Search This Blog

De Omnibus Dubitandum - Lux Veritas

Thursday, July 10, 2025

"A Thing of Beauty Is a Joy Forever" — John Keats

Susan Daniels, Jul 09, 2025,  @ Susan's Newsletter 

Several years ago, I went to St. Petersburg, Russia. My lifelong dream was to visit the Hermitage Museum. I saw some of the most beautiful works of art there, including a 10’ tall automated, gold peacock clock. It was built for Peter the Great in the 1870s by a British craftsman, James Cox, and still works.

The most breathtaking thing I saw in Russia was the Amber Room in Catherine’s Palace. It is a reproduction of an entire room stolen by the Nazis. In today’s prices the room would be valued at $250 million.

And when the Nazis were done:

But, whether at the Hermitage or any of the many palaces in St. Petersburg, which was once called Leningrad, there waits at every doorway a heavyset, dour-looking matron daring you to make a wrong move.

Great Moments in State Government

July 9, 2025 by Dan Mitchell @ International Liberty

Why is the private sector efficient and the government inefficient?

I answered that question back in 2017, noting that there is feedback (both positive and negative) in the private sector. With government, by contrast, it seems that there are no consequences of any kind.

 

…people in the private sector make mistakes (most new business ventures ultimately fail, for instance), but I explain that’s part of a dynamic process in a market economy. Every success and every mistake leads to feedback, both via the price system and also via profits and losses.  

All of which leads to continuous changes as people – especially entrepreneurs – seek to better serve the needs and wants of consumers, since that’s how they can increase their income and wealth. In other words, Adam Smith was right when he said that self interest encourages people to focus on making others better off.  

By contrast, when politicians and bureaucrats allocate resources (either directly via spending programs, or indirectly via regulation or tax distortions), feedback mechanisms are very weak. Once politicians intervene, they never seem to care if they are generating positive results.

Today, let’s look at an example of this phenomenon.

It comes from New York, where the state government recently tossed $100 million in a toilet.

Here are some jaw-dropping details from a report by Greg Floyd of Albany’s CBS affiliate.

 

More than $100 million was spent on specialty lighting intended to illuminate New York State bridges, but the lights were never used and have been sitting in storage for two years. The New York Power Authority purchased the lighting equipment and design plans under former Governor Andrew Cuomo… 

However, the lights remained in cardboard boxes inside a warehouse, costing taxpayers an additional $2.1 million in storage fees over seven years. In late June, the state attempted to recoup some of the costs by auctioning off the lights. Despite the initial $100 million investment, the auction yielded only $383,000. Taxpayers are left to bear the financial burden of the unused lighting project.

This absurd bit of government inefficiency motivated a talk radio host to post a tweet summarizing what happened.

Except he’s being too nice.

The government didn’t squander merely $99.6 million. You also need to add the $2.1 million in storage costs.

So the total loss is $101.7 million.

Returning to the point I raised at the start of today’s column, I can’t help but ask if anyone lost their job because of this horrific example of waste?

Andrew Cuomo was forced to resign, but because of sexual harassment rather than taxpayer harassment. So that doesn’t count.

But what about the political appointees and bureaucrats who were involved with this boondoggle? Did any of them suffer any adverse consequences?

Given the no-consequences track record of government, I’m doubtful.

P.S. I feel sorry for the voters of New York City. Their main choices for Mayor are the profligate Andrew Cuomo, the corrupt Eric Adams, and the lunatic Bolshevik Zohran Mamdani.

P.P.S. For other examples of inane policy at the state level, click here.

Wednesday, July 9, 2025

P&D Geopolitical Edition, July 9, 2025

 By Rich Kozlovich

There's every indication China's "President for Life" Xi may be facing some serious issues for his continued rule.  I'd hoped he'd last long enough to fully destroy China's economy.  His hero Mao was on the verge of doing so before Nixon and Kissinger bailed him out, but I don't think that's going to happen now, at least with Xi at the helm.

There's been a lot of purges going on with charges of corruption including his military.  I'm sure all the corruption charges against these military people are valid.  For a long time there was a tacit understanding between them and the Xi cabal.... don't bother us, and we won't bother you.... and  Xi needed them, ergo the corruption metastasized.  

But for them to be exposed and purged, and Xi couldn't or wouldn't stop it, one has to ask why?  In my opinion that's the real story, and needs closely watched to see who the players are behind this.   I'm of the opinion every military in the world has a von Stauffenberg cabal, and I also believe every government in the world has a von Stauffenberg cabal, including China. 

 There's a youth league faction of Xi's government who favor "socio-economic reforms to reduce inequality as well as collective leadership and consensus-based rule", which Xi seriously marginalized almost to extinction early in his rise to power, but that movement appears to be resurging.  So, if Xi's tossed out and they become dominant it's possible they wouldn't be so hot to continue all China's international mischief making, it's not good economics. 

But as of right now, China's spending massive amounts of money on their military with the worlds first twin-seat fifth-generation fighter jet, which can be used to control for "unmanned wingman aircraft and could also be used as electronic attack aircraft and airborne command posts."   All of which becomes more interesting remembering nothing about China is ever as it appears.  So, is there more than what appears here on the surface?  I think so.  What tanks and jets were to 2oth century warfare, drones and lasers will be for 21st century warfare.  

I've reported that Russia can't produce it's own military hardware, but now China is helping Russia build a drone factory in Khabarovsk that will produce 10,000 drones a month.   Clearly the intent is to produce drones China will be using also, with Russia footing the cost of the project.  

This is a city at the far Eastern end of Russia sitting right on the border of China, and at one time a region once owned by China.  I find that interesting!  There's also evidence they're getting support from "Chinese academic institutions and firms sanctioned by the United States."  More reason to impose more economic hardships on China.  

The world's nations have a debt load of almost 310 trillion dollars, and much of that can't be repaid, nor can it be collected.  And that includes China.  Much of that money is gone and China won't be able to do a thing about it.

Their Road and Belt schemes are failing, their loan traps to smaller nations is weakening their economy, their BRICS scheme is demonstrating a serious failure in planning, organization, and implementation, since as far as I can tell they have no logical plan for implementation, what currency will replace the dollar, and there's bickering in their group as it becomes more obvious any scheme they adopt must benefit China, even if it impacts the rest negatively, and that's not sitting well with them. 

Iran is not to be trusted no matter what they say and do publicly.  Behind the scenes they asked for a meeting with Trump over their nuke program, which Trump rebuffed since it been destroyed, and then Iran claims they never asked for such a meeting, not trusting Iran should be (SOP), Standard Operating Procedure.  Russia is willing to restore Iran's enriched uranium supplies, and now China has supplied Iran with their HQ-9B surface-to-air missile systems.  Why does China care.  They get around 80% of their oil from Iran.  That's a major weak point for both of them, and the last thing China wants happening is for Israel to destroy Iran's oil producing sectors.

Finally, Putin attacked Ukraine claiming he was afraid of NATO, which was an excuse, not a reason for his revanche aggression, and what ended up happening was he scared the western European powers so more nations joined NATO.  Trump forced them to step up and start funding NATO on their own and raise their contribution percent from 2 to 5 percent, and now they're laying down plans to repel any Russian incursion into Europe's NATO members. 

Trump says he's pretty much had it with Putin, and in spite of wanting to end sending more military hardware to Ukraine, which is depleting America's supplies,  he's backed away from that saying events made it necessary to keep Ukraine supplied.  

There's actually a lot more going on, but this will do for today.  

 

The Epstein Case: Far Ranging and Nuclear, Part V

By Rich Kozlovich Tags:  The Epstein Case: Far Ranging and Nuclear Part I, Part IIPart IIIPart IV

It was generally believed, and promised, President Donald Trump would bring in a team that would cut right through the Deep State like a hot knife through butter, and to a large degree they have.  So what happened with the Epstein case?  Let's start by saying it this is a coverup, it's not the first one involving Epstein.

This whole thing stunk to high heaven from the beginning, which I outline in Parts 1 through IV, but the phrase, "Something is rotten in the state Denmark", really is hitting home now.   As time went by nothing coming out of the DOJ, seemed to make sense, and so too with the FBI. 

They claim Epstein really did committed suicide, and have a video showing an empty hallway as proof, yet at least 1 minute is missing from the footage of his prison wing.   Bondi says according to the  Bureau of Prisons that minute is missing every night as they reset the video.  Okay, I can buy into that, but that doesn't explain why Epstein didn't have a cellmate after his was transferred and not replaced the night he died.  His guards were supposed to check on him every 30 minutes and didn't.  Two guards fell asleep at their desks and falsified their records, and two cameras were inoperable that night.   Given all the big time people allegedly involved in this case, doesn't that kinda seem suspicious?  Or is it a conspiracy theory?  After all, we need more conspiracy theories since so many of them have turned out to be true.  

They're claiming there's no evidence that Epstein blackmailed powerful political figures, yet no one can tell the world where all his billion dollar empire came from, none of which was reported to the IRS.  If Epstein wasn't blackmailing people, why did he have recorded tapes of their behavior?  There is an abundance of evidence that points to conspiracy to hide the truth as the DOJ announced they would not be pursuing charges against any of the criminals they have on tape. 

The FBI allegedly has “tens of thousands of videos” of sex crimes by wealthy powerful men.  If there's no conspiracy to cover up what went on, why is it then with all this evidence only Epstein an Ghislaine Maxwell were arrested?

And they're saying no further Epstein records will be released.  If there are no further records, why say they won't be released?  One former CIA Officer says the Deep State probably destroyed the list long ago.  A lot of people think that's really amazing since at one point Pam Bondi said the list was "on my desk right now".   

Gateway Pundit founder Jim Hoft asks: If there was No Epstein client list why did a New York court deny the Gateway Pundit’s legal request for the list based on an anonymous ‘John Doe’ who was allegedly on that list, if there is no list?  Hoft goes on to ask: 

Who is this person [John Doe] and why is he the lone person fighting to keep the Epstein client list hidden from public view?  What is his connection to Epstein?  Why did the court side with this anonymous and powerful power player?  

Nick Lopez notes in his commentary, The government's Epstein problem, "either they were lying then, or they’re lying now, maybe both. They don’t get to claim that there are no client lists after issuing statements going back over a decade saying there were “client lists”.  
 
And this from what was generally considered conservative leadership committed truth, justice and transparency.  One writer suggests the reason for this deception is now all that evidence of corruption can potentially lead to "blackmail-driven control over various heads of state and corporate leaders."  
 
But no matter what, I don't think this is going away, and I believe the stench of this could impact the administration.  But one thing is sure, the credibility of the "reformed" DOJ and FBI is now totally questionable.   
 
"Pamie, you got some splainin to do".   

The Milei Miracle

July 8, 2025 by Dan Mitchell @ International Liberty

I’ve written extensively about the amazing libertarian reforms being implemented by Javier Milei in Argentina. Here’s a very short video celebrating his accomplishments.

Except the headline of this column is misleading. What’s happening in Argentina is super impressive, but it’s not a miracle.

Yes, Milei’s reforms are generating great results, but that is exactly what libertarians and small-government conservatives said would happen.

Let’s start with this celebration of the amazing growth of private-sector wages since Milei took office in late 2023.

Or how about the astounding way that Milei has conquered inflation (I also like how this tweet mocks the statists like Piketty who frantically and erroneously warned that Milei’s election would produce an economic catastrophe).

The folks at National Review have a new editorial about Argentina’s amazing renaissance.

Here are some excerpts.

 

Argentina’s economy is growing at 7.7 percent, according to the latest year-over-year data. …Argentina is achieving this growth not through a strategic industrial policy or a mercantilist trade policy. It’s achieving it by rolling back the overextended public sector, slashing the government budget, controlling the money supply, and removing price controls. …He turned a budget deficit into a surplus in his first full year in office. He eliminated half of the country’s cabinet departments. … 

When Milei took office in December 2023, inflation was 25 percent per month. In May, it was 1.5 percent. …the poverty rate…has been falling since the second half of last year and is now lower than when Milei became president. …Milei knows that these are not miracles. They may feel miraculous for people who have been suffering, but they are exactly what economic principles suggest would happen when government controls are removed and people are made free to buy, sell, produce, and consume as they see fit. People have known about this since at least the time of Adam Smith, yet they continue to be surprised when it works.

I especially like the conclusion of the editorial.

If Argentina can become a byword for free markets, responsible fiscal policy, and supercharged economic growth, anything is possible — even a rejuvenation of those principles in the United States.

Let’s also look at some excerpts from Scott Lincicome’s article for the Cato Institute.

 

Thanks to decades of Peronist mismanagement and corruption, an Argentinian economy that once paralleled those of the world’s wealthiest countries had become a global laughingstock with skyrocketing inflation, routine fiscal crises, and crippling poverty. …Inaugurated in December 2023, Milei immediately set about to reverse these and other trends by shrinking the bloated Argentine bureaucracy, slashing government spending, and in turn getting inflation under control. Within the first month, he’d cut the number of government ministries in half—from 18 to nine—and cut spending by 30 percent…

 

Milei’s deregulatory work that’s even more impressive… Milei in his first year in office “fired 37,000 public employees and abolished about 100 secretariats and subsecretariats in addition to more than 200 lower-level bureaucratic departments.” He’s also rapidly deregulated across the economy…in Milei’s first year in office, his administration had implemented 672 regulatory reforms (331 eliminated and 341 modified), or around two per day for an entire year.

All told, an amazing set of results.

I also can’t resist citing one more sentence.

Milei’s team of legal experts and economists have pursued a clear mission: “to increase freedom rather than make the government more efficient.”

Let’s close with another tweet.

Here’s Noah Smith, who is not a libertarian, shared two days ago.

Give him credit for acknowledging Milei’s success.

I’ll add two comments about this tweet, one about economic data and the other about predicting whether Milei would get great results.

Regarding data, I don’t think anyone should get overly excited by one month or one quarter of economic data. Even one year of data might create a misleading impression (which is why my Anti-Convergence Club is always based on decades of data). That being said, there is every reason to expect continuing strong results for Argentina.

Regarding predictions, Smith’s tweet asserts that libertarians didn’t expect Milei to be so wildly successful. At the risk of sounding like a politician, I agree and disagree.

  • The “agree” part is that many libertarians were worried at the beginning of Milei’s presidency that he might face immovable opposition from the Peronist-controlled legislature. We also worried that the special interest groups might launch massive – and successful – protests that would derail necessary reforms. So if you asked me in December 2023 for my prediction, I would not have been overflowing with optimism.
  • The “disagree” part is that I have always had total and absolute confidence that radical pro-market policies will produce great results, anywhere and everywhere. And I assume other libertarians (as well as Reagan-type conservatives) share my faith that good policies lead to good outcomes. So if I was told in December 2023 what Milei would have accomplished in his first 18 months, I would have fully expected the great news we now see.

In other words, what’s miraculous is that the reforms happened. The subsequent economic renaissance has been boringly inevitable (but totally wonderful).

P.S. I am cautiously optimistic that Milei will get more allies in the legislature after Argentina’s mid-term elections later this year.

Tuesday, July 8, 2025

Christian Persecution: A Worldwide Horror Story That's Growing in Frequency and Intensity, Part VII

By Rich Kozlovich, Tags: 

I'm going to start this article with this quote from an article I read some time in the past. However, I didn't link it, nor do remember who said it, but I think it's a good start to this piece, so I'm going to use it as it outlines what's going on in general all over the world. 

For decades, evangelical Christianity championed Israel and religious freedom. As a result, it often found itself clashing with supremacist strands of Islam. Deep concern over Christian persecution largely in Muslim-majority countries post-Soviet collapse fueled wariness of political Islam's aggressive forms. 

Recently, things have begun to shift. Some evangelical institutions in the US have begun to embrace woke ideologies, softening their stance on Islamism. Meanwhile, as evangelicalism wanes in the U.S. it is surging in the global south. There, Christians face radical Islam head-on, and staunchly pro-Israel positions remain in the ascendant. This shift is shaping new dynamics. In Iran, for example, evangelicals are quietly building the underground church's strength, and hoping for the fall of the regime. 

What is Islam all about?  The moral foundation of Islam and leftism is identical.  Hate, greed, envy, lust, violence, and the desire to attain absolute power in order to control everyone's life. In Islam that manifests itself in practices such as mass murder, rape, and violence of every sort, along with "practices such as child marriage, honour killings, female genital mutilation,all of which are rooted in doctrine, not cultural misunderstandings."   

  • Islam and the Children: What the Doctrine Demands, and What the West Is Ignoring.  - This article details how Islamic doctrine impacts children, both in Islamic societies and in the West. Drawing from primary Islamic texts — including the Koran, Hadith, and Reliance of the Traveller — it shows how children are expected to begin religious practices by age 7, are beaten by age 10 if they resist, and may be denied secular education. Practices such as child marriage, honour killings, and female genital mutilation are shown to be rooted in doctrine, not cultural misunderstandings.

It documents real-world consequences: the child martyrs of Gaza, the enslavement of Yazidi girls, the denial of education for Afghan girls, and the systemic rape of non-Muslim children by grooming gangs in the West. Meanwhile, Western children are being softened up through Islamic rituals disguised as cultural inclusion — kneeling in mosques, fasting for Ramadan, and celebrating ‘world hijab day’ in classrooms.

This article isn't just going to discuss the horrors Islam is perpetuating on humanity, it will link articles as source pieces, from Africa, America, Asia, Europe, and the Middle East.  This is a horror story that's worldwide, and growing.   Nearly 400 million Christians are being persecuted globally, with Islam and leftism, in all it's manifestations, as the driving forces for these horrors.  And Western civilization is either being silent, or actually in cooperation with this outrages.  

here's what happened in in February 2025.  In the Democratic Republic of Congo, which isn't democratic or a republic, seventy Christians, men, women and children were “tied up and decapitated with knives.”  

In Egypt young Christian girls are being kidnapped and being trafficked and the police do nothing.  Muslims are setting fire to churches, with the official position is these are "natural occurrences", and in Pakistan "a Muslim man twice abducted a married Christian mother of three children, raped her, fraudulently converted her to Islam, and fabricated an Islamic marriage.   Christians are abducted, humiliated and accused of crimes with no relief from authorizes.  

In France a Muslim immigrant imprisoned and murdered...the word used  slaughtered three Christians in a church in Nice.  In Spain “Islamic State terrorist organisation is threatening to attack Catholic cathedrals in Spain, in an organized and open attempt to destroy Christianity in Europe, which is also being done in Syria.

In Indonesian Muslims attack Christians demanding the rejection of Christian worship in their community, but that's nothing compared to the nightmare Christians face in Nigeria which is being called '“pure genocide” with Muslim terrorists “leaving a trail of bloodshed, destruction and despair”.  In Uganda a Christian evangelist was beaten and stabbed for leading "a 75-year-old Muslim widow known as Hasifa to Christ', all in public.  

‘Red Wednesday’ events to be held in over 20 countries to raise awareness of Christian - Aid to the Church in Need (ACN), an international Catholic charity, is organizing hundreds of activities in more than 20 countries for Red Wednesday, which is on November 20 this year. 
 
The global event aims at raising awareness of Christian persecution and religious freedom issues throughout the world. Initially a single day of solidarity, marked by illuminating churches and secular buildings in red, it has grown into extended initiatives in some areas, such as “Red Week” or “Red November,” featuring prayer vigils, testimonies, conferences, and exhibitions. Next week’s event is marked by the release of the 2024 edition of Persecuted & Forgotten?, a report highlighting conditions for Christians in 18 countries where persecution is severe. 
 
According to the report, most of these nations have seen conditions worsen or remain unchanged. ACN USA presented the report at the USCCB Plenary Assembly on November 12, encouraging U.S. bishops to support “Courage in Faith Week,” an initiative inviting bishops to advocate for persecuted Christians, offer Masses for martyrs, and engage their parishes in solidarity. 

Thousands of Christians Killed and Imprisoned for for Their Faith in 2024, Report Reveals In 2024, 4,476 Christians were murdered around the globe because of their beliefs. Another 4,744 were imprisoned. Over 7,670 churches and Christian properties were attacked, too.  Those numbers are reported by Open Doors—a global ministry dedicated to serving persecuted believers—which has released its 2025 World Watch List. The annual report reveals the top 50 countries where Christians are most likely to face severe consequences for their faith, from the loss of homes and jobs to imprisonment and death.

History is everything, and here are the articles I've been storing going back to some time which lays historical foundation for all that's discussed. 

AMERICA

  1. Pro-Life Christian Detained for Preaching Gospel, Offering to Adopt Babies at Abortion Clinic 
  2. Why the Education Department’s Actions Against Christian Schools and Career Colleges Demand Scrutiny
  3. There Were 436 Attacks on Churches Last Year, Traitor Joe Didn’t Prosecute a Single One 
  4. Fire chief gets fired for attending Christian event, now Supreme Court asked to get involved
  5. Harris/Biden attack more Christians than anyone knew
  6. Federal officials warn Boston churches to increase security after wave of arson attacks  
  7. Report: Young People Are Leading Christianity’s Comeback Across U.S.
  8. State tries to make Christian camp coerce kids into anti-Christ faith 
  9. The Gen Z Worship War 
  10. Why Trump’s Religious Liberty Agenda Terrifies the Left — but Tells the Truth 
  11. Christian Group Urges Trump: Keep Tariffs on Canada Until Carney Ends War on Christians
  12. Congress revisits persecution of Catholics by Biden’s FBI
  13. Christian Rally in Seattle Park Attacked by Violent Woke Mob 
  14. Seattle’s mayor blames law-abiding Christians for being victims of an Antifa attack
 ASIA
  1. Declaration of Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò on the Secret Vatican Agreement with China
  2. China’s War on the Cross 
  3. China Moves to Formally End Christian Missionary Activity
  4. Muslims Ethnically Cleansed 1 Million Christians in Kazakhstan 
  5. A Day in the Life of a Christian – Under Pakistan’s Blasphemy Laws 

EUROPE 

It's a fact Christianity is no longer the foundational religious or social paradigm of Europe.  In Ireland the government froze a Christian teacher's bank account after he refused to use gender neutral pronouns, and not only did they freeze them, they planned to seize them, and any other assets he may own, as directed by their courts.  How can this in any way be considered legal?

  1. Afghan Asylum Seeker Climbs Altar – Rips Off the Gowns of the Famous Black Madonna of Switzerland and Puts On Her Crown
  2. Belarus Bans Christian Group In Broader Crackdown
  3. The Silent Pope while Christians are being murdered worldwide 
  4. Christian nurse who refused to refer to a male pedophile as a woman was suspended
  5. London Council Orders Staff to Stop Using the Term ‘Christian Name’
  6. Cyprus President Appoints ‘Special Representative’ for Religious Freedom‘We Aim to Work for the Protection of Christians’
  7. Report: Anti-Christian Hate Crimes in Europe Triple
  8. While Islamists slaughter Germans by knife and by car, the German Evangelical Church hosts workshops for all children…except white ones
  9. Warning From The United Kingdom For American Christians 
  10. New Evidence Reveals the Collusion and Lies That Led to a Christian Artist Being Banned From Own Exhibition

MIDDLE EAST

Assessing OBBBA’s Provisions

July 7, 2025 by Dan Mitchell @ International Liberty

I gave my overall assessment of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act last week, which can be summarized in two sentences.

  • The good news is that “…the bill prevents a massive automatic tax increase starting on January 1 of 2026.”
  • The bad news is that “…the legislation will not save the country from a fiscal crisis.”

Today, let’s look at some of the details.

We’ll start with this chart from a recent New York Times column by Steven Rattner. As you can see, I’ve added my two cents on each of the major provisions.

By the way, I can’t resist commenting on the title of the chart. Rattner (who opposes OBBBA) obviously wants readers to think the bill is designed to help only the rich.

That’s a bit silly given the various provisions like child tax credits that are designed for the middle class. But what’s absurd – and utterly inaccurate – is the implication that only the rich have been enjoying income growth.

Rattner also has a sin of omission in that he doesn’t list the most pro-growth part of the bill, which is the reduction of the tax bias against new investment.

Here are some excerpts from the Tax Foundation’s summary.

 

The Senate bill makes permanent the House bill’s provisions allowing expensing for investment in short-lived assets and domestic research and development. Permanent expensing has the most bang-for-the-buck when it comes to economic growth. In the context of the full Senate bill, the two provisions boost long-run GDP by 0.7 percent by providing taxpayers the certainty they need to boost long-run investment. …The House and Senate bills both secure permanent extension of the rates and brackets of the 2017 individual tax cuts, providing certainty for households and stability to the structure of the tax code.

The Tax Foundation also explains some of the bad provisions.

…too much money on political gimmicks and carveouts. They both introduce tax exemptions for overtime pay and tips, a deduction for auto loan interest, and an additional standard deduction available for some seniors, all of which violate basic tax principles of treating taxpayers equally. …No tax on tips, overtime, and car loans comes with various conditions and guardrails that…will likely require hundreds of pages of IRS guidance to interpret. …

Now let’s shift back to Mr. Rattner’s column.

To his credit, he includes this chart that shows that fiscal imbalance in America is caused by a growing burden of government spending.

There’s one final chart I want to share.

Here are the various estimates of potential economic growth from OBBBA.

Rattner’s chart says the economic growth would be trivial.

For what it’s worth, I think the White House estimate is absurdly high.

However, I don’t view the growth estimates from the other groups as being “negligible.” Even small differences in growth, if sustained, can make a big difference in long-run living standards.

P.S. Keep in mind that it’s hard to predict potential growth effects when we don’t know what Trump will do on trade policy. If he is merely bad, maybe the effect of OBBBA will be enough to deliver additional prosperity. But if he is terrible (i.e., Liberation Day-type nonsense), then the net effect of his policies will probably be negative.

Green Energy Provisions In The One Big Beautiful Bill Act: Unfortunately, A Mixed Bag

17 Comments, @ Manhattan Contrarian 

On July 4 President Trump signed what everyone is now calling the “One Big Beautiful Bill Act.” (Doesn’t it cease being a “Bill” when it becomes an “Act”? Not this one, apparently.). The Act is a compendium of dozens of provisions relating to all aspects of the federal budget and taxation. As a result, many summaries that you may have read focus on things like income tax rates and deductions, and other such matters directly relevant to individuals. That leaves some other important subjects of the Act getting short shrift, particularly the provisions dealing with various aspects of the ongoing green energy scam. So I will try to hit the highlights on that subject here.

I previously had a post on May 24 covering the provisions on this subject in the version of the Bill that had just been passed by the House. That post was highly optimistic that the House’s language, if it could survive wrestling with the Senate, could essentially put an end to almost all of the green energy subsidies. Unfortunately, as you might expect from the swamp of Washington, the final language will likely let some of the scam continue.

But let’s start with the positive news. For your reference, in case you want to read the actual provisions of the Act, here is a link to the Table of Contents, with ongoing links to each section.

Rescission and repeal of green energy handouts from the Inflation Reduction Act

The fraudulently-named Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 contained more than twenty open-ended handouts to various sorts of programs supposedly related to decarbonization of the economy and saving the planet. Most this was to be administered by the EPA, representing a vast expansion of its prior mission. These grant programs were generally structured like open-ended entitlements, so that nobody could know the total amounts that would actually get spent in the end. These were essentially unlimited slush funds for left-wing activist groups. Estimates of the ultimate spend under these programs ranged into the trillions.

Title VI of the OBBBA goes through these things one by one and rescinds or repeals them. There are some twenty-four sections, from 60001 to 60024, providing for the rescissions. To give you just a smattering: Section 60001 rescinds funding for “clean heavy-duty vehicles”; section 60002 rescinds a “greenhouse gas reduction fund”; in section 60003 it’s funding for “diesel emissions reductions”; in 60005, it’s “air pollution in schools”; 60006 rescinds funding for the “low emissions electricity program”; in 60010 it’s “greenhouse gas corporate reporting”; etc., etc., etc.

In each case, the language of the OBBBA limits the rescission to “unobligated balances.” E.g., “The unobligated balances of amounts made available to carry out section 132 of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7432) are rescinded.” (That’s the one that relates to heavy-duty trucks.). In other words, the statute unfortunately does not touch the “gold bars off the Titanic” extravaganza that took place in the closing weeks of the Biden administration. However, current EPA Administrator Zeldin and the Department of Justice may well have remedies available for some of the most abusive spending, even if supposedly already “obligated.”

Repeal and termination of tax credits

Title VII of the OBBBA is where we find the tax provisions. Chapter 5 of that is headed “Ending Green New Deal spending, promoting America-first energy, and other reforms.” Subchapter A is then headed “Termination of Green New Deal subsidies.” And there then follows a long list of tax credits and benefits getting terminated. Unfortunately, none of them gets terminated immediately; but many get terminated expeditiously.

For example, there’s Section 70502, “Termination of clean vehicle credit.” That amends another statute making the “clean” (electric) vehicle tax credit available until December 31, 2032, and replaces that date with September 30, 2025. That’s less than three months from now. You can see why Elon Musk is so upset.

There are varying dates for different credits getting terminated. For “residential clean energy credits” (e.g., putting solar panels on your roof), the date moves up from December 31, 2034 to December 31, 2025 — less than six months away. The new termination date for the “energy efficient home credit” moves up from 2032 to December 31, 2026 — now we’re talking a year and a half. The new termination date for the “new energy efficient home credit” is June 30, 2026.

But now let’s get to the big money — the tax credits that subsidize wind and solar electricity generation facilities. Here, unfortunately, the OBBBA falls short. As discussed in my May 24 post, the House version of the Bill provided for an effective ending of the massive tax subsidies to these projects by leaving only a 60-day window to commence construction, and a required “in service” date of 2028. The 60 day window to commence construction was particularly significant, because the program would be effectively ended before any more legislation to extend the deadlines could be making its way through Congress.

Well, now the period to commence construction on a qualifying wind or solar project has been extended until a year after enactment of the legislation. The “placed in service” date has supposedly been accelerated to December 31, 2027 (Sections 70511 and 70512), but energy analyst Alex Epstein points out that this is likely illusory:

[U]nder [a] last-minute carveout [inserted into the Bill], Big Green has 12 months to initiate as many subsidized projects as it wants using the insanely-easy-to-meet "construction" threshold. (All you need to do is commit 5% of expected project cost to buying re-sellable assets like solar panels.) Once they declare "construction"—e.g., in July 2026—they'll have 4 years (e.g., July 2030) to "place in service." And then some of those projects, e.g., most wind projects, will get 10 years of subsidies.

These tax credits are something that a taxpayer can qualify for by meeting the tests of the statute, without need to apply for some grant from an executive agency. In other words, there may be little or nothing that Trump can do to stop this.

So unfortunately, the bottom line is that the OBBBA is a mixed bag in terms of getting rid of outrageous subsidies for useless wind and solar generation. Big wind and big solar have lived to fight another day. It remains to be seen whether there will be another chance to try to get rid of these tax breaks during Trump’s term.

I’d like someone on Congress or staff to name names as to who slipped these last-minute changes into the Act.

Monday, July 7, 2025

Media Balance Newsletter for July 7, 2025

Free... Twice-a-Month...What you won't find in one place, anywhere else.

By John Droz, Jr 

Enjoy the latest edition of our free, critically thinking Media Balance Newsletter, and the picture in this edition says volumes.  So much for "toxic" masculinity.  

We cover Climate to COVID, Elections to Education, Renewables to Religion — showing you what the lamestream media has revised or filtered out.  If you missed it, here is the prior Newsletter.

Please use these links to pass on the Newsletter to other open-minded citizens via social media, etc. Anyone can subscribe (or unsubscribe) by emailing me. (aaprjohn@northnet.org)

We are continuously working at making this twice-a-month publication more interesting, more useful and more accessible to our 20,000± readers.

Due to loyal supporters, the Newsletter has been published 16 years now — thank you! Please let me know the email of anyone you feel would appreciate getting this unique and powerful information. 

PS — My substack site is now quite popular! It's about the lack of Critical Thinking relating to numerous societal matters (education, climate, energy, etc.). If you haven't already, signup for a FREE subscription. Enjoy and pass it on!

 Copyright © 2025; Alliance for Wise Energy Decisions (see WiseEnergy.orgElection-Integrity.info & C19Science.info)

Cry Havoc and Let Slip the Dogs of War

Deep state treason and Obama was in on it!

 By Rich Kozlovich

  Main Image: Cartoon

The title is a quote from William Shakespeare's play Julius Caesar, and what it meant was soldiers were released from any semblance of civilized behavior, including rape and plunder, like a pack of wild dogs. On Sunday Clarice Feldman published an article dealing with the events of the week, with subtitles dealing with each issue.  She starts out saying, " What a week! The 2016 and 2020 plots against Trump are now confirmed", which was followed by the first subtitle, "Dirty Deeds Done Down Low", opening the discussion saying;

The perfidious acts of then-CIA Director John Brennan, Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, and FBI Director James Comey could not be hidden forever, and, this week, much more was detailed in a CIA review released by its director John Ratcliffe and in a congressional hearing............

Rasmussen polls confirm that the Trump Collusion concoction “fabricated by Obama’s functionaries” benefited the Democrats in the 2018 midterms........[and]  the story about the FBI’s covering up Chinese efforts to interfere with the 2020 election should place the role of the then-heads of these agencies in the sociopathic hall of fame. 

All of which was supported by corrupt reporting by the Washington Post, claiming:

Suddenly, the revised piece asserted as fact that Vladimir Putin had orchestrated Trump’s election. It is almost certain that corrupt intelligence officials were dissatisfied with the original reporting which wasn't tailored to the narrative. They needed to preemptively sabotage Trump’s presidency, so they told the Washington Post to publish a version that reflected the Intelligence Community’s preferred narrative. To this day, no one has been held accountable for this fraud -- neither at the Washington Post, which later won Pulitzers for their lies, nor within the Intelligence Community, which orchestrated the deception.

According to Jim Hoft, Obama was in on it!  As CIA Director John Ratcliffe states:

All the world can now see the truth: Brennan, Clapper and Comey manipulated intelligence and silenced career professionals — all to get Trump. Thank you to the career CIA officers who conducted this review and exposed the facts.

In this past week's P&D and The Week That Was I state the FBI blocked an investigation into the 2020 "Chinese mail-in voting scam to protect Chris Wray who likely lied to Congress".  The DOJ is pursuing that and before all of this is over, and if there's any justice in the world, Wray, Comey, Brennan, and Clapper should all be heading to prison.   After all, "no one is above the law."  The fact is we're seeing what clearly must evidence of perjury by Brennan and others.  Before Clinton perjury was considered a serious crime.  Will it be again?
 
Should John Brennan Be in Prison? Brennan’s lie about Hunter’s laptop echoed his earlier lies about Russian collusion. The statement of the “intelligence professionals” referred to “our view that the Russians are involved in the Hunter Biden email issue,” and added that “media reports say that the FBI has now opened an investigation into Russian involvement in this case.”  
 
 The statement ends with this: “It is high time that Russia stops interfering in our democracy.”  Sheesh. Yeah, it sure is. And it’s also high time that Brennan faces justice for his anti-American actions. But if he ever did, the left would raise such a hue and cry that all their other hysterical fits would look like a philosophical disquisition. 
 
Nevertheless, Bryan Dean Wright is 100% correct: John Brennan belongs in the slammer.
 
There are those who wish to just move on, forgive and forget.  Baloney!  What these people have done should not be forgiven, nor forgotten.  They still keep shooting off their mouths with falsehoods trying to manipulate the public with their lies, and the public has a right to know  the truth, and those attacked have a right to have the truth exposed, and justice served.  Then we can move on.  
 
However, what I think we can move on from right now is the idea there's no such thing as a conspiracy.  To quote Senator John Kennedy of Louisiana:  "Sounds to me like we need to get some new conspiracy theories because all the old ones turned out to be true."
 
Update: 7/9/25:   
  • Yep -- it was Obama- Why are the Democrats so bent on locking up Trump? They tried everything, from Russia hoaxes to unleashing Fani to sham trials in New York City to feeding friendly newsmen negative information about Trump ....... This is from Margot Cleveland: "President Barack Obama. Not CIA Director John Brennan. Not Director of National Intelligence James Clapper. And not FBI Director James Comey. But President Barack Obama. The 44th president of the United States, directed the intelligence community to interfere in the peaceful transition of power to his successor -- Donald Trump. And for that Obama should forevermore be considered a pariah in presidential history"...........
  • CIA Review Reveals Obama Pushed Intel Community To Launch Trump-Russia Witch Hunt - While Brennan, Clapper, and Comey all rightly deserve condemnation, Obama launched the plot and as president he holds greater responsibility for politicizing the intelligence community against his successor......
  • FBI Launches Criminal Probes Into John Brennan, James Comey Over Trump-Russia Collusion Hoax - The FBI has launched a criminal investigation into former CIA Director John Brennan as well as former FBI Director James Comey related to the Trump-Russia collusion hoax, according to Fox News.  The outlet reported, citing DOJ sources, that CIA Director John Ratcliffe has given evidence concerning Brennan to FBI Director Kash Patel and that an investigation into Comey is also underway. The investigation may involve potentially false statements made to Congress. 
  • Brennan, Comey, and the Reckoning Long Overdue - For years, patriotic Americans have known something smelled rotten in the deep-state narrative about Trump and Russia. We knew it when CNN breathlessly paraded James Clapper in front of cameras. We knew it when John Brennan tried to look solemn while peddling dossiers, and we definitely knew it when Jim Comey told Congress he just “doesn’t recall” half of anything that happened on his watch. Now, the Department of Justice has officially confirmed that both former CIA Director John Brennan and ex-FBI Director James Comey are under criminal investigation. Let that sink in: the architects of the most dishonest intelligence operation in modern political history might finally have to answer for it.......
  • CIA review suggests Brennan misled Congress on Steele Dossier and 2016 intel, lawmakers want probe  - A new report by the CIA revealed new details about infirmities and failures with the U.S. intelligence community’s assessment of Russian influence in the 2016 election, criticizing now-former CIA Director John Brennan for his actions and raising the possibility he may have misled Congress. Brennan is currently a Senior National Security Analyst for NBC.......
  • EXCLUSIVE: Brennan’s Fake Russia Collusion Assessment Even More Corrupt Than Current Report Shows – A still-classified staff report compiled by the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence (HPSCI) found the John Brennan-led 2016 Intelligence Community Assessment (“ICA”) on Russian Election Interference significantly worse and significantly more corrupt than conveyed in the memorandum released last week by CIA Director John Ratcliffe, according to sources familiar with the report. The HPSCI staff report also reveals more details of the corruption, the sources told The Federalist...........
  • Ex-CIA chief John Brennan may have opened himself up to perjury charges over Trump-Russia hoax – John Brennan, the disgraced former Obama CIA director, may have opened himself up to perjury charges after a new email was uncovered in a scathing internal review by CIA career professionals of the agency’s 2016 Trump-Russia collusion assessment. Brennan is said to be under renewed scrutiny by authorities over discrepancies between his sworn testimony to federal investigations and his written orders to underlings conducting the Intelligence Community Assessment commissioned by President Barack Obama in December 2016 that found Russia interfered in the 2016 presidential election to help Donald Trump........
  • Should John Brennan Be in Prison? – Former CIA top dog John Brennan is the poster child for the catastrophically widespread corruption of our intelligence apparatus, or at least of our intelligence apparatus before Donald Trump became president again. If this were indeed a land of impartial justice, and not one in which the prosecution of high-profile leftists would bring so much hysteria that Trump is a fascist dictator-in-the-making, that the firestorm could interfere with the implementation of his agenda, Brennan would be in prison today. That is the assessment of one of his former employees at the CIA, Bryan Dean Wright.

Concertgoers Cheer Muslim Terrorists Killing Them

By Daniel Greenfield, @ Sultan Knish Blog

On Nov 13, 2015, Muslim terrorists attacked a concert at the Bataclan theater in Paris, opening fire on the crowd while shouting, “Allah Akbar.” The Muslim attackers took 20 hostages, killed 90 concertgoers and left hundreds wounded. A year later the theater reopened under new ownership with ‘Insallah’ or ‘If Allah Wills” by Sting to support the Muslim migrants invading Europe. One of the members of the American band that had been playing during the attack was banned from attending the commemoration because he had been accused of ‘Islamophobia’.

A few years later, there was a Bataclan concert featuring a Muslim rappers supporting Jihad. After Oct 7, the Bataclan was filled with shouts of ‘Free Palestine’ at yet another Islamic concert.

By then Muslim terrorists had racked up multiple concert massacres at the Open Festival suicide bombing in Germany in 2016, the Manchester Arena bombing at an Ariana Grande concert in 2017 which killed 22 people, some of them children, and wounded over 1,000, the Nova festival massacre which killed nearly 400 people and the Moscow concert hall attack in 2024 that killed 145 people and wounded over 500.

Last year, Muslim terrorists plotted an attack at a Taylor Swift concert in Vienna.

Add nightclubs to the toll, and you have the Dolphinarium discotheque bombing in Israel by Hamas in 2001, which killed 21 people, most of them teens, the Pulse nightclub massacre which killed 49 people in Orlando in 2016 and the Istanbul nightclub shootings in 2017 that killed 39 people.

With over 800 concertgoers killed in Muslim terrorist attacks since 9/11, you might think that concertgoers would have some sense of vulnerability and outrage, but just the opposite. Concerts of the ‘trendier’ kind have become venues for celebrating Islamic terrorism. Not only wasn’t Bataclan going from a terrorist target to a terrorist rallying ground an exception, but Glastonbury with its terror flags and cries of support for Islamic terrorists is commonplace.

And while that sort of behavior is associated with expensive venues for trendy acts these days, a decade ago, New York’s Metropolitan Opera put on a production of The Death of Klinghoffer, justifying the Muslim terrorist killing of an elderly Jewish man in a wheelchair. Despite outrage and muted protests from the Jewish community, the show went on. The terrorist production is now due to open at Florence’s Maggio Musicale Fiorentino Theatre next year.

No one sitting in their box seats in Florence or jumping up and down at $500 a pop concert venues in Europe ever considers that at any point the sounds of “Allah Akbar” and gunfire could pierce their world. The whole point of terrorist propaganda from Kneecap, Bob Vylan or The Death of Klinghoffer is to believe that the victims of terrorism have it coming. And that they can enjoy the spectacle from the comfort of the concert without terror ever touching them.

The music scene values what’s edgy and planting nails in the faces of children, as Muslim terrorists did in Manchester, people dangling from windows at the Bataclan or a bar full of bodies at Nova are certainly edgy. Enjoying the scenes of horror requires maintaining a sense of distance from the dead mediated by narratives that make them objects in a terrorist victory.

The purpose of terrorist propaganda is not just to demonize Israel, America, the UK or any other nation affected by Islamic terrorism, but to manufacture the illusion that the terrorists are members of the same ‘tribe’ as the half-naked white concertgoers bopping to their hate, that the ‘victories’ of Hamas, Hezbollah and the Houthis are their triumphs, and that their support for the cause somehow insulates them so that the bullets and bombs will never fly their way.

Indoctrination is also insulation. Even seeing people just like them bleed and die from Manchester to Nova to Bataclan, bodies falling from balconies, women being raped in the dirt, the wounded lying in the open and hoping the terrorists don’t realize they are still alive, doesn’t get through to them as they watch colorful flags with Arabic curlicues which translate into death wave overhead. At least not until the moment it happens to them. And maybe not even then.

The concertgoers who cheer for the Muslim terrorists murdering concertgoers somewhere else, in Israel, or at another place, like the Manchester Arena, or another time at the Bataclan, are a microcosm of members of a suicidal hipster left who dismantle public safety in the name of social justice, and won’t believe until the last second that the monsters can come for them.

They walk the streets of New York City, San Francisco or London after unleashing criminals and terrorists while feeling invulnerable behind their virtue signaling shielding. Surely the murderers, terrorists and the rapists who were only victims of an unjust system won’t harm them too.

Surely destroying America, Canada, Israel, England and all of Europe and turning their cities over to mobs, monsters and killers will make the world a better place and the cafes will stay open, the concerts will go on and the only ones who will die will be the bad people. Not them.

“Violence is a construct,” Zohran Mamdani, New York City’s Democrat Muslim mayoral nominee, said. Personal liberty, the nation state, bodily integrity and nearly everything else are constructs too. Through the fog of academic theories detached from daily realities, everything becomes an unreal theory, but when the shooting starts and the bombs go off, constructs have a way of becoming blindingly painful realities and life boils down to fight or flight imperatives.

“We are here to kill you,” the Bataclan Muslim terrorists said to their victims. That was a truth that clears away all the talk of constructs, the academic lenses and the distancing of pop culture propaganda that makes concertgoers cheer for those who kill other concertgoers elsewhere.

The undergrown men and women cheering for Islamic terrorism at Glastonbury and at other concert venues might be the ones running for cover and slipping in their own blood on the next leg of the festival tour once they realize that Muslim terrorists really are here to kill them too.

Daniel Greenfield is a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the David Horowitz Freedom Center. This article previously appeared at the Center's Front Page Magazine. Click here to subscribe to my articles. And click here to support my work with a donationThank you for reading.