Kakistocracy is a system of government run by the least suitable or competent citizens of a state!
By Rich Kozlovich
(Editor's Note: This is Part VI in this ongoing series. Part I, Part II, Part III, Part IV, Part V. You may wish to view my entire kakistocracy file, which will include the articles from this series, and twelve more. More are on the way. RK)
Well, here it is, and it starts out with a definition that's only partially correct saying:
Fascism (/ˈfæʃɪzəm/ FASH-iz-əm) is a far-right, authoritarian, ultranationalist political ideology and movement, characterized by a dictatorial leader, centralized autocracy, militarism, forcible suppression of opposition, belief in a natural social hierarchy, subordination of individual interests for the perceived.
Fascism isn't right of anything except communism, and defining it in this way is an attempt to besmirch conservatives. What fascism represents is far left on everything, and it's only to the right of communism. Fascism and communism are two sides of the same coin, socialism, and both are leftist in character and action "characterized by a dictatorial leader, centralized autocracy, militarism, forcible suppression of opposition, belief in a natural social hierarchy, subordination of individual interests for the perceived".
Benito Mussolini, a fascist socialist stated: "Everything within the state, nothing outside the state, nothing against the state"? So, what party is constantly promoting government control over our lives, including what we should eat? Democrats!
The Democrat party "[has] been largely devoured and directed by its socialist and communist-leaning members. It also encompasses various anarchist and fascist—fascists are leftists—branches such as BLM, Antifa and other charming social organizations, though they’re a bit more overt in their destructive designs."
If the Democrat party is the party of freedom, and hates fascism, why then did Democrat Congresswoman Barbara Lee, a "communist sympathizer who was a personal friend to Fidel Castro" whine because she couldn't interrupt a committee hearing to defend Castro, a greater mass murderer per ratio than Stalin?
"Whining that she was “silenced” in her promotion of the Communist dictatorship by a daughter of Cuban refugees."
Was it the Democrats or the Republicans who violated House rules over the January 6 kangaroo court House committee membership? Then when we look at the activity of that committee we see more fascist corruption:
The Department of Justice’s prosecution of a group of Oath Keepers was one of the centerpieces of the Democrats’ effort to build the January 6 protest into an “insurrection.” It worked: the Oath Keeper defendants were convicted and sentenced to up to 18 years in prison. Now investigative journalist Steve Baker of Blaze News has pieced together security camera footage released by the House Republican majority that, he says, proves that a key witness for the government in the Oath Keepers trial–Nancy Pelosi’s head of security–committed perjury."
Remember, the Committee had that evidence and kept it hidden and refused to release it. Why? Because they knew, or should have known, this January 6th event wasn't an insurrection, and the committee hearing was all a gigantic corrupt political scam, and this was perjured testimony. In effect allowing corruption of the justice system, deliberately, promoting corruption of the rule of law, just like every leftist government that ever existed. That was the Democrats.
These Davos meetings are the most telling, as Gary Gidler notes in his article, Davos: From Proto-Fascism to Post-Fascism, saying:The Davos gatherings are a microcosm of what the Left has in mind for the rest of the world. .........The story of the proto-fascist policies of Richelieu demonstrates the theme observable in all future left-wing economies: a short-term boost in economic activity due to crushing, inescapable state intervention, and then, in the long run, unavoidable decline and stagnation. As it is known, the Soviet Union, Nazi Germany, Cuba, Venezuela, and the entire Soviet bloc post-World War II followed this course. The demise of Communist China is inevitable for the same reason. A similar fate is awaiting the Davos Oracles of “stakeholder capitalism.” From that outlook, all four of Dumas’s three musketeers were the first proto-anti-fascists. State-managed “stakeholder capitalism” was known in the 1600s as mercantilism. To use 21st-century terminology, Cardinal Richelieu established a form of stakeholder capitalism in France, where the government served as the only principal stakeholder.
Who are the biggest supporters of all this? Democrats!
The newly elected President of Argentina, Javier Milei Warns Davos to Abandon Socialism: The West in in Danger:
Argentine President Javier Milei delivered an address fiercely condemning socialism at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, on Wednesday, rejecting the “radical feminist” and “environmental” agendas fueled by socialism as well. Milei urged world leaders to embrace capitalism as an alternative. Milei, a libertarian economist, explained in a roughly 20-minute speech how socialism ultimately leads to poverty, how the state “is not the solution,” but rather “the problem itself,” and how leftism has co-opted Western government institutions to further its agendas. Wednesday’s speech was Milei’s first international address since taking office in December.
What party wants to destroy capitalism and impose unlimited government control over the economy and death of the nation via collectivism? The Democrats! And just how well have they done with what they're already controlling? On January 16, 2024 Jack Hellner published this piece, Media operatives peddle ‘strong economy’ narrative but include contradicting facts saying:
It is absolute disinformation for the WSJ to tell the public that the big banks profits went up because of a strong economy. It is a shame that the news pages of the WSJ are no better than the WaPo, NYT, and other media outlets as they campaign for Joe Biden. It is no wonder that the public has so little respect for, or trust in, what supposed journalists write or report. They are mostly pushing the Democrat agenda to remake or destroy the greatest, most prosperous, and most free country that has ever existed.
Is it Democrats or Conservatives who subscribes to this idea the world's wealth should be confiscated and distributed according to their whims, and all done by a:
"religious cult masquerading as scientific discipline" they're falsely calling "climate science”, seeking to "employ climate modeling to reallocate wealth and solve the moral conundrum of human inequality “paradigm shifting” plan for “environmental redistributionism” (a.k.a., ecosocialism).".........This distillation of the Green New Deal into the guise of scientific study is a bait-and-switch too far.
The more climate ideology steers
humans toward grand schemes of totalitarian domination, the more
apparently disconnected from established liberties and traditional
scientific methods it becomes. The climate priests of woke theocracy are
polluting science in the name of ending pollution............ The environment has become the Marxist Trojan horse through which the government seizes all power over all humanity.
Leftist/fascists "promote authoritarianism, dictatorial leadership, centralized autocracy, suppression of opposition, belief in a social hierarchy, centralized autocracy, and forcible subordination of individual rights." So, who are the fascists, Democrats, or Conservatives?
No comments:
Post a Comment