Elon is Just Being Elon. So, Who Cares?

By Rich Kozlovich, Tags: Mars and Elon Musk Are Both Out There

Elon Musk is threatening to launch a third party if the Congress dares to ignore him and pass Trump's Big Beautiful Bill!  And we're shocked why?  There were many, including me, who believed the day would come when he would be a serious problem for Trump.  Why? Because he's Elon Musk, and unlike Sir Thomas More, "A man for all Seasons", Elon Musk is a "man for no seasons", and a man for whom I've had little respect.  

I consider him to be a massively self serving con artist, feeding at the government's subsidy trough on electric cars, and even promoting global warming.  Elon Musk has been touting this Mars expedition for some time, and it just ain't gonna happen, and while I don't know where the funding would come from, I'm betting it's just another opportunity to feed at the government subsidy trough.  As my friend John Ray noted, "he is a brilliant fundraiser off governments, State and Federal."  As for me, I think he's a strange man, and I think he's a bit nuts.  A man who thrives on and lusts for attention. 

As for a third party headed up by Elon Musk, I don't think it's going to happen.  Who exactly does he think he's going to attract? 

• MAGA voters? That just ain't gonna happen as they're almost universal in their contempt for Musk, many of whom predicted this kind of backstabbing from him.
• Disgruntled Democrats?  That could happen, but just how many are left in the Democrat party who've not already turned to Trump?  A party with it's core solidly Marxist.  You can almost hear those remaining disgruntles saying:  That's it, I've had it, I'm voting for a different Democrat!  How many of them were going to vote for Trump? Few to none, so there's no loss there, but they're never voting for Musk.
• Far left voters.  Not in a million years, they hate Musk.   
• Green party?  Maybe, but if every Green party member joined him they would be just as ineffective and meaningless as they are now. 
• Libertarians?  Maybe, but Libertarian members are mostly ideologues, and I think a bit strange. Their impact on American elections has been meaningless.  Joining Musk won't make them meaningful, and they know it.  
• Never Trumpers?  They're numbers are also meaningless, and their influence is non existent, like John Kasich, Liz Chaney, George Will, and Bill Kristol.  No one listens to them, and no one cares what they have to say.  Just like their fellow RINO's, as in disgusted Republicans who are false conservatives versus real conservatives, they already weren't voting for Trump or any other real conservative anyway, so there would be no lost votes there or for that matter, in any of these categories.  

History, and the cultures they're departing are against them and the American culture won't support them!  You have to have the numbers to be a politically important movement,  even if some of those numbers are offensive to the touch.  He doesn't have the skills necessary to bring diverse groups together, and since the left is treating this as a war of conquest and destruction of American capitalism and democracy, that makes it a real war, and we need to understand they are the enemy of the American identity, the American culture, the American economy and the U.S. Constitution, and any attempt by Musk to undermine Trump and the MAGA movement will be viewed as supporting a movement that wants to destroy the nation.  

Finally, recruitment and strategic thinking requires goals, and Elon Musk has no determinable goals, nor does he have definable policies that he would install in place of Trump's.  So, Elon is just being Elon, and as my mother used to say, "this falls under the category of who gives a crap", only she didn't say crap.  

Mars and Elon Musk Are Both Out There

By Rich Kozlovich 

 

Over time I've saved a lot of information about Elon Musk, for whom I have very little respect as I consider him to be a massively self serving con artist, feeding at the government's subsidy trough on electric cars, and even promoting global warming, and has a personal life that's not exactly awe inspiring.  He's been married three times, obviously he's not very good at marriage, who named his child with his third wife,  X Æ A-Xii. Who in the world would name their child X Æ A-Xii?  

I think he's nuts.  I think he's a strange man, and not exactly inspiring confidence and trust.  However, even a blind monkey can find a coconut on occasion, and it appears he's stumbled onto a big coconut by Trump making him the head of DOGE.  I just can't figure out what is his angle.  I'll tell you what, we'll come back to that.  In the meanwhile, let's talk history.  

Musk has created a mixed bag of opinions because he's actually done something right with his X (Twitter) site exposing what European leaders have been censoring to the best of their ability, the Muslim Rape Gangs.  They consider his exposure of all this as "tinkering with their control of the working class."  And it's even bigger as  S. David Sultzer claims Musk is the last best hope for Europe’s survival, and then goes on to say Europe's leaders have driven Europe to the "brink of socialist autocracy, even as they accuse Musk of being an existential threat to “democracy” in Europe", and how these "increasingly totalitarian European governments are desperate to destroy Musk, whom they say (echoing Democrats at home) threatens democracy."

Europe is dying economically.  Now they're being forced to pay for their own defense, they're "cutting their own throats with utopian energy policies, they've corrupted their election processes in France, Germany, Romania, England and Europe is facing:

........a complete cultural collapse as hard-left politicians war on the Judeo-Christian religions, the twin foundations of Western civilization. The radical atheist/socialist left is not merely winning, but it is also inviting radical Muslims to immigrate and serve as allies in that fight. 

So, who's destroying democracy in Europe?  Is it Elon Musk who's bypassing and exposing their censorship efforts and their corruption, or Europe's leaders?  

Elon Musk has been touting this Mars expedition for some time, and I just can't believe what I hearing.....listen up folks....it ain't gonna happen.

It would take three years to get there, and we don't have to technology do to it. But if in some crazy way it happened and if the astronauts survived, which is unlikely, that would be a one way trip. There's all this talk how Mars might have been much different in the past and could support life..that's science fiction. So, why go there?

There's talk that Mars can be explored robotically.  Okay, I think that's at best wishful thinking, but if it could be done, so what?  Let's put some reality into this question.  Alan Stevens commented in response to the silly article Mars is part of our Manifest Destiny saying: 

Mars is 500 times farther away than the Moon. The atmosphere of Mars is quite different from Earth's. It's composed mostly of carbon dioxide (95%), with smaller amounts of nitrogen (2.7%), argon (1.6%), and trace amounts of oxygen (0.13%), carbon monoxide (0.07%), and water vapor (0.03%). The atmosphere is also about 100 times thinner than Earth's, which means it provides very little protection from solar radiation and micrometeoroids.

Mars is much colder than Earth. The average surface temperature is around -80°F (-60°C), but it can vary widely. During the day, temperatures near the equator can reach up to 70°F (21°C), while at night, they can plummet to -100°F (-73°C). Near the poles, winter temperatures can drop to as low as -195°F (-125°C). Dry ice temps.

Space radiation is a major concern, as astronauts traveling to Mars will be exposed to cosmic radiation for extended periods. This can increase the risk of cancer, cardiovascular diseases, and damage to the nervous system.

The vast distance between Earth and Mars means that communication will have significant delays, making real-time support from mission control impossible. This requires astronauts to be highly autonomous and capable of making critical decisions independently.

Creating a closed ecosystem that can support human life for the duration of the mission is a complex challenge. This includes providing food, water, and oxygen, as well as managing waste and maintaining a habitable environment.

Martian soil is rich in iron oxides, giving it the characteristic red color. It also contains silicates, sulfates, and perchlorates. Perchlorates are toxic compounds that pose a challenge for potential human habitats and agriculture.

There's nothing there! There's no reason to go there!  Maybe to build a space port on a planet with no way to develop it's resources, assuming there are resources, no infrastructure, no manufacturing capacity, no people to build it, and if that miracle happened the purpose would be to go..... where?

There's nothing out there for humanity, and while I will happily give credit to Elon Musk for exposing all the Muslim rape gangs in Europe, that doesn't change the fact I think he's a con man, and I think he's nuts. 

That bring me to the Musk-Trump feud, and "finding out who's the smartest guy in the room?..... The social-media feud between the world’s most powerful man and the richest man was unbecoming, but it was incorrigible Elon who raced to the bottom.  Trump comes out smelling like roses, and the BBB remains on track.  Elon a genius?  Sure, whatever, but Trump is smarter.  MAGA marches on."

While I think the Big Beautiful Bill is just big, and in Musk's defense is he making some seriously valid points about this bill, which Musk called a ‘Disgusting Abomination" saying:

 “I’m sorry, but I just can’t stand it anymore. This massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination. Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong. You know it.” 

Or is it just sour grapes on his part over the end of his EV tax credits?  But Trump claims he always knew that would be eliminated.  But then he went over the line, way over the line, claiming the reason the Epstein files haven't been released is because Trump is in them.

Since the files haven't been released he knows this how?  Are we to believe Pam Bondi or Kash Patel shared that information with him?  Yeah, that's as believable as saying rain isn't wet.  

No his evidence is a video of Trump with Jeffrey Epstein at a party that's been around for years, and Epstein's lawyer refutes that saying there's nothing that incriminates Trump saying:

 I was hired to lead Jeffrey Epstein’s defense as his criminal lawyer 9 days before he died. He sought my advice for months before that. I can say authoritatively, unequivocally, and definitively that he had no information to hurt President Trump. I specifically asked him!

Apparently reality is reaching it's apex over this with Musk, and Musk thinks he and  Trump should “make peace” (and here).  Trump may move on on publicly, but privately, Musk went over the top and must be punished, and he deserves to be punished.  I also think Musk is a nasty, foolish, and petulant snot with an ego that makes Trump look humble, who shoots off his mouth and thinks he can get away with it, and has, until now.  He's burnt that bridge forever.  

From the beginning my opinion of this man is he's weird beyond weird.  He's a lousy husband, he gives his children weird names, he's a back stabber and scam artist who has fed like a hog on government grants and subsidies.  Not one bit of this surprises me.  He's done a lot of good with Twitter in exposing the Muslim rape gangs in Europe, especially in Britain since the Brits censor all that, and he did good work on DOGE, but that's like a broken clock... right twice a day.  If there ever was evidence of interstellar aliens here on Earth, then he's their ambassador.

Finally, what did he hope to gain from all this?  I have no idea, except he loves the be in the limelight, and I'm of the opinion he's capable of shifting gears faster than an automatic transmission in order to do that.  

Progressive Violence Inherent in a New Survey About Elon Musk

He should be jailed or buried? The poll should act as a wake-up call to the nation.

By Sarah Cowgill | May 21, 2025 @ Liberty Nation News, Tags: Articles, Opinion, Politics

An American cultural war is simmering – and it lies on the fringes, just in the peripheral view. Transparency is a promise being kept and accounted for by Elon Musk, who is uncovering fraud and corruption on nearly every level of a bloated federal government, showing it for all the world to see. And many progressives want to put him in jail – or worse.

“71% of Democrats think that Elon Musk should go to prison for his work eliminating waste, fraud, and abuse from the government,” was the latest poll from Rasmussen Reports and The Heartland Institute. Justin Haskins, a senior fellow at The Heartland Institute and the poll’s primary author, said the quiet part out loud:

“The fact that a majority of Democratic voters would support imprisoning Elon Musk for trying to make government more efficient is a shocking indictment of the modern left, which has become increasingly more tyrannical in recent years. We’ve reached a point where many Americans would rather unjustly punish innovation than fix the broken systems Musk was trying to reform.”

Death of Civility to Claim Musk

The progressive left seems to have forgotten about the US Constitution. There is an argument at every turn: The Second Amendment must go, and free speech must be curbed for hurt feelings. Don’t like your opponent on the right? Throw him in jail. Although Elon Musk is the current flash point for the left, he is just one of many targeted by progressives.

Network Contagion Research Institute (NCRI) and Rutgers University Social Perception Lab surveyed 1,264 American citizens to get a read on the acceptance and willingness for violence against a political foe. The researchers call it Assassination Culture and use it throughout the 16-page data document. What they found was chilling: 41% of Democrats said they believed killing a “powerful political leader” is “at least somewhat justified.”

But add in the names of Donald Trump and Elon Musk, and those numbers are even more shocking: Among those left of center on the political spectrum, 55% said killing Trump was justified, and 48% could see Musk being slain as well.

For what? And what is the hero worship of the man who assassinated a healthcare CEO? Luigi Mangione was unhinged. He was prodded and promoted to commit violence and fed a steady diet by the left-wing media and fringe outlets that killing Brian Thompson, UnitedHealthcare CEO, was the way to go. Numerous progressives praised that he had etched “deny, defend, depose” on the casing of the round that killed Thompson.

This week, James Comey, former FBI Director, posted “86 47” on his Instagram account. During the campaign, as Trump was nearly assassinated in Butler, PA, during his rally, a Democratic politician posted, “The last thing America needed was sympathy for the devil, but here we are,” said Rep. Steven Woodrow of Denver. And in a phone call after the Butler incident, then-President Biden told donors that the media wasn’t doing enough to scrutinize Trump and that it was “time to put Trump in the bulls-eye.”

Democratic Rep. Dan Goldman of New York said that Trump is so “dangerous” to Democracy that he “has to be eliminated.” Then-Vice President Harris said, “Does one of us have to come out alive?” when asked if she’d rather be stuck in an elevator with Trump, then-VP Pence, or former Sen. Jeff Sessions.

And Rep. Maxine Waters (D-CA) told a group of protesters gathered outside the Derek Chauvin trial for the death of George Floyd: “Well, we gotta stay on the street. And we’ve got to get more active. We’ve got to get more confrontational. We’ve got to ensure they know that we mean business.”

However, the violence is not only against Musk and Trump. It’s being primed, promoted, and inflicted by progressive politicians.

Storming the Bastille

Rep. LaMonica McIver (D-NJ) was caught on video during the arrest of Newark Mayor Ras Baraka at the Delaney Hall Detention Center, allegedly body-slamming the police. A heated confrontation as Baraka was being detained for trespassing – he says he wanted to inspect the facility – between law enforcement violent mindset. McIver denies the incident: “Absolutely no. I mean, I honestly do not know how to body slam anyone. There’s no video that supports me body-slamming anyone. We, as Congresswoman Bonnie Watson Coleman said we were simply there to do our job. There for an oversight visit.”

But that isn’t a true statement: DHS spokesperson Tricia McLaughlin told CNN that lawmakers could be arrested; the Department has “body camera footage of some of these members of Congress assaulting our ICE enforcement officers, including body slamming a female ICE officer.”

The scrum with ICE agents is the latest escalation of progressive pushback. Raymond Brown, an attorney for Baraka, dismissed the Trump administration officials who said Baraka “stormed Delaney Hall” and then referenced storming the Bastille and, of course, the go-to mantra – the Jan. 6, 2021, riot at the US Capitol.

“That’s storming. It’s a term of art. He didn’t do it,” Brown said.

Can We Dial It Down?

Two assassination attempts on a presidential candidate were committed by unhinged men who have been indoctrinated with the worst possible ways to cope with reality. High percentages of Americans believe that murdering the enemy will save Democracy. Our Democracy is in good hands; it’s the mindset that needs retooling. The actions of progressives, such as destroying personal property, tossing Molotov cocktails at Tesla dealerships, and promoting the elimination of Jews in America, are the exact opposite of what this great experiment stands for. Heroes are not those who murder healthcare executives. Heroes are not those calling for the genocide of the very people this nation liberated in WWII. Heroes don’t assassinate presidents.

We all must question our times and ask whether these events are aberrations or reflect an increasing national problem. Are they linked to a larger network? And does the public support them? It appears the public – at least a large portion, anyway – is way ahead in embracing the violent side in the political world.

~

Liberty Nation does not endorse candidates, campaigns, or legislation, and this presentation is no endorsement.

Read More From Sarah Cowgill National Columnist

Election Funding: Democrats and their Hypocrisy

By Rich Kozlovich 

I think this story has taken on a really interesting twist. There's an election in Wisconsin on April 1st for a seat on the Wisconsin Supreme court and "is considered by many the most important race of 2025, with wide-ranging consequences not just for the battleground state, but for the nation." 

One candidate is Judge Susan Crawford, a far left radical judge that supports every far left lunacy out there, and has made it clear she wants to have an impact on redistricting in her state to make sure more Democrats are elected to Congress, and she was considered a shoo in.

Okay, I gotta give her credit for honesty, since that's the goal of a host of members of the judiciary, in both the state and federal level, only they don't say it.  But, was it really just a matter of being honest on her part?  Or was it she was so sure of being elected she didn't need to hide her very real intentions.  

Running against her is "Trump-backed Waukesha County Circuit Court Judge and former Wisconsin Attorney General Brad Schimel and Dane County Circuit Judge", who has made it clear his goal is to save the state and the nation from and activist court.  Now, as the race started coming to the end his poll numbers shot up so much he actually has a chance to take that seat.  

Now the kicker.  Musk announces $1 million for Wisconsin voter in Supreme Court race.  

Billionaire Elon Musk says a Wisconsin voter has been awarded $1 million just days before the conclusion of a fiercely contested state Supreme Court election that’s broken spending records Musk announces $1 million for Wisconsin voter in Supreme Court race. Opposition calls it ‘corrupt’.  But as they say in all those irritating infomercials, "Wait, there's more".  

It turns out Elon Musk will pay two voting attendees of his Wisconsin event $1,000,000 each.

"With the most important election of the year for the nation happening on April 1 in Wisconsin, Elon Musk has been keenly interested in it. He passionately backs conservative candidate Brad Schimel over Soros-backed Susan Crawford and has actively worked on voter turnout. On Sunday, he’s holding an event that will only be open to those who have voted. Moreover, he’s going to be giving two lucky people a lot of money."

>

And of course the Democrats call that corruption, and truth be told, no matter how I feel about very wealthy people funding elections to suit themselves, I will say that he at least has been open and above board, unlike the Democrats who scream corruption, and who are more than happy to willingly accept Dark Money from autonomous sources.  If that's true, and it is, then how many groups are funded surreptitiously though the Tides Foundation to fund candidates of their liking?

The Tides Center was launched in 1996 as an offshoot of the Tides Foundation. It has incubated numerous social justice, environmental, gun-control, and abortion-rights groups. George Soros's Open Society Foundations, the Ford Foundation, the Rockefeller Brothers Fund, the W.K. Kellogg Foundation, and the William and Flora Hewlett Foundation have all pushed funding through the network.

 

One thing we do know is Dark Money is being used to destroy America, and that's been known for many years.  So, if that's true, and it is, what it boils down to is the anonymous donors donating to those kinds of funds to bring about that destruction are "the absentee owners of the Democrat Party", and their hypocrisy has no boundaries.   

New Elon Musk Hoax Just Dropped

The first day of Trump's second term signified things to come.

by Andrew Moran | Jan 21, 2025 @ Liberty Nation News, Tags: Articles, Opinion, Politics

On Inauguration Day 2017, President Donald Trump’s first day in the White House, the mainstream media delivered the opening salvo in a long list of hoaxes. The press claimed that Trump had removed a bust of Martin Luther King Jr. from display in the Oval Office. By the time the news was corrected, it was too late, as the Twitterverse blew up. Four years later, it is the same old story.

Elon Musk Got Trumped

The Fourth Estate and social media dropped a new hoax in record fashion. This time, the press focused its efforts on the Tesla Motors and SpaceX CEO, claiming he made the “Sieg Heil” used by the National Socialist German Workers’ Party at the end of a raucous speech before the Capital One Arena audience.

A chorus of news outlets provided readers with quite the headlines:

• The Guardian: “Elon Musk appears to make back-to-back fascist salutes at inauguration rally.”
• Yahoo: “Musk causes stir with ‘Nazi’ salute at inauguration.”
• Rolling Stone: “Right-Wing Extremists Are Abuzz Over Musk’s Straight-Arm Salute.”
• The Wrap: “Elon Musk’s Salute to Trump Crowd Condemned as Nazi Signal.”

PBS News wrote on social media platform X: “Billionaire Elon Musk gave what appeared to be a fascist salute Monday while making a speech at the post-inauguration celebration for President Donald Trump at the Capital One Arena.” During a live CNN broadcast, the anchors called it “a salute” and added: “I think our viewers are smart, and they can take a look at that, but it certainly was; it’s not something that you typically see at American political rallies.”

Even politicians got in on the Elon Musk hoax, including Rep. Jerry Nadler (D-NY), who clutched his suspenders. “I never imagined we would see the day when what appears to be a Heil Hitler salute would be made behind the Presidential seal,” he said. Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) lambasted the ADL for not condemning Musk. “Just to be clear, you are defending a Heil Hitler salute that was performed and repeated for emphasis and clarity,” Ocasio-Cortez stated.

Of course, one glance at a photo shared worldwide or an edited five-second clip would show Musk performing the “Sieg Heil.” However, watching his entire speech, particularly the part taken out of context, reveals something completely different from what journalists were pontificating. Here is the text of this portion of Musk’s remarks (emphasis ours)

“This is what victory feels like. And this was no ordinary victory. This was a fork in the road of human civilization. There are elections that come and go. Some elections are important, some are not, but this one really mattered, and I just want to say thank you for making it happen.

“My heart goes out to you.

“It is thanks to you that the future of civilization is assured. We’re going to have safe cities, secure borders, sensible spending, basic stuff, and we’re going to take DOGE to Mars.”

So, instead of giving the Nazi salute, Musk gestured his heart going out to the crowd. Another facepalm moment, indeed.

Hypocrisy and Ignorance

Because X is no longer the home of censorship, a flood of users quickly identified past instances of politicians on the other side of the aisle performing similar gestures during rallies or at the end of speeches. From former Vice President Kamala Harris to Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA), these individuals appeared to be delivering the “Sieg Heil,” but they were not. And yet, members of the press did not feign outrage, howl at the moon, or partake in good old-fashioned handwringing.

Ultimately, this is another example of the mainstream media not learning from their behavior during Trump 1.0. It is safe to predict that journalists, anchors, and prominent social media voices will run the same predictable plays from 2017 to 2021. This time, X and its Community Notes will be the arbiters of truth, slaying every hoax, falsehood, and misleading reportage emanating from the corridors of the Fourth Estate.

~

Liberty Nation does not endorse candidates, campaigns, or legislation, and this presentation is no endorsement.

Read More From Andrew Moran Economics Editor

Muslim Rape Gangs

25oo years ago Herodotus said "Culture is King".  Nothing's changed.

 

By Rich Kozlovich, Tags:

 

Over the last few days there's been a outcry in the UK over these Muslim rape gangs grooming young girls for the most vile abuses.  But let's get this right.  This isn't just the UK, this is going on all over Europe.   As you read this I want you all to understand, this didn't just start yesterday, and while the media is running with it, I've been writing about and linked articles about this since 2011, where Sweden was being called the "rape capital of the world", which was excused by Sweden's leaders.   And it's not just been happening in Europe. 

 

In 2016 a "5-year-old girl was orally, anally and vaginally raped and urinated upon by three Muslim migrant boys" and the authorities acted as if the raped girls family were the criminals.  "The Council on American-Islamic Relations has whined that the case has become “a lightning rod for anti-Muslim, and anti-refugee sentiments.”  

 

The rape was videotaped.

 

The medical expenses were large, and yet they were only allowed assistance of $4500, and because the local Muslims were harassing and menacing them they had to keep moving to different hotels costing a couple of thousand dollars, along with "babysitting fees,....expenses for transportation to get themselves to and from court, and ......... the astronomical cost of their lawyer.  

 

The old lady who caught them doing these terrible things had to live in fear being "stalked by the Iraqi family" of one of the attackers, who was 7.   Here's the thing that can never be fixed.   A once happy five year old child wants to be alone and stays in a small safe closet ..... for hours fearing "those naughty boys".  City officials and the media cast doubts on whether or not the rape occurred.  

 

The rape was videotaped.

 

And where did this happen? Twin Falls, Idaho.  The poor child is now thirteen and I can't help wonder what lingering impact all this has had on her, and will have for the rest of her life. 

The farce of multiculturalism - We should view the migrant turmoil in Europe as a signpost for what the USA can expect from mass Islamic immigration. ..........

What I think we have to look at is the overall experience worldwide of the stable social environments where Muslims have been thrust upon.  Germany is having a rape crisis.  Sweden is a mess and between Sweden and Denmark they've become the rape capital of the world.  So who are responsible for this massive increase in sexual assaults?  Muslims!  That's only the tip of the iceberg regarding Muslims and the increase in crime in the nations they invade.  And all these officials are completely dismissive of the reality of that including ignoring or challenging the facts.  Here's the link to my Sweden Commentaries.   

In Vienna seventeen Muslims ..... SEVENTEEN.... raped a twelve year old girl for months, and one of them has been acquitted, in spite of confessing.  The judge, who is as vile as the perpetrators, said "there was no evidence to prove the schoolgirl did not consent". 

 

Are we to believe a twelve year old can legally consent to such a thing in Austria?  The answer is no, they can't, and how is this girl supposed to "prove" she didn't give consent?  That's a logical fallacy called proving a negative, which is impossible.  Furthermore, since she's a minor all that has to be proved is they sexually molested a minor child, and all since all this was video taped, there can be no question whether or not this vile crime was committed.  This vile judge needs to be disbarred and prosecuted ... for... something ..... even if it's just public humiliation. 

• In the UK one in seven Pakistani Muslims participated in grooming and gang rapes of underage white girls.  Thousands were raped and brutally assaulted. 
• In 'Taharrush' in Italy young female tourists were surrounded and brutally assaulted sexually by Muslims.   
• In Germany pocket knives over 1.5 inches had to be carried in “locked containers” in public [which] didn’t stop Muslim mass stabbing attacks. There was one on New Year’s Eve....[and the ] of banning mace, pepper spray, etc was to actually prevent women from defending themselves and from stopping Muslim terrorists.
• More veiled threats against those asking the government what it really knew about the migrant rape gangs - Just another example of the media, politicians, and others covering up abuses and looking the other way if the truth is inconvenient to their agenda. 

This is a fire storm that was created by Elon Musk and his exposure of all this.  Why didn't the Brits know all this?  It appears the European countries have a lot more control over the news than in America, and the British government is horrified at Elon Musk’s language.   There's no limit to the stupidity the "elite" can embrace since "free speech in Britain is almost as dead as many of the young girls who were brutalized by migrant South Asian men."  It turns out:

 

"There is absolute horror at the highest levels of government at the “incendiary language” we have seen from Elon Musk."..... “Harumph! In polite society it is very bad form indeed to use words like ‘rape’ and ‘anal,’ let alone to cast aspersions on a marginalized group of immigrant men!  Has Elon Musk no shame?!”  

 

Shame? They're unbothered over these crimes against humanity, but they're upset over Musk's language, and truly outraged at all this attention to these rape gangs brutalizing their nation's children.  And they think Musk should be ashamed?

 

SICK. British Philosopher and Writer Lashes Out at Elon Musk and Refuses to Condemn Muslims for Massive Gangrape Epidemic of Little Girls in the Country (VIDEO)

In England the police arrested a father for trying to save his daughter who was being abused by Muslim gangs and the police did nothing, and these questions hang in the air.  Are police working with the gangs?   Are the police ashamed? They should be hanging their heads in shame.

 

Musk attacked the British prime minister over Muslim rape gangs, and he didn't stop with the current PM. The entire British establishment should be hanging their heads in shame, both Labour and  Tories.   Musk not only attacked the "current Prime Minister ......Sir Keir Starmer, who was a former director of Public Prosecutions from 2008-2013, to be jailed for his role what Musk views, right along with millions of others, as one of the most shameful events in recent British history", he also went after Tony Blair and Gordon Brown.  They sold little girls for votes.  The Parliament should be as ashamed as the government for rejection an inquiry on Muslim rape gangs.    

 

Why would  Parliament vote 364 to 111 against Muslim rape gang investigation.  They sold the nation's little girls for votes, "250,000 votes of rape victims vs 4 million Muslim bloc votes."    

These three young girls, Elsie, Bebe and Alice were killed by a Muslim with a knife in England, and Keir Starmer is worried about Islamophobia, calling Musk's posts "poison for the far right." He accused people such as Musk and those supporting Tommy Robinson of spreading "lies and misinformation" as far and as wide as possible, alleging they were "not interested in the victims," but rather being out for themselves. He added they were "not interested in justice… these are people who are trying to get some vicarious thrill from street violence, which people like Tommy Robinson promote."  And that's the best he can offer in his defense, and the defense of the vile practices of the British government?

 

I really don't like Musk and I've spoken harshly about him, and I don't take back one word, but this has the potential to become his legacy that all will remember.  Again, and I can't repeat this enough, European leaders are supposed to be the shepherds guarding their flocks, but they have not only foisted these wolves on the flock they've covered for them, protected them, arrested any who resisted them, and brought in more wolves. And they're upset that according to them it's Musk who is rude, and has no shame.

There may not always be an England as the UK has sunk into a vile cesspool of barbarism.  For the British government, the courts, and the police to turn a blind eye to this vile behavior is abandoning western civilization and putting savages in charge of the nation.  Islam isn't a religion, it's a criminal political movement masquerading as a religion with the foundational values of hate, greed, envy, lust, and violence, and by supporting this the government of the UK is now bereft of any sane moral foundation.   It seems to me these political invertebrates are on the take, or they afraid to do what they were elected to do. 

All this is coming to a head, and the Labour Party will soon be out, the Tories are in the wood shed for the foreseeable future, and Farage’s Reform UK will create the next government, with Farage as the next PM.   He vows an inquiry into these rape gangs and one of the victims of the infamous Rotherham Child Rape Grooming Gang is standing by Farage demanding a national inquiry, which is the desire of an overwhelming majority of Brits.

I do think there may be issues with Farage and where he really stands on immigration, as I read some of his views and they seem somewhat ambivalent, and I really don't like his take on Tommy Robinson who has been in prison as a political prisoner!  Yes, Tommy is a convicted criminal, but so too is "every patriotic Brit who’s now in jail for expressing concern online about grooming gangs and other aspects of the Islamization of Britain".  

He's been in prison since October for exposing all of this to the UK and the world, and has been doing it for years, and refuses to obey the court order to be quiet.  Where was Farage over this in all the years Tommy has been fighting this battle?  Not in the ring with Tommy and says Tommy has no place in his Reform party because he's a convicted criminal. Here's my

The vile history of Islam is incontestable.  We have almost 1500 years of history that shows Muslims everywhere in the world destroy the stable societies they invade and the officials in these countries, who are supposed to be the shepherds protecting the flock, are more concerned with political correctness than they are the flocks they're supposed to be protecting while being ravaged by wolves. 

Culture and the Perils of Ideology - One of the remarkable lessons about the British grooming gangs scandal is how dismissive ideologues are of first principles and the concept of natural consequences.  The idea that sexual crimes by immigrant communities should be concealed, or even abetted by government officials in the interest of "community relations" or some abstract multicultural ideal is dismissive of the of the nature of and minimal requirements for functioning human societies. 

The grooming scandals highlight some very basic attributes of cultures and societies. At a very basic level a society is a group of people who live among and interact with each other, and who share at least some common interests. Cultures are, at base, those collections of habits, manners and values that influence the interactions among members of a society. Cultures and societies may be much more complex and involve many more facets than described here, but these basic criteria are essential. Societies may contain subcultures, but it is the dominant culture that provides stability...........

The catastrophic folly of multiculturalism is the belief that cultures that arise in significantly different environments, and from significantly different histories, can exist unchanged in a new environment if afforded sufficient tolerance. In practice, a new culture introduces a new environment and the interacting cultures will change each other in unpredictable and often undesirable ways. 

Introducing a culture that has little respect for property, for example, will not reliably make the host culture more accommodating of pilfering, but may instead provoke more aggressiveness in defending property.....Not all cultures are compatible within the same society or geographic region. These are basic realities that apply to societies and cultures all over the world. They are natural consequences of humans living among and interacting with one another and do not yield readily to arrogant theories or deluded hubris................ Culture determines the fates of civilizations.

Here's the question I keep coming back to time after time on so many subjects.  These people are at the center of the information universe, and we're to believe they didn't really know or understand what was happening?   Yet the bugman knew all about this, and has published information about these outrages for almost 15 years.  So, if the bugman knew all this, how is it possible they didn't?  

It's time to close the immigration door to the antisemitic, anti-white, anti-capitalist, and anti-Christian migrants, and yes, it does have a lot to do with race, religion, and ethnicity, as so often the cultures these people are coming from are incompatible with our culture, and they not only have no desire to assimilate, they expect all of western civilization to change to accommodate them. Muslims don't give, they take!

I would still like an answer to this question.  What Did the Royal Family Know, and When Did They Know It?

Musk, Farage, and Tommy Robinson – Here’s the Deal

An insider's look at the row heard around the world. 

By Mark Angelides | Jan 7, 2025 @ Liberty Nation News, Tags: Articles, Opinion, Politics

A public feud between X owner Elon Musk and Britain’s Reform Party leader Nigel Farage over activist Tommy Robinson has created a perfect storm of recrimination and chaos on the UK political scene. With Musk calling for Farage to step aside as frontman of the party he created, patriots on both sides of the Atlantic are torn. But there’s an element at play that this author witnessed firsthand. And it may be the very thing that has played gatekeeper against insurgent parties in British politics. It also serves as a cautionary tale to the incoming Donald Trump administration.

The Spat

Musk on Jan. 5 tweeted: “The Reform Party needs a new leader. Farage doesn’t have what it takes.” This was in response to Farage refusing to publicly back Robinson’s release from prison and invite him to be an active part of the Reform Party. Farage responded:

“Well, this is a surprise! Elon is a remarkable individual but on this I am afraid I disagree. My view remains that Tommy Robinson is not right for Reform and I never sell out my principles.”

Robinson is currently serving time in prison for a contempt-of-court charge over the airing of his compelling documentary film regarding a cover-up of a young migrant being beaten by an English boy and the back story that saw head teachers and staff paid off to remain silent about the allegedly culpable behavior of the migrant child. And while a number of Reform voters may agree strongly with the “Free Tommy Robinson” campaign, there are elements to welcoming Robinson into the party that are not being openly discussed.

The disagreement has sparked division – and debate. Just a week ago, British politicians on the political left were fuming wildly over Musk offering his opinion on UK politics and calling for changes in the law to stop him donating to Farage. Notably, their pearl-clutching was aimed at Musk using his right to free speech and to comment on whatever he wishes – supposedly the bedrock of democratic nations. The Tesla CEO is now embroiled in bringing attention to the sordid rape gangs that have plagued Britain for the last decades – largely made up of men of Pakistani origin – an issue that Robinson has been at the forefront of exposing. But what of the Reform leader?

From UKIP to Reform

Farage is the only person to ever lead two parties to national election wins – albeit in the European Parliament. As leader of the United Kingdom Independence Party (UKIP), seeking to exit the UK from the EU, he shocked the political establishment by trouncing all other British parties in the 2014 election. In 2015, he steered the party to almost 4 million votes and more than 12% of the vote share; due to the peculiarities of the UK voting system, however, this resulted in a grand total of one elected Member of Parliament. Farage stepped back from frontline politics. UKIP was still riding high in the Euros, though. And this is where the Tommy Robinson saga begins.

Gerard Batten became the new leader of the UKIP* and embraced the cause celebre that was the contentious Robinson, hiring him to become an adviser. The decision to bring Robinson on board was the culminating factor that led Farage to leave the party he had guided to electoral success in the EU. He said that Batten was “obsessed with the issue of Islam, not just Islamic extremism, but Islam, and UKIP wasn’t founded to be a party fighting a religious crusade.” He believed that Robinson’s long history of criminal trouble would taint the party image just as it was gaining mainstream acceptance.

He was correct.

UKIP dissolved into factions and has slipped into electoral insignificance. “Battenites” went to war with those who believed Robinson was a destructive force to the party’s burgeoning reputation. New leadership votes were marred by infighting within the executive committee, and members left the party in droves.

Ahead of the 2019 European elections, Farage started the Brexit Party (renamed now to the Reform Party), which went on to sweep the floor with all other parties – including UKIP, which lost every single seat it contested.

Batten resigned as leader, and the party never really recovered its mojo under successive leaders Richard Braine and political dynamo Freddy Vaccha, despite valiant efforts – behind the curtain was the ongoing divide of having Robinson play a role in the party.

Why It Matters

The British press is the gatekeeper of the political status quo. Unlike the United States, the United Kingdom has a very limited media, with the state broadcaster, the BBC, being the dominant force. The denizens of this system have few qualms over “tabloid lynching” insurgent parties. Despite this, Farage managed to create a foothold in Parliament during the last UK election, securing five seats – which may not seem like a huge win, but historically it was an earthquake that heralded the downfall of the ruling Conservative Party.

Skip the Scrolling – Head to Roku!

Betting odds have Farage as the favorite to become the next prime minister when the elections are held in 2029 – and while he might not achieve such lofty heights this time around, his party is almost certain to become the king-maker. But fate is fickle and “there’s many a slip ‘twixt the cup and the lip.”

Having Robinson as a lightning rod in UKIP derailed its electoral hopes, regardless of how important his cause and his work as an investigative journalist. To a significant proportion of the British public, he is a pariah, and his association is a political kiss of death.

Musk Offers a Choice

Political death by association is often permanent. Farage has his sights set on 2029, and open support of Robinson could effectively blunt his momentum. This is a tough inflection point for the Reform leader. Speculation was rife that Musk was preparing to bankroll the party with a significant sum, and such largesse would have been game-changing in terms of doing battle with the Conservative and Labour Party.

For those who have long accused Farage of being “about the money,” his decision not to go along with the X boss in order to get a big donation came as a surprise. The unenviable choice was either to remain in Musk’s good graces and potentially have a well-funded war chest or to learn from UKIP’s experience and continue to keep plugging away at the two-party system that dominates British politics. As the most influential British politician since the days of Margaret Thatcher, Farage has yet again decided to forge his own path.

* In 2019, this author was invited to become the communications director of the party (and accepted), a position that involved coordinating with the press and the party leadership.

~

Liberty Nation does not endorse candidates, campaigns, or legislation, and this presentation is no endorsement.

Read More From Mark Angelides

Elon Musk and X Targeted by Increasingly Hysterical Progressives

For the left, politically balanced equals right-wing extremist takeover. 

By Graham J Noble Nov 27, 2024 @ Liberty Nation News, Tags: Articles, Opinion, Politics

President-elect Donald Trump has been living in leftist heads since 2016, but he’s now sharing his rent-free digs with billionaire entrepreneur and free-speech advocate Elon Musk. Progressives have been furious with Musk since he acquired a controlling interest in Twitter, now X. More recently, of course, things escalated when the Tesla CEO endorsed then-presidential candidate Trump and was subsequently tapped to head up the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) after Trump’s 2024 election victory. This has all sent the political left over the edge, and the attacks on all things Elon have now become both hilarious and quite disturbing.

It is widely known that, for years, conservative users and right-leaning news outlets were heavily censored on Twitter. Since Musk’s takeover and the platform’s rebirth as X, politically motivated censorship has all but disappeared. Conservative voices on the platform are emboldened and more visible, which has caused a lot of progressives to scream that X is now a haven of right-wing extremism.

Elon Musk Brings Balance to X

Survey data from Pew Research dispels that hysteria, though. Pew polled Twitter/X users on their party identification. In 2022, 65% of the people who said they regularly use the platform to get their news identified as Democrat, while only 31% claimed to be Republican. In 2024, the split is 48% Democrat and 47% Republican. As Harry Enten, host of CNN’s Margins of Error, said of Elon Musk, “He’s remade X/Twitter in his image… Turning it from a Democratic bastion to one that is far more evenly divided (& friendlier to the GOP).”

This hasn’t stopped left-wing “journalists” from losing their minds over a social media landscape that exists only in their heads – or perhaps only in the propaganda they disseminate in their attempts to destroy everything that Elon Musk has touched. Atlantic writer Charlie Warzel provides just one of the countless examples when he writes, “X is no longer a social-media site with a white-supremacy problem, but a white-supremacist site with a social-media problem.”

Some X users pithily – and accurately – pointed to the real issue leftists have with the new-look platform. As reported by Twitchy, Jeff A (@Mithrandir48) wrote that it’s “really just in the head of liberals who are so used to dominating the narrative that equality feels like oppression.” Sam Barber (@SamBarber1910) observed, “A reminder that folks who are leaving Twitter are doing so not because they were not permitted to express their opinion, but because you *are* permitted to express yours.”

California Grudge Match

However, it’s not just the anti-free speech crowd going after Elon Musk because he restored free speech to the social media platform. The world’s richest man being a “right wing activist” – as some on the left have called him – is a threat to the entire progressive agenda, and Musk is being targeted outside the world of social media.

Ditch the Diatribe – Try This!

As Donald Trump mulls eliminating federal tax credits for buyers of electric vehicles (EVs), California Governor Gavin Newsom has unveiled a plan that would provide rebates to people who purchase EVs in his state – unless the EV in question was built by Musk’s Tesla. The irony of this possibly unconstitutional idea, as Musk himself pointed out, is that Tesla is the only company manufacturing EVs in California. So, this is hardly a sound decision from a business perspective, and it appears to be a case of Newsom directly targeting Elon Musk for political reasons.

Judging by Newsom’s questionable legislative proposal and by former Clinton Labor Secretary Robert Reich calling for Musk’s arrest, among other accusations and calls for investigations targeting the billionaire, it appears the left has found a new bogeyman. So far, Elon Musk seems to be enjoying the show. But now that he will be working in tandem with a new Trump administration, the attacks on him are only just ramping up. It’s going to be interesting to watch over the next four years. Will Musk simply weather the storm, or will he go on the offensive and bring the storm to his critics?

~

Liberty Nation does not endorse candidates, campaigns, or legislation, and this presentation is no endorsement.

Read More From Graham J Noble, Chief Political Correspondent & Satirist

 

Elon Musk’s DOGE Is Complete – What’s Next?

Finding waste in Washington won’t be hard to do. 

By Andrew Moran | Nov 15, 2024 @ Liberty Nation News, Tags: Articles, Opinion, Politics

President-elect Donald Trump formally announced the creation of the Department of Government Efficiency, also known as DOGE. Billionaire Elon Musk and former presidential candidate Vivek Ramaswamy will spearhead the entity and work together to “pave the way” for Trump’s administration to “dismantle Government Bureaucracy, slash excess regulations, cut wasteful expenditures, and restructure Federal Agencies,” explained the president-elect. The US government maintains a roughly $7 trillion budget, so it should not be too challenging for DOGE to uncover massive amounts of waste. But will it improve the country’s fiscal condition?

Where DOGE Can Snoop

This past summer, the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) released an eye-opening report that concluded nearly 1,300 federal programs and bureaus faced expired authorizations but continued receiving half a trillion dollars in funding for fiscal year 2024.

The Government Accountability Office (GAO) reported in 2022 that the United States wastes $247 billion annually. Additionally, the GAO projected that the federal government lost approximately $2.4 trillion over the last 20 years because of basic payment mistakes, be it overpayments, underpayments, or unknown payments.

Each year, Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) releases his “Festivus” report, highlighting egregious examples of waste. The 2023 edition uncovered $900 billion in taxpayer money poured down the drain, including $477,721 for transgender monkey research, $3.8 million to probe pandemic-era misinformation exposure on social media among black and rural communities, and $170 million that the Department of Defense tossed out the window by improperly storing engines, military tanks, and transmissions.

Previous installments, such as $2.1 million to encourage Ethiopians to wear shoes, $1.1 million to get mice drunk, and $187,500 to determine whether children love their pets, triggered fiscal conservatives to faint on their couches and sport a lukewarm towel on their foreheads. Indeed, over the years, Paul’s Festivus and other reports have circulated revealing government departments misusing funds, from the US military purchasing soap dispensers for aircraft at more than 80 times the commercial price to the Pentagon spending $8,395 to buy a lobster tank.

Of course, what about the major programs that contribute overwhelmingly to the annual budget?

No Word on the Big Guns

The challenge behind balancing the budget is that two-thirds of annual outlays are dedicated to mandatory spending, including Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid. These programs are becoming more expensive due to inflation, requiring more resource allocation from cash-strapped taxpayers.

For now, DOGE has yet to suggest holding the magnifying glass over the untouchables. Trump has stated that neither he nor the Republican Party will cut a penny from Social Security, which faces an eternal shortfall of $63 trillion and is a decade away from insolvency. That said, the transition team, including co-chair Howard Lutnick, suggests correcting the fiscal imbalance by addressing the enormous waste and unleashing economic growth.

Bored? Check This Out!

Even if the US economy registered 4% growth, double the CBO’s long-term baseline estimate, it would still struggle to reverse the deficit or trim the debt-to-GDP ratio, which is already at or near 100%. Why? Policymakers can never reform the elephants in the room, as doing so would be political suicide and ensure ballot box defeats in any election cycle.

And then what about the $1 trillion in annual interest payments? This is perhaps the most significant waste because it is money spent without getting anything in return.

Ultimately, focusing on initiatives like the US Agency for International Development’s $6 million promotion of tourism in Egypt is commendable and welcomed by taxpayers. At the same time, however, it pales compared to the $6.4 trillion the federal government will spend on mandatory expenditures by 2034.

Hurling Snowballs

In personal finance, indebted individuals may employ the snowball method. This strategy consists of paying down your smallest debts first and then repeating the step until you are debt-free. Ancient financial wisdom dictates that the dollars will follow if you watch the pennies. So, while eliminating $20,000 for drag queen shows in Ecuador may not help balance the federal budget, it is one step toward restoring fiscal sanity in the nation’s capital and respecting millions of taxpayers. The minds behind DOGE want to slash spending by $2 trillion. It is a lofty endeavor, but prying taxpayer dollars from bureaucrats is like stepping in the ring with Mike Tyson for a Netflix special.

As legendary economist Milton Friedman once quipped, “Hell hath no fury like a bureaucrat scorned.”

~

Liberty Nation does not endorse candidates, campaigns, or legislation, and this presentation is no endorsement.

 

Read More From Andrew Moran

Free Speech Opponents Are Coming for Elon Musk

X and its CEO are being targeted for refusing to censor political speech.

By Graham J Noble Sep 4, 2024 @ Liberty Nation News Tags: Articles, Opinion, Politics

The enemies of free speech have relentlessly targeted Elon Musk since he acquired Twitter, rebranded it to X, and did away with the politically driven censorship that was once rife on the platform. The Australian government has been trying to meddle with what its citizens can and cannot post on the social media site, and, most recently, X was shut down in Brazil by an overzealous judge. Still, one would have thought that here in the United States – the last bastion of free speech on the planet – Musk would be on safe ground. That’s not the case, however, and one political operative even went as far as to call for the billionaire’s arrest.

Robert Reich served as Bill Clinton’s Labor secretary. He’s no moderate, and he’s not a fan of the First Amendment. In particular, he is not at all happy with Elon Musk, who has become one of the most well-known advocates for free speech on the Internet. But people like Reich want social media platforms censored, filtered, and regulated so that only news and opinions approved by progressives and globalists are disseminated to the general public.

“Musk wants to ‘free’ the Internet,” Reich once wrote. “But what he really aims to do is make it even less accountable than it is now.” One hardly needs to read between the lines to understand what the man is implying here: Free speech should no longer be a universal right. Instead, people must be held accountable for what they say and write. But accountable to whom? That’s the scary part.

The Pursuit of Elon Musk

Another prominent advocate for free speech is Jonathan Turley, the Shapiro Professor of Public Interest Law at George Washington University. Turley, who is a long way indeed from being a right-wing “extremist,” recently reminded us of the perilous state of our constitutional and, quite frankly, human right to free speech. As he recounted, Reich went on yet another enraged rant against Elon Musk, writing that the entrepreneur “may be the richest man in the world. He may own one of the world’s most influential social media platforms. But that doesn’t mean we’re powerless to stop him.” Stop him from doing what, exactly? Reich went on, “Regulators around the world should threaten Musk with arrest if he doesn’t stop disseminating lies and hate on X.”

No objective observer could reasonably claim that Musk has ever disseminated lies and hate on his social media platform nor produce evidence to back up the allegation. He has simply shared news and expressed opinions that some leftists associated with and in the current US administration don’t like. And for that, he should be arrested?

Meanwhile, another Elon Musk story that has gone largely under the radar – and is again brought to us by Turley, writing for The Hill – is the lawsuit brought by the X and Tesla CEO against Media Matters. The progressive activist site has been waging a campaign to drive advertisers away from X. One of Media Matter’s tactics was to publish a report that claimed some advertisements from major corporations appeared on X alongside pro-Nazi posts. Elon Musk is accusing Media Matters of manipulating the algorithms to create these pairings of corporate ads with pro-Nazi content. A federal judge recently ruled that Musk’s lawsuit can go ahead, and the leftist media outlet may well find itself in hot water.

Without free speech, there is no democracy. America is in grave danger because the very people who portray themselves as defenders of democracy are the ones behind an apparently growing campaign to end free speech in this country. It’s not only about Elon Musk and his social media platform. The whole of America – and, indeed, the world – is facing a dark future so long as people who share Reich’s philosophy continue to push for the suppression of the most fundamental of rights.

Liberty Nation does not endorse candidates, campaigns, or legislation, and this presentation is no endorsement.

 

Read More From Graham J Noble