Whistleblowers Claim NOAA Rushed
Contentious Climate Paper Despite Reservations And It Turns Out The Of Threat Of Melting Antarctic Ice ‘Has
Been Exaggerated’, New Study
House Science Committee Chairman Lamar Smith (R-Tex.)
opened another front in his war with federal climate researchers on Wednesday,
saying a groundbreaking global warming study was “rushed to publication” over
the objections of numerous scientists at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration. In a second letter in
less than a week to Commerce Secretary Penny Pritzker, Smith urged her to
pressure NOAA to comply with his subpoena for internal communications.
Smith says whistleblowers have come forward with new information
on the climate study’s path to publication in June. Smith told Pritzker that
the whistleblowers’ allegations make it more crucial that he be provided with
the scientists’ internal e-mails and communications. If NOAA does not
produce the e-mails he is seeking by Friday, the chairman said, “I will be
forced to consider use of compulsory process,” a threat to subpoena the
commerce secretary herself. —Lisa Rein, The Washington Post,
18 November 2015
The risk of the Antarctic ice
sheet collapsing and flooding coasts around the world has been exaggerated,
according to researchers. Previous studies had claimed that melting Antarctic
ice could contribute one metre to the rising sea levels by the end of the
century, flooding the homes of 150 million people and threatening dozens of
coastal cities. However, a team of British and French scientists has found that
the collapse in the ice sheet is likely to raise sea levels by 10cm by 2100. An
increase in sea levels from the ice sheet becoming unstable is “extremely
unlikely to be higher than 30cm” this century, they say, describing previous,
more apocalyptic predictions, as implausible. Ben Webster, The
Times, 19 November 2015
Amber Rudd on Wednesday
became the first Conservative energy secretary in a quarter of a century to
outline her own vision for how Britain should power itself. In doing so, she
reached even further back for inspiration — to 1982, and Lord Lawson’s moves to
break up the nationalised energy monopolies. She told an audience in central
London: “[Lord Lawson’s approach] is the Conservative way: allowing markets to
flourish . . . [with] competition keeping prices as low as
possible.” For green activists, who have watched in dismay as ministers have
slashed subsidies to renewables, the comparison was worrying. Lord Lawson has been at the forefront of attempts to
water down action on climate change, arguing it is too expensive. —Kiran Stacey
and Pilita Clark, Financial
Times, 19 November 2015
Germany’s federal government
received an urgent warning shortly before the United Nations climate
conference. A group of government advisors who annually assess the progress of
the Energy Transition sees Germany’s legally binding climate targets “at
significant risk”. Despite the government numerous actions, these are unlikely
to sufficient “in light of the dimension of the still necessary reduction in
order to achieve these goals and the time remaining until 2020,” the report
concludes. —Der
Spiegel, 18 November 2015
Brought to you by BennyPeiser’s Global Warming Policy Foundation
No comments:
Post a Comment