By Rich Kozlovich
|
|
Recent polls are showing Kamala Harris is the Democrat favorite for President in 2028 as a 41% favorite, beating out Gavin Newsom at 8%, Gov. Josh Shapiro at 7% percent, Pete Buttigieg at 6% and Tim Walz at 6%. Imagine that, Walz has massive name recognition and he can't even beat out a nitwit like Buttigieg, who will most likely run in 2028 and have a big following.
As time is moves along, truth generally follows, and it's now being shown while spending over a billion dollars, and leaving a debt of 20 million dollars, her campaign knew Kamala had no to path to victory. In point of fact, their entire operation was a one billion dollar lie. And she's a 41% favorite? Just how vacuous are Democrats?
But Kamala (it's not my fault) Harris will always be Kamala telling her campaign staff You Have the Same Power that You Did Before November 5, they just don't have jobs, or money, and now DNC staffers are getting desperate, after Kamala hung them out to dry. But no need to worry, as they scrounging for cash on GoFundMe, Kamala took a Hawaiian vacation as her staffers are still fighting for severance pay. Hey, come on man, ya gotta have priorities. Right?
As Monica Showalter asks, "if she doesn't take care of her staff, does anyone imagine she'd take care of the American people?"
And she's at the top of the Democrat poll for 2028, imagine that. But why is Tampon Timmy Walz so badly disrespected? Although he was thought of as odd from the beginning:
"I just don't think the Walz pick made a ton of sense for Harris" is putting it rather politely..... Walz came up with the "weird" campaign against Vice President-elect JD Vance may have endeared Walz to Harris and other Democrats, but it also is the start of what a nasty person, rather than "folksy" and "Minnesota nice" that Walz supposedly is..... From his far-left views to his own lackluster electoral vote history, connections with anti-Israel imams and concerns with stolen valor, plus habitual lying on many more matters, Walz was indeed a puzzling choice. He likely did nothing to help the campaign. The Harris-Walz ticket didn't win Minnesota by much, and the ticket even lost Walz's home county.
One "Democrat strategist" says, please don't run again, and one megadonor says she's disqualified to run forever as she can't be trusted with money, "if you can't run a campaign, you can't run America." Imagine that. He must be channeling Captain Louis Renault, and he's shocked, shocked I tell you.Then there's Buttigieg. Charlton Allen defines Buttigieg as the Peter Principle on wheels, from the "Mayor of mediocrity" as Mayor of South Bend, Indiana, to a $75 billion "electric vehicle debacle, a fiasco so monumental that it could be used as a case study in bureaucratic ineptitude.".......
"a man who can speak at length about problems he never solves.......... a lot of talk, a lot of spin, and very little delivered.........Buttigieg does his best to spin them like a used car salesman hawking a lemon. The New York Post labeled him “The Little Cabinet Secretary Who Couldn’t.” Even Newsweek, not exactly a bastion of conservatism, ridiculed him for defending what is clearly a massive failure. And if you think the numbers on E.V. stations are bad, wait until you hear him defend Biden’s trillion-dollar “climate investments” as a net positive. It’s like watching someone try to sell you beachfront property in Nebraska."
There's so much written about what a disaster Newsome has been to California, nothing more needs to be said, as for Shapiro, he has a very real antisemitism problem in his party.
Someone recently suggested Chelsea Clinton could decide to run. Now that's an interesting thought, given that polls show Kamala is the Democrat favorite due to name recognition and the Democrat bench is so shallow they think those other nitwits are even worse than Kamala.
So, who knows, she just might have a shot since she has as good a name recognition as Kamala, has no record to defend, and on her worst days sounds intelligent compared to Kamala on her best days. Nah, I don't see that happening, she has three very young children, and I don't think she's that stupid.
The Democrat party is now thoroughly controlled by far left radicals, and there's no one in the Democrat party that will be allowed to run who isn't. If Bernie was a bit younger he might actually have a chance now, but he isn't, he doesn't, and neither are do all the other leaders of the party. We'll come back to that. They were good at play acting, but the younger up and comers refuse to act, and are happy to demonstrate who they are, and demand everyone like it.... or else.
Since Kamala and company performed so badly most are probably thinking that's the end for the Democrats. Disabuse yourself of that fallacious thinking. In the 2024 elections socialists won in 94 percent of the races they ran in, and won easily, at local, state, and national levels. That can be viewed in different ways, but here's what we need to understand, the left will now take two tacts.
First they will vilify, resist, make vile proclamations and accusations spewing out their vile self righteous leftist morality as if vomitus was virtue, with the goal of creating emotional outrage.
Others will
take a far more subtle, more low profile tact, "continuing to
make inroads across all levels of government". It's the "slow
walk through the institutions" mentality, and it's dangerous. This is something to pay attention to, and
expose,....forever...., because leftism is like rust, it never sleeps, always playing the long game filled with lies and deceit using our own values against us.
Socialism in America didn't start out as an openly
Marxist movement, because socialism is foundationally atheistic, and
in the late 19th and early 20th centuries that didn't fly in America. So they called themselves "progressives", and believe it or not, the driving force behind
that was religion. What's now called the "progressive gospel". In effect
claiming socialism was the practical application of the Christian
ethic, everyone is everyone's bother and we are morally
obligated to ___________fill in the blank, and they would be the moral arbiters deciding who would owe, and who would pay.
After WWII the real powers behind this movement didn't need religion any longer and kicked them to the curb. After that the driving force was psychology. If you disagreed with what they promoted, you were not only morally inadequate, you were insane, which is the same clabber they're promoting now.
After over 125 years of religious and social corruption condemning western civilization's moral and mental foundations it's a wonder we're now finally coming out of that miasma, and truth is coming to the fore.
Truth is the sublime convergence of history and reality. Everything we're told has a historical foundation and context, and everything we're told should bear some resemblance to what we see going on in reality. If it doesn't, it's wrong, and all that's left to do is develop the intellectual response to explain why it's wrong. And that's what's finally happening, and why the Pravda media is collapsing and swirling down the drain.