Thirteen years ago a New York Times report (Note: The link no longer works so you will have to take my word for what was said, or not, as it pleases you. RK)
stated that “53 percent of babies delivered to women under the age of 30—the prime
motherhood demographic—enter the world without their parents married to one
another." I'm not sure where they got that number since today it's estimated the overall number is 40%. But no matter which is correct, or what the parameters for those figures were, this should seem startling to everyone, except of course for the New York Times. They see
things just a a bit differently. And I'm shocked why?
But it’s not the rise of illegitimacy that scandalizes sex scribbler Katie Roiphe. It is the newspaper’s “peculiar moral undertone.’ “[M]arriage is very rapidly becoming only one way to raise children,” Roiphe explains at Slate, noting that “other countries are obviously way ahead of the United States in incorporating a rational recognition of the vicissitudes of love, and the varieties of family life, into cultural attitudes toward unmarried parents.”
The peculiar immoral undertone in Roiphe’s plea to deny children a two-parent home stems in part from her bringing two children into the world fathered by different men, neither of whom remains in a relationship with the writer. The personal is political.
So then, “other countries are obviously way ahead of the United States” in abandoning traditional values? Can we also conclude they also way ahead of the United States in stupid?
Have we have lost our minds. Historically, traditionally, biologically, and rationally a family is made up of a man, a women and their children with the goal of forming a stable, reliable, lasting monogamous relationship. No matter how the left works to destroy this with their embrace of sexually irresponsible conduct that results in illegitimacy with multiple partners, and homosexuals adopting and becoming a “family” this conduct is not conducive to a sable society. It is however conducive to destroying the foundational structure of American cultural thinking, as in Judaic/Christian principles.
“In 1963, as Pres. Lyndon Johnson was launching the War on Poverty, 7 percent of American children were born outside marriage....... Daniel Patrick Moynihan.....warned the nation of the calamities associated with the growing number of out-of-wedlock births. For more than 40 years, our society has ignored Moynihan’s warnings. Despite the transparent linkages among poverty, social problems, and disintegration of the family, the liberal intelligentsia has watched the steady collapse of marriage in low-income communities with silent indifference. “
George Will wrote this about him in 2003 saying, "forty years ago he
called attention "to the crisis of the African-American family--26 percent
of children were being born out of wedlock--he was denounced as a racist by
lesser liberals. Out-of-wedlock births comprised 5.3% of total births in 1960, including
2.3% of white births and 23 percent of black births. Today illegitimacy is approximately 28% among whites, 70% in the black
community, and 45% in Hispanic America. Family disintegration, meaning absent fathers, which is
recognized as the most powerful predictor of most social pathologies.
The left works at destroying the traditional nuclear family. Why? This
forces more and more people to need government assistance; this grows
government; this puts more power into the hands of unelected bureaucrats; this
destroys individual freedom because nothing grows the “welfare state like the
disappearance of marriage.” What is the solution to this growing problem from
the left. More public sex education, free condoms and absolutely no moralizing
about their conduct! That has been their solution for decades and the problem
grows.
This continuing trend in illegitimacy for the last sixty years is startling. The reality is this:
“The statist Left is not content to merely watch marriage die; it seeks to nail the coffin lid tightly shut.”
The left is always at the front of the line to point out any minor misstep in their demands for perfection. Their claim of being able to deliver utopian freedom is lie. What they ultimately deliver is dystopia. We really do need to get that!
I have another suggestion. Perhaps we
could start to read some history and maybe…. just maybe… we wouldn’t so easily
gulled by so many smooth talkers. You will want to watch the video below, Theory of Stupidity! It's worth your time.
No comments:
Post a Comment