Daniel Greenfield
April 14, 2021 @ Sultan Knish Blog
Are you a New Yorker who wants to live a normal life? Move to Florida.
And
if you can’t do that, get an Excelsior Pass. ‘Excelsior’ means ‘higher’
in Latin and is New York’s motto. It’s probably not the best motto for a
broken state tiptoeing toward bankruptcy. And it’s an even worse name
for a vaccine passport that allows businesses to discriminate.
A
day after April Fools’ Day, the Excelsior Pass launched in New York to
enable businesses to determine whom they can refuse service to by
employing IBM’s Digital Health Pass.
IBM
describes its vaccine passport as “voluntary” and will allow New
Yorkers “the ability to voluntarily share their health status on their
own terms”, but there’s nothing voluntary about forcing people to use a
passport carrying private health information in order to live their
lives.
There’s nothing less voluntary than that.
Digital
passports are big business and a few weeks ago IBM closed on a
multimillion dollar contract for a German vaccine passport and is in the
second phase of a contract with UK's NIH socialized medicine setup with
potentially
millions
at stake. There’s no official contract in New York which is just
“testing” IBM’s vaccine passport technology, but the existence of the
trial alone would help the tech giant secure international and national
vaccine passport contracts.
News stories have claimed that New
York has “fully subsidized” the vaccine passport, but have no details of
the financing. The lack of basic information about this arrangement is
unsettling.
IBM’s Excelsior Pass has been aggressively pushed by
New York’s Governor’s Cuomo. Major sports arenas were being allowed to
reopen, even while Cuomo was falsely blaming Jewish weddings for the
spread of the virus, and some of those arenas are “testing” the
passport.
Cuomo has repeatedly described the vaccine passport as crucial for reopening New York.
“The
innovative Excelsior Pass is another tool in our new toolbox to fight
the virus while allowing more sectors of the economy to reopen safely,”
the scandal-ridden governor insisted.
But before Governor Andrew
Cuomo was known for sexually harassing his subordinates, the mass murder
of the elderly in nursing homes, or for somehow scoring a book deal
that rewarded him with $86 for
every copy sold, he was known for shady deals and economic arrangements.
Long
before the pandemic, there were bets being taken in Albany over which
scandal would be the likeliest to take Cuomo down and send him off to
make hand sanitizer for the state in prison.
IBM had a key role in one of the arrangements that at one time seemed likely to bring him down.
In
2018, Cuomo aide Alain Kaloyeros, a Lebanese immigrant dubbed by the
New York Times as the "Architect of Cuomo's Buffalo Billion Project",
was sentenced to three and a half years in prison for rigging $850
million worth of contracts to Cuomo's donors and political allies.
Kaloyeros
had regularly appeared at Cuomo press conferences and the governor had
referred to him as his economic guru. The judge who threw the book at
him had described him as “the Apple in Cuomo’s eyes”.
Percoco, a
top Cuomo aide and close friend, whom the governor had compared to a
brother, was sentenced to six years in prison for taking $300,000 in
bribes.
All of this sleaze and slime was well known and settled
by the time the pandemic arrived and the media decided to spin Cuomo’s
disastrous mishandling of the virus as brilliant political leadership,
while suggesting that he might have a future as a presidential
candidate.
The media not only knew who Cuomo was, they had previously reported on all of this.
The
Buffalo Billion Project didn’t make national headlines, but a key part
of it had involved Cuomo claiming that IBM would bring 500 IT jobs to
Buffalo, an economically depressed upstate city, backed by $55 million
in state spending. All it would take is some construction work.
The
500 IT jobs that were supposed to pay over $70,000 a year were as
imaginary as Cuomo's leadership. Instead IBM outsourced some dead end
minimum-wage call center jobs to subcontractors. Worse still, IBM got a
$57 million New York contract to outsource state IT work.
All of this came out to a
$110,000 subsidy per job.
That same year, IBM was reported to have laid off or outsourced
4,000 jobs despite $1 billion in subsidies.
The
original announcement came with some ass-kissing from Kaloyeros,
boasting that "Governor Cuomo's blueprint for job creation and economic
growth through targeted, high-tech investment has delivered another
victory for all of New York... We look forward to yet another successful
partnership with International Business Machines.”
Ginni
Rometty, then the CEO of IBM, had declared that, "IBM is excited to
partner with the State of New York and the SUNY College of Nanoscale
Science and Engineering."
The CEO of the SUNY College of Nanoscale Science and Engineering was Kaloyeros.
Rometty stepped down last year, but sat on Cuomo’s Blue Ribbon Commission on Telehealth.
This sort of story has kept repeating itself in New York. In 2019, there was yet another announcement of a
$300 million state subsidy for a supposed $2 billion expansion.
And it’s not just Cuomo.
At
the end of March, Senator Schumer announced a "historic collaboration"
involving IBM that "positions Upstate New York for even more
semiconductor manufacturing jobs", backed by federal funding. That’s
after a year in which IBM laid off workers in New York once again.
Over a decade ago, IBM employed 130,000 Americans. These days, it employs less than 100,000 Americans, but has
130,000 employees
in India. In a 2016 op-ed, Rometty claimed that, "we have thousands of
open positions at any given moment, and we intend to hire about 25,000
professionals in the next four years in the United States."
These claims are impossible to measure because IBM has
refused to disclose its
American job numbers since 2010, and refuses to often even identify the
size of its layoffs, but there’s no apparent evidence of such growth by
IBM in the United States. IBM’s latest layoffs last year have been
reported by the Wall Street Journal using its sources as being
in the thousands.
One estimate suggests IBM killed
20,000
American jobs in the last decade for employees over the age of 40, and
moved those jobs over to India while violating age discrimination laws.
IBM’s new focus on hiring millennials and firing older workers was partly blamed on Rometty.
New
York politicians have been mostly uninterested in these claims while
writing more checks and promising another boom in IBM jobs that never
actually materializes, but does end up helping out Cuomo’s donors.
IBM
claims that its vaccine passport can be trusted, and that personal data
is safe with its setup, yet the tech giant provides curiously little
information about its arrangement with New York.
The Excelsior
Pass is the first major vaccine passport field test in America. It is a
system that will inescapably discriminate by personal health,
disability, race, and other criteria. It’s an arrangement between a
scandal-ridden governor and a company that has played a role in at least
one of his major scandals for which no information, except press
releases, is available.
Both Cuomo and IBM have inculcated a
paranoid culture of secrecy about the most basic details of their
operations, while barraging the media with endless press releases.
The
public deserves to know the details of Cuomo’s vaccine passport deal.
Cuomo and IBM want to control the movements of millions of New Yorkers,
but they don’t seem to want New Yorkers to know anything about the
arrangement for this vaccine passport pilot program.
The
Excelsior Pass will shape the future of vaccine passports in America.
That’s why it’s important to know everything about it. And yet the same
media that refused to ask any of the tough questions about Cuomo’s
mishandling of the pandemic, is now eager to report on his sexual
harassment scandals, but still won’t ask any real questions about his
vaccine passport.
Tags:
Coronavirus,
Cuomo,
recent
About Daniel Greenfield
Daniel Greenfield is a journalist investigating Islamic terrorism and
the Left. He is a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the David Horowitz
Freedom Center