The Next Climategate?
NOAA Refuses To Comply With US Congress
Subpoena
The federal
government’s chief climate research agency is refusing to give House
Republicans the detailed information they want on a controversial study on
climate change. Citing confidentiality concerns and the integrity of the
scientific process, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)
said it won’t give Rep. Lamar Smith (R-Texas) the research documents he
subpoenaed. At the center of the controversy is a study that concluded there
has not been a 15-year “pause” in global warming. Some NOAA scientists
contributed to the report. Timothy Cama The Hill 28 October 2015
Worried about
climate fraud, Congress is investigating a federal agency for allegedly
manipulating weather data to show recent global warming when there is none. So
why is the agency refusing to cooperate? Taxpayers pay for this research, which
is being used to justify massive new federal spending and regulation. They
deserve to know what NOAA and other federal agencies are doing — and whether
they're being honest or serving an unspoken extreme political
agenda.--Editorial, Investor’s Business Daily, 28 October 2015
It sounds like
Climategate all over again, with climate scientists trying to cover up,
obfuscate and frustrate all attempts by outsiders to get at the truth. What
gives them the right to decide they are above the law? As a publically funded
operation, why do they think they are entitled to pick and choose what
information they release to Congress? And above all, what are they trying to
hide? --Paul Homewood, Not A Lot Of People Know That, 28 October 2015
The global warming debate on Capitol Hill is heating up. Government scientists refused to comply with lawmakers’ demands they turn over internal documents regarding a study that eliminated the “hiatus” in global warming from the temperature record. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) officials argued such records are confidential and “essential to frank discourse among scientists.” The science agency said it has a history of protecting the“confidentiality of deliberative scientific discussions.” NOAA’s decision not to comply with a subpoena from House science committee lawmakers has only angered Chairman Lamar Smith, a Texas Republican, who says Americans have a right to know what taxpayer-funded scientists were thinking when they altered the temperature record in June. --Michael Bastasch, Daily Caller News Foundation, 28 October 2015
The global warming debate on Capitol Hill is heating up. Government scientists refused to comply with lawmakers’ demands they turn over internal documents regarding a study that eliminated the “hiatus” in global warming from the temperature record. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) officials argued such records are confidential and “essential to frank discourse among scientists.” The science agency said it has a history of protecting the“confidentiality of deliberative scientific discussions.” NOAA’s decision not to comply with a subpoena from House science committee lawmakers has only angered Chairman Lamar Smith, a Texas Republican, who says Americans have a right to know what taxpayer-funded scientists were thinking when they altered the temperature record in June. --Michael Bastasch, Daily Caller News Foundation, 28 October 2015
NOAA needs to
come clean about why they altered the data to get the results they needed to
advance this administration’s extreme climate change agenda. Congress cannot do
its job when agencies openly defy Congress and refuse to turn over information.
When an agency decides to alter the way it has analyzed historical temperature
data for the past few decades, it's crucial to understand on what basis those
decisions were made. This action has broad national and policy implications.
--Committee Chairman Rep. Lamar Smith, The Christian Science Monitor, 28 October 2015
Brought to you
by Benny Peiser's
Global Warming Policy Foundation
No comments:
Post a Comment