Daniel Greenfield
December 1, 2023 @ Sultan Knish Blog
Shock. Horror. And then acceptance.
“Today,
millions of Americans mourned and prayed, and tomorrow we go back to
work,” President George W. Bush began his address days after 9/11.
“Tomorrow the good people of America go back to their shops, their
fields, American factories, and go back to work.”
“We cannot let
the terrorists achieve the objective of frightening our nation to the
point where we don’t — where we don’t conduct business, where people
don’t shop,” he urged in a later press conference.
Defeating the terrorists meant going on with business as usual. And we did.
Life
changed. Flying became grueling. There were alerts and terror plots and
we stopped paying attention to them. A generation was born and came of
age who had never known another life.
It’s not so different in
most countries where Islamic Jihadis perform their regular rounds of
terror. Israel has been the canary in the coal mine in more ways than
one. The scenes we’ve come to accept as normal in Boston, Paris or
Manchester, dying flowers on streets, tearful women resting their heads
on the shoulders of men while a sad song plays, assertions that we are
stronger than the terrorists and will not lose our humanity were all
field tested out in Israel.
The peace agreement with the PLO took
Israel from a place where occasional terrorist attacks happened to a
place where they occurred all the time. And when conservative
governments isolated them to end the wave of urban bombings, rocket
attacks became normal. And when Israel began to neutralize those, the
terrorists broke through for an unprecedented massacre.
At
each previous juncture, the horror became the new normal. First it was
suicide bombs on buses, body parts scraped off the sidewalks outside
pizza stores, and strollers full of broken glass. Parents made sure that
their children had cell phones so they could immediately check if they
were all right after each terrorist attack. Then residents of Jerusalem
and Tel Aviv came to accept running to bomb shelters as the new normal.
What will the new normal be now?
Bush may have meant well, but
his assertion that, “our nation was horrified, but it’s not going to be
terrorized” was wrong. Being terrorized can be expressed just as much
through adaptation and numbness as through fear and anger. The failure
to fight back and end the state of terror is what being ‘terrorized’
looks like just as much as public outbursts of panic and hysteria.
Getting
back to normal without dealing with the problem is not resistance; it’s
acceptance.. Living with terror is integrated into everyday routines.
What once seemed horrifying slowly becomes the new normal.
What
we thought was impossible for the mind to grasp becomes the baseline for
life on 9/12 or 10/7 or any of the other dates freighted with horror
and meaning until they become history.
Already the atrocities of
Oct 7 are being discussed the way 9/11 was: a new reality to adapt to.
In America, having terrorists blow things up around us became background
noise. It happens sometimes, as it recently did in North Dakota, but we
try not to pay too much attention to it.
Israelis will brace for
the new normal of having thousands or maybe only hundreds, of murderous
savages occasionally invade their communities while out to massacre
them.
The talk has already turned to “how do we stop the next
one” instead of “how do we make sure this never happens again.” It’s a
responsible conversation, but it’s also a sign of acceptance.
Truly resisting terrorism is refusing to accept it as the new normal.
Getting
back to normal is not that difficult. It appears initially impossible,
but time does its work. We grow numb, too overloaded with stress, worn
out by the parade of inconceivable images and thoughts, and then, much
like lost travelers trudging through the snow, we go to sleep.
And
then before we know it, we’re living in a nightmare but we no longer
feel horror at it. The world has monsters. We pass them on the way to
work and we see them on the evening news. And we no longer react because
extraordinary evil has been integrated into our everyday lives.
What’s
the alternative? It’s not a constant immersion in the horrors of
Islamic terrorism. But neither is it an acceptance of it as the new
normal. Nothing changes when we passively go along and treat the
unacceptable as the new course of things. The process of adaptation to
each atrocity coarsens and lowers our standards. Slowly we lose our
sense that this should not be happening and that it’s happening only
because our governments are refusing to end it.
Islamic terrorism
is not an indestructible monster. It exists for one reason alone. And
the reason is that we tolerate it. Given a choice between two
alternatives, doing whatever it takes to end the terror threat or
tolerating some acceptable level of terrorism, governments always choose
the latter. And when we accept terrorism as the new normal, we make the
choice for them.
Big choices like these are not defined by
absolutes, but by ‘gut’ feelings. They come down to asking politicians
which option seems scarier, more disturbing, immoral or outrageous. We
have spent generations suffering from Islamic terrorism because each
time the answer is that destroying terrorists is the scarier option
while letting them kill us is the least scary one.
As long as Gitmo or Muslim travel bans are scarier than the terrorist attacks, this will go on.
Politicians
know how to cope with the aftermath of a terrorist attack. It’s become a
new normal for them too. There are flags, tearful songs and finally a
call to get back to normal. Go shopping. Laugh. Eat out. And those are
all good things to do. But the unspoken passenger on these trips is
Islamic terrorism. Getting back to normal also normalizes a new level of
terror.
Living with Islamic terrorism should never be
normalized. The answer to an enemy trying to kill you is not going
through the stages of grief, passing from anger to acceptance: it’s
resistance.
The only acceptable answer to Islamic terrorism is to
utterly destroy it while making the terrorist supporting populations
pay the largest share of the price for that destruction. Any other
answer normalizes terrorism. The failure to commit and then carry out
anything short of total destruction perpetuates terrorism. The refusal
to imagine that such a thing is possible makes it impossible to end
terrorism. And the idea that there is any alternative to this is either a
fantasy or a lie.
Refusing to accept terrorism as the new normal
means confronting politicians, even those on our side, with the firm
position that we will not accept anything from them short of a plan to
win: not incrementally, not to establish deterrence, and not just to
“show the terrorists we mean business”. We will live our lives, but we
will not treat Islamic terror as business as usual.
Bombs, massacres and assaults are not the new normal: they are the new abnormal.
Our
only hope for victory is to treat them as abnormal, to never adapt and
accept the idea that being attacked by terrorists is just the price we
pay for living in a big city, for our foreign policy, for living in the
region, or for a world where madmen can get hold of weapons.
It’s
easy to forget what life was like before Islamic terrorism since the
abnormal world foisted on us by Islamic terrorism is all around us. The
political distortion has made that world seem normal and any proposals
to dismantle it appear abnormal. The chattering class rushes to shout
down even the most modest proposals for stopping the terrorists because
moral inversion in this abnormal world has made terrorists into the
victims. And we forget that all of this is abnormal.
Our vital
resistance is to define this as abnormal, not normal. It is not normal
to adapt to terrorism, what is normal is for terrorists to adapt to
running for their lives. A lawless society is a place where citizens are
terrified and criminals are emboldened. A lawful society however is one
where citizens are emboldened and criminals are terrified. Until the
terrorists are terrified, we are the ones who are living in a lawless
society at the mercy of monsters. We are not physically weak, but
morally weakened by politicians who offer mercy to the monsters and none
to us.
Failed politicians have ushered in this abnormal world in
which we are afraid and our leaders negotiate with the terrorists and
appease them to determine how much they can terrorize us. They worry
about what the terrorists and their allies will think more than whether
their citizens will live or die when the next terrorist attack rolls
around. That is abnormal and unacceptable.
Muslim terrorism is a
norm within Islamic societies, but abnormal in ours. If we continue to
accept it, we will end up living in an Islamic society and the abnormal
will become the norm.
What we are fighting for is the
abnormalization of not only Islamic terrorism, but its appeasement, any
tolerance for it, any acceptance of it and any concern for its
perpetrators.
All of these things must be made abnormal, from last to first, to restore a normal world.
Daniel Greenfield is a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the David Horowitz Freedom Center. This article previously appeared at the Center's Front Page Magazine. here to subscribe to my articles. And click here to support my work with a donation. Thank you for reading.
Tags: recent, Terrorism
No comments:
Post a Comment