Search This Blog

De Omnibus Dubitandum - Lux Veritas

Friday, April 18, 2025

The Judiciary is in Serious Need of Restraint

The Judiciary and America's Third Revolution: Part III

By Rich Kozlovich, Tags: 

We already know the federal judiciary is filled with not very bright political hacks who think they are the real legislative and executive branches of government, not the Congress and most assuredly not the President of the United States.  All of which is promoted in the nation's law schools.   What's worse, their seditious and treasonous concepts are like a contagious disease, so when the federal judiciary can pervert, subvert, and ignore the Constitution, why shouldn't the state's courts?

On February 7, 2024 Hawaii's Supreme Court issued a decision saying that the U.S. Supreme Court’s Bruen (2022) does not surpass Hawaii’s constitution, which recognizes “no state constitutional right to carry a firearm in public.”  The decision came in Hawaii v. Wilson, a case in which Wilson is seeking recognition of his right to carry a gun in public for self-defense without first acquiring a permit from the state.... 

Their Supreme Court's ruling totally ignores Supreme Court decisions on the Second Amendment deciding they don't apply to Hawaii!  Why?   Because there's "no state constitutional right to carry a firearm"!  They've claimed “Conventional interpretive modalities", whatever the heck that means, shows there is no historical right to bear arms, and all this silly “founding era’s understanding of the Constitution" is meaningless.  

So, this insurrectionist court is in effect throwing the Constitution out the door, stating there's no reason for "contemporary society to pledge allegiance to the founding era’s culture, realities, laws, and understanding of the Constitution", because it is in conflict with the "Spirit of Aloha", whatever the heck that means!  It appears the court believes people have no right to bear arms in order to protect themselves from the "deadly aims of others".   Is it any wonder they believe the Spirit of Aloha is in conflict with the Bill of Rights. 

Secessionists?  Really?  C'mon man, that's irrational.  No, it's history, and it's reality.   On January 11, 2024, a month before this decision, Daniel Greenfield published this piece,
Communist Lawyers Sue to Create a Secessionist Monarchy in Hawaii, calling for an end to the U.S. occupation of Hawaii and the restoration of the Hawaiian Kingdom, which bears "a certain irony in a former Communist front group fighting to create a secessionist Hawaiian monarchy out of a republic. But as Stalin told his mother, “I am the new czar”'.
People are what they do, and what these rogue judges are doing is flat out radical insurrection, and they need to be called to account for the what I consider the criminal damage they're doing.   It's time Congress got nasty and started overturning these insane decisions, and create a law that can impose criminal sanctions of judges who are openly, or subtly, destroying the rule of law.   Again, the nation is in serious need of a 28th Amendment.



No comments:

Post a Comment