Planned Parenthood's records, Sebelius, a committed opponent of any legislative "restrictions" on women's abortion rights, launched an aggressive campaign designed to suppress that evidence and smear the attorney general…..
NOTE: Elements of the smear campaign included the following:
The state ethics board, two of whose members were Sebelius appointees, accused Kline of lying.
The left-wing state Supreme Court (appointed by Sebelius) repeatedly hindered Kline’s subpoenas and appeals.
For 20 months, the state’s disciplinary board for lawyers suppressed an internal investigative report indicating that there was absolutely no probable cause to justify any ethics complaints against Kline.
A subsequent Kansas attorney general (appointed by Sebelius) destroyed a large number of key documents that possibly could have proven the felony charges against Planned Parenthood, and thus the case had to be dropped.

Spain's Great Unfinished Task

By Carlos Alberto Montaner
It looks like the recession in Spain is ending. About time. It has lasted five years and has been harsh. The economy grew a few tenths of a percent this quarter. It is a weak sign but a good one. Unemployment remains sky-high (26.6 percent of the potential work force), but the only rational way to reduce that scourge is with growth and investments that will produce profits that will sustain the cycle.
The road taken by Spain, beginning in the second term of José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero, the Socialist prime minister who froze the pensions, and later by Mariano Rajoy, has been one of austerity. That means cutbacks in public spending and a reduction of the national debt.
The country couldn't go on creating infrastructures that sometimes were unnecessary - airports without customers, speed trains that made no profit, extraordinary highways for few vehicles. From these crises you emerge by generating wealth, and wealth is produced only by businesses…..ToRead More…..
My TakeAmazing!  This Socialist says they must cut pensions, stop spending money and reduce the national debt.  Sounds like a capitalist.  Is this a kind of confession.....like..... oops….we’ve been wrong all this time, and what we need is capitalism, because that’s what works, especially American style capitalism.  It’s unfortunate American’s have been convinced to no longer believe in it. 

David Suzuki bombs on Q&A, knows nothing about the climate

By Jo Nova
“What data? “ David Suzuki on Q&A  David Suzuki’s performance on Q&A last night was extraordinary. I was knock-me-over amazed that he has not heard of UAH, GISS, HADcrut and RSS, and knew nothing of the pause in global surface temperatures that even the UK Met Office and IPCC lead author climate scientists like Hans von Storch are discussing.
How afraid is Suzuki about man-made global warming? So afraid, it doesn’t occur to him to check the data, incredibly he doesn’t even know what the data is. Tony Jones had to rephrase the questions to explain them to Suzuki, who doesn’t even understand them.
How much is his reputation as a scientist worth when he doesn’t even bother to check the evidence for a cause he stakes his reputation on?  Three times in Q&A he admitted he didn’t know — he didn’t know there was a pause in warming for the last 15 years, he didn’t know how global temperatures are measured, and he didn’t know that cyclones were not increasing over the Great Barrier Reef. He wants politicians jailed for “denying the science”. “You bet!” he exclaims, but then admits he hasn’t thought that through either…… Even Tony Jones asks how realistic solar is. At this first prod, Suzuki throws his hands up in the air, “I don’t know”.…The man is emphatically an activist who might as well be innumerate. He is unburdened by data, evidence or logic.....To Read More.....

The Political Science of Global Warming

The U.N.'s latest climate-change report should be its last.
RUPERT DARWALL September 30, 2013
"Human influence extremely likely to be the dominant cause of observed warming since the middle of the last century," was the headline from Friday's release of the first instalment of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change's fifth assessment report. "Extremely likely"—indicating a 95%-100% likelihood—was ratcheted up one notch from the 2007 fourth assessment report's "very likely." Yet compared to 2007, the IPCC widened its estimate of the responsiveness of the climate system to carbon dioxide by reducing the lower band to a 1.5°C increase from 2°C, qualifying the new estimate as only "likely."
This is a glaring discrepancy. How can the IPCC be more confident that more than half the temperature rise since the mid-20th century is caused by greenhouse-gas emissions when it is less sure of the climatic impact of carbon dioxide? The explanation is that IPCC reports, especially the summaries for policymakers, are primarily designed for political consumption. And as if on cue, British Prime Minister David Cameron commented on the IPCC report, "If someone said there is a 95% chance that your house might burn down, even if you are in the 5% that doesn't agree with it, you still take out the insurance."
But poke beneath the surface of the IPCC's latest offering and the confection is revealed for what it is. …..To Read More…..

Michael Brown, astronomer, says science is not about debate, people are too stupid to judge

By Jo Nova
Michael Brown, recipient of taxpayer funds for astronomy, tells us that science is not about debate because people are not smart enough to judge the winner. He doesn’t list any evidence to support his faith in climate models (he’s just part of the herd following the consensus pack). Nor does he have any serious scientific criticism of the NIPCC climate report. But he uses plenty of names, baseless allusion, and innuendo. In the article ”Adversaries, zombies and NIPCC climate pseudoscience” in The Conversation he resorts to a group smear (with the help of the taxpayer funded site) in the hope that people won’t listen to those who disagree with him. Apparently he can’t win a fair and open debate, so he’s doing what he can to stop one.
If science now has “Gods” who are above question, it’s not science, it’s a religion. A scientist who says “I’m right because I’m a scientist” is neither right nor much of a scientist. Brown is acting like a self-appointed High-Priest of the Climate Doctrine.
The NIPCC report is more balanced, more comprehensive, and more accurate than the politically-guided tome from the IPCC . It contains hundreds of peer reviewed references put together by independent scientists. In his reply to it, Michael Brown tells us all we need to know about the intellectual state of Australian science, and the value of The Conversation…..ToRead More….

Rich, Arrogant and Stupid

October 1, 2013 By Bruce Thornton 9 Comments
The modern West demonstrates a phenomenon unknown in history––unprecedented wealth, technology, and access to information combined with abject stupidity. Wisdom once known by every village explainer and cracker-barrel crank has been discarded and replaced with phony “sciences” making claims about human nature and behavior that are based on nothing other than false assumptions, political ideology, and wishful thinking. Whether it’s foreign policy, managing the economy, or teaching the young, our leaders institute policies that violate the traditional wisdom accumulated by generations of human experience….. So why do we continue to chase pedagogical fads that make our children more ignorant and unprepared for the adult world?
Because we can afford to.
The malign effects of turning out generation after generation of ignoramuses with bloated self-esteem are insidious. Like the exploding federal debt, the apocalypse lies down the road, which means it will be somebody else’s problem. Meanwhile we have enough accumulated capital from our forbears, and enough smart people who somehow escape or overcome the educational mediocrity machine to keep the economy humming just enough for most of us to keep shopping, eating, and twerking ourselves into oblivion.....To Read More......

A Response to Richard Dawkins

October 1, 2013 By Dennis Prager 33 Comments

This past Friday CNN conducted an interview with Richard Dawkins, the British biologist most widely known for his polemics against religion and on behalf of atheism.  Asked “whether an absence of religion would leave us without a moral compass,” Dawkins responded: “The very idea that we get a moral compass from religion is horrible.”
This is the crux of the issue for Dawkins and other anti-religion activists — that not only do we not need religion or God for morality, but we would have a considerably more moral world without them.  This argument is so wrong — both rationally and empirically – that its appeal can only be explained by a) a desire to believe it and b) an ignorance of history.
First, the rational argument.  If there is no God, the labels “good” and “evil” are merely opinions. They are substitutes for “I like it” and “I don’t like it.” They are not objective realities.....To Read More.....

Rethinking the two-state solution

An Israeli-Palestinian power-sharing model could guarantee democracy and a certain kind of Zionism.
By Neve GordonOctober 1, 2013
In the 2012 elections, J Street, the relatively new pro-Israel lobby whose stated purpose is to promote a progressive peace agenda in the Middle East, says its PAC disbursed more than $1.8 million to candidates from 26 states, thus helping eight Senate and 63 House hopefuls win their races. Among the winners are the chairs and ranking members of five committees, including the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence and the House Armed Services Committee, as well as chairs and ranking members of more than 30 subcommittees.
Within a mere five years of its establishment, J Street has gone a long way toward fulfilling its initial goal of becoming an alternative voice to the powerful, hawkish American Israel Public Affairs Committee, which reportedly has 12 full-time lobbyists and spends nearly $3 million annually on its efforts. At its annual conference, which ends today, J Street expects about 3,000 attendees — AIPAC's drew 13,000. Still, the fledgling organization has succeeded in making room for welcome dissent within mainstream political debates about Israel, and it has begun to redefine what it means to be "pro-Israel" on Capitol Hill…..To Read More…..

My Take I posted this article so that I could say this -This man is a blithering idiot!
The Irish example is fallacious because although their conflict is foundationally religious, they’re both Christians and have no religious imperative to murder each other. Islamists in Israel will never forgo the need to murder Jews because it is a religious imperative. That shouldn’t have to be explained any Jew, Israeli or any sane person who has paid the least amount of attention as to what is happening now and what has been happening in the Mideast forever.     

Remember Cairo?

While Washington focuses on Syria and Iran, Egypt looks headed for a dangerous and destabilizing insurgency.
BY SHADI HAMID, PETER MANDAVILLE |SEPTEMBER 30, 2013
With the world focused on the crisis in Syria and the possibility of a U.S.-Iranian détente, the fact that Egypt's political situation is going from bad to worse has flown under the political radar. Much to the relief of the generals in Cairo -- and likely also some members of U.S. President Barack Obama's Middle East policy team -- the United States appears to be kicking another difficult regional policy decision down the road.
This is a mistake. By countenancing the July 3 coup and the military's subsequent crackdown on the supporters of ousted President Mohamed Morsy, the United States may be helping to sow seeds that could ripen into a costly and deeply destabilizing insurgency for years to come.
The Obama administration responded to the military crackdown, which resulted in more than 1,000 deaths, with the diplomatic equivalent of a few light raps on the knuckles of Egypt's generals. It canceled joint military exercises with Egypt and announced that the White House's national security staff would begin a comprehensive review of bilateral aid. Since late August, a recommendation to suspend the majority of U.S. military assistance to Cairo has been sitting with the president. Meanwhile, Egyptian security forces have re-escalated their campaign against the Muslim Brotherhood, raiding the movement's strongholds and arresting the few remaining senior Brotherhood figures not already in custody…..ToRead More….
My Take – Shades of Jimmy Carter. 
 

Jihadist Ritual Murder & Mutilation at the Mall

October 1, 2013 By Dawn Perlmutter 26 Comments
During the four-day siege in Kenya’s Westgate shopping Mall, al-Shabaab jihadists raped, tortured, beheaded, dismembered, castrated, gouged out eyes, amputated fingers and hung hostages on hooks from the roof. According to a forensic medical doctor, “They [the al-Shabaab attackers] removed eyes, ears, noses. Fingers are cut by pliers, noses ripped by pliers”… “Those are not allegations. Those are f****** truths,”… “They removed balls, eyes, ears, nose. They get your hand and sharpen it like a pencil then they tell you to write your name with the blood. They drive knives inside a child’s body. Actually, if you look at all the bodies, unless those ones that were escaping, fingers are cut by pliers, the noses are ripped by pliers.” There were also reports that hostages were beheaded and their heads thrown out of the windows…..To Read More…..
My Take – Well, let me see a show of hands of the ‘moderate’ Muslims, and Muslim leaders in Muslim countries that are standing up and condemning these atrocities!  I’m waiting!
I’m still waiting! 
Okay, while we are waiting; how about the President and Congress standing up and loudly condemning these followers of Islam and publishing all the pictures of all the atrocities n order for everyone to see how maniacal Islam really is?
Islam's Latest Contributions to Peace
"Mohammed is God's apostle. Those who follow him are harsh to the unbelievers but merciful to one another" Quran 48:29
9/29/13
(Gujba, Nigeria) - Forty-four college students are slaughtered in the middle of the night by Boko Haram gunmen at their dorm.
(Mussayab, Iraq) - Forty people at a Shiite funeral join their beloved courtesy of a Sunni suicide bomber.
(Peshawar, Pakistan) - Forty innocents at a packed market are torn to shreds by a Religion of Peace bomb blast.
9/28.13
(Ghazni, Afghanistan) - Women and children are among the casualties of a bombing by religious hardliners.
(Timbuktu, Mali) - Two civilians on a horse-cart are sent to Allah by Shahid suicide bombers.
9/27/13
 (Peshawar, Pakistan) - Hardliners fighting for an Islamic state blow up nineteen passengers on a bus.
* Sources for individual incidents can be provided upon request.



Tuesday, October 1, 2013

E-Mail From John Droz Jr.

Rich:
As you know, some of the most pressing state and national issues are in the environmental and energy arenas. They include such significant matters as global warming, renewable energy, and sea level rise.
In our view, government policies on all of these technical matters should be based on genuine Scientific assessments. Unfortunately, that is usually not the case, as real Science has been under siege by lobbyists promoting their clients’ economic and/or political agendas.
The consequence of not basing technical policies on Science are that:
1) the results are far less than promised,
2) the costs are much higher, and
3) there are many unintended consequences — like a net loss in jobs.
My talk is about how Science is being subtly but successfully undermined across the board, from our education system to the media — yet almost no one realizes the magnitude of what is going on. This has profoundly adverse consequences on our economy, national security, and freedoms.
Science Under Assault is an unusually candid critique of this extraordinarily significant phenomena of our times, where Science is being killed via "death by a thousand stings." (The unabridged version of this presentation is online.)
My talk will be Thursday, October 17th in Washington DC, on Capitol Hill, in Rayburn 2325.
It is being sponsored by the House Science, Space and Technology Committee.
To make this more accessible, two identical presentations will be given, each a 45 minute slideshow, followed by a Q&A. The first will be at 11:00 AM, and the second at 1:00 PM.
Lunch will be available between presentations, from noon to 1 PM. This Panera lunch is graciously provided by Utah’s Deseret Power Cooperative.
This is an apolitical event, as whether attendees are Democrats or Republicans, Progressives or Conservatives, is irrelevant to the information presented about Science, education, and employment. Please consider attending this unique presentation to US legislators and their staff, which is open to the public.
Please pass this information onto other science-oriented contacts you have.
Let me know any questions, or ways you can help support this important event.
— John Droz, jr.
RSVP:
We are expecting an overflow attendance, so reservations would be appreciated. With your RSVP we will do our best to divide up the attendance between the two times offered, to maximize everyone's comfort, and to make sure that we have adequate food for those wanting lunch.
Yes, I am planning on attending the Science presentation on October 17th, in Rayburn 2325. Regarding the two different times that it is being given:
____ the 11:00 AM time is much better for me
____ the 1:00 PM time is much better for me
___ either 11:00 AM or 1:00 PM time is OK for me [we will get back to you which will be less crowded]
____ I would appreciate lunch (served from Noon and 1:00 PM, between presentations)
____ I would like to help with this event by:
[Please email this back to me, ASAP]

FEATURED ARTICLE: Green Policies Translate Into Less Food, Higher Prices

by Angela Logomasini on September 30, 2013
Thanks to misguided bureaucracy and fear mongering from environmental activists, myriad valuable products are disappearing from the marketplace. Walmart, Proctor & Gamble, and Johnson and Johnson are leading the way by following green advice to phase out a host of valuable chemical technologies because of misinformed green hype.
Pesticides—which are needed to feed a growing world population and fight vector-borne diseases—are often found on the regulatory chopping block, thanks to environmentalist scare campaigns related to both food safety and wildlife protection.  In Europe, as in the United States, pesticide regulations are driving a host of products off the market and will surely raise prices and reduce the ability of European farmers to produce food. While green groups suggest that we should fear these chemicals, what we really need to fear is their crazy policies.
A recent article in a European farmer’s publication explains how nonsensical European pesticide regulations will likely affect food production there:....To Read More.....

 

Government Policing Does Not Mix Well With Private Security

Mises Daily: Tuesday, October 01, 2013 by Dave Albin
When government police fail to provide adequate protection, people turn to private security. Yet, when private security becomes inconvenient for the monopoly security force (i.e., the state), purchasers of private security are punished.
Recently, public police departments in the Des Moines, Iowa area have been charging businesses and private homeowners for responding to false alarms — that is, alarms generated by business or home security systems that were not the result of apparent criminal activity. For example, an alarm may be activated when debris blows by a motion sensor, and the local police department is then notified and it responds.
According to The Des Moines Register, this has been occurring a lot recently. Des Moines police responded to 3,806 alarms last year, more than 90 percent of which were false; West Des Moines police responded similarly with a 95 percent false alarm rate; and Urbandale (part of the greater Des Moines metropolitan area) police encountered a 91 percent false alarm rate.....To Read More.....

Terry McAuliffe's MyCar Isn't Even a "Real Car": Car and Driver

Marita Noon | Sep 29, 2013
With the embarrassment the three “er”s—Switzer, Wiener, and Filner—have created for the Democratic Party, one would think they would want to steer clear of scandal-ridden candidates. But—no. Terry McAuliffe is, once again, hoping to become the governor of the Commonwealth of Virginia when voters go to the polls next month. Among his friends, McAuliffe is known as The Macker—which my sources tell me is a play on the Yiddish “Macher,” meaning: “Big shot. A man who is (or thinks he is) really important. Usually refers to someone who is showing off in some way.”.......To Read More......

CEI’s Battered Business Bureau: The Week in Regulation

by Ryan Young on September 30, 2013  
This week in the world of regulation:
  • Last week, 80 new final regulations were published in the Federal Register. There were 76 new final rules the previous week.That’s the equivalent of a new regulation every two hours and six minutes — 24 hours a day, seven days a week.  All in all, 2,750 final rules have been published in the Federal Register this year.  If this keeps up, the total tally for 2013 will be 3,718 new final rules....... Highlights from final rules published last week:....To Read More.....

Obamacare Quadruples Rates for Some, Subsidizes Some Wealthy Who Retired Early

by Hans Bader on September 30, 2013

Due to Obamacare, North Carolina “will see individual-market” health insurance rates “triple for women, and quadruple for men.”
In Tennessee, Obamacare will triple men’s premiums, and double women’s, in the market for individual health insurance. Nationally, Obamacare will increase men’s premiums by 99 percent, and women’s by 62%.
Kathy Kristof of CBS MoneyWatch describes experiencing a 67 percent spike in her premiums, for a worse policy than she had before:....To Read More....

7 myths about a federal government shutdown

By M.D. Kittle | Watchdog.org
MADISON – Again, the United States stands on the brink of another federal government shutdown as its two major parties play their recurring game of fiscal chicken.
There’s been a lot of rhetoric about just what a government shutdown would mean to the nation at large and the average citizen in particular. A prolonged shutdown, economists tell Watchdog.org, would have a deleterious impact on an economy struggling to recover. But most of the so-called government shutdowns in the past, when Congress and the president failed to come to terms on a budget or continuing resolution, lasted but a few days. As one economist put it, a brief stall would have the impact of a “snow day” in Washington, D.C.
So let’s cut through the heated rhetoric, starting with the notion of what a government shutdown is.....To Read More.....

More infection control woes

This HND piece examines the ongoing, ever ongoing problem of highly preventable infection control breaches. As I point out: Obamacare is driven by the "quite absurd notion that lack of universal insurance coverage is the biggest problem facing American health care."
Hardly. The biggest problem facing American health care is that we are paying drastically more than any other country in the world for our care, but our outcomes on average are markedly inferior. The single most important reason for this pathetic state of affairs is that our system hugely favors procedural and acute medicine over cognitive and preventive medicine.
Not surprisingly, infection control is a stepchild, even though there are at least 1.7 million healthcare-associated infections each year in the US, causing 99,000 deaths. Nearly all of these are preventable. This piece discusses two current cases.

A Comment By Loren Feldman Worth Posting

By Loren Feldman

Based on recent experience on some big websites for which I write, I am inclined to agree (around 90 percent, anyway). In one particular case relating to a health care matter, a commenter seemed to delight in—paraphrasing a certain Jesus of Nazareth—ignoring the "plank" in his argument, while scrutinizing the speck in mine.
I have encountered this often, among what I tend to call "stat freaks," those who would endlessly and misguidedly analyze the quality of data while missing the obvious point of the research. Ironically, stat freaks tend to criticize the few good studies out there, while ignoring the junk science.
On political websites, you might see the "regulars" gang up on a newbie, just for being a newbie.   This sort of "engagement" probably scares off more visitors than it attracts....This Appeared Here.....
Personal Note: I find this to be unendingly true. I have one objective. Find out that which is factual and follow those facts wherever they may lead. Entirely too many, seemingly intelligent and well educated people, are only interested in what they believe, not what's believable. I have found this to be true regarding Rachel Carson and DDT, global warming, claims that chemicals - especially pesticides - cause cancer, endocrine disruption, asthma, and a host of other afflictions. They search out poorly done studies - and those are the majority by the way - that are nothing more than conclusions in search of data. Like that Non Sequitur cartoon about Pre-conceptual Science.
 

A look at fracking

September 30, 2013
This HND piece examines the Greenie's latest target: Fracking, a superb source of cheap natural gas
As I note:
The attitude of the environmental movement toward fracking is…interesting. You may recall not too long ago, that the Greens spoke with great praise of "clean-burning natural gas." Gas was even referred to as "The bridge fuel to the renewable energy future," and, its much lower carbon emissions were constantly touted. Note that this praise was lavished on natural gas before the rise of fracking.
To find out the simple—if sick—reason behind this, read the complete article....

Americans are more conservative than they have been in decades

By Larry Bartels

James Stimson knows as much about public opinion as anyone in America. He has been tracking the nation’s policy preferences for more than 20 years using a “policy mood” index derived from responses to a wide variety of opinion surveys involving hundreds of specific policy questions on topics ranging from taxes and spending to environmental regulation to gun control.
The latest update of Stimson’s policy mood series suggests that the American public in 2012 was more conservative than at any point since 1952. (Actually, since mood in each year is estimated with some error, it seems safer to say that the current level of conservatism roughly equals the previous highs recorded in 1980 and 1952.) While the slight increase in conservatism from 2011 to 2012 is too small to be significant, it continues a marked trend that began as soon as Barack Obama moved into the White House.....To Read More.....

CNN Abandons Hillary Clinton Doc

30 Sep 2013
After all the fight and fuss CNN put up to defend its decision to produce and broadcast a feature-length documentary about likely 2016 Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton, CNN has now abandoned the project. The director of the project, left-wing filmmaker Charles Ferguson, who says he was approached by CNN, puts most of the blame on Team Clinton's lack of cooperation:
And then the fun began. The day after the contract was signed I received a message from Nick Merrill, Hillary Clinton's press secretary. He already knew about the film, and clearly had a source within CNN. He interrogated me; at first I answered, but eventually I stopped. When I requested an off-the-record, private conversation with Mrs. Clinton, Merrill replied that she was busy writing her book, and not speaking to the media.....To Read More....

Political Correctness is a Killer

September 29, 2013 by Rowan Besthe

How does political correctness influence personal responsibility and remove inhibition? If inhibitory emotions are removed from the definition of ones actions, then the person is free to become uninhibited. They would no longer be subjected to emotions of guilt, embarrassment, or remorse. To illustrate how the wording can alter the emotion of a phrase, look at abortion and welfare. Abortion, simply put, is the killing of embryonic human life, whereas “women’s reproductive rights” is nebulous in meaning and eliminates the association of guilt by removing the negative connotation of the word kill. Welfare can be the receipt of a benefit, which implies you are indebted to another’s kindness. “Low income,” as a replacement, decouples the notion of benefit to the recipient and alleviates the burden of indebtedness. Thus, the emotion of shame for not being able to contribute and the desire to repay someone else’s kindness is removed.....To Read More....

Industry acts to meet green target

27 September 2013
The chemical industry has been dealing with EU legislation in recent years aimed at making the world a safer and healthier place to live and work in. More than 130 separate environmental targets and objectives have to be met in Europe between 2010 and 2050 in a drive to cut energy use, pollution, and waste generation......Perhaps the most trendsetting regulation has to be Reach. It is said to be the most complex legislation in the EU’s history. The regulation, which has its third and final registration deadline in 2018, has forced companies to evaluate their products and improve the sustainability of their portfolios.
Peter Holicki, EPCA vice president and vice president of operations for Europe, Middle East & Africa at Dow Chemical, says: “The chemicals industry recognises and accepts the shared responsibility placed by Reach on all participants in the value chain. Like other regulation, Reach should be enforced in an equitable manner and harmonised across Europe to support the competitiveness of the industry and the operation of the single European market.”
Holicki adds that another important trendsetter for global standards and common principles will be the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP). He says this is an ideal opportunity for the EU and US to share approaches to energy and natural resources efficiency, trade facilitation and regulatory cooperation. He comments: “A shared transatlantic approach can do much to remove hidden trade barriers and provide a win/win for consumers, businesses, employment and the environment.”....To Read More....
My Take - Make no mistake about it. The Chemical Safety Improvement Act, which was to be a replacement for the Toxic Safety Chemicals Act is all about imposing the Precautionary Principle on American businesses. The TSCA was inspired by REACH and this is the next step. Let's face it folks...if the Europeans are adopting this we shouldn't because it’s all about the German green philosophy going back to the early to mid 1800's. I will be publishing an article soon on the origin of the Precautionary Principle, and Germany's influence on the green movement. The reality is that if you actually look at this closely you begin to realize that the green movement has become the descendant of pagan Druidic religion.  


From Benny Peiser's Global Warming Policy Foundation

British Environment Minister: Global Warming May Be Good For The World

The First Alpine Glaciers Are Growing Again

Owen Paterson, Britain’s secretary of state for environment, food and rural affairs, says effects of global warming could be beneficial. The cabinet minister responsible for fighting the effects of climate change claimed there would be advantages to an increase in temperature predicted by the United Nations including fewer people dying of cold in winter and the growth of certain crops further north. Paterson has long been suspected of being a climate change sceptic. He has previously called for a reduction in the subsidies given to wind farms and other green energy initiatives. Rajeev Syal, The Guardian, 30 September 2013

People get very emotional about this subject and I think we should just accept that the climate has been changing for centuries. I think the relief of this latest IPCC report is that it shows a really quite modest increase, half of which has already happened. They are talking one to two and a half degrees. Remember that for humans, the biggest cause of death is cold in winter, far bigger than heat in summer. It would also lead to longer growing seasons and you could extend growing a little further north into some of the colder areas. –UK Environment Minister Owen Patterson,
The Guardian, 30 September 2013
For the Swiss Alps 2013 was a good summer. Not since ten years ago have the glaciers lost as little mass as this year. And some seem to be gaining a little weight. The latest research shows: Glaciers can still grow back. “We have been doubting whether this is even possible at all. Now we know: It is possible,” says the glaciologist Andreas Bauder. --Fabienne Riklin, Schweiz am Sonntag, 29 September 2013
THE global warming doomsday cult is coming to an end. Belief that the world is doomed, unless we replace coal and gas by renewables costing two or three times as much, is already driving up home energy bills and making manufacturing uncompetitive. But last week both Ed Miliband and a report from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) signalled - by what they deliberately didn't say - that global warming alarmism is no longer politically or scientifically sustainable. --Peter Lilley, City A.M. 30 September 2013

The real story of the IPCC’s summary for policy makers is not the upgrading of scientific confidence from 90% to 95% – whatever that really means – but the attempt at burying the ‘pause.’ It won’t matter in the long run because the IPCC hierarchy, just like many climate scientists, know that if the ‘pause’ continues for a few more years then everything will change. Despite what the IPCC said at the end of a week-long process to distil the science and communicate it simply, the ‘pause’ is still the biggest problem in climate science. Overall, for a press conference about the science of climate change, those scientists answering the questions behaved like politicians, and slippery ones at that. -- David Whitehouse,
The Global Warming Policy Foundation, 27 September 2013

Climate scientists at the Met Office Hadley Centre will unveil the first decadal climate prediction model in a paper published on 10 August 2007 in the journal Science. The paper includes the Met Office's prediction for annual global temperature to 2014. Over the 10-year period as a whole, climate continues to warm and 2014 is likely to be 0.3 °C warmer than 2004. At least half of the years after 2009 are predicted to exceed the warmest year currently on record. --
Met Office, 10 August 2007

Vahrenholt and Lüning reserve their major criticisms for the debasement of the science. The West can clearly cite the scientific method as among its most obvious triumphs. Yet this painstakingly-won advantage is now being sacrificed, they contend, in the interests of activists, egos, political necessity and headlines. In short, the science has been corrupted in the interests of political expediency. We can take some comfort from this. Truth has a way of winning, however painfully. Patently, Vahrenholt and Lüning have laid out what at the very minimum must be a serious case for calling into question the IPPC orthodoxy. -- Thomas Cussans,
Bishop Hill, 30 September 2013

Julia Gillard reveals her 'murderous rage' at sexist attacks

By , 30 Sep 2013
In her first public outing in Australia since she was deposed as prime minister in June, Ms Gillard appeared upbeat and buoyed by a strong show of support in a packed hall at the Sydney Opera House.  During a candid question and answer session, Ms Gillard, 52, was asked by an eleven-year-old girl how she coped with “all that horrible sexism”.   The former Labor prime minister said one of her strongest motivations when she left office was not to give her most strident critics the pleasure of seeing her publicly cry.
“In moments of some stress and pressure… I certainly did say to myself that I would not give those people the satisfaction of seeing me shed a tear,” she said. “[It was] some iteration of ‘don’t let them get you down’”......To Read More.....
My Take –  I think it’s pretty clear that she’s no Maggie Thatcher. Another leftist pity party. 

China threatens closure of mobile news apps amid Internet crackdown

BEIJING (Reuters)

China on Monday launched a crackdown on several mobile news applications that provide news information services without approval from government regulators, threatening to shut down those who refuse to "rectify".  The ruling follows a government campaign to curb "online rumours", as the government tries to rein in social media.
The State Internet Information Office said that some of the news applications carried "pornography and obscene information and harm the physical and mental health of youngsters", and others published false information.  Some mobile news applications also provide a channel for subscribers in China to read articles published by foreign media outlets whose articles have been blocked in China, such as the New York Times.....To Read More....
My TakeWell, it would appear that even a leftist government thinks the New York Times prints claptrap.   However, since the NYT is about as far left as a newspaper can be without being an outright communist organ, is there any newspaper in the world that would satisfy the Chinese government?  My Chinese readers have surged to the top four this week and the top two in the last 24 hours.  I’m inclined to think that readership is going to be cut off.