The Epstein Case: Far Ranging and Nuclear, Part V

By Rich Kozlovich Tags:  The Epstein Case: Far Ranging and Nuclear Part I, Part II, Part III, Part IV

It was generally believed, and promised, President Donald Trump would bring in a team that would cut right through the Deep State like a hot knife through butter, and to a large degree they have.  So what happened with the Epstein case?  Let's start by saying it this is a coverup, it's not the first one involving Epstein.

This whole thing stunk to high heaven from the beginning, which I outline in Parts 1 through IV, but the phrase, "Something is rotten in the state Denmark", really is hitting home now.   As time went by nothing coming out of the DOJ, seemed to make sense, and so too with the FBI. 

They claim Epstein really did committed suicide, and have a video showing an empty hallway as proof, yet at least 1 minute is missing from the footage of his prison wing.   Bondi says according to the  Bureau of Prisons that minute is missing every night as they reset the video.  Okay, I can buy into that, but that doesn't explain why Epstein didn't have a cellmate after his was transferred and not replaced the night he died.  His guards were supposed to check on him every 30 minutes and didn't.  Two guards fell asleep at their desks and falsified their records, and two cameras were inoperable that night.   Given all the big time people allegedly involved in this case, doesn't that kinda seem suspicious?  Or is it a conspiracy theory?  After all, we need more conspiracy theories since so many of them have turned out to be true.  

They're claiming there's no evidence that Epstein blackmailed powerful political figures, yet no one can tell the world where all his billion dollar empire came from, none of which was reported to the IRS.  If Epstein wasn't blackmailing people, why did he have recorded tapes of their behavior?  There is an abundance of evidence that points to conspiracy to hide the truth as the DOJ announced they would not be pursuing charges against any of the criminals they have on tape. 

The FBI allegedly has “tens of thousands of videos” of sex crimes by wealthy powerful men.  If there's no conspiracy to cover up what went on, why is it then with all this evidence only Epstein an Ghislaine Maxwell were arrested?

And they're saying no further Epstein records will be released.  If there are no further records, why say they won't be released?  One former CIA Officer says the Deep State probably destroyed the list long ago.  A lot of people think that's really amazing since at one point Pam Bondi said the list was "on my desk right now".   

Gateway Pundit founder Jim Hoft asks: If there was No Epstein client list why did a New York court deny the Gateway Pundit’s legal request for the list based on an anonymous ‘John Doe’ who was allegedly on that list, if there is no list?  Hoft goes on to ask: 

Who is this person [John Doe] and why is he the lone person fighting to keep the Epstein client list hidden from public view?  What is his connection to Epstein?  Why did the court side with this anonymous and powerful power player?  

Nick Lopez notes in his commentary, The government's Epstein problem, "either they were lying then, or they’re lying now, maybe both. They don’t get to claim that there are no client lists after issuing statements going back over a decade saying there were “client lists”.  

 

And this from what was generally considered conservative leadership committed truth, justice and transparency.  One writer suggests the reason for this deception is now all that evidence of corruption can potentially lead to "blackmail-driven control over various heads of state and corporate leaders."  

 

But no matter what, I don't think this is going away, and I believe the stench of this could impact the administration.  But one thing is sure, the credibility of the "reformed" DOJ and FBI is now totally questionable.   

 

"Pamie, you got some splainin to do".   

The Epstein Case: Far Ranging and Nuclear, Part IV

By Rich Kozlovich

It's being claimed trying Epstein now is a case of double jeopardy, and mostly because of Acosta's handling of the plea agreement.  But that's in federal court. New evidence in the old cases won't cut it.  It will take evidence of new offences, and apparently they don't have that....yet! 

However, in this February 2019 article they state:

Federal prosecutors, under former Miami U.S. Attorney Alex Acosta, broke the law when they concealed a plea agreement from more than 30 underage victims who had been sexually abused by wealthy New York hedge fund manager Jeffrey Epstein, a federal judge ruled Thursday. 

While the decision marks a victory for crime victims, the federal judge, Kenneth A. Marra, stopped short of overturning Epstein’s plea deal, or issuing an order resolving the case. He instead gave federal prosecutors 15 days to confer with Epstein’s victims and their attorneys to come up with a settlement. The victims did not seek money or damages as part of the suit. 

It’s not clear whether the victims, now in their late 20s and early 30s, can, as part of the settlement, demand that the government prosecute Epstein. But others are calling on the Justice Department to take a new look at the case in the wake of the judge’s ruling.

Read more here: https://www.miamiherald.com/news/state/florida/article226577419.html#storylink=cpy

Will that be a factor in this case?  I have to believe it will.  But one thing seems clear to me, and that is none of this prevents local and state prosecutors from taking action.  This is getting too big for the locals to ignore, and someone will have to step up and be counted. 

• Investigating Bill Clinton’s claim that he only flew on Epstein’s jet 4 times - 7/14/19 July 14, 2019Remember when Bill Clinton claimed a quarter century ago that he was "never alone in a hotel" with Paula Jones?
• Jeffrey Epstein, Alex Acosta and an Elephant Named Bill Jonathan F. KeilerThe Democrats and the media saw the Epstein indictment as a direct attack on Clinton and thus the Democratic Party. 
• The ‘Lady of the House’ Who Was Long Entangled With Jeffrey Epstein - Shortly after Ghislaine Maxwell arrived in New York from England in the early 1990s, she was looking for a new start. She had just lost her father, a British media mogul, along with much of her family fortune and her social standing.

• The Epstein Case: Far Ranging and Nuclear
• The Epstein Case: Far Ranging and Nuclear, Part II
• The Epstein Case: Far Ranging and Nuclear, Part III

The Epstein Case: Far Ranging and Nuclear, Part III

By Rich Kozlovich

What's becoming clear is this is going to be truly sordid and a lot of prominent people are going to be involved.  Was his fortune acquired by blackmailing people?  I have my doubts about that because I think they wanted in on his disgraceful behavior.  All this strikes me as a kind of a Roman thing in modern times.  Here' are my picks for the day on this issue.


Trump Clears Democrat Smokescreen with Removal of Acosta - The hysterical and almost totally unwarranted attack on Alexander Acosta was a way to divert attention from Bill Clinton's squalid relationship with Jeffrey Epstein.

Bill Clinton Dashes Into The Bunker When Pressed About Jeffrey Epstein 'Lolita Express' Flights - Billionaire former hedge fund manager Jeffrey Epstein has been arrested and charged with sex crimes against minors. It was apparently a long time coming and many already knew the stories of his aberrant and perverse sexual proclivities.

Jeffrey Epstein Accused Of Witness Tampering After Allegedly Wiring $350,000 - Billionaire and heinous pervert Jeffrey Epstein has been accused of tampering with a witness after allegedly wiring $350,000 to two people who could have been potential witnesses against him. He was arrested for trafficking underage girls earlier this week and will appear in court Monday. According to the New York Times, the allegation was revealed in a new court filing in which "prosecutors said that Mr. Epstein had paid significant amounts of money to influence individuals who were close to him and who might be witnesses against him at trial."

Theories Fly: Was Epstein Running a Massive Blackmail Scheme And Was He An Intelligence Asset? - His position untenable and his saga inflicting an endless parade of headache-inducing news cycles upon the White House, Secretary of Labor Alexander Acosta announced his resignation this morning. Some of the points he made in his own defense at a lengthy press conference this week seemed fair and valid, but his combination of buck-passing, contrived helplessness, and selective talking points left numerous questions unanswered. So he's out. The stomach-turning Epstein case is far from over, of course, and one gets the sense that there's much more sordidness lurking beneath its already-seedy and disturbing surface.

The Epstein Case: Far Ranging and Nuclear, Part II

By Rich Kozlovich

With lunatics like Senator Schumer screaming for Labor Secretary Andrew Acosta's head, the left works itself into a frothing frenzy attempting to tie Trump in with Epstein through Acosta.  However, the truth is now being exposed and those who let Epstein off the hook were Democrats.  And the corruption by the officials, all Democrats, surrounding that case is astounding. 

Daniel Greenfield  has clearly outlined how this happened in his article The Democrat Who Let Jeffrey Epstein Get Away and asks this question: " Why is no one talking about Barry Krischer?"

Who is Barry Krischer? 

This guy is publicly portrayed as the great humanitarian, but Daniel Greenfield's article let's us know the back story about Krischer, and it isn't pretty. 

That's the story that needs to be pursued by the media and the authorities who are now taking Epstein's crimes seriously, and what's more interesting, I had said this story may have international repercussions, well, it appears this really will now be an international affair because people are now looking at where Epstein's money came from.  But the one thing Greenfield makes clear in this article is this: "unlike Epstein’s Democrat pals, Trump wasn’t hanging out with Epstein after the truth came out."

Please enjoy my picks from American Thinker. Once again, as far as I can tell, this is the only site really focusing on this scandal. 

• The Absurd Attack on Alexander Acosta - The Jeffrey Epstein case is making liberals foam at the mouth with rabid rage. More   
• Bill Clinton: Frequent Flyer on Jeffrey Epstein's 'Lolita Express' - Given Bill Clinton’s track record and Epstein’s expertise on procurement, one doubts it was to solicit donations to the Clinton Foundation.  More
• Speaking of willies: In Epstein case, Bill Clinton is going to find himself politically expendable - The former president at the center of the Epstein scandal is going to find himself "fresh out of friends." More
• Sex, Lies, and Epstein/Clinton Flight Logs - Jeffrey Epstein is facing a 45-year prison sentence for his sex-trafficking adventures. Will he flip on Bill Clinton? More
• Schumer suddenly decides Jeffrey Epstein's money is tainted - Shh...focus on Acosta...yeah, that's the ticket. More

The Epstein Case: Far Ranging and Nuclear

By Rich Kozlovich

Like most newsies I've followed this from the beginning, and that was a long time ago. And like most of us newsies, I never understood how it all went away. Now we know.

We also know this may become one of the most destructive scandals to hit ..... watch it ..... here it comes..... the Democrats, leftists and progressives infesting this nation's government and commerce in all of this nation's history.  And the possible international implications are profound. 

Watergate?  Compared to Democrat scandals over the recent years, that was chump change!

But, in spite of the leftists who keep bringing up Watergate, somehow thinking that makes all the scandals of the Obama meaningless, in reality, all the scandals of the Obama administration were larger....much larger....than Watergate!  But the Democrats and their propaganda wing, commonly known as the Main Stream Media, simply refused to address it.  Why?  Because this wasn't going to destroy conservatives and Republicans.

Although, corrupt legislators in the Congress like Senator Shumer are working overtime to make this a Republican issue by demanding the firing of a former prosecutor on the original case, who's the current Secretary of Labor,  that may turn on them because the decision to go light on Epstein wasn't his alone to make.  Were there bigger political players in the decision making process?  If that's so, we need to know who were these people, and why the decision to go light was made. 

That's going to come out.   But even if it doesn't - that won't change who's really going to face the music over this.  The Democrats, leftists and their supporters.  It's too big now!  It's even too big for the Democrats propaganda wing to ignore. 

Here's a list of the articles dealing with this appearing in American Thinker today.  In fact, as far as I can tell, they seem to be the only website that has been super active regarding the Epstein case, and that includes all the conservative sites I visit daily.

So.....enjoy.....sort of.  I guess.  This whole thing is a depressing and disturbing commentary on the values of our society.  We've giving up on the Judaic/Christian values and principles that made this nation great, and we became Rome. 

The question that must be asked: Was Epstein running 'honey traps' and blackmailing the power elite? - It strikes me as quite unlikely that Jeffrey Epstein's motive for allegedly inviting powerful figures from the U.S. and Europe aboard the Lolita Express on a trip to Orgy Island was mere fellowship — like a round of golf. More

Left goes into overdrive, trying to pin Epstein case on Trump - They're biasing the news. They're editing the Wikipedia pages. They're censoring over at Facebook... More

Barr's recusal from Epstein case should give Democrats the willies - It suggests the evidence against all the Democrats about to be named in the case is airtight. No Epstein-Barr virus here... More

Epstein's former Wall Street mentor: 'The Clinton relationship destroyed Jeffrey Epstein' - If you were facing life in prison, is there a better "big fish" to offer to prosecutors in return for a deal than a president or former president of the United States? More

Investigative reporter with a decade of scrutinizing Epstein calls out Bill Clinton's lies - An issue too hot for a major segment of the Democrats' base for progressive solidarity to silence everyone who is not a movement conservative. More

Epstein panic hitting US and Euro elites - Trump has been preparing for this moment at least since his CPAC speech in 2015, when he predicted trouble for Bill Clinton over "the island." More

The Epstein story...and a big 'what if?' - The Democrats are about to find out via Epstein that their pact with the devil was a bad idea. More