Search This Blog

De Omnibus Dubitandum - Lux Veritas

Showing posts with label Hawaii. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Hawaii. Show all posts

Friday, April 18, 2025

The Judiciary is in Serious Need of Restraint

The Judiciary and America's Third Revolution: Part III

By Rich Kozlovich, Tags: 

We already know the federal judiciary is filled with not very bright political hacks who think they are the real legislative and executive branches of government, not the Congress and most assuredly not the President of the United States.  All of which is promoted in the nation's law schools.   What's worse, their seditious and treasonous concepts are like a contagious disease, so when the federal judiciary can pervert, subvert, and ignore the Constitution, why shouldn't the state's courts?

On February 7, 2024 Hawaii's Supreme Court issued a decision saying that the U.S. Supreme Court’s Bruen (2022) does not surpass Hawaii’s constitution, which recognizes “no state constitutional right to carry a firearm in public.”  The decision came in Hawaii v. Wilson, a case in which Wilson is seeking recognition of his right to carry a gun in public for self-defense without first acquiring a permit from the state.... 

Their Supreme Court's ruling totally ignores Supreme Court decisions on the Second Amendment deciding they don't apply to Hawaii!  Why?   Because there's "no state constitutional right to carry a firearm"!  They've claimed “Conventional interpretive modalities", whatever the heck that means, shows there is no historical right to bear arms, and all this silly “founding era’s understanding of the Constitution" is meaningless.  

So, this insurrectionist court is in effect throwing the Constitution out the door, stating there's no reason for "contemporary society to pledge allegiance to the founding era’s culture, realities, laws, and understanding of the Constitution", because it is in conflict with the "Spirit of Aloha", whatever the heck that means!  It appears the court believes people have no right to bear arms in order to protect themselves from the "deadly aims of others".   Is it any wonder they believe the Spirit of Aloha is in conflict with the Bill of Rights. 

Secessionists?  Really?  C'mon man, that's irrational.  No, it's history, and it's reality.   On January 11, 2024, a month before this decision, Daniel Greenfield published this piece,
Communist Lawyers Sue to Create a Secessionist Monarchy in Hawaii, calling for an end to the U.S. occupation of Hawaii and the restoration of the Hawaiian Kingdom, which bears "a certain irony in a former Communist front group fighting to create a secessionist Hawaiian monarchy out of a republic. But as Stalin told his mother, “I am the new czar”'.
People are what they do, and what these rogue judges are doing is flat out radical insurrection, and they need to be called to account for the what I consider the criminal damage they're doing.   It's time Congress got nasty and started overturning these insane decisions, and create a law that can impose criminal sanctions of judges who are openly, or subtly, destroying the rule of law.   Again, the nation is in serious need of a 28th Amendment.



Thursday, January 11, 2024

Communist Lawyers Sue to Create a Secessionist Monarchy in Hawaii

By @ Sultan Knish Blog 

Secessionism is in the political eye of the beholder. Propose the restoration of the Republic of Texas and you’re a dangerous secessionist, but open fire on Congress in the name of Puerto Rico’s independence and you’re a hero of social justice. Then there’s Hawaiian secessionism.

The restoration of the Hawaiian monarchy seems both secessionist and anti-democratic which hasn’t stopped the quixotic project from winning the support of the anti-American Left.

Hawaii was a feudal society with nobles who believed that they were descended from the gods, and the kauwa pariahs, the actual descendants of the original conquered indigenous peoples, who were born as slaves, had their foreheads tattooed, and were used for human sacrifice.

America’s Neo-Communist lawyers would like to bring Hawaii’s glorious nobility back to power.

Because sometimes the right side of history requires fighting to restore a system based on slavery and human sacrifice, not just in Syria, Libya, and Egypt, but in the Hawaiian islands.

Call it the 1319 Project.

In the latest secessionist shot across the bow, the National Lawyers Guild filed a friend of the court brief in support of the “Hawaiian Kingdom” calling for the “End of U.S. Occupation”.

There’s a certain irony in a former Communist front group fighting to create a secessionist Hawaiian monarchy out of a republic. But as Stalin told his mother, “I am the new czar”.

Over 500,000 Hawaiians voted in the 2020 election. Did anyone vote for the King of Hawaii?

Despite the National Lawyers Guild (NLG) and the International Association of Democratic Lawyers (IADL), two former Communist front groups, filing briefs in support of the “Hawaiian Kingdom”, there isn’t an actual king, queen or archduke of Hawaii. The original lawsuit was filed by Dexter Kaiama, styled as the Attorney General of the Hawaiian Kingdom as distinct from Attorney General Clare Connors of the State of Hawaii.

David Keanu Sai, the Kingdom’s Regent Pro Term, had gotten in trouble before for issuing a deed to a home owned by someone else in his capacity as regent. The Kingdom’s former attorney general had been disbarred for allegedly engaging in “dishonesty, fraud and deceit”.

The Hawaiian Kingdom, like many imaginary countries such as the Dominion of British West Florida under Robert VII, Duke of Florida, and the Republic of Molossia in Nevada under President Kevin Baugh, has a website. David Keanu Sai, the Kingdom’s Chairman of the Council of Regency and Minister of Foreign Affairs, teaches an introductory course to political science at Windward Community College. The Kingdom’s Ministry of Finance offers savings bonds that can be redeemed after America leaves and the Hawaiian monarchy is reestablished.

Conveniently, the Minister of Finance, Mrs. Kau’i Sai-Dudoit, appears to be David’s cousin. The Minister of Foreign Affairs, His Excellency Peter Umialiloa “Jiggy Boy” Sai, may be another relative.

The Hawaiian Kingdom claims that it was recognized by Cuba during the Trump administration.

The evidence that the Communist dictatorship recognized the Hawaiian Kingdom are a few emails exchanged with the Cuban embassy in the Netherlands where David Sai, acting as “Ambassador-at-Large”, got a meeting with a low-ranking third secretary after which she warned him “not to mention it” and not to publish “the pictures you took of our courtesy meeting.”

Terrorists have gotten a warmer reception from the Cubans.

Sai claims that, “by exchange of notes, through email, the Universal Postal Union in Bern, Switzerland, recognized the Hawaiian government.” The notes involved emails in which Sai arranged to meet with a UPU official on the “ground floor” after being informed that the deputy director general could not meet with him because he was sick.

But where the Hawaiian Kingdom didn’t get very far with Cuba, it won the support of the NLG.

The Neo-Communist legal front groups decided to file in support of the Kingdom’s lawsuit against not only the United States government, an admiral, diplomats from Australia, Belgium, and Switzerland, as well as a variety of Hawaiian elected officials who, unlike the Kingdom of Hawaii, were actually elected by someone, calling for “applying the laws of the Hawaiian Kingdom”. Then maybe the Communists can decide who gets thrown into the volcano gulag.

“The NLG supports all Native peoples’ right to self-determination and resistance against settler-colonial oppression—whether it be in Palestine, Standing Rock, or Hawai’i,” NLG President Elena Cohen ranted. The leftist then warned that the United States “must end its occupation of the Hawaiian Kingdom.”

Elena focuses on defending “those arrested for protest-related activities” and her areas of expertise include “sexuality, non-human animals, and comparative constitutional law.” If you’re wondering how all of those come together, her dissertation, Dangerous Exhibitions: Erotic Justice and Comparative Constitutional Law may relate to her time protesting for PETA.

The NLG boss could allegedly be seen ice skating topless pretending to be a fox or dressed up as an alligator outside a handbag boutique while protesting against cruelty to crocodiles.

The NLG’s transition from militant Communists to militant exhibitionists hasn’t improved it any.

IADL President Jeanne Mirer, a veteran NLGer, declared that, “the IADL reiterates its support for the Hawaiian Kingdom and the people of Hawai‘i in their ongoing struggle for sovereignty, and self-determination.”

The NLG may resemble a freak show, but it’s quite influential in leftist circles. The media describes it as a civil rights organization, rarely mentioning its political affinities and never its Communist past. Lawyers who volunteer for the NLG score points with their white shoe firms.

While lawyers supportive of President Trump and conservative activists have been ousted from law firms and law school teaching positions, the NLG can blatantly support secession in Hawaii with no negative consequences. And if the media hasn’t quite figured out how to advocate for turning Hawaii from a free state into a monarchy from a system based on slavery, give it time.

Waving a Confederate flag comes with severe social and economic sanctions, but restoring a monarchy whose origins lie in ethnic cleansing, slavery and human sacrifice is social justice.

Under Biden, there’s widespread support for secession with a majority of Republicans and Independents supporting a regional South-Texas Republic and 47% of Democrats backing a West Coast breakaway republic. No one bothered to poll Hawaii. What do Hawaiians actually want? In a Honolulu Star-Advertiser poll, only 6% wanted independence.

Despite that you can find media outlets including the Voice of America, funded by taxpayers, pushing claims that Hawaiians won’t “settle for anything less than complete independence”.

If Hawaii were to become a monarchy ruled by the Sai family, Democrats would lose two Senate members and two House members (media pundits who complain about the unfairness that California and Wyoming both have two senators, rarely bring up Florida and Hawaii).

That would be bad news for Democrats, but Communists want to destroy America. Democrat power is not their end, just a means to the end of America. These plots are sometimes deadly serious. Other times they may seem as absurd as a woman who used to lie in her underwear painted like a crocodile demanding that the United States leave Hawaii to make way for a king.

But they all have the same end in mind.

Secession, insurgency, and treason are words that the Democrats and their media throw around for political purposes even as they are the ones abundantly guilty of all of them and even worse. 

Daniel Greenfield is a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the David Horowitz Freedom Center. This article previously appeared at the Center's Front Page Magazine. Click here to subscribe to my articles. And click here to support my work with a donation.  Thank you for reading.

Monday, September 4, 2023

Hawaiian Racism and the Maui Fires

 

When Christopher Kunzelman’s wife was diagnosed with multiple sclerosis, he asked her where she wanted to spend the last days of her life.  She chose Maui.

Kunzelman came from Scottsboro, Arizona, bought a house and prepared to move his family in, but he soon learned that he did not belong there. Locals warned him “this is a Hawaiian village. The only thing coming from the outside is the electricity,” and “you don’t even belong in Hawaii.”

While he was moving in the furniture, two men showed up. They told him, “You seem like a nice guy, but you’re the wrong color for this place.” When he didn’t get the message, one of the men told him, “your skin is the wrong f****** color.” and hit him on the back of the head with a shovel.

The Polynesian islanders beat him with the shovel, punched him, and kicked him in the ribs while he lay unconscious. They told him, “No white man is ever going to live here.”

Kunzelman regained consciousness and made his escape while the two men were discussing how to kill him and his uncle. But when he made it to the hospital, the police refused to do anything even though he had severe injuries and had recorded part of the incident on video.

Meanwhile one of the attackers went out and assaulted another white man.

The Maui attackers had told Kunzelman, “We’re the law, we’re the police, the police have our backs, we’re the ones who make the laws, we’re the ones who enforce the laws, we’re the judge in Kahakuloa, and we’re the ones who decide if you live or die.”

And it seemed they were right. The Kunzelmans were never able to sell the house because it wasn’t safe to live there.

When the men were finally arrested, they got off with probation while Kunzelman lost vision in one eye. That was in 2014. The hate crime victim never stopped campaigning for justice and federal charges were finally brought and the men were sentenced to prison in March 2023.

Had the races in the Maui assault been reversed, we would have all heard about it. Not only did we not hear about it, but local leftist activists and the media rallied in support of the attackers.

An Associated Press article claimed that two racist thugs beating a man and planning to kill him reflects “Hawaii’s nuanced and complicated relationship with race.”

That’s not how attacks on black people moving into white neighborhoods were described.

Hawaii Public Radio, an NPR member, provided “context” and “complex history” for the case. A Hawaiian language professor blamed white colonialism, called the vicious assault a “clash of cultural values”, and worried that ‘Haole’, the slur that the Polynesian attackers had used, would make them “fearful of expressing ourselves using our own language in our own homeland”.

Another leftist professor claimed that ‘Haole’ is a legitimate slur because it names “colonial settler whiteness” and that the assault should be ignored because the real problem was “settler colonialism”. The article contained no quotes from the victim. Not even his name.

Hawaii Maui College hosted an event defending the vicious racist attackers in which a leftist activist complained that, “these young men had already been pled guilty in the state system, but that wasn’t good enough. They’re being used as scapegoats for the white culture to teach everybody else a lesson.”

The Kunzelman case can help us understand what happened before and after the Maui fires.

What looks like incompetence by government officials really reflects an ongoing racial conflict. Leftist activists, most of them white or black, have organized some activist Polynesian residents (often wrongly referred to as native Hawaiians) along the American Indian or Australian aboriginal model into their own system with extensive leverage over the bureaucracy.

Ongoing conflicts over water rights between plantations and so-called ‘native cultivation” led to a denial of water to fight the fires. The widely reported denial of water by M. Kaleo Manuel, the deputy director of the Hawaii Commission on Water Resource Management, to fight the fires led to national outrage, but local pro-Polynesian activists and the media rallied to his defense since what he was really defending was ‘native cultivation’ against the sugar cane plantations.

Even with the wildfires going on, the Hawaii Supreme Court rejected a petition from the state government to free up water to fight the fires. The state was not allowed to divert water from that being wasted for “customary Hawaiian practices and ecological balance”.

The court ruled that the state government had not shown a “clear and indisputable right to the relief requested” that being the use of the water needed to put out the fires instead of using it to inefficiently grow the ‘Taro’ plant: an Asian root vegetable that we are told by activists is specially sacred to Hawaii even though it’s grown and eaten all over Asia and even Africa.

Taro requires a lot of fresh flowing water, especially when grown the ‘native’ way, and ‘traditional methods’ ignore all the accomplishments of modern agriculture to grow it in the most wasteful way possible. Taro plants suffer from innumerable diseases while the ‘native’ approach is to ignore modern cross-breeding methods that would make the crops more resilient.

Nigeria grows and exports Taro around the world, while Hawaii’s ‘native agriculture’ is so hopeless that the state has to import 2 million pounds of its ‘sacred vegetable.’ If you visit Hawaii, the Taro you eat could very well be coming from Nigeria or China. But growing Taro the traditional way isn’t about functional agriculture, but striking a blow against the plantations.

And denying the plantations the water they needed to fight fires, like the Kunzelman assault, was about striking a blow against the hated ‘Haoles’ who colonized the land after the Polynesians had originally colonized it by enslaving the original inhabitants, tattooing their heads and then using them as human sacrifices while making Captain Cook look like a saint.

Growing Taro the ‘native way’ was more important than fighting fires and saving lives. Local activists have shown little interest in the wildfires which may have claimed hundreds of lives, but view the fires as a colonialist conspiracy to take away water rights from a bureaucracy of “indigenous” activists. ‘Native rights’ matter much more than fighting wildfires or human life.

The ‘missteps’ that killed people, from failing to sound the sirens to setting up a barricade that blocked drivers trying to escape the fires, are typical of an insular society where things are often done informally and outsider ‘Haoles’ are deliberately denied the information they need unless they have lived there long enough to cultivate relationships and get a feel for what is going on.

Much of Hawaii operates by third world rules that subvert American norms. Corrupt cronyism is ubiquitous. Rules, including safety regulations, are only honored in the breach. And resentment toward mainlanders, while not universal, is enough of a factor that the perpetrators of the Kunzelman assault could not only expect to get away with it, but they nearly did.

What role did all of those factors play in the record wildfire deaths? The answer is some. It will be very hard to separate disdain from malice, an obsession with maintaining a racial power struggle even during a crisis, a disregard for outsiders that under normal circumstances might be merely inconvenient but in this case proved fatal, and line up a specific body count.

But what happened is what leftists in America call “systemic racism”.

The system in Hawaii, while often headed by Americans, is handicapped by a significant presence of ‘indigenous’ activists who may be merely neglectful or actively hostile. And there’s little question that some people of all races died because of the systemic racism of a setup that treated outsiders as despised interlopers and used informal, rather than formal, systems.

That is the story of the Maui wildfires that no one will tell. It’s the background behind the tragedy.

After the wildfires, the battle over land and water will continue to be fought between leftist groups like the Sierra Club and its Polynesian activist allies, and everyone else. Hawaii’s original Polynesian colonists are not villains in this. Most of them simply want to live their lives. Like minority communities in America, leftists have recruited ugly, racist and radical elements from among them and weaponized them to seize power and wreck their share of the country.

The Maui wildfires, like the aftermath of disasters in Puerto Rico or the misery in urban inner cities in America, reflect an inculcated culture of systemic racism, victimhood and dysfunction.

The damage from the wildfires will heal, but the underlying crisis of Hawaii will continue.

A decade ago, Christopher Kunzelman was told that, “no white man is ever going to live here.” Hawaiian activists worsened the impact of the wildfires to make sure that “no white man is ever going to live” in a much broader swath of Hawaii than just one house in one village.

Daniel Greenfield is a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the David Horowitz Freedom Center. This article previously appeared at the Center's Front Page Magazine. here to subscribe to my articles. And click here to support my work with a donationThank you for reading.

Thursday, October 23, 2014

Bleeding of Aloha: Ugliness of the anti-GMO movement in Hawaii

Joni Kamiya | October 21, 2014 | Hawaii Farmer's Daughter

The last two years have been very tumultuous here in our state in regards to biotechnology. With a 12 month growing season, Hawaii is one of the great places for the large ag companies to run their breeding programs. With anti-GMO/anti-corporate ag sentiment on the rise, Hawaii has been the subject of the heavy hand of activism based in fear and misinformation. It hasn’t been pretty.

Here’s a summary of what’s happening across our state, county by county.

Last year, in the county of Kauai, the notorious anti-GMO bill to create buffer zones and disclosure for the spraying of pesticides was passed and then invalidated in federal court. This did not stop the mainland based SHAKA Movement from managing to garner some 9000 signatures to get an anti-GMO, anti-ag bill placed on the ballot in the county of Maui.....To Read More.....