Daniel Greenfield November 24, 2021
Biden
claims that the Build Back Better Act will help ordinary Americans, but
the legislation, like so much in Washington D.C., is a collection of
pork for corrupt special interests. One of those special interests is
the media which suppressed negative stories about Biden and the
Democrats, like the FBI investigation of Hunter Biden, while promoting
disinformation, like the Steele Dossier, targeting President Trump:
Biden’s opponent in the presidential election.
The
media operates like a Democrat messaging operation and its partisanship
has undermined its business model, especially for local news outlets
which, unlike major national outlets, cannot simply ignore their
existing readers and viewers to focus exclusively on radical urban
leftists.
Congressional Democrats, with the complicity of some Republicans, had previously proposed
media subsidy schemes that included tax credits for media companies, tax breaks for subscribing to papers, and even a $5,000 tax credit for
taking out an ad in the local paper.
The
media subsidy scheme in Biden’s Build Back Better Act offers $1.9
billion to the media with a payroll tax credit covering 50% of salaries,
as much as $25,000, for the Democrat propagandists on media company
payrolls, and another 30% over the next four years.
While
the Democrats claim that this $1.9 billion special interest giveaway to
the media is helping "local news", it's capped at 1,500 employees. The
Washington Post has
only a little over 1,000 “journalists” on its payroll. The legislation
is written in a typically convoluted fashion, so it’s not altogether
clear if the premier propaganda outlet of the Democrats, owned by the
richest man in the country, would qualify for these subsidies at a time
when Americans are struggling to get by.
Lest
there be any doubt that the so-called "local journalism" provision is a
State Media scheme to subsidize hit pieces on Republicans, Democrats
explained that's exactly what it's there for.
Rep.
Earl Blumenauer touted the ability of "local journalism" to stop
Republican candidates like Edward Durr, a truck driver who spent $153
to defeat New Jersey Senate boss Steve Sweeney: the biggest Democrat
power broker in the state.
“There
was no opportunity for local media to provide even basic information
about the candidates,” Rep. Blumenauer whined. “The guy would never have
been elected if he had gotten any scrutiny at all.” By scrutiny, the
leftist Democrat means hit pieces, of the kind that the media belatedly
began generating after the truck driver’s unexpected election night win.
Give
the media $1.9 billion in subsidies and they can stop the next truck
driver from beating their Senate boss through lies, smears,
intimidation, and disinformation campaigns.
If this dirty deal were any more corrupt, it would be taking place in a brothel.
But
Democrats are not just relying on the innate biases of the media. One
of the biggest dark money investments of their political machines have
been fake news local operations.
Democrat groups like Report for America and Courier Newsroom have embedded subsidized reporters and created fake local news outlets to push leftist agendas. Report for America is
funded by the usual Democrats megadonors, the Ford Foundation, the
MacArthur Foundation, and the Knight Foundation, as well as by Big Tech
monopolies like Google and Facebook.
Courier Newsroom, backed by the controversial Acronym/Pacronym network, had
begun generating fake local news sites for the 2020 election with names
like “UpNorth News” in Wisconsin. It's being rebooted with the backing
of George Soros and LinkedIn founder Reid Hoffman who had previously
been caught pushing fake news through the Alabama Project.
The
Alabama Project had, in its own words, targeted the state's Senate
election, by having "orchestrated an elaborate ‘false flag’ operation
that planted the idea that the Moore campaign was amplified on social
media by a Russian botnet.”
The LinkedIn co-founder apologized, claimed that he knew nothing and that it would never happen again. And here he is,
alongside Soros, backing Good Information Inc. which will fund
non-profit propaganda media and invest in for-profit media that pushes
its political agenda.
Good Information Inc., is just a rebooted version of Courier Newsroom’s fake news network.
The
Build Back Better Act’s $1.9 billion media subsidy isn’t just funding
an industry aligned with the Democrats, but one that has become a false
flag operation for its messaging apparatus.
The Dems might just as well add $1.9 billion in subsidies for their own political consultants.
The connection between the media’s political fake news operations and the pork isn’t even being disguised.
CNN’s
Brian Stelter quotes “Report for America co-founder Steven Waldman, who
has helped lead the drive for the tax credit”, saying, "It's a huge
breakthrough for local news if it becomes law.” Report for America is
indeed vocally advocating for the Democrat media subsidy. And it would
be a “huge breakthrough” if part of the cost of Democrat messaging
operations were being subsidized by American taxpayers freeing Dem
megadonors to wage war elsewhere.
But
the core business model of the leftist machine has been to not simply
establish political operations that can swing elections, but figuring
out how to make them into permanent taxpayer-funded features of public
life so they can move on to their next “startup”.
like CNN and Report for America, not to mention many of RFA’s
megadonors, operate out of New York City. Their interest isn’t in local
news, it’s in winning elections. Local elections are now routinely swung
by rivers of cash coming out of New York and California. Not satisfied
with using billions to rig local elections in places they would never
visit, they want American taxpayers to subsidize their political
activists and their fake news operations.
The
media has gone to work telling Americans that giving them billions is
actually a wonderful idea in the ultimate example of a conflict of
interest. What the media neglects to mention is that its outlets are
facing hard financial times because they have alienated two thirds of
their audience. Unable to convince Americans to watch, read, and pay for
their lies, they’re now resorting to extracting the money through the
politicians they’ve been working to elect.
The
same radical shift in the media that alienated its readers and viewers
also vested the industry with the political power to steal billions from
Americans and put it in their pockets. The media is no longer an independent industry, it’s an arm of the ruling party. The
$1.9 billion in media subsidies is a timely reminder that the only
thing that the trillions in special interest pork are actually “building
back better” is the Democrat Party.
Tags:
Democrats,
media,
recent
About Daniel Greenfield
Daniel Greenfield is a journalist investigating Islamic terrorism and
the Left. He is a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the David Horowitz
Freedom Center