The lull in the coverage of all things Islamic was
broken by two terrorist attacks in Canada, a reminder that so long as the world
does not unite to destroy the Islamic State, we shall all remain vulnerable. A
“lone wolf” terrorist can kill you just as dead as one in a terrorist
organization, particularly one encouraging these attacks.
While the media’s herd mentality continues to
report about Ebola in West Africa and gears up for massive coverage of the
forthcoming November 4 midterm elections, the Middle East remains in a low
state of boil, never failing to produce bombings, skirmishes, and the usual
inhumanities we associate with Islam.
Americans pay attention to the Middle East only
when blood is flowing and at the present time the only element generating that
is the Islamic State (ISIS) which continues to attack Kobani in northern Syria
and assault the Yazidis and other targets in Iraq. The U.S., Britain and France
are bombing ISIS forces, largely to protect and assist the Kurdish Peshmerga
forces, the only fighting force of any consequence.
Virtually unreported are the 18 million Muslim refugees
throughout out the Middle East. The U.N. reports that these and internally
displaced persons reflect the turmoil in Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Pakistan,
Somalia, Syria, and Yemen. To grasp this, think about what either the U.S. or
Europe would be like with a comparable number of refugees.
As David P. Goldman, a Senior Fellow at the London
Center for Policy Research and Wax Family Writing Fellow at the Middle East
Forum, noted October 20 on the Forum website, “That is cause for desperation:
unprecedented numbers of people have been torn from traditional society and
driven from their homes, many with little but the clothes on their backs.”
“There are millions of young men in the Muslim
world sitting in refugee camps with nothing to do, nowhere to go back to, and
nothing to look forward to…never has an extremist movement had so many
frustrated and footloose young men in its prospective recruitment pool.”
So what does John Kerry, our Secretary of State,
think is the greatest problem in the Middle East? While discussing the ISIS
coalition with Middle East leaders, Kerry expressed the opinion a week ago that
the Israeli-Palestine situation was the real problem. Apparently he is unaware
that there is no Palestinian state and never has been. The one on the West Bank
exists thanks to Israeli support and the one in Gaza, controlled by Hamas,
provoked Israeli defense measures by rocketing it for months.
Prof. Efraim Inbar, director of the Begin-Sadat
Center for Strategic Studies and a Shillman/Ginsberg fellow at the Middle East Forum, has a quite different point
of view. “In reality, however, the novelty of the Islamic State, as well as the
magnitude of the threat it poses, are greatly exaggerated.”
Noting that many of the Arab states have “failed to
modernize and deliver basic services” Prof. Inbar has little anticipation that
ISIS could do that either. Moreover “Much of the fragmented Arab world will be
busy dealing with its domestic problems for decades, minimizing the possibility
that it will turn into a formidable enemy for Israel or the West.”
What has seemed to escape Kerry’s and the
President’s attention is the threat of a nuclear armed Iran. The negotiations
to encourage Iran to step back from its efforts to create the warheads for its
missiles do not appear to promise a favorable outcome. Iran managed to get some
sanctions lifted and that was likely why Iran entered into them. They don’t
care what the West or the rest of the Middle East wants.
Neither Israel, nor Saudi Arabia are as naïve as
the U.S. In March, Richard Silverstein, writing in Tikun Olam, reported that
“the level of intense cooperation between Israel and Saudi Arabia in targeting
Iran has become clear. Saudi Arabia isn’t just coordinating its own
intelligence efforts with Israel. It’s actually financing a good deal of
Israel’s very expensive campaign against Iran.” A recent explosion at an
Iranian nuclear facility suggests that the campaign is still quite active.
Noting “airtight military censorship in Israel”, Silverstein pointed out that information about the Israeli-Saudi relationship would not have been reported in an Israeli daily newspaper, Maariv, if both governments did not want Iran and the U.S. to know. In effect, the Saudis have replaced the U.S. as a source of support given President Obama’s barely concealed dislike of Israel.
“But Israel,” wrote Silverstein, “isn’t going to war tomorrow.” Israel will watch the outcome of the U.S.-Iran negotiations and determine what action to take or not at that point. Meanwhile, it will keep the pressure on Iran with its covert program.
At some point the news media will begin to pay more attention to the Middle East. It will not get much cooperation, however, from ISIS because the Islamic State has made it clear that only journalists that obey its rules and write what it wants will live very long.
The “religion of peace”, Islam, has not produced
much peace in the Middle East and elsewhere in the world for the last 1,400
years.
An American Decline that Must Be Reversed - The tendency of pundits is to address the decline in American culture and traditional moral values. The concerns addressed include the rather sudden, but widespread embrace of same-sex marriages or calls for the legalization of marijuana so anyone can get high without the fear of arrest. You can probably name a few things you consider evidence of decline, but there is one you are not likely to notice much. It’s the nation’s infrastructure of highways, airports, waterways and ports. It’s only dramatic declines such as the decay of Detroit, once one of the nation’s most dynamic cities that get attention because it is so blatant. We judge the backwardness of third world nations by their bad roads and lack of infrastructure to support their economies.
We don’t, however, think of the U.S. as a nation in decline, but we are….
Killing
Confidence in Our Government - What has been the over-riding theme of life in
America since Barack Obama became President in 2008? It
has been the continued loss of confidence Americans have
regarding various elements of the federal government. From the Centers for
Disease Control, the Veterans Administration, the Secret Service, to the
Department of Justice and the Internal Revenue Service, these and other
agencies have been tainted in ways that have turned his two terms into a litany
of scandals and failures. Obama is a President for whom
politics is the sole reason against which every decision is made. The
latest example was the naming of an Ebola Czar. “Sources confirm to Fox News
that President Obama plans to name Ron Klain, a longtime political hand with no
apparent medical or health background.” In the past, Klain has served as chief
of staff to Al Gore and Joe Biden. Does this make you feel any better about the
Ebola threat?
No Ebola Panic
Despite Media Hysteria - One man has died of Ebola in the U.S. and he came
here from Liberia. Two of the nurses that tended him are in intensive care and likely
to survive. A third was thought to be infected, but wasn’t. That news has been
sufficient to keep most Americans calm as the media has done its best to
exploit Ebola-related news. The public absorbed the facts and came to their own
conclusion.
An October 8 Pew Research survey found that “Most
are confident in Government’s ability to prevent major Ebola outbreak in U.S.”
That reflects the way we have all been conditioned to look to the federal
government to solve our problems, but the public mood had not changed by
October 20 when a Rasmussen Reports analysis of a survey concluded that
“Americans are keeping their cool about Ebola, but some acknowledge that they
have changed travel plans because of the outbreak of the deadly virus in the
United States.” .....
Politicizing a
Plague - If President Obama does not want the Ebola virus to
kill Americans, why has his administration done nothing to restrict any flights
from Liberia, Guinea, and Sierra Leone, the hot spots in Africa where it
appears the virus is spreading? One
of the reason flights from Liberia were not stopped, we have been told, was the
historical link of the U.S. with that nation, founded as a place freed slaves
could migrate. That is no excuse in the face of the threat of a single Liberian
with Ebola getting off a flight in any U.S. airport……
The "Malaise" Has Returned - The joke is that Jimmy Carter is happy that Barack Obama has replaced him as the worst President of the modern era. It is a supreme irony that Obama’s campaign theme was “Hope and Change” when Americans have lost a great deal of hope about their personal futures and the only change they want is to see Obama gone from office. Elected by a narrow margin in 1976, Carter managed in his one term to see his approval ratings fall to twenty-five percent by June 1979. The lesson Americans have to learn over and over again is that liberal policies and programs don’t work......
As this is being written, Rasmussen Reports says that 48%
of likely voters approve of President Obama’s performance in office while 50%
disapproved. Other polls indicate far more unhappiness with Obama, but in
general one must conclude that half the voters are idiots. He is an enormous
failure domestically and with his foreign relations. In early July, a
Quinnipiac University national poll found that Obama was regarded as “the worst
president since World War II.”The only poll that counts will be the midterm
elections on November 4th......
No comments:
Post a Comment