As the leading opponent
of Medicaid expansion in Ohio, The Buckeye Institute's opposition-as our latest blog explains-does not stem from politics or
ideology, but is rooted in our concern for sound public policy.
Medicaid expansion was bad policy last year, it remains bad
policy this year, and it will continue to be bad policy with rising and
unforeseen long-term costs for years to come. As we have argued:
"[Expanding Medicaid] places unsustainable financial
liabilities on future taxpayers. It will provide an additional burden to a labor market that
has already been reeling in
Ohio, doing long-term damage to the economy and compounding the expansion's
direct impacts to the state budget. We
have also pointed out that this economic sacrifice is for a program that has
not proven to be able to obtain significantly better health outcomes for
most recipients and fails to provide a real
saving grace to the most vulnerable.".....To Read More......
Further, to suggest that the Medicaid expansion is somehow
distinct from ObamaCare is simply not accurate. The Heritage Foundation revealed this week that nearly 71% of individuals receiving
coverage under ObamaCare are getting it through the expanded Medicaid program.
The Medicaid expansion was a key component of ObamaCare and the Obama
Administration's so-called healthcare reform initiative, and to suggest
otherwise borders on the disingenuous.
Even more misleading is the revisionist claim that expanding
Medicaid extends President Reagan's legacy. Former Reagan Attorney General, Ed
Meese, and the Buckeye Institute's president, Robert Alt, set the record
straight last year in an article for National Review: .....To Read More......
No comments:
Post a Comment