Culture is King! Even When the Culture is Insane!

By Rich Kozlovich

For days I've read unending diatribes as to why Kamala lost the election, with a lot of excuses, and a lot of finger pointing.  I was Biden's fault because he didn't drop out soon enough, or even chose to run in the first place. It was George Clooney's  fault because....well.... I'm not quite sure why he was blamed, but the excuses, accusations, and finger pointing didn't end there. 

On Monday J.B. Shurk published this article, No Wake for the Woke saying:

Democrats will learn nothing from their electoral drubbing.  If they were capable of self-reflection and intellectual growth, they would not need “safe spaces” or social media platforms dedicated to mass censorship.  When you are so afraid of dissent that you feel psychologically compelled to label all contrary opinions as “hate speech,” you are not a fully functioning adult willing to process new information and adapt accordingly.... Democrat operatives tell their dwindling viewing audience that they lost the election because of “disinformation,” racism, and misogyny.  Americans are just too “stupid” and “deplorable” to be trusted with the vote.  The country is a MAGA junkyard filled with “garbage” human beings.  

And they think that was the perfect campaign?   The author goes on to say:

If anyone is to blame for her loss, the formaldehyde femmes explain, it is the news media.  “Journalists” should have used all their airtime reminding Americans that President Trump is “literally Hitler.”  You see, America, Democrats didn’t lose because they’re stark raving mad!  They lost because of bad “messaging”! 

Actually, the unending vilification of Trump was pretty much what the media did, .  But they just don't get it, and as strange as it seems, they seem to actually believe all the clabber they spew out.  Not only that, they're going to double down with what they believe is their '“winning” policy agenda!"

More illegal immigration, less crime control, more expensive energy, less drilling for oil, more spending and borrowing, more inflation, more DEI, more gender bending, a further diminished and capable military, more violations of constitutional rights by the DOJ, FBI, less secure retirement funding, and always remembering, .....censorship is free speech.  

So now what are we seeing from these people?

• The U.S. State Department decided to fund “therapy and listening sessions” for heartbroken employees (so much for the notion that our spies and diplomats are made of sterner stuff).  
• Stephen Colbert and other overpaid late-night “comedians” have turned their shows into group counseling services for damaged Democrats unable to accept Kamala Harris’s loss.  
• Meathead Rob Reiner, who confidently predicted Kamala’s victory on Election Day, is so distraught that he has checked himself into a mental health facility.  
• News organizations are so distressed over their loss of influence that overrated “journalists” take turns screaming at the public for having rejected their pro-Harris talking points.  
• Joy Reid and other mentally unstable hosts on MSNBC are warning Democrats to cut off communications with their Trump-supporting relatives.   
• Democrat teachers owing list of post-election incidents that includes terrorizing students
•  Democrat doctors threatening patients, 
• Democrat psychiatrists conspiring to harm Trump voters, Democrats working to bankrupt Trump-supporting businesses, 
• Democrats divorcing their Trump-voting spouses, 
• Democrats threatening or committing acts of violence against MAGA Americans.
  

He concludes his article by saying:

This much is certain: people this psychologically unstable are not survivors.  They cannot endure conflict.  Hell, they can’t even endure intellectual debate.  They need censorship and “safe spaces” to avoid melting into an emotional puddle.  Democrats will not control the future because they can barely control themselves. 

Hollywood is filled with people living in a hermetically sealed bug house.

• The Radicalization of the Democrat Party
• When Democrats lose vs. when Republicans lose 

DeNiro and other once-favored celebs are in serious need of psychological counseling, only the counselors are probably as troubled as they.  Dick Van Dyke would rather die than suffer another four years with Trump as President.  In years gone by he acknowledged he had, and possibly still has, a serious drinking problem.  It appears it's true, overindulgence in alcohol destroys brain cells. 

There are two characters I really want to highlight, I should say two nitwits, the Meathead, and Ellen DeGeneres.   Eric Utter posted this article, Meathead Wrestles With TDS quoting the self important Reiner:

“I have big decisions to make. For the good of myself, my family, and my country.”......“Ellen DeGeneres whom I have known a long time and is a beautiful and caring woman had the right idea. She obviously does not want to be a part of a place that is filled with hate, evil and fascism. Much respect to her for standing up to madness.”.....I have made the decision to take the next few days to check into a facility for peace and relaxation. No phones, social media, no trolls, just calmness to heal my pain.”

He's checking himself into a facility?  Sounds more like a mental institution filled with psychologically challenged people (Reiner's normal environment) surrounded by people in white coats administering emotion calming drugs.  To me this sounds more like all those around him did an intervention letting him know he sounds like he's losing his mind, as little as there may be there. 

Then there's Ellen DeGeneres who says she can't stand living in such a hateful fascist America under Trump any longer.  So, now they're living in England, a nation that will tax that 400 million she's worth massively.  Which is a good thing since a record number of millionaires are all set to flee Britain over looming labour tax raids.  And if she's under the impression she can shoot off her mouth there as she does here, then she's in for a visit from Britain's Thought Police.  Then of course there's this very real potential:

".....become victims of England’s burgeoning Muslim male extremist population which is sexually assaulting and stabbing women at an unprecedented rate. But doing so without hate, and in a non-evil and entirely antifascist way!"

Ya just gotta see the humor in that, but having said all that, I think Ellen should be congratulated and encouraged and get all of her celebrity friends to follow her.  And to really show us how seriously they all take this, they should all give up their American citizenship.

That'll fix us. 

Oh, I just had a thought.  Where will Ellen go next since Britain is getting ready to dump the recently.... very recently....... elected labour party, which stands for everything Ellen loves, when they elect a Trump of their own?

 

Snatching Defeat Out of the Jaws of Victory

 No one does it better than the Republicans

By Rich Kozlovich

 

This was a cartoon that appeared this week, and it really says it all, but I'm going to do a bit of history and analysis anyway, since we now know McConnell won via John Thune. 

There was a lot of CO2 wasted this week over who the GOP leaders in the Senate would be in the next Congressional term.  The House chose to keep Johnson as Speaker, and Thune as the Majority Leader in the Senate.  

It took only two secret votes in for the GOP to pick Thune, who beat out Cornyn with a vote of 29 votes to 24, and Scott who scored third in the first round of voting, and was out of the running.

Think about this, and I'm going to make an assumption here, if Cornyn got 24 votes in the second round of voting, it seems to me that means Scott had to have had 11 or less votes in the first round.  Out of 53 Republican Senators 11 or less voted for the one who had a history of  being on Trump's side. 

That left the two big McConnell RINO's, which I think is telling, and McConnell's number two man, John Thune won, who for years supported everything Ole Mitch wanted to do, or not do as the case may have been, and while he didn't vote to impeach Trump, there's a huge negative history between he and Trump.   Are we to believe he's going to be all warm and fuzzy now with his claim of being anxious to implement Trump's agenda?  You would think that would be most telling for the GOP, but apparently not.  I'll tell you what, we'll come back to that.  

Let's start with John Cornyn, who came in second with the Senate GOP:

RINO Senator John Cornyn, who’s been deeply involved in a left-wing “disinformation” group that uses the old Russia, Russia, Russia nonsense to run a so-called foreign disinformation department. Elon Musk suspects it’s actually a front to control social media behind the scenes, and he’s probably right......[he wasn't] just a gun-grabbing liberal in Republican clothes..........he’s so much more than that. Not only does he feverishly push the left’s agenda, but he’s also working behind the scenes to help run left-wing “disinformation” groups.............

And he was in Mitch's leadership group, are we to believe Mitch didn't know any of that?

Senator Rick Scott was absolutely one of the biggest Trump supporters in the Senate, and in 2022 offered this 11-Point Plan to drain the swamp and fulfill the MAGA agenda.  The GOP didn't take the Senate in 2022, but the plan showed clear intent to support a Trump agenda, which neither Thune or Cornyn have ever shown such intent.  They're part of the "establishment Democrats and Republicans and their corporate media mouthpieces view the American taxpayer as an ATM to fund their priorities."

The so-called infrastructure bill that 19 miserable, loathsome Republican senators just helped to pass shows the utter worthlessness of a corporatist Republican Party out of touch with its constituents. Most of these senators are from red states, and many of them are people Trump bailed out in 2016 and 2020 (including McTurtle) and helped to get reelected. They just gave their voters, and the American people, the middle finger. One can’t help but think they’re either incredibly stupid or incredibly corrupt; probably both if we’re being honest......

 

While both Thune and Cornyn voted nay on that bill, Mitch McConnell voted for it, and they're his acolytes, which tells of a certain mind set.  Just because they got something right once doesn't give them a pass on all the damage they've done.  Who wants to own a watch that doesn't work just because it right twice a day?

 

Eric Utter posted this piece today:

 

Thune elected majority leader, RINOs emboldened? John Thune.... is a McConnell acolyte, and a bend-over-backwards to compromise with Democrats Trump-disdaining RINO. This is a bad sign. Spineless establishment Republicans can always snatch defeat from the jaws of victory. Even a rout. Trump is transforming the party, and they feel threatened like the Deep Staters do..................The Democrats will do everything they can to destroy Trump and all of his cabinet picks, indeed everyone in his administration, because Trump is trying to Make America Great Again...........

 

Eric went on to say, "Republicans—all of them—need to stand up to Democrats, not aid and abet them in their quest to return to power.........".   And is that going to happen?  Here's my analysis of how Senate power will play out.  

 

There are 53 Republicans and 47 Democrat/Independent Senators, with Arizona being challenged for voter fraud, and Pennsylvania attempting to perform a massive level of voter fraud.  So, what does that mean in the real world? It means the Republicans will officially be in charge of legislation and it also means the Democrat/Independent cabal will still be in control.  

 

Why?   

 

Because the Democrat/Independent contingent will vote in lock step, and there are so many RINO's who will typically vote with the Democrats, the Democrats will still control the Senate.  The realistic numbers?   Anywhere up to 19 RINO's will give the Democrats exactly what they want, and that's the history of Mitch McConnell, and his two acolytes, Thune and Cornyn. 

After all that should we rationally believe Thune when he says he's "extremely honored” to be leading the “Republican team [that] is united behind President Trump’s agenda”? 

Snatching defeat out of the jaws of victory is legendary for the Republicans because they're not who they claim to be, conservatives, they're like John Kasich, who suffers from a serious case of weird compounded by a massive infection of hubris claiming he has the right to define conservatism as he sees fit.   Which is on the left side of a one way street, and he's not alone.  

We make men without chests and expect of them virtue and enterprise. We laugh at honour and are shocked to find traitors in our midst. - C.S. Lewis

What Were the Real Reasons Kamala Failed?

By Rich Kozlovich

What was the real reason Kamala failed?  First, everything Kamala ever stood for decades was far to the left regarding race, gender, energy, taxes, and crime, all of which were unpopular.   To survive she would have had to embrace fracking, more drilling, more support for police, strong immigration policies and control of the border, end racial reparations, end the administration's goals for massive new taxes, end socialized medicine schemes, end the left's schemes to redistribute the nations wealth, end the left's efforts to confiscate the citizens guns, and invading American homes without warrant to search for them.  But Kamala Harris is a hate mongering Marxist, a racist, anti-American, and antisemitic.  Get over it!  As for her economic polices.... and I use the word policies loosely.... are blatantly stupid.  Rent control is always as disaster, but Marxists love eliminating property rights.   

Her lies, flip flops, and a complete failure to offer rational policies even lost her massive numbers of black and Hispanic voters.   For Kamala to renounce her historical policy positions would mean abandoning her base.  And the more she twisted and turned the more ridiculous she appeared.  Her polls were so bad they had to shove her out the door and do interviews, and even when she faced friendly and supportive interviewers she look like a halfwit.  When facing an adversarial interviewer, she demonstrated what ever wit she appeared to have didn't really exist.

She had no policies other than the policies she and Joe Biden promoted for four years, and they were all utter disasters, orchestrated by a President who was suffering from dementia or worse.  Which she never noticed because she, as well as a lot of prominent people, kept saying he was hale and hardy.  Imagine that. 

What did she have left?  Abortion, Trump's a Nazi, and Americans are nothing more than racists, misogynists, and fascists.  So her political strategy was to insult over half the voting population, and somehow she thought that was a really good idea.  Her base?  Well off leftists, criminals, and those who constantly have their hands out to feed at the government trough.  

Her pick of a seriously flawed, and seriously weird Vice Presidential running mate really didn't help, that pick merely amplified her own "mediocrity". He couldn’t even beat Trump in his home county in Minnesota, the state where he's governor.  And now it looks as if his history is drawing some attention by law enforcement.  After this, I'm betting there will be an investigation of his activity with China and regarding claims of personal illegal moral impropriety. 

The reasons she failed according supporters?  She didn't fail, it was America that failed. 

Jen Psaki went over the edge, proclaiming the usual lies about Trump.  The White House blames covid. Now you have to admit, that's unique.  Jimmy Kimmel says: 

“It was a terrible night for women, for children, for the hundreds of thousands of hard working immigrants who make this country great, for health care, for our climate, for science, for journalism, for justice, for free speech”.   

Thank you Jimmy, the more you talk the dumber you look.  

Then we have Bette Midler who deleted her X account after she promised to drink Drano if Trump was elected.  The stunningly stupid Rob Reiner, who claimed he'd “set himself on fire” if Trump won, declared that Kamala was the winner, just before Trump's landslide victory.   AOC's explanation? America is a sexist racist nation.  

Cardi B, whoever she is, brilliantly proclaimed her loss was the reason "why some of y’all states be getting hurricanes".    Joy Reid scolds male Latino Trump voters because their illegal migrant relatives will suffer, and she's supported by the communist President of Colombia.  Joy Reid is not only dumb, she's a historical ignoramus.  Two things.  

First, did it ever occur to her that, perhaps.... just perhaps.... they supported Trump because most of their relatives are here legally, and most of the criminals illegally coming over the border are hiding in their communities murdering, stealing, and pushing illegal drugs.  

Secondly, Hispanic groups supported mass deportations in the 1950's, and attitude was prevalent in the Hispanic communities of America going back to the 1930's. 

Joe Scarborough says black and Hispanic men have issues with race, and misogyny.  A position supported by Al Sharpton, which really lends credibility to that statement.......right?   Little Jimmy Carville is depressed.  Well good, as he's been the cause a lot depression in America for decades.   

Letitia James "vows to continue her lawfare against Trump", and I hope she does, as it's my belief she's committed election interference crimes and if there's massive election interference RICO investigation, or even a felony charge of "conspiracy against rights",  she could very well end up in jail.  Now that would be fun to watch them have a swat team at her door at 5:00 AM, handcuffed, and perp walked to a waiting van while being filmed by the media,  alerted ahead of time of course, just as they did with Roger Stone.

 

 

The Era of corp media dominance is over.   

What followed was a brutal, ten-year, house-to-house fight. Backed by Hollywood, academia, the Deep State’s grotesque alphabet agencies, the legal system, a shameless Democrat Party, and hundreds of billions of corporate dollars, the media committed itself to destroying one man, and the inevitable third-act climax arrived during this year’s presidential campaign........ 

In the preceding years, Trump had been battered, bruised, and covered in the flaming arrows of the left’s naked corruption and unquenchable thirst for power: two impeachments, 91 indictments, and 34 felony convictions, all at the hands of a federal special prosecutor, two local Democrat prosecutors, and a Democrat state attorney general. The feds raided his home. Lawfare sought to bankrupt his business. He was literally shot in the face. He was almost literally gunned down on a golf course.

 Backing all of this was a relentless corporate media cacophony of lies, hoaxes, slander, misinformation, disinformation, and desperate distractions.

The Pravda media is filled with liars with big egos, bad attitudes, and a non existent moral foundation, and they absolutely lost it when it was declared Trump was the victor, and heads exploded at the Woke "UK-based Economist magazine  when it was announced of Donald Trump’s blowout victory, insisting this means '“huge” damage to America’s economy, institutions, and the world."   Well I think we should thank the editor's at the Economist for their input.  Now we know of another publication that needs to be ignored.  Here's the reality about economists.  Most of them have no idea what they're talking about.  

Talking about the nitwits who don't know what they're talking about, here's how the "ladies of the View" handled Kamala's massive defeat.

However, and I find Chris Cuomo's recent transformation on so many issues confusing,  saying Trump Won Because of “Wokeism Run Amok”.  Go figure, that's not the  

Alex Soros, delusional as ever, says failed Democrat policies aren't to blame for Kamala's loss, it was  ‘unstoppable’ global trends.  Does he mean unstoppable because they're sick and tired of leftist tyranny that he, his father, the Democrat party and others are trying to impose on humanity?   

And after spending billions and still losing, Kamala's team blames Biden, and Biden's team blames Kamala.  George Clooney for pushing Biden out, ‘It’s All His Fault’.  Ya just gotta love that.  

You may find this article by Andrea Widburg a really interesting analysis of how leftism must be a mental disorder.  

• America's Progressive Era Comes Crashing Down, Who's to Blame? - In their search for culprits, will the left look in the mirror? 
• Not the Party of Common Sense’
• But Dem Strategist Admits: We Don’t Know How to Talk to ‘Normal People…’

As for all those Hollywood celebrity endorsements, no one is impressed, and no one cares what they think.  When will these egotistical nitwits get that?  And when are they going to do what they promised over and over again, which many in America sincerely hoped they would do, that is, leave the country.  In recapping the slimy ‘celebs’ who said they’d off themselves or flee America with a Trump victory, Olivia Murray says: "Well have at it—time to get going! Also, where can I tune in to watch?"

• Leftists Flood Google with ‘Move to Canada’ Searches Following Trump Victory
  

Well this is a long piece, and there's a lot more, but it's time to cut it off.  I've listed all the finger pointing and Trump Derangement Syndrome stuff here today. In Monday's edition we'll take in other view points.  

 

Squeal To Make A Deal

By Rich Kozlovich

It's being claimed this has been a record election year turnout, and Kamala got 20 million fewer votes than Joe Biden in 2020, a year when the nation was locked down, forced to wear masks, and social distance.  

So, where are those 20 million votes?   Leftists are claiming there's something fishy going on here, and they're right. I had predicted the only way Kamala could with this race was the same way Joe "the basement candidate" Biden won.  Massive voter fraud.  Only this time the fraud would have to be so massive it would be impossible to ignore, even by SCOTUS, as dim a light bulbs as most of them are.   As one commentator noted, the voter fraud in that election was so egregious Joe Biden resurrected more people than Jesus Christ.

But there may be a rational explanation.   Maybe it was magic, or Scotty from Star Trek failed to bean them down this time, or they moved back to Russia?  Or maybe this explanation is a bit more rational.  They never existed in the first place!  After all, they weren't there in 2012, or 2016, so why would they be there only in 2020, and then be missing in 2024?  

The new Republican party isn't playing by the same rules any longer, and it's clear they were far more on top of stopping that with the new RNC leadership.  No more playing patsy for the thugs on the left, and make no mistake, fraud is a crime.   They're going after these fraudsters, and if they go after them with a massive all inclusive election interference RICO investigation they can drag in all these corrupt district attorneys, judges, government employees, and sitting politicians into it.  Let the purge begin, and let it end up with a lot of people in prison because they committed crimes, not some corrupt lawfare scheme, and not like the political prisoners in the January 6th scandal.  Crimes committed by criminals who need to be called to account. 

Once such an investigation begins we're going to see how loud these vile swine can squeal to make a deal.

Lichtman's Thirteen Keys. Kamala Fails all Thirteen

By Rich Kozlovich

On October 23, 2024 this Townhall article appeared, "Allan Lichtman’s Keys Say Harris Will Win?"  It appears Lichtman, using his "keys" accurately predicted the out come of  "every presidential election since 1984 — except one", and claiming to use his "keys" he's calling the election for Kamala Harris.  Let's explore this.  

Since 1960 starting at age fourteen, out of the twelve elections that have taken place I've accurately predicted eleven of them.....sort of...... and we'll come back to that.

I accurately predicted Kennedy, Johnson, and Nixon wins.  Then Carter surprised me, as it was clear to me he was a loser. Then I picked Reagan, Bush, Clinton, and Bush the Second.  

Obama's first and second victories were disappointments, and at the beginning I thought he would lose, but as the campaign progressed it came down to looking at who the Republicans nominated, John McCain, and Mitt Romney, both loser RINO's who conservatives just refused to vote for, and it became clear Obama would win.   

While I still maintain voter fraud played a role in both those elections, but given who he was running against, Obama didn't need that much.  I didn't pick Trump as the candidate, but after he was nominated I picked him for President, and then finally Biden surprised me again, but not because he won.  Because he didn't. 

Other than Carter, I failed to accurately predict the Biden "victory" was because voter fraud was massive, and that was the real factor, not the candidates.  I picked Trump, and he won, but the system was so corrupted, including the judiciary, Biden fraudulently sits behind the Resolute Desk.

Taking that into consideration, I've accurately predicted eleven of the twelve candidates since 1960.   From a teenager who knew nothing, to a bug man who knows a lot, I've been able to see things clearly.   So saying Lichtman's accuracy rate is important is a load of horsepucky, and so is how he uses his Thirteen Keys.  I think the keys are valid, it's Lichtman who's the problem, and we'll come back to that also.  So, let's take a look at his Thirteen Keys.

1.  Party mandate, after the midterm elections, the incumbent party holds more seats in the U.S. House of Representatives than after the previous midterm elections. 

The Republicans took over the House. 

2. No primary contest There is no serious contest for the incumbent party nomination. 

The Democrats forced Biden out and enthroned Kamala without one primary victory. 

3. Incumbent seeking re-election The incumbent party candidate is the sitting president. 

Kamala is not he sitting President, and the seated President is depicted, accurately so, as having dementia or some other neurological problem. 

4. No third party There is no significant third party or independent campaign. 

Kennedy launched a fairly successful third party campaign, and then gave up and joined Trump.

I'm combining keys 5, 6 and 7.  Strong short-term economy. The economy is not in recession during the election campaign, and or, strong long-term economy with real per capita economic growth during the term equals or exceeds mean growth during the previous two terms, and major policy change, the incumbent administration effects major changes in national policy. 

The economy is in recession, and if things aren't changed it will end up in depression.   Biden and the Democrats have failed miserably on all counts and are wanting to double down on all of their failed anti-American policies. 

8. No social unrest, meaning there is no sustained social unrest during the term. 

Sine the amount of social unrest is ubiquitous, that's an abject failure for the administration as crime and violence is spreading like a plague due to their criminal friendly policies and the mass illegal immigration of criminals, thugs, rapists, terrorists, and more, all of which they're saying they're going to double down on. 

9. No scandal.  The incumbent administration is untainted by major scandal. 

Well, I have to chuckle at that, as both Kamala and Walz are walking scandals of unending lies, corruption, potential treason, and even accusations of illegal sexual misconduct.  The book on Kamala is at best sordid, and the book on Walz runs the gaumet from weird, to treasonous, and worse in between. 

I'm combining 10 and 11.  No foreign or military failure, the incumbent administration suffers no major failure in foreign or military affairs, and,  major foreign or military success, the incumbent administration achieves a major success in foreign or military affairs. 

Starting in Afghanistan and ending with the Russo/Ukraine War, and the Israel/Hamas/Hezbollah/Iran War, all of the domestic/economic of the administration has been a total failure.  There have been no foreign/domestic policy in which they can claim success, unless they lie about their failures calling them successes, as the FBI did with their crime statistics. 

12.  Charismatic incumbent, the incumbent party candidate is charismatic or a national hero. 

Not only are Kamala and Walz not charismatic, they're an embarrassment, and on a daily basis.  And to such a degree many Democrat candidates don't want to campaign with them for fear what those two have will rub off on them in voter's eyes. 

13.  Uncharismatic challenger, the challenging party candidate is not charismatic or a national hero. 

Trump is, if anything, charismatic. This one is the beauty, as it's hard to explain how Lichtman can claim Trump isn't charismatic, but he does so in this manner: 

Dismissing "Trump’s charisma as not fitting his narrowly defined parameters, “You have to be the once in a generation, broadly inspirational candidate, cutting across partisan lines. Clearly, while Trump is a great showman, he appeals only to a narrow base. And, therefore,…he doesn’t fit the criteria of the keys. He’s no FDR.” 

Two things.  As the author points out he left out “national hero", which the author rightly argues, "Trump qualifies for, subsequent to his heroic response to the assassination attempt in Butler, PA."  And secondly Lichtman's leftist bent is showing by calling a manure pile a rose garden. Kamala fails in all thirteen of his keys, and yet Lichtman says she'll win.  

The bug man says the only way she can win is through voter fraud on such a massive scale it will make the voter fraud that brought Biden into the White House look legitimate.  And my record is better than his because Trump won the 2020 election, and there's no way he could have predicted a Biden win based on his thirteen keys as Biden failed all of them and Trump succeeded all of them except social unrest, and that was deliberately perpetrated by the Democrats, and the Soros cabal of destructive globalist billionaires.  

Considering the issue of voter fraud and Joe Biden, the reality of my record is eleven out of twelve, and his real record is five out of seven, and Kamala's campaign is collapsing.  Even the owner of the far left wing newspaper, the Los Angeles Times, is passing on Kamala.  But not because she's a far left, Marxist nitwit.  It's because she's not far left enough enough to suit the owner, and that's the Democrat party now, and of the future.  

The question that should be in everyone's mind is what happens if the country manages to turn the House, the Senate, and the White House over to the Republicans in this election, what happens to the Democrat party?  

First, there will be leftist riots in all of America's major cities by BLM, Antifa, and all the other rioting gangsters funded by leftists.  Then the leadership will be challenged by the farthest of the far left and drive a stake into the heart of the party, because destructive far left nitwits like OAC are in districts that will keep voting for them forever, just like Mad Maxine, and the moderates will have already been driven out of the party, giving them total control.  There will be no third party because there no longer is a loyal opposition mentality in American politics because one of the parties is absolutely the party of treason. 

Update, 11/8/24, 6:16 PM:  Dog ate my homework: Allan Lichtman offers his excuses for failing to foresee Trump's big victory - By Monica Showalter, November 8, 2024 -  Lichtman is a bright academic prognosticator, but boy, was he insufferable during this election, claiming he had 'science' of some kind to forecast the election for Kamala Harris.  He says it's unnecessary to rely on polls or other indicators for presidential predictions, because all one needed to do was look at his system of 13 "keys," meaning, checkboxes of conditions on the ground, in a methodology that sort of resembles how Chinese astrology is done. 

Lichtman had been right in the past but with all the media attention he got for it, he seemed to have lost his touch, reaching Peak Allan instead of a correct prediction. He badmouthed RealClearPolitics which has a poll of polls, as well as pollsters in general because he insisted he was always right. He got into a scrap with Nate Silver, who makes predictions of his own, a long extended one on Twitter, insisting that Nate's forecast for a Trump victory was utter nonsense.  Now he's eating crow, and his excuses are something else...........

Update, 11/8/24, 8:17 PM:   Instead of Admitting Fault, Presidential Historian Blames Bigotry and “Disinformation” for His Incorrect Election Prediction - By Jason Cohen, Daily Caller News Foundation • Nov. 8, 2024 - Historian Allan Lichtman on Thursday largely blamed “disinformation” and bigotry for his wrong prediction that Vice President Kamala Harris would defeat President-elect Donald Trump in Tuesday’s elections.  

Lichtman accurately forecast nine of the 10 last elections before wrongly predicting Harris would be victorious, according to USA Today. The historian, on his YouTube channel, argued that voters were not “rational” or “pragmatic” due to what he characterized as a massive uptick in “disinformation” and Trump’s promotion of “xenophobia,” “misogyny” and “racism.”......

Update, 11/14/24, 4:42 AM:   Lichtman Blames Conservative ‘Disinformation,’ Elon Musk for Prediction Fail - Historian and political scientist Allan Lichtman said Tuesday on NewsNation’s “Cuomo” that conservative media disinformation and billionaire Elon Musk were why his election prediction that Vice President Harris would win the presidency was incorrect.  Lichtman said, “As I said, things could go wrong. There could be unprecedented events that change the pattern of 160 years of history. That’s what happened here.”

My Gazette: Media Collapse and Corruption Part IV

By Rich Kozlovich,  Tags:

 

The claim some time has been the Main Stream Media, or as I call it the Pravda media, has lost all credibility.  The debates sealed that claim.  What was the media's biggest beef with J.D. Vance?  The man had the audacity to confidently smile.  Imagine that.  Did he shout, scowl, wave his arms in outrage, bang his fits on the podium?  No, he did much worse, and it was far more "chilling".  He outrageously " put on a mask of likability and empathy.”    That was unforgivable male toxicity.  After a face crime such as that, how does he even dare "breathe  in the air we breathe on this planet! ”  But that was from Maureen Dowd, as far left loon a as there is. 

In Discover the Networks, Dowd is described as a "narcissistic writer tending to reduce “all political phenomena .... to caricatures of the personalities", who finds it “easier to whine than to take a stand or offer solutions".  Her "favorite rhetorical device is parallelism", which is like a the logical fallacy of inappropriate comparisons.  Claims anyone who opposed abortion suffers from "mental impairment", and is an unending race baiter, and I think the real reason she dislikes Vance so much is she identifies as one J.D. Vance's childless cat ladies, just like Kamala Harris, "who hadn’t procreated.... were “miserable” and had no “direct stake” in the country", whether she owns a cat or not. 

The arrogance of the "stars" of the Pravda Media is beyond the pale, Stephanopoulos says "he will not continue with any interview with a Republican if they won't concede Joe Biden won in 2020.  He won't allow any discussion of voter fraud, or watered down ballot rules.  Nitwits like him "think it's journalistic malpractice to do a live interview with President Trump on television."  Why? Because if it's live they can't contort what was said as they've done over and over again with taped interviews.    

Then we have Morning Joe Scarborough, who has been described as America's Baghdad Bob.  You remember Baghdad Bob don't you?  He was "Saddam Hussein’s Information Minister, Mohammed Saeed al-Sahhaf", who '"ludicrously claimed “The infidels are committing suicide by the hundreds on the gates of Baghdad.”  "Americans “are going to surrender or be burned in their tanks. They will surrender, it is they who will surrender."  The next day Baghdad fell.

Joe Scarborough? At one point, he was considered a conservative Republican congressman from Florida. Today, he is a disgraceful fool spouting a never-ending array of talking points for President Joe Biden on cable news. His credibility as a journalist, although never very impressive, has completely evaporated.  His performances on MSNBC have become so laughable that the comparisons to “Baghdad Bob” are impossible to ignore.

 Scarborough claims former President Donald Trump was “preparing for civil war.”  What triggered that statement?  Well, he quotes Trump saying:

 “Those who want to stop us from achieving this future have slandered me, impeached me, indicted me, tried to throw me off the ballot. And who knows? Maybe even tried to kill me.”.....“You know, I always say there is an enemy from within, and there is an outside enemy. If you are smart, the outside enemy is not going to be a problem. Russia, China, North Korea, we are not going to have a problem if you have a smart president. If you have not such a smart president then it’s a problem. We have an enemy from within, which I think is much more dangerous than the outside enemy.”

How does Scarborough define all those true statements?  He calls that a stunning level of un-American activity. 

“The level of un-American activity that you just saw is stunning. That is un-American. They know they’re lying. Donald Trump knows that’s a lie. He will tell you that the Secret Service, he thought, did the best job they could do. The fact that JD Vance and Trump’s family would out and out say what they said takes the threat of violence takes the threat beyond where it was even leading up to January 6. This is an increasingly desperate person, an increasingly desperate family, who is preparing for civil war. They just are.”

And the list of outrageous statements by Scarborough and his team are listed in the linked artilce, go there and see clearly they're all about "punishing Trump, coddling Biden".  And "this is what our media elite considers a well-functioning democracy and apolitical justice", and the reason I call them the Pravda media.

There's no debate or interview that won't be a designed trap to make conservatives look bad, and a lot of that is backfiring as conservatives have given up any idea the media will play fair.  They won't, and now people like J.D. Vance are prepared to deal with them, and even challenge them.   

Katarina Bradford on October 16, 2024 posted this article, 4 Times the Left-wing Media has  C0mpletely Destroyed its Credibility, saying:

The mainstream media no longer pursues truth. It is a puppet of the political establishment and will demonize anyone who dares question their establishment-approved narratives. Labeling everyday Americans as “conspiracy theorists” and purveyors of “disinformation,” the media has weaponized its platforms to shield political elites rather than holding them accountable. From silencing critical stories like Hunter Biden’s laptop to ridiculing valid concerns about COVID vaccines, the mainstream media has consistently acted as the enforcer of the political machine, not a champion of truth.

As the facts came to light, many of the stories they dismissed and suppressed have been vindicated—exposing not only the media’s bias but also the lengths they’ll go to discredit those who challenge their carefully constructed narratives. Here are four of the most shocking lies the mainstream media purported to protect their leftist political elites that absolutely destroy their credibility: 

Lie #1: The Hunter Biden laptop theory is Russian disinformation.....
Lie #2: The COVID lab-leak theory is a conspiracy theory.....
Lie #3: COVID vaccines are safe and effective.....
Lie #4: Joe Biden's mental state is "not" declining.....

Actually, while those are four excellent examples, the amount of vile and corrupt lies of commission, lies of omission, logical fallacies, and projection, spewed out by these corrupt misfits is much larger than just these four examples, actually going back a hundred years, and probably just as long as news organizations have existed. 

Will This Stolen Election Create a Third Party?

By Rich Kozlovich 

 I originally published this on Saturday, December 19, 2020, but given the run by RFK, Jr. and his "Independent Party", I thought it was worth republishing, as the principle issues regarding third parties remain the same.  Liz Chaney says the GOP will realign, and of course she means against Trump.  Well, that's delusional, and she's not gotten one bit smarter since her state kicked her out of the Congress, in point of fact she's nose dived into the stupid pool, and has dragged her dad in with her.   I don't see anything that's changed other than any talk of a "Trump" third party is meaningless since now Trump is the leader of the Republican party.    

Here were my thoughts four years ago.

Recently I've read about a potential conservative third party emerging from the Republican party, and there seems to be a lot of discussion among conservatives over this based on conversations I've had.  There are two articles I've posted today dealing with this that takes us into the emotions of such thinking, and the practical thinking that I believe will prevail.

First!  This piece by Sarah Cowgill entitled, They Are Mad as Hell but Will They Take It Anymore?, with the sub-headline, "Has there ever been a more opportune time to create a new political party?" @ Liberty Nation, where she states:

Out of the ashes of an embittered, archaic, and dying Republican Party, Donald J. Trump rose to the occasion while descending on a golden escalator to put the GOP out of its self-inflicted misery. The Silent Majority was silent no more, and joining forces with an America-first candidate, 63 million energized, excited, and optimistic people swept the man and dozens of hangers-on into office.

Instead of embracing a win and a Republican mandate in both houses of Congress, petty arguments, backstabbing, distancing, and incredible disloyalty to the president, Republicans have done little to keep their party members happy. Rather, the green-eyed monster from losers long ago reared its ugly head in the trappings of Senators John McCain and Mitt Romney and their sycophants who followed along. For many, the fix was in – from the inside out — making the Republican Party no better than the Democrats of 2016.

She's suggesting that a "Trumplican Party", made up of America Firsters, blacks and Hispanics who've turned the corner because they could clearly see Trump did more for them in four years than did the Democrats in decades, and those she calls Trumplicans who believe in real justice.  Not a dual system we're clearly stuck with now where the elite get away with treason.  Along with those who support a strong economy, a strong military, and immigration control.  

She didn't mention less regulations, less spending, less taxes, etc, but those are the traditional conservative talking point for Republican party leaders to keep the rank and file in line while never delivering when they had the power, and this election has made it clear, they never intended to. 

That may be emotionally appealing, but is it a real potential?  Personally, I don't think the groups she's outlining are going to support that idea, and it's not going to happen. 

The second piece I posted today was from Brad Slager, who in his piece, The President’s Departure Means the Never-Trump Crowd Now Find Themselves as Outcasts observed: 

When former RNC chairman and current Never Trump minion Michael Steele came out last month to state they had plans for how to reconstitute the Republican Party his plea was met with little more than eye rolls from the GOP. When the pyromaniacs who burned down the barn come forward to state they will be there to help rebuild it the normal reaction is to chase them off the property with buckshot................

He went on to say: 

To go along with these figures acting like evicted tenants pledging not to send Christmas cards there is Bill Kristol, who has appeared like a doddering shopper at a mall who forgot where he parked the car. Kristol this week made the attempt to promote the concept of forming a third political party, and the result could not have been more dismal. His proposal was to come up with The Owl Party as a centrist alternative and he nearly broke his nose, stumbling so magnificently. Once he realized there has already been a satirical Owl Party - one that stood for Out With Logic - he wavered on his cause, and once he was met with complete apathy it was mere hours later when he had abandoned his plan entirely. 

While the two articles differ in that one wants real conservatives to form a third party, and Sager's piece observes a third party of Never Trumpers isn't in any way possible.  But the issue isn't about which group, it's about any group among the Republicans.   The fact is, it's my view there will be no viable third party by any dissatisfied Republicans, from any segment of the party.

There may be an effort to form a third party made up of disgusted Democrats, who are moderately (if there really is such a thing as a moderate Democrat) to the left, and disgusted Republicans who are fauxcons, versus real conservatives, but that won't float.  History and the cultures they're departing are against them and the American culture won't support them!  

Why?  Paraphrasing Harry Truman:  "If the public has a choice between a Republican and a Republican, they'll chose a Republican every time".  And it works in reverse. 

As Slager notes, and I think very credibly. about these Never Trumper fauxcons:

In other words these allegedly "True Conservatives" declare they will continue what they have been doing for years -- acting like Democrats and supporting left-wing agendas. They will do this all the while telling others on the Right how they are not truly conservative. As they wander off into the political wilderness these pariahs will not be missed by anyone in conservative circles.

It's clear that segment of the Republican party is toast.  They may as well become Democrats, except the Democrats don't want them!  Schadenfreude!

Well, what about a Trumplican party?  Teddy Roosevelt tried that with his Bull Moose party, and it failed, worse yet, it split the vote and Woodrow Wilson, known as America's first fascist president, was elected.  In America political parties are formed around ideas, not personalities.

There was talk about the Tea Party becoming a third party, and there was some effort there, but most of the Tea Party people were only interested in supporting the party that embraces conservative issues. Which of course left them no choice but the Republicans.  Only there was a problem with that! They learned the Republican leadership was great at the talking the talk, but was lousy at walking the talk.  

Their options? 

Form a third party or take over the Republican party.  They chose the latter, and that's what they've been doing, much to the dismay of the Mitch McConnell and John McCain crowd, with McCain calling them misfits.  

The fraud of this election, and the actions of the current Republican leadership, has outraged them and their take over is going to happen big time now.  In two years there will be another election for House and Senate members, and the landscape has changed politically, and socially.  

The take over started at the local level and in this election Republicans picked up 11 seats, and they're now in control of more state legislatures, which is critical, because they'll be in charge of redistricting their states, and especially in states where the census has given them more seats in the House.  The Republicans could "dominate the process".

If so, there will be a new Third Party! The new, improved, outraged and transformed Republican Party!  The Kraken has been awakened! 

News and Views

By Rich Kozlovich 

 

Well, it looks like we have another Road to Damascus convert.  Alan Dershowitz has dropped out of the Democrat party for its blatant antisemitism.  Okay, I get that, but he just now noticed?  What about all the other vile stuff they've been promoting for all of his life, and he never noticed that?  Amazing!  Well, this epiphany doesn't make up for all the damage he's supported for all these years, and at his age, he won't have to wait long to answer for it.   

The Chaney's, daughter and father, have gone off the deep end supporting Kamala, because Trump is such a danger to democracy, and Bush says he's not endorsing anyone.  It's not just Trump either, Liz is also supporting Ted Cruz's opponent.  

 

So, what's that all mean?   

 

It means they support antisemitism, higher prices for all the essentials, higher energy costs, higher taxes, outrageous theft by the federal government on "unrealized capital gains" , more regulations, more spending, more debt, more government bureaucracy, they love the CCP, and less freedom.  But it's Trump who is the danger to democracy.  The Chaney's have no shame, and could care less what their choice of ignorant arrogance would do to America, and now conservatives will shun them and the left will laugh at them.  What fools, right along with Mitt Romney, Dennis Kucinich, and Susan Collins. 

You know that little voice in your head that keeps you from saying the things you shouldn't say?  Yeah, well, I don't have that, but entirely too many pretty good writers do.  Let's start out with this foundational reality!   Polls are crap, and it drives me crazy when conservatives cite polls in states claiming Kamala Harris is ahead, which Brian C. Joondeph a regular writer at American Thinker does.  However, he also had this to say about Colorado:

Surprisingly illegal immigration and the border fall far behind the economy. That may change as news of Venezuelan gangs taking over apartment buildings in Aurora Colorado, Chicago, Dallas, and New York City makes headlines. Many other cities likely have or will face the same.  An illegal alien truck driver killed a Colorado man and received less than a one-year prison sentence. Deportation? Fat chance in sanctuary Colorado. Voters may change the 2024 election mantra to “It’s the border, stupid.”

 

Then we have The Harris Mystique by Matthew Continetti outlining how Kamala has crashed and burned consistently and yet is now running for President saying the Pravda media is totally committed to Kamala, with "84 percent positive coverage" in her first month as a candidate, a far cry from Trump’s 89 percent negative coverage during the same period", but claims, "worshipful press coverage doesn’t fully explain the reversal of Harris’s fortunes." I disagree.  Any upswing, which I don't really believe exists, is a massive nationally organized effort by the left following the Goebbels philosophy of keep repeating lies until they become truth. 

 

The Pravda media is so contemptible and so vile no corruption of thought, lies, or the twisting of facts will stand in the way of this organized effort to totally scam the public into believing Kamala is sharp as a tack..... ooops!    Isn't that what they told the world about Biden?  Then the very next day after his debate with Trump demanded he drop out of the race because he was a babbling idiot.  Remarkable!  You gotta really admire those media guys, they really know a babbling idiot when they see one.  That's meant as a snark for those who don't get it.  

The Biden/Harris administration imposed almost $1.4 trillion in regulations, wants to end right to work laws, and tax the Nation to the tune of another $5 trillion of new taxes over 10 years, and this is the trend in each and every state run by the Democrats, and seemingly the left loves it.  Those a just a few of the stunningly unpleasant realities of Kamala Harris the Pravda media will continue to hide, misdirect, forget about, twist the facts, lie, and falsely accuse other's of doing the things the Obama cabal are in reality actually doing.   They are cause of higher costs.  An administration so filled with incompetence and stupidity, I would think they should scare everyone with their treasonous actions and decisions. 

Now here's something really resonating with conservatives.  Trump has promised to purge the federal bureaucracy by creating "..... a Government Efficiency Commission tasked with conducting a complete financial and performance audit of the entire federal government — and making recommendations for drastic reforms.” And that needs done badly.  

We know the very young are rarely impacted by covid, and we also know the damage these false vaccines represent to those who've taken the shots, and the damage is serious. So, what's the deep state wanting to do, inject very small children with these false vaccine, gene altering chemical compounds.  Some one needs to go to jail over this, and it's long overdue for Americans to recognize these "seven myths" of our medical system, and the damage these "myths' represent.   

In western civilization the idea of a religious war is anathema.  There's only one problem with that.  Western civilization has no say in that.  If a religious movement decides to declare war based on their religious principles, then it's a religious war, and Islam has been at war with civilization for all of it's existence, including today!  We really do need to get that.

The lawfare claims by the left against Trump are starting to come unglued.  A Manhattan attorney working for..or with.. Bragg admitted it was all a corrupt farce for personal political gain for Bragg.  Judge Merchan has decided to put off his sentencing until after the election in order make sure there's no appearance of election interference.  Hogwash, this whole trail was clearly set to do just that. It's being claimed he fears sentence him now because no matter what schemes he's hatched, Trump's polls skyrocketed, and he fears sentencing him will help in his re-election bid.  Well, there may be some truth to that, but what I believe is he sees the handwriting on the wall, and he knows if trump is elected there's going to be an RICO investigation on all this lawfare corruption nationwide, and he'll be a part of it. 

 

 The Congressional Black Caucus has issued new guidelines for corporations to use in adopting their diversity, equity and inclusion policies, as if this is anything but a scam.  DEI is nothing short of the acceptance of incompetence without consequence, and they need to be told to shove it.  If they really want to improve the conditions in black America they need to stop lying and recognize it's not racism that's black America's problem.  It's single parent families, and the black churches bear a large degree of responsibility for that.

 

For years politics in black America was centered in black churches, assuming that's still true, what have we seen? Radicals like Jeremiah Wright, Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton, Amos Brown, and others, blaming all of their problems on whites. Black academics are equally to blame. Not one word about illegitimacy, the real root of their problems.

If you want a stable successful society, you start with a stable foundation, the family, made up of a man, a woman, and their children. Let them address that, and then we won't have to talk about DEI. 

Remember when the Pravda media highlighted .....  24/7 ...with outrage I might add... every time Bush went to his home in Texas insisting he was neglecting his duties and responsibility as President?    Well, it appears Ole Joe spent over forty percent of his time on vacation, and no one noticed.  Imagine that.  

Ya just gotta really hand it to those media boys, they really know what's going on.  Unless they don't what you to know what's going on, and don't want you to know what's going on.  

Now, who could find fault wit that?

When it Comes to Abortion, There's Only One Choice

By Rich Kozlovich 

The Democrats have only one issue in this upcoming election they believe is a winning issue for them, and that's abortion.  The right to murder the innocent unborn is being used against the Republicans, and especially Trump. 

Yesterday Dean Davis posted this article, Is the New Pro-Choice GOP Committing Political Suicide?, dealing with the fact Trump and JD Vance are both opposed to a national ban on abortion, that Trump would veto any such legislation, and SCOTUS was right that the states should decide that issue.  He states:

Imagine, then, our shock and dismay now that President Trump and much of the GOP leadership have rejected the historic GOP position on abortion and the sanctity of human life.

The litany of President Trump’s recent statements is all too familiar.  He has told us that the SCOTUS got it right, that abortion law is best left to the states and the (diverse and ever-shifting) will of the voters.  Though he personally opposes late-term abortions, he is fine with letting blue states permit them, even up to birth.  He thinks current abortion law in Florida, Arizona, and some 14 other states (law that has saved thousands of lives) is too restrictive.

I find this position by Trump and Vance to be vile. Abortion is the murder of the innocent unborn, and violates all the principles outlined in the Constitution, and the human conscience!  Once the human conscience has been scarred, there's no end to the horrors humanity can perpetrate.

Those shifting values are the result of the corruption of truth by the Pravda media, and the leftist controlled system of education in America destroying foundational Judaic/Christian values of the nation, and many heretical "Christian" and "Jewish" religious "leaders" have become vile in their support of this corruption.  

Then there's the "Trump made a smart, pragmatic decision" argument saying "any rational individual would rather see Trump reelected by playing a little chess than lose by being a martyr."  

Then there are those who point out unlike other Republican Presidents Trump has appointed judges to SCOTUS who would vote against Roe v. Wade, and did.  

The problem with these arguments are three fold.  

First, I really get tired of the "pragmatic" argument.  Who wants a leader that stands on the hill waving a flag that says, "I stand for consensus", instead of a leader with the courage to say, "I stand for truth, justice, and the protection of human life."   True leaders are willing to draw lines in the sand and tell the world, "you're wrong, you're going the wrong way, and I'm going to tell you why!"  And then fight with truthful and solidly rational arguments, unflinchingly!  

Those who say, "I oppose abortion personally, but I don’t want to impose my view of
abortion on others” is a hypocritical corruption in truth, morality, and logic.   How about this!  Would the argument, "While I oppose slavery personally, it's okay if my neighbors have slaves", resonate with you?

Secondly, there's no way a President can know what happens to these jurists once they're seated.  Trump just got lucky.   And based on some of the decisions by these so-called "traditionalist" judges, we can see how lucky.

Entirely too many of these judicial nominees are closet liberals when it comes to the Constitution, because culture is king.  The entire structure of America's legal system, from academia to sitting jurists, is made up of entirely too many leftists who take on an air of self-righteous arrogance, and I believe traditionalists fear being ostracized from their culture.  Heterodoxy isn't for the faint of heart.  It takes guts, it takes determination, and the willingness to be attacked unendingly, just as we've seen Justice Thomas being attacked.

Finally there's the argument for justifying this is that it "should be up to the states" is because "people in Alabama would think differently on the issue than people in California."   That's a false narrative.  First, can anyone name one issue where that hasn't been the case?  The federal government doesn't operate on a "they think differently" philosophy when it comes to rule making.  The federal government has ignored those value differences time after time, after time, on every major issue the nation has faced, and imposed a one size fits all solution, and no objections are allowed, and the courts have consistently supported that.  I'll tell you what, we'll come back to that.

 

The Chevron ruling is just one example, and those rules weren't even imposed by Congress, they were imposed on the nation by unelected bureaucrats.  So, why is abortion different? Why is murdering the innocent unborn less important than issues involving race, the environment, education, and more, where the federal government demands obsolete obedience.... or else!  

 

But somehow it's up to the states, with their shifting and often unstable values, to decide if murdering the innocent unborn is constitutional.   It's an issue of guts, and the willingness to stand against the current of immoral, murderous, misanthropic, and irrational social paradigms.

 

In this election anti-abortion forces have two choices.  Which means they only have one choice, and it's not Kamala, who would unleash the federal government deep state operatives against any state that chose life versus murder.  And then the argument that states think differently won't matter any longer.  With the left that was nothing more than a smoke screen argument using our own values against us.  That's what communists do.

 

One last point.  I'm a firm believer someone is watching the slaughter of all this innocent blood, and there will be an accounting for this vileness.

• Trump, Harris, and Communism 
• Like any good tyrant, Kamala wants the government to ban speech she dislikes 

Pay Attention! He's a Kennedy!!!!!

By Rich Kozlovich

I gotta tell ya, I can't believe all the warm and fuzzy claptrap coming from conservatives over RFK, Jr's "Road to Damascus" conversion by dropping out of the race and endorsing Trump. 

He's not being selfless! Pay attention folks, history is everything, culture is king, and he's not going MAGA. Get over it!  He's always been a left wing nutroll who's angry because he isn't being allowed to play in the left wing nutroll sand box any longer.  So now he wants to punish all these former nutroll collaborators he was so cozy with for all these years.  However, I think there may be more going on here than meets the eye.  I'll tell you what, we'll come back to that.  

Here was my article, Grading Robert F. Kennedy Jr. on the Curve, so have no doubt he is in no way a moderate.  He's a far left walking disaster, so, stop gushing over this guy.  Just say thanks, and then move on.  

The Democrats are more like a criminal organization than a political party, and he wanted to be their head.  He had to know how corrupt they've become, and his family has to know how corrupt they are, and yet they publicly condemned him for running against "the party" of treason.  His sister Kerry saying "he betrayed the family and everything they stand for."  Well that pretty much sums up the Kennedy family, corrupt in thought and action, going back to old Joe Kennedy the family patriarch.

There was some talk of Republicans supporting him because he took a stand on free speech, and a stand against these false vaccines for covid.  But he's a total antivax nutcase, he's against all vaccinations.  It's kinda like a clock that doesn't work.  It's absolutely right twice a day.  Hardly a touchstone for reliability or trustworthiness.   

On May 11, 2024, Sarah Arnold claimed any Republican support will change when they get a look at his real views reporting:

Supports push to clean energy and zero emissions, supports eliminating fracking, endorsed Bernie’s climate plan, supports divesting from fossil fuels, supports carbon tax, supports Paris Climate Accords, called the NRA a ‘terror group,’ supports affirmative action, supports reparations, supports amnesty for non-violent drug offenders, wants to ‘transform the police,’ called Louis Farrakhan a ‘truly great partner,’ supports raising minimum wage to $15/hour, supports labor unions, supports raising taxes, endorsed Al Gore in 2000, endorsed John Kerry in 2004, claimed 2004 election was stolen, donated to Obama, endorsed Hillary Clinton for Senate in 2000, endorsed Hillary Clinton for president in 2007, repeatedly praised Bernie Sanders, a ‘sin’ for people to not address global warming, blamed America for causing 9/11, supports ESG,” and “called Fidel Castro ‘incredibly charming.’ Via the Daily Wire."

Wow!  Can you name one thing listed there Republicans and conservatives would or should like?  How about this for an answer.  NO, there isn't, not one!

On Saturday August 24, 2024 Dawn Merrill published this gag inducing adoring article, The RFK, Jr. shift upends the landscape of the election saying:

He did it. He went and did it. Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. suspended his campaign and threw his support to Donald Trump.   It really kind of came out of the blue, I didn’t have it on my bingo card.  But here we are.  Sadly,  there are many “concern trolls” out in force on the right, wailing like spoiled children that RFK, Jr. is not “pure” enough.  He’s a gun control freak!  He’s a global warming alarmist!  He’s a nut who has far too radical a stance on vaccines!  He's pro-abortion. And so on.  To be fair, in some ways, he is all of the above.  But his record on environmentalism is not exactly one of global warming extremism, but more what used to be actual environmental concerns.  His research and issues with nutrition and medical overreach are very valid arguments.  Don’t listen to the concern trolls.

First off, she was clearly clueless as to what was happening right in front of everyone, so she already laid foundation to justify ignoring her views, and secondly, she has no idea what a troll actually is.  Presenting rational history based arguments, isn't trolling.

Interesting article?  Well, whether one thinks so or not, here is what her article really was.  Wrong! Kennedy is a radical leftist.  Once again, when it comes to health issues, he was right regarding the false vaccines forced on society, but that was because he's against ALL vaccines, so in no way can that be construed as an act of moral courage. 

There's is no "moderate" position regarding the environmentalists global warming initiatives. It's a fraud, which I've been writing about and reporting about for over 15 years.  It's an even a bigger fraud than the covid fraud, both of which are nothing but an effort to impose tyranny on the nation, and the world.  And not only did he not stand as a rock in the current against it, he even wants those who challenge that fraud thrown in jail, calling them war criminals, and that's bold for a man who has consorted with the nation's most virulent anti-semites.

If someone tells you they hate you, you should believe them, and he hates conservatives because he hates all organizations that promote conservative values, such as:

"The Cato Institute, The Heritage Foundation, Cooler Heads Coalition, Global Climate Coalition, American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC), Americans for Prosperity, Heartland Institute, Committee for a Constructive Tomorrow (CFACT), George C. Marshall Institute, State Policy Network, Competitive Enterprise Institute (CEI) and American Enterprise Institute (AEI)".   His view is: "These front groups," ……. "are snake pits for sociopaths." 

If you're a conservative, he hates you, he says so, and you should believe him. RFK, Jr. as an ally is at best a leaky vessel, and that’s being kind!  And he's a Kennedy!  Nuf Ced?

Finally, I'm betting if Trump wins we'll see unending clabber how it was Kennedy who put him over the top, taking and getting credit for that which would be totally unprovable either way.  But he'll take the credit for it anyway, so make no mistake about that.  

Which brings me to this. 

Why do I really think he's doing all he's done and is doing now?  I think he's laying ground work for a take over of the Democrat party by demanding they purge the dingdongs now running it.   I know that's really Machiavellian, but....He's a Kennedy!  Do I think he can do it?

The party has no bench, the leaders are at an age where they're going to be dropping dead soon, and the young "leaders" are just like AOC, stunningly destructive hate filled radicals who are clueless, and stupid. But if Trump is elected, and the Senate and House go Republican that may leave enough "moderate" Democrats  to make it happen, so, I think it's possible. 

One last note.  There's no such thing as a "moderate" Democrat.  If they're an elected Democrat, they're all just like Kennedy, a radical left wing nutroll.  None others need apply, the fact remains, Democrats hate America. 

Update:  This appeared today at American Thinker, Mark Levin rips the mask off the anti-democratic 'thug' Kamala Harris in his FOX News show saying:

In closing his FOX News program yesterday, Levin quoted these lines from the first chapter of his prescient book, The Democrat Party Hates America, published in September 2023.

Inevitably, the Democrat party's infinite cultural, economic, and political interventions, always in the name of the people and some virtuous worthy cause, lead to the steady decline of liberty, and the steady rise of totalitarianism, and the exploitation of the people. 

Fewer and fewer masterminds, with an ever-increasing army of bureaucrats and enforcers, reign over the citizenry and decide what is and what is not good for them. The abuses of power are limitless, as are the justifications. And slowly but surely, the people get used to it, even vote for it, until one day its grip is too tight. Then it is too late.

In this, and virtually all else it does, the Democrat Party's loathing of America is boundless.