Anti-GMO campaigners often attack Monsanto and other large agricultural companies for
suing farmers who illegally save their seeds and replant them. But most non-GMO
seeds as well as genetically modified versions are patent protected for
companies to recoup their investment costs. If these intellectual protection
rights were removed, would farmers go back to saving seeds and replanting them
in subsequent years?
In some cases, yes. Some crops are
able to produce viable seed that can be saved and replanted to yield offspring
that perform similarly to their parents. But for other crops, most notably
hybrid corn, no. In the case of crops that have been improved by hybridization
in conventional breeding, saving seeds for replanting doesn’t make sense as any
saved seed will not perform as well as their parents.
Let’s take a look at the process of
hybridization in conventional breeding. Hybridization is when breeders take two
distinct, but related plants and mate them, commonly by pollinating the plants
by hand. For example, a breeder could cross a big corn plant that is
susceptible to disease with another that is small but more resistant to disease
to produce a hybrid plant that is both big and resistant to disease. This
resulting hybrid plant is called F1 hybrid (first-filial generation).....To Read More....
No comments:
Post a Comment