Blasey Ford Tells Grassley Why She Has Not Accepted Invitation to Testify

Cortney O'Brien Sep 18, 2018

The Senate Judiciary Committee asked Christine Blasey Ford to come forward and testify on Monday about her accusation against Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh. She claims he sexually assaulted her in high school, over 36 years ago. She has not accepted the invitation to tell her story publicly in Congress, however, puzzling many senators. Tuesday night, her attorneys sent a letter to Chairman Chuck Grassley explaining their client's hesitation. They claim that the committee was trying make Ford testify at the same table as Kavanaugh. .............. A couple of spokesmen for Grassley rejected that claim..........To Read More.....

Senate Judiciary Chair Grassley: Dianne Feinstein’s office refuses to cooperate on Kavanaugh accuser procedure

Chris Pandolfo · September 17, 2018  

 

Here’s yet more proof that the Democrats are playing dirty with Kavanaugh.  Senate Republicans want to follow up with Kavanaugh’s accuser, Christine Blasey Ford, in the regular order of the Senate confirmation process. What’s supposed to happen is that an update to a nominee’s background will be discussed in private phone calls between each party and the committee. If necessary, additional testimony may be required, but the phone calls should come before the committee reaches that point.

But a statement from Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, says that Sen. Dianne Feinstein’s office is refusing to cooperate in the follow-up on Ford’s accusations.   Here’s the statement:............It’s unethical. It’s disgusting. It’s the Democratic Party.........To Read More....

 

 

 

Klayman on Judicial Watch

Politico: Mueller Adds Another Lawyer to Russia Probe Team

 Klayman: Another Deep State Obama Pro-Clinton Prosecutor Joins Mueller's Corrupted Grand Jury Investigations!

 

By Wanda Carruthers Newsmax September 16, 2017

A Justice Department attorney recently left work on a high-profile money laundering case to join special counsel Robert Mueller's team, Politico reported Friday, bringing to 17 the number of lawyers working for the prosecution in the Russia probe.  Harvard Law School graduate Kyle Freeny had not been previously reported to be working on the investigation. A spokesman for Mueller's office confirmed Freeny was working on his staff, but gave no details about her role. ............ Continue Reading.....

 See also: "Mueller Must Be Removed, Disbarred, Prosecuted," by Larry Klayman

 

Judiciary Chairman Considers Subpoenas in Trump Investigation

Klayman: Sen. Grassley Is Republican Establishment That Wants to Destroy Trump! He Has Ignored Evidence of Illegal Surveillance by Obama Intel Agencies of Not Just Trump and Associates but Also SCOTUS Justices and Judges. Grassley Should Be Investigated! See www.freedomwatchusa.org.

By Nicholas Fandos New York Times September 16, 2017

 

WASHINGTON — Senator Charles E. Grassley, facing what he sees as Justice Department stonewalling, is considering subpoenas to compel several witnesses to appear before the Senate Judiciary Committee and divulge what they know about President Trump's connections to Russia and his firing of James B. Comey as F.B.I. director.  Mr. Grassley and the committee's top Democrat, Senator Dianne Feinstein of California, have agreed that the witnesses are key to the committee's investigation and could compel them to appear despite apparent objections by the Justice Department and the special counsel, Robert S. Mueller III............. Continue Reading.....

 

Chefs react angrily as federal appeals court upholds California ban on foie gras

 

Klayman: Now the Ninth Circuit Is in Its Natural Venue: Bans "Daffy Duck Liver"!

By Maura Dolan, Jenn Harris, Geoffrey Mohan latimes.com September 16, 2017
California may once again scrape foie gras off restaurant plates, after judges ruled in favor of a ban on the delicacy made by force feeding ducks and geese.  The decision Friday by a three-judge panel of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals removes a roadblock to enforcing a 2004 ban that has been idled for more than half the time it has been on the books..............Continue Reading.....