How Dianne Feinstein saved the day for the Republican Party.
Although Feinstein likely did not betray Dr. Christine Blasey Ford’s request for anonymity herself, her feckless and reckless handling of Ford’s 36-year-old sexual assault accusation against D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals Judge and Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh led to a spectacle so outrageous, so beneath the dignity even of an already ignominious Senate Democratic Caucus, that Republicans and non-leftist unaffiliated voters across the nation have come together to oppose the injustice meted out by Feinstein, Spartacus, Kamala Harris, and others against a good man and his family...........To Read More....
Showing posts with label Feinstein. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Feinstein. Show all posts
Saturday, October 6, 2018
Wednesday, September 19, 2018
Dianne Feinstein’s Metzenbaum Moment
Why the embattled senator really initiated the Kavanaugh smear campaign
September 17, 2018 Lloyd Billingsley
Last week California Senator Dianne Feinstein kept confidential the individual who claimed to have been sexually assaulted by Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh more than 30 years ago. On Sunday, the accuser came out of the closet in classic style.
Christine Blasey Ford, a professor of psychology at Palo Alto University in California, is an activist Democrat, who in June signed a letter denouncing President Trump’s border policy. The ACLU used the letter in a lawsuit against the Trump administration. Ford told the Washington Post she had been attacked by four individuals from an unnamed “elitist boys school.” The four attackers were all now “highly respected and high-ranking members of society in Washington.”
The attack occurred at a private residence but Ford did not recall who owned the house or how she got there. On the other hand, she did recall that Brett Kavanaugh and his friend Mark Judge were “stumbling drunk” when Kavanaugh tried to remove her clothes and put his hand over her mouth.
“I thought he might inadvertently kill me,” Ford told the Post. “He was trying to attack me and remove my clothing.” The attack left her with “anguish and terror about retaliation,” and “derailed me substantially for four or five years.” And so on, like the bogus University of Virginia rape story in Rolling Stone. For some observers the smear job on Kavanaugh may recall the 1991 hearings for Clarence Thomas.............To Read More....
Last week California Senator Dianne Feinstein kept confidential the individual who claimed to have been sexually assaulted by Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh more than 30 years ago. On Sunday, the accuser came out of the closet in classic style.
Christine Blasey Ford, a professor of psychology at Palo Alto University in California, is an activist Democrat, who in June signed a letter denouncing President Trump’s border policy. The ACLU used the letter in a lawsuit against the Trump administration. Ford told the Washington Post she had been attacked by four individuals from an unnamed “elitist boys school.” The four attackers were all now “highly respected and high-ranking members of society in Washington.”
The attack occurred at a private residence but Ford did not recall who owned the house or how she got there. On the other hand, she did recall that Brett Kavanaugh and his friend Mark Judge were “stumbling drunk” when Kavanaugh tried to remove her clothes and put his hand over her mouth.
“I thought he might inadvertently kill me,” Ford told the Post. “He was trying to attack me and remove my clothing.” The attack left her with “anguish and terror about retaliation,” and “derailed me substantially for four or five years.” And so on, like the bogus University of Virginia rape story in Rolling Stone. For some observers the smear job on Kavanaugh may recall the 1991 hearings for Clarence Thomas.............To Read More....
Senate Judiciary Chair Grassley: Dianne Feinstein’s office refuses to cooperate on Kavanaugh accuser procedure
Chris Pandolfo
· September 17, 2018
Here’s yet more proof that the
Democrats are playing dirty with Kavanaugh. Senate Republicans want to follow up
with Kavanaugh’s accuser, Christine Blasey Ford, in the regular order of the
Senate confirmation process. What’s supposed to happen is that an update to a
nominee’s background will be discussed in private phone calls between each
party and the committee. If necessary, additional testimony may be required,
but the phone calls should come before the committee reaches that point.
But a statement from Senate
Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, says that Sen. Dianne
Feinstein’s office is refusing to cooperate in the follow-up on Ford’s
accusations. Here’s the statement:............It’s unethical. It’s disgusting. It’s the Democratic Party.
Tuesday, September 18, 2018
Before Believing Kavanaugh's Accuser
Allie Stuckey Sep 17, 2018
On Sunday, the Washington Post published the account of Brett Kavanaugh’s previously anonymous accuser. Her name is Christine Blasey Ford, she is a professor in California, and she claims Kavanaugh forced himself on her in high school—more than 30 years ago.
Ford says she contacted Senator Feinstein’s office with her story in July, and she had hoped that her story would be kept secret. Feinstein failed to fulfill Ford’s wishes when she cryptically released a letter last week stating that someone had contacted her about a sexual assault allegation against Kavanaugh. Frustrated by the circulating inaccuracies following the publication of the letter, she reached out to the Post to set her story straight.
The details are disturbing. Ford alleges Kavanaugh held her down against her will, groped her, attempted to take her clothes off, and covered her mouth when she tried to scream. Ford told the Post: “I thought he might inadvertently kill me.” She reportedly told no one about the incident until couple’s therapy with her husband in 2012—a claim her therapist supports..........To Read More....
On Sunday, the Washington Post published the account of Brett Kavanaugh’s previously anonymous accuser. Her name is Christine Blasey Ford, she is a professor in California, and she claims Kavanaugh forced himself on her in high school—more than 30 years ago.
Ford says she contacted Senator Feinstein’s office with her story in July, and she had hoped that her story would be kept secret. Feinstein failed to fulfill Ford’s wishes when she cryptically released a letter last week stating that someone had contacted her about a sexual assault allegation against Kavanaugh. Frustrated by the circulating inaccuracies following the publication of the letter, she reached out to the Post to set her story straight.
The details are disturbing. Ford alleges Kavanaugh held her down against her will, groped her, attempted to take her clothes off, and covered her mouth when she tried to scream. Ford told the Post: “I thought he might inadvertently kill me.” She reportedly told no one about the incident until couple’s therapy with her husband in 2012—a claim her therapist supports..........To Read More....
Is Dianne Feinstein the Most Corrupt Senator in the United States?
By Michael Ledeen September 16, 2018
On top of her McCarthyite smear of Judge Kavanaugh, she's closely tied to both Chinese and Russian operations in the United States. To date, only one fairly obscure member of Congress has asked our intel people in this case, the FBI--to look into the alarming case of a Chinese agent becoming her office manager and personal chauffeur. An excerpt from Rep. Jim Banks' letter to FBI Director Wray:
It has recently come to light that U.S. Senator Dianne Feinstein, the former chair of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, employed a staff member who was using his position to secretly report information to the Ministry of State Security in China. Given the type of information Senator Feinstein had access to and China's position as a top foreign adversary of the United States, this revelation is alarming.
The Chinese agent is apparently working without annoyance in California. Feinstein is running for reelection. I wonder if he is planning to vote for her. Banks asked for an investigation and a briefing. That was last month, and I haven't seen anything since. Have you? Yet the "news" is chock-a-block with thousands of column inches on an unknown event alleged by an unknown woman who claims it happened when she and Judge Kavanaugh were in high school 35-40 years ago.........To Read More....
Saturday, September 15, 2018
The Moral Compass of Dianne Feinstein, et al
By Rich Kozlovich
(Editor's Note: There is an important update (9/16/18 7:00 PM) at the end of the article. RK)
One of the things we're going to be seeing more and more of are politicians in solid blue states being forced to become more radically left than ever before. That includes people like 85 year old Diane Feinstein who's running for her fifth Senate term, who will face Kevin de León, a fellow Democrat in November, who is even farther to the left than Feinstein, and her constituents think she's too moderate. Imagine that!
So now she's in a quandary. Now she has to go left or go home. But Feinstein's newly found moral outrage involving Kavanaugh carries some baggage, and some of its personal baggage.
On September 14th , saying:
Feinstein, insists the person who sent her this "bomb shell" letter "strongly requested confidentiality, declined to come forward or press the matter further." Wow! Now how hard hitting is that?
An anonymous donor, with unknown information about an alleged high school misadventure, and even better yet, it appears "that the senator received the information through a third party." Well, it appears this unknown person's information, which passed through a third party, claims "when Brett Kavanaugh was 17, he and a friend supposedly tried to trap a girl his age in a room at a party in an effort to initiate sexual contact of some kind. But so far as we can tell nothing sexual actually happened."
Wow! !!! Explosive. Nothing happened, there's no proof, no one is identified, and no one can be questioned! Is that nuclear or what? Well that should be enough. It's clear - Kavanaugh is out!!!!
Right?
Well, if anything happened at all, which Kavanaugh adamantly denies, it was high school stuff, and so are Feinstein and and a number of others on that corrupt Democrat cabal sitting on the panel.
Feinstein, like all her leftist breed, have a really difficult time with facts, history, a moral compass that points faithfully North, and a serious problem with consistency!
Tom Trinko posted an article entitled, Dianne Feinstein Prepares a Deathblow for Kavanaugh, which helps us to remember the history of Feinstein's moral compass saying:
But she isn't alone, as Patricia McCarthy notes in her article Dianne Feinstein is a Judas goat:
(Editor's Note: There is an important update (9/16/18 7:00 PM) at the end of the article. RK)
One of the things we're going to be seeing more and more of are politicians in solid blue states being forced to become more radically left than ever before. That includes people like 85 year old Diane Feinstein who's running for her fifth Senate term, who will face Kevin de León, a fellow Democrat in November, who is even farther to the left than Feinstein, and her constituents think she's too moderate. Imagine that!
So now she's in a quandary. Now she has to go left or go home. But Feinstein's newly found moral outrage involving Kavanaugh carries some baggage, and some of its personal baggage.
On September 14th , saying:
"The pathetic attacks on Brett Kavanaugh forever stain the Democrat Party. On Thursday, word circulated that Senate Democrats — and in particular Sen. Dianne Feinstein — sent a “secret letter” to the FBI which contained an undisclosed allegation by an undisclosed person regarding an undisclosed offense supposedly committed by Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh."Apparently information came into the possession of Senator Dianne Feinstein which makes a claim Kavanaugh did a bad thing when he was in high school. Information so terrible she didn't disclose it, but forwarded to the FBI, who pretty much dismissed it by sending the information to the White House.
Feinstein, insists the person who sent her this "bomb shell" letter "strongly requested confidentiality, declined to come forward or press the matter further." Wow! Now how hard hitting is that?
An anonymous donor, with unknown information about an alleged high school misadventure, and even better yet, it appears "that the senator received the information through a third party." Well, it appears this unknown person's information, which passed through a third party, claims "when Brett Kavanaugh was 17, he and a friend supposedly tried to trap a girl his age in a room at a party in an effort to initiate sexual contact of some kind. But so far as we can tell nothing sexual actually happened."
Wow! !!! Explosive. Nothing happened, there's no proof, no one is identified, and no one can be questioned! Is that nuclear or what? Well that should be enough. It's clear - Kavanaugh is out!!!!
Right?
Well, if anything happened at all, which Kavanaugh adamantly denies, it was high school stuff, and so are Feinstein and and a number of others on that corrupt Democrat cabal sitting on the panel.
Feinstein, like all her leftist breed, have a really difficult time with facts, history, a moral compass that points faithfully North, and a serious problem with consistency!
Tom Trinko posted an article entitled, Dianne Feinstein Prepares a Deathblow for Kavanaugh, which helps us to remember the history of Feinstein's moral compass saying:
"I'm so old that I remember when people like Feinstein were telling us that Obama's regular, and criminal, use of drugs in high school was no big deal......I remember when Feinstein told us Clinton's lying under oath in order to avoid losing a #MeToo lawsuit had nothing to do with his fitness to be president.
She did say Clinton's actions were "immoral, deplorable, and indefensible" and merited "strong condemnation and censure." Given that she voted to acquit Clinton, it would seem that Feinstein believes that being guilty of immoral, deplorable, and indefensible things has no bearing on a person's suitability to be president."Here's a Senator who just had "
"One Chinese bagman, Nanping-born John Huang, showed up at Feinstein’s San Francisco home for a fundraising dinner with a Beijing official tied to the People’s Bank of China and the Communist Party Committee. As a foreign national, the official wasn’t legally qualified to make the $50,000-a-plate donation to dine at the banquet........Beijing got its favored trade status extended — thanks in part to Feinstein."......"she shamelessly spun China’s human-rights violations.......led efforts to bring China into the World Trade Organization in 1999........ travels to China each year........"Joining her on those trips is her mega-millionaire investor husband, Richard C. Blum, who has seemingly benefited greatly from the relationship........China was aggressively currying favor with his wife, Blum was able to take large stakes in Chinese state-run steel and food companies, and has brokered over $100 million in deals in China since then — with the help of partners who sit on the boards of Chinese military front companies like COSCO and CITIC. China investments have helped make Feinstein.........one of the richest members in Congress."But Feinstein, who has no moral compass unless it's pointing to the bank, thinks an anonymous third party letter making unsubstantiated claims about an alleged high school incident disqualifies a man who has led an exemplary existence from being seated on the Supreme Court.
But she isn't alone, as Patricia McCarthy notes in her article Dianne Feinstein is a Judas goat:
Tuesday, August 14, 2018
Where Do We Get Such Losers?
August 13, 2018 By Colin Flaherty
When delivered by Ronald Reagan, the question “Where do we get such men?” used to be the ultimate contemplation about the people who make this country great. Not anymore.
Today, when we look at the delusion and deceit surrounding at least five Democrat members of the U.S. Senate, the question now becomes “Is this the best we have?” Let’s look at a few.
When Cory Booker moved to Newark, New Jersey, he had it all: multiple degrees from Stanford, a Rhodes scholarship, a winning smile and a willingness to lie his keister off about a central feature of his earlier campaigns.
He also had an imaginary friend, T-Bone -- a drug-dealing, streetwise guardian angel of Cory Booker -- as he tried to convince the people of Newark he was not just a little rich kid, he was one of them, bursting with street cred.
Booker trotted out the T-Bone stories at every early campaign stop in his races for mayor: T-Bone told him this, T-Bone told him that. And of course, as brilliant as T-Bone was, he was still on many occasions the recipient of Cory Booker’s sage counsel.
But T-Bone was never there. The Star Ledger and National Review broke this story of delusion almost at the same time. An excerpt from Booker’s home town paper.............Read more
When delivered by Ronald Reagan, the question “Where do we get such men?” used to be the ultimate contemplation about the people who make this country great. Not anymore.
Today, when we look at the delusion and deceit surrounding at least five Democrat members of the U.S. Senate, the question now becomes “Is this the best we have?” Let’s look at a few.
When Cory Booker moved to Newark, New Jersey, he had it all: multiple degrees from Stanford, a Rhodes scholarship, a winning smile and a willingness to lie his keister off about a central feature of his earlier campaigns.
He also had an imaginary friend, T-Bone -- a drug-dealing, streetwise guardian angel of Cory Booker -- as he tried to convince the people of Newark he was not just a little rich kid, he was one of them, bursting with street cred.
Booker trotted out the T-Bone stories at every early campaign stop in his races for mayor: T-Bone told him this, T-Bone told him that. And of course, as brilliant as T-Bone was, he was still on many occasions the recipient of Cory Booker’s sage counsel.
But T-Bone was never there. The Star Ledger and National Review broke this story of delusion almost at the same time. An excerpt from Booker’s home town paper.............Read more
Sunday, February 25, 2018
California Democratic Party declines to endorse Dianne Feinstein in re-election bid
By Casey Tolan | ctolan@bayareanewsgroup.com February 25, 2018
The California Democratic Party declined to make an endorsement in this year’s U.S. Senate race early Sunday morning, snubbing Sen. Dianne Feinstein in her bid for a fifth full term.
Her main challenger, State Senate leader Kevin de León, won the support of 54 percent of the delegates at the state party convention here this weekend, short of the 60 percent needed to secure the party endorsement. Feinstein received only 37 percent of the votes.
The rebuke of Feinstein by the party delegates comes even though the 25-year incumbent has led polls by wide margins and has received broad support from state party luminaries like Sen. Kamala Harris and House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi.
The results were a sign of discomfort among many liberals who believe Feinstein should do more to challenge President Trump — and of de León’s strong connections to the party’s activist left flank. The endorsement contest was a “test of the establishment’s authority and power,” de León chief of staff Dan Reeves said before the vote...........To Read More.....
My Take - Did you ever wonder why Pre-Alzheimer Pelosi and Mad Maxine say the goofy things they say? Other then I really think they're so loony they actually believe their own idiocy - this is what happens when you come from a far left district. You just can't be far left enough for the far left. Even Pelosi was criticized for not being far left enough in one of her recent runs for Congress. Can you imagine? There's a reason why I call them the Lunatic Left.
More evidence of what I call the 2018 Mid Term Bloodbath. I've been saying the bloodbath for the Republicans will be in the primaries, and for the Democrats in the general election. Well, many of the "moderate" RINO's are dropping out so that may be a self fixing problem, but it appears this primary bloodbath that will be an issue for the Republicans may also be an issue in a sure Democrat district.
The California Democratic Party declined to make an endorsement in this year’s U.S. Senate race early Sunday morning, snubbing Sen. Dianne Feinstein in her bid for a fifth full term.
Her main challenger, State Senate leader Kevin de León, won the support of 54 percent of the delegates at the state party convention here this weekend, short of the 60 percent needed to secure the party endorsement. Feinstein received only 37 percent of the votes.
The rebuke of Feinstein by the party delegates comes even though the 25-year incumbent has led polls by wide margins and has received broad support from state party luminaries like Sen. Kamala Harris and House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi.
The results were a sign of discomfort among many liberals who believe Feinstein should do more to challenge President Trump — and of de León’s strong connections to the party’s activist left flank. The endorsement contest was a “test of the establishment’s authority and power,” de León chief of staff Dan Reeves said before the vote...........To Read More.....
My Take - Did you ever wonder why Pre-Alzheimer Pelosi and Mad Maxine say the goofy things they say? Other then I really think they're so loony they actually believe their own idiocy - this is what happens when you come from a far left district. You just can't be far left enough for the far left. Even Pelosi was criticized for not being far left enough in one of her recent runs for Congress. Can you imagine? There's a reason why I call them the Lunatic Left.
More evidence of what I call the 2018 Mid Term Bloodbath. I've been saying the bloodbath for the Republicans will be in the primaries, and for the Democrats in the general election. Well, many of the "moderate" RINO's are dropping out so that may be a self fixing problem, but it appears this primary bloodbath that will be an issue for the Republicans may also be an issue in a sure Democrat district.
Tuesday, June 13, 2017
Feinstein Calls for Investigation Into Whether Loretta Lynch Provided Cover for Hillary Clinton
Jennifer Van Laar 6/11/2017
When Democrats were calling for James Comey to testify before Congress, a number of Republicans warned them to be careful what they wished for. After all, this is the man they blame (when it's convenient)Â for Hillary Clinton's election loss.
Comey's comments about Loretta Lynch and the Hillary Clinton "matter" have raised a few eyebrows on Capitol Hill, including those of Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA). Feinstein was unnerved by Comey's characterization of Lynch's conduct and is now calling for an investigation into whether there was an obstruction of justice...........
Watch the interaction:............
Here is the portion of Comey's testimony she's referencing:....
To Read and See More....
When Democrats were calling for James Comey to testify before Congress, a number of Republicans warned them to be careful what they wished for. After all, this is the man they blame (when it's convenient)Â for Hillary Clinton's election loss.
Comey's comments about Loretta Lynch and the Hillary Clinton "matter" have raised a few eyebrows on Capitol Hill, including those of Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA). Feinstein was unnerved by Comey's characterization of Lynch's conduct and is now calling for an investigation into whether there was an obstruction of justice...........
Watch the interaction:............
Here is the portion of Comey's testimony she's referencing:....
To Read and See More....
Friday, May 19, 2017
Dianne Feinstein Admits STILL “No Evidence” of Trump Wrongdoing
The media has been moaning and groaning about the possibility of collusion between President Trump and Russia since before the inauguration. Stories have been circulating and rumors have been started but no facts have ever been presented showing impropriety from the President. In fact, more of the media’s stories have been proven to be bunk than have actually been proven to be accurate. Instead, what we’ve had over the last 6 months or so is a revolving door of inflammatory stories that seek to paint the President as evil, corrupt, stupid, or worse.......To Read More.....
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)