Search This Blog

De Omnibus Dubitandum - Lux Veritas

Showing posts with label Rational Db8. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Rational Db8. Show all posts

Monday, July 18, 2022

The Brilliance of Democrats

By Rational Db8

It is really incredible that the Dems manage to find the caliber of candidate for President that they do, time and again. I mean there have been: 

  1. Creepy gropin' crazy Uncle Quid Pro Quo Slow Alzheimer Joe 'I love it when kids rub my wet leg hairs down, jump on my lap, and watch it rise again' Biden, sometimes affectionately known as "Racist Plagiarism Plugs".
  2. Mini Mike "Big Gulp, Lemme Frisk You - and I'm great at plagiarizing policies too!" 
  3. Bloomy, Hillary "the FBI certified me as too stupid and corrupt to handle national security documents, I want to be president! Oh, and never mind those thousands of slam dunk felonies to my name".
  4. Clinton, aka Quid Pro Dough Felonia Von Pantsuit William "Slick Willy Teflon Cigar" Clinton.
  5. Barack "I'm god, will fundamentally change America into a socialist cesspool AND stop the rise of the seas" O'bow'ma.
  6. Al "I'm such a great con man I can suck hundreds of millions off you rubes by pretending AGW is real even tho I'm scientifically illiterate" Goricle (Goricle = Gore + Icicle since anywhere he goes it turns unseasonably cold).
  7. Ketchup John Swiftboat "I love conspiring with the enemy" Kerry, sometimes affectionately known as "Lurch," 'who, by the way, served in Vietnam.' 
  8. Bernie "I'm an ancient curmudgeon with no accomplishments to my name other than getting elected, an unconstitutional socialist, and racist anti-semite from top to bottom!" Sanders.
  9. Fauxcahontas, aka Liarwatha Running Joke Saint 
  10. Boo-Boo Baby Buttigieg - 'I couldn't even run a small town, let me run the entire nation!' 
  11. Amy "Bobblehead" Klobachar.
  12. Beto "I'm a fake Hispanic, LUV dressing up as a sheep and singing in the worst band ever, all when I'm not doing vehicular hit and runs" O'Rourke.
  13. Cory "Spartacus" Booker.
  14. Senator Kamala "I sleep my way to the top!" Harris.
  15. Screamin' Howard "YAAAAAAAAaaaaaa!!!" Dean.
  16.  Jimmah "I'm a peanut fahmah - NOT a nuclur expert, contrary to reports" Cahtah.
  17. Michael "Zorba the Clerk, look at me - I can ride a tank! " Dukakis. 
  18. The Breck Girl, John "I feel pretty - gotta have my $1,250 haircut!" Edwards, so I look good while banging my mistress on the plane as my wife is dying.
  19. Heck, they even had Al "race baiter extraordinaire who actually got people killed, a $4.5 million tax cheat" Sharpton as a presidential candidate one year. 
  20.  And let's not forget his good buddy, fellow race baiter Jesse "I hate [I'd quote what he said about NY City Jews, but the automatic filters stop the post then!]!" Jaaak-suun, etc., etc., etc. 
  21. Next thing you know, they'll be running Alexandria "commie barbie - my IQ test was negative!" Ocasio-Cortez for president, regardless of the fact that she's proven to be entirely Factose Intolerant! 
  22. That, or good ol' Mad Max "Impeach fortified" Waters. 
  23.  Hank "islands tip over and sink if overpopulated" Johnson. 

It's mind boggling that out of 340+ million people, these are the BEST the Dems can come up with - and they actually seem to think they're competent - and they're willing to actually vote for them rather than laughing them off the stage on day one!

Thursday, January 27, 2022

January 6 Fraud: Even When RINO's Are Right, They're Still Wrong

By Guest Columnist, Rational Db8 

 
Prosecutors are needlessly risking acquittal by filing inappropriate charges.   Two elements are indispensable to the crime of seditious conspiracy. First, there must be an agreement to use force, as opposed to protesting peacefully — even if rambunctiously. Second is the concept of levying war against the United States or opposing the lawful authority of the United States. Now that the Justice Department has been goaded into charging members of the Oath Keepers with seditious conspiracy for their participation in the Capitol riot, prosecutors may find that these elements pose insuperable challenges to their case. The indictment filed Thursday necessitates revisiting this subject. It does not, however, change what I’ve already said about it, back in June: The actions of then-president Donald Trump before and during the riot undermine seditious-conspiracy charges.
 
McCarthy does a very good job of explaining why the seditious conspiracy charges are totally bogus.  The DOJ & prosecutors trying to claim that people who strongly believed they were protecting the Constitution, the nation, our government, and the legal outcome of an election are guilty of 'seditious conspiracy' is... well, there aren't words to express how insane and absurd this is. It's patently politically biased persecution & prosecution.  Hard core banana republic police state stuff.

Where McCarthy is badly flawed, however, is his arrogant insistence that the protestors were all just brainwashed by a nefarious Trump and that there was no justification for believing that the election was rigged and badly flawed.  Multiple court cases have found that quite a few important election laws were violated by either the state(s), state governors, election officials, etc., etc.  Time Mag. even did an article on the election conspiracy of the left.Hundreds of millions of dollars were flooded into the swing state election system virtually all to benefit the left/Democrats - also illegal and unconstitutional in a number of ways.

In some of these deep blue major metro swing state areas, private money actually ran the election offices and polling places and made up far more money than government money for those things.   Forensic audit findings in some of these states have turned up huge problems involving more votes than Biden "won" those states by (the illegal election law/practices changes also involved more ballots than Biden supposedly won those states by).  And so on. 
For McCarthy to sit there still pretending that there's no basis for people to believe there were very serious problems with the election is counter to the known facts.  For him to assert that people only have a problem with this because "Trump said" is patently absurd.  It's all the more absurd when you look at polls which find that well over half the nation believes there were massive problems in this election - and that includes even 30% or more of Democrats!!  Blaming this on Trump is utterly ludicrous.

Regardless, it's well worth reading the article for the legal aspects involved in the charges - just ignore the absurd anti-Trump stuff.

Wednesday, September 29, 2021

The Modern Liberal-Democrat-Progressive-Socialist Orwellian Dictionary

Liberal dictionary rule of thumb: If a term doesn't suit the leftist purpose, focus group test to find the most favorable terms of the times and rename the reviled thing, and that will fix the entire problem for awhile.  

The new name will likely be diametrically opposed in literal meaning to the thing you are applying it to - just ignore that fact and keep applying the new name over and over and over - this is the key to success!

By Rational Db8 

  • Fake, but accurate.  Remember - if it feels true (to a liberal), it is true - even when the examples used are proven totally false!  #HandsUpDon'tShoot #FakeNews #MattressGirl #RapeCulture #MeToo
  • Free speech = only speech that the liberal agrees with - anything else is clearly "hate speech" and must be suppressed and stomped out by any and all means necessary.
  • Right wing = Racists. Make that EEEEEEeee-vil Racists.
  • Left wing = bleeding hearted tolerant compassionate wonderful rational scientific caring loving people who just want the best for everyone and their CHILLLLLLLLLdren.
  • My opinion isn't opinion, it's fact even if I can't begin to prove it.  Your opinion, however, is clearly fantasy based hateful wishes with no basis in reality.
  • It's for the chilllldreeennnnn = Pull your heartstrings and make you look evil while we kick the can down the road for someone else to deal with after I am gone.
  • 'Lawfully'Doesn't = 'Legally' the Obama Administration tells the  Supreme Court
  • Affordable Health Care Act = Nobody can afford it but the most wealthy who don't need it, but hey, the name helps us sell it to you rubes, and the special interests get rich off the program so they're happy, and we get to claim we did something for the PEEEEE-pul again!!
  • Fox News = EEEEEE-vil incarnate propaganda machine.
  • Liberal Mainstream Media = fountain of truth and reality.  Even more so for sites like Truth Out, Mother Jones, The Daily Beast, and Huffington Post - they are the keys to wisdom!
  • Utterly anemic job growth that cannot even keep up with population growth = historic 75 months of job growth.
  • Stereotypes = if conservatives use them, they are hate speech and EEEEEeeeee-vil.  Liberals never use stereotypes, only accurate descriptive generalizations. 
  • Irony (definition): the idea that a man is a woman because he says so, but a Republican isn't allowed to use a nickname or he must be hiding something and untrustworthy.
  • Liberal apology = “I'm sorry that this has been confusing to people and has raised a lot of questions, but there are answers to all these questions.” (end of apology)
  • Liberal politician:  "I take responsibility" = I have no intention of accepting any blame or consequences for these actions, but since I said the magic words, you have to quit pestering me about it and feel sympathy for me instead.
  • Having one nuclear bomb, doesn't equal having a nuclear bomb (h/t John Kerry)
  • Troll = anyone who disagrees with me, even when I held the opposite position mere minutes ago.
  • Swiftboating = when Conservatives tell the truth about liberals who lie about their military service, or any other liberal/progressive/socialist/Democrat who lies about an issue.
  • "The Science is Settled" or "It's not debatable," etc., = anything they WISH were true but haven't the facts to support.
  • Obstructionist = When Republicans-Conservatives refuse to yield completely, without the possibility of compromise, to Democrat desires.
  • Bipartisanship = When Republicans cease being obstructionist and agree completely to the Democrat-Progressive-Liberal desires.
  • Tolerance = Even when you disagree with us, we still let you live, don't we?  Too bad it's only in the back of the bus, suck it up and thank us profusely or we may change our minds. (h/t Barack Obama, who kindly informed us this was the case.) 
  • "Of the people, for the people, by the people":  clearly means "We the few, will tell the rest of you, exactly what to do."  AND we don't have to do what we insist YOU do. 
  • Hacking cyber theft = "data exfiltration."
  • An own goal or major entirely preventable error that gets people killed = 'The Fog of War.'
  • Income you earn and the government allows you to keep = tax expenditures
  • It's rude to refer to transgendered people getting sex reassignment surgery - such procedures should be called gender confirmation.,
  • Budget Cut = A definite budget increase, but slightly lower than had been planned.
  • Lies = Fabrications and Inconsistencies.  Sometimes they're even "fake but accurate!"  Or now "fake but morally right!" (a la Ocasio-Cortez)
  • "Doing something" = 
    • 1)  Give a Speech;  
    • 2) Tweet a picture of a woman with a sad face holding up a hash tag.  (h/t Michelle Obama)
  • Liberal Opinion = Definition of meaning or fact.
  • "Owner" = out, now you're a "governor."  You can no longer "own" a sport's team, as that means slavery... So never mind if you buy the team and have nothing to do with managing it, now you're presto chango a "governor."  Who cares that the new term in no way reflects reality!!
  • Illegal aliens = new lifelong Democrat voters.
    • b) non-citizen (per recent change at Library of Congress)
    • c) People who are not, shall we say, fully documented, of U.S. citizens (h/t Pelosi).
  • Undocumented minors = Illegal alien young men with gang affiliations and criminal records.
  • Felon or Convict =  “person who committed a crime” and “individual who was incarcerated” (per Justice Department) because somehow magically the definition of the word is less offensive than the word.
  • Criminal = Justice Involved Individual.  Previously known as a "legally-challenged Individual," but that was too prejudicial.  Perhaps the term should be: "undocumented moral authority."
  • Honor a heroic or national figure like Neil Armstrong, Rosa Parks, etc. = present a picture of Obama.
  • Celebrate Easter = publish a photo of the Obama family.
  • History = 
    • 1) whatever we decide at the time to say it was 
    • 2) whatever spin benefits us politically.
  • Liberal think tanks are intelligent and factual.  Conservative think tanks are an oxymoron, and a propaganda arm of the Right Wing charged with fabrication, invention, and deflection.
  • Free speech = hate speech U. California students remove offensive American flag from 'inclusive' space
  • American flag = offensive hate speech
  • Inclusive or Non-offensive = anything that agrees with liberal/progressive/Democrat/socialist opinions.
  • War = "Overseas Contingency Operation."
  • Democrats are never involved in wars, only Overseas Contingency Operations.
  • Terrorist attack on U.S. soil = "work place violence."
  • Terrorist = "Unlawful Enemy Combatant."  Oops, strike that, it's out.  Now they are “Unprivileged Enemy Belligerents."
  • ISIL Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant) = not Islamic.
  • Foreign invasion of sovereign nation = 'Um . . . uh . . . to act, uh . . . to cross the border in an unauthorized way."  

In fact, it couldn't be clearer:  Kinetic military action in response to man-caused disasters is going to produce unprivileged enemy who may cross the border in an unauthorized way to participate in non-Islamic workplace violence immediately preceded by the rallying yell "Allahu Akbar!"  Doublespeak at it's best, Orwell is rolling in his grave.

Hum.... I guess a bank robbery will now be considered to simply be an 'unauthorized loan' or 'undocumented withdrawal,' and Underprivileged Enemy Belligerents will be soon be known as 'Misunderstood Future Friends,' right? 

San Francisco is right with the woke action now.  They no longer have "convicted felons." Nope, now they're "justice-involved persons."

Then there is the example of these courageous undocumented shoppers rescuing shoes from Hurricane Irma!  Oddly enough, not one pair of work boots was rescued - no apology for such obvious discrimination was forthcoming.  CNN is reporting that many soles were lost. 

Concerned citizens promptly started a new hashtag:  #NikeLivesMatter

Friday, May 7, 2021

Homelessness and Government

By Rational Db8

On April 21, 2021 Christopher F. Rufo posted this piece, The Shaky Foundations of L.A.’s Housing ‘Entitlement’ for the Homeless, exposing a number of truths.  First, the road to hell is paved with good intentions, and most importantly, federal government programs are a rabbit hole of over runs, corruption and failure.  

That's the problem with so many large government programs. That's true regardless of which side puts forth the program, although it is far far more the case with those pushed by the left. The last programs are almost always far worse this way because  they  refuse  to look at possible unintended or even virtually guaranteed unintended consequences. They're more concerned with emotions, messaging, and convincing voters to accept their schemes, with the usual raise in taxes, than actually coming up with good functioning successful programs. 

It's one of the key reasons why socialism and centralized planning just does not work and utterly destroys nations. That and the fact that socialism and centralized planning totally ignores key facets of human nature and thus incentivizes and disincentivizes all the wrong things, all while trumpeting that such policies will result in utopian Pie in the Sky outcomes. Only then they never bothered to even go back and evaluate the outcomes, let alone adjust things accordingly.

Just look at the way welfare has utterly destroyed black culture, with over 70% of black children now born into single-parent homes thanks almost entirely to the way welfare is set up.  We are reaping the rewards of dismal educational outcomes, far worse crime, larger wealth gaps, etc etc etc. The inevitable results were very well prophesied by Senator Moynihan (D) in the Moynihan report, along with others at the time when the welfare bills were first being considered in Congress.

And of course, once a government program is established it's almost impossible to get rid of, especially large ones.

The ethanol subsidy is another example of a dismally failed expensive program that we've been stuck with ever since.

No Child Left Behind is another example. Decades after it was promulgated, they finally went back and evaluated the results only to find out that by 4th grade there were virtually no improvements for kids in No Child Left Behind versus no program. And yet billions and billions have been spent on it. And, of course, even though they discovered long ago that it was essentially worthless, it's still going strong.

And all too often as with the "guaranteed right to Housing" insanity, there was never a solid foundation for such a program to begin with.

Such things so often sound as if they ought to work, and sound extremely good and humane, unfortunately, far too often the road to hell is paved with good intentions. Good intentions just is not remotely enough for success at anything.  Let alone just wanting to sound good without ever bothering to do basic due diligence looking at the evidence that is available and considering possible unintended consequences. All of which is drastically compounded when such programs are implemented on a widespread basis rather than having small trial programs first, and then, after a suitable time period that is long enough to have meaning, thoroughly evaluating the results before even considering expanding the program.

Even then, once something is implemented there has to be reasonably time periodic evaluations of weather the program is actually meeting its intended goals or not. Adjustments have to be able to be made when problems are found, and the program has to be able to be scrapped if it isn't effective.

But eliminating programs run by the government is almost impossible because politicians are loathe to reduce funding to anything because of the inevitable loss of jobs and therefore loss of votes from any and all of those who are directly involved in it. 
 
No matter how failed or harmful the blasted program turns out to be.

Wednesday, February 10, 2021

Impeachment II: Vicious Leftist Corruption and Insanity

Rational Db8,  February 9, 2021

I've been watching or listening to much of the first day of the Senate impeachment trial of Donald Trump. This first day was, as I understand it, supposed to be about whether the Senate actually has jurisdiction to try a former president, or if doing so would be unconstitutional. The day began with an allotted two hours for the Democrat impeachment managers to lay out their argument, followed by the same for Trump's lawyers.

I have to say that the Democrat impeachment manager's approach was disgraceful, and downright dishonest time and again. It was mainly one massive appeal to emotion (a logical fallacy, that is, an argument tactic that is false from the get-go but hopes to win simply because it tugs on one's heart strings to elicit empathy/sympathy). 

They began with a 20 minute video compilation of the protests and riot at the Capitol on the 6th, which of course was horrifying to everyone - both on the right and the left - but has nothing to do with either the question of Senate jurisdiction for this trial or even anything to do with whether Trump was in any way responsible for creating it. 

The entire presentation after that was heavily dramatized, one emotional breathless statement after another - all just as irrelevant to the issue of jurisdiction and for the most part even to the issue of whether Trump had anything to do with "inciting insurrection."

Raskin, the lead Impeachment Manager, even worked himself up to the point of a quavery voice, seeming to hold back tears (more than once! And I'll bet anything it was entirely fake), using the idiocracy of "gee, I even told my family that going with me that day would be safe, but we wound up fearing for our lives, and 'gasp' (chokes back crocodile tears again) my daughter wound up saying she never wanted to go back to the Capitol again!  Oh, the horrors!!

Raskin even had the unmitigated gall to use his son's own suicide (entirely unrelated to this issue!) in his appeal to emotion. It's disgusting. Even if what he was saying was true and heartfelt (highly doubtful), it's got nothing to do with whether the Senate has jurisdiction to impeach a former president, or even with whether Trump was in any way responsible for the rioting. It's just attempted guilt by association - "this horrible thing happened, we must have someone, anyone, to blame, let's blame the guy we hate, Trump!"

Beyond that, they blatantly lied multiple times, lying both directly and by omission, did a ton of psychological projection, twisted people's words and took them grossly out of context, etc. all so they could then build factual sounding but grossly false conclusions out of their construct. They even cited Jonathon Turley (leftist/liberal constitutional scholar) multiple times, claiming that he supposedly very recently believed it was constitutional to impeach after someone is out of office, and only changed his tune in the last few weeks. They even displayed some of Turley's writings with highlighted portions. All while failing to tell people that those excerpts were from two or three decades ago, and that in the interim with more experience and research, Turley decided that in fact trying a former official is clearly not constitutional at all - and that he has shown why quite clearly multiple times.

Oh, and ironically, the Democrat impeachment managers even b*tched that Trump is saying he shouldn't be referred to as President, and that he must be referred to as President Trump... only to turn right around and claim that there's no problem with Chief Justice Roberts of the Supreme Court not presiding over the trial, because, gee, the Constitution says that the Supreme Court Chief Justice only presides over presidents - and that there's only one president at a time, and that's Biden. So, magically, according to the Democrats, Trump is actually 'Schrodinger Trump' - both President and not-President at the same time.

It would all be pathetically laughable, if this weren't so serious. This is nothing more than the highest level of our elected government, Congress - well, those on the left in Congress - in a nakedly partisan power grab and transparent attempt to falsely manipulate the system, abuse their power, and thus eliminate their biggest political opponent in 2024 - who they've tried time and again to perpetrate a soft coup on since literally before he even took office in 2020!!!

All at the expense of their actual duties; dealing with the pandemic, unemployment, the massive federal debt, and so on. You know, actually governing the nation. But hey, it's a great distraction to help avoid people noticing that Biden has no pandemic plan and it's Trump's work that got us the vaccines in record time - including distribution - that Biden is already flooding the nation with illegal aliens most of whom aren't even tested for coronavirus before being released into the nation, that he's already killing thousands of jobs, kow-towing to China, Iran and so on while ticking off our allies like Israel and Canada, driving energy prices higher, and all sorts of other actions which are clearly harmful to our nation.

Monday, August 17, 2020

The Brilliance of Gibbering Joe Biden

Thursday, March 5, 2020

2020 Democrat Presidential Picks of the Crop!

By Rational Db8

You know, there for a while it seemed like even in debates Biden was having massive problems even staying awake... went missing from the campaign trail for awhile, around the time Trump pronounced him "Slo Joe" or "Sleepy Joe"... which really seemed to get his goat.  Then in either the Nevada debate or the one right before it, suddenly he had all sorts of energy and his temper has been notably flaring badly too.... and he can't think straight.

He's always been a little prone to gaffes (more like blatant lies "I'm a guy next door like you, see, I just ate at the restaurant in your neighborhood the other day - never mind that it's been closed for 20 years!"....) But here recently his verbal goofs have been WAY more extreme and common than they used to be - he can't seem to keep anything straight, including what office he's running for, what office others are running for, where his wife and sister are (or which is which), what state he's in, who's interviewing him, and on and on and on....

There's something really wrong with him. And I have to seriously wonder if they put him on meds to give him an energy boost and that's contributing to it, or if he's just seriously progressing into dementia of one form or another.

And this is the Democrat's candidate for President. Talk about horrifying.

It is really incredible that the Dems manage to find this caliber candidate for President time and again, tho! I mean there've been:
  • Mini Mike "Big Gulp, Lemme Frisk You - and I'm great at plagiarizing policies" Bloomy,
  • Creepy gropin' Uncle Quid Pro Quo Slow Joe 'I love it when kids jump on my lap, rub my wet leg hairs down, and watch it rise again' Biden
  • Hillary "Felonia Von Pantsuit - the FBI certified me as too stupid and corrupt to handle national security documents, but I want to be president! Oh, and never mind those thousands of slam dunk felonies to my name" Clinton,
  • William "Slick Willy Cigar Teflon" Clinton
  • Barack "I'm god and will fundamentally change America into a socialist cesspool AND stop the rise of the seas" Obama,
  • Al "I'm such a great con man I can suck hundreds of millions off you rubes by pretending AGW is real even tho I'm scientifically illiterate" Gore,
  • Ketchup John "Swiftboat I love conspiring with the enemy" Kerry, sometimes affectionarly known as "Lurch,"
  • Bernie "I'm an ancient curmudgeon with no accomplishments to my name other than getting elected, unconstitutional socialist, racist from top to bottom!" Sanders,
  • Fauxcahontas,
  • Saint Boo-Boo Baby Buttigieg
  • Amy "Bobblehead" Klobuchar
  • Beto "I'm a fake Hispanic who loved to dress up as a sheep and sing in the worst band ever, when I'm not doing vehicular hit and runs" O'Rourke,
  • Cory "Spartacus" Booker, etc., etc., etc.
  • And there was Kamala "Sleeping to the Top" Harris
It's mind boggling that out of 340+ million people, these are the BEST the Dems can come up with - and they're willing to actually vote for them!

Thursday, January 10, 2019

Cliff notes on the Mainstream Media: Trump hates people, and he's a racist!

By Rational Db8

When he makes clear statements of empathy, it can't possibly be real and is clearly fake because Trump hates people - he's proven that by not giving in to what we want. He's a racist because it so happens that the border where we have the biggest illegal immigration problem is with Mexico, so the majority of illegals are Hispanic, and that makes him racist because he's not willing to let them continue flooding our borders and sucking down our citizen's resources.

Worse, he's sowing fear by stating actual facts. His facts aren't facts because we don't like them, and they don't fit our opinions.

Trump's stupid. And racist.

He never compromises, refuses to be bipartisan. We'll portray his offers of compromise out of context as him simply being inconsistent, the hallmark of a bad person, being all inconsistent like that! He refuses to offer the "compromise" WE want, even when he's actually done exactly that before and we turned him down. He refuses to offer the other "compromise" WE want, never mind that doing so would directly go against his promises to the electorate which voted for him and put him in office. Never mind that we've refused compromise offer after compromise offer from him.

And did we tell you he's racist?

Trump isn't presidential, but Democrat congressmen who use vastly more vile language are justified, because Trump's not presidential - obviously not since he doesn't give condescending lectures for hours using five syllable words like Obama did (especially when filibustering questions he didn't want to answer).

Besides, Trump's a racist hater and fearmongerer, therefore anything vile said about him, no matter how vile and vulgar, is well warranted. But Trump's not presidential because he sometimes rambles and says things which might sound like "bigly" even when it's really "big league" if you listen closely, so we'll ridicule him as if he said something he didn't say anyhow. So it's fine, GOOD even, to call him a "motherf..ker."

And he hates women too! After all, didn't you hear all the factual things he said about Hillary, Pelosi, and Warren which puts Dems in a bad light?

Clearly, he hates women! And he's racist.

Trump's so unfeeling he wastes valuable precious prime time air giving his first oval office speech after two years in office, thus hurting all the networks, and it's even worse because he did so with a very brief speech rather than a huge long one. What's more, in that speech, which we knew never should have occurred even before he gave it, Trump failed to explain what he clearly just explained in that speech... and the speech should have been MUCH longer, it was far too short. He didn't say it like we think he should have said it, therefore he's a bad man.

Trump lies. We'll tell you that even when we've no facts to prove what we're saying is a lie really is, and there's plenty to show that it's not. We'll cherry pick our data - AND paraphrase his words - to show he's lying, never mind that his literal words and the actual data show that he's quite right or at most very slightly rounding up/exaggerating. Never mind the point he's making is correct - can't have that!

Besides, he's stupid and doesn't do what we want, when we want it. He's a racist woman hater who had the unmitigated gall to actually win the last election over a woman - see, misogynist! - and besides, it's all HIS fault, WHAAAAAAA!!!!!

Oh, by the way, did we tell you he's an unpresidential misogynist racist?

Lather, rinse, repeat.