Abortion: You Just Can't Make This Stuff Up

By Rich Kozlovich

There are some things so incredibly stupid it's hard to believe anyone sane could spout them.  One psychologist claims unborn babies can give permission for their murder, aka, abortion, by telepathically communicating the desire to be murdered to the mother before they're born, in effect agreeing to, and  we're to assume, thankful for their murder.  

Imagine that!

Oh, and it gets better. Better being another word for insane.   Get this:

In the article “Conscious Abortion: Engaging the Fetus in a Compassionate Dialogue” in the Journal of Prenatal and Perinatal Psychology and Health, psychologist Claudette Nantel encourages women to communicate with their baby before an abortion, tell them how much they love them, say goodbye, and even get their child’s permission for the abortion.

Imagine that. 

Of course this is all predicated on the idea the murderer and her victim are capable of being in telepathic communication in the first place.  Furthermore for those who buy into this it's explained the murderer and the victim need to have:

"a heart-to-heart conversation with her baby in the womb, explaining how this is not a good time for her to raise a child, reassuring them that they are deeply loved.”

Now, I would think most people would consider this ....wellll ......just a bit ... insane?  Especially since they're going to have this telepathic conversation about the murderer's deep and abiding love for her victim, just before the victim is to be "dismembered or poisoned".   After all, everyone knows dismembering and poisoning goes hand in hand with being deeply loved.  Right?

Or how about this:

Several other counselors tell women with unwanted pregnancies to ask their baby to leave the womb. PH Fairfield instructs the following: “With deep love and concern, ask [the baby] to leave. Let yourself feel the divine love and connection with them, then tell them that it is not time for them to come in, or that you would like them to come back at a later time.” It is hoped, then, the baby will choose to leave, and the woman will miscarry. If not, then they believe abortion is needed to complete the process.

They would like them to come back another more convenient time?  And the victim is to agree to this and commit suicide?  Really?  Did I get that right?  Did I miss something here?  And just how is this victim to come back at a more convenient time after dying?

Who in the world could possibly think up this kind of thing?  Also, what if during this, "conversation", where the murderer asks the victim to leave the body and die, the victim says...NO?

One woman allegedly “heard” the child say no, so she came back and "said" to the victim.....“You don’t mean that?”   So she had the "surgical intervention" anyway feeling no guilt because she knew she made the right decision.  You see, it appears she concluded since the baby didn't respond to her "you don't mean that" question, the victim's silence denoted agreement to the "surgical intervention", and the following death by dismemberment and or poison.  

Now, at this point, I have to ask:  Does anyone find any fault with that kind of reasoning?  Does anyone besides me think this is nuts?  Worse yet, apparently this isn't some isolated bit of insanity either.   The writer notes:

The phenomenon of “conscious abortion” is about twisting reality to make abortion acceptable, even while admitting it’s killing babies. If doctors, counselors, and women having abortions believe the baby has no objections, they don’t have to feel guilty.

Guilt expiation for profit!  

This apparently is being pushed in a lot of places, and guilt expiation really is the thrust of all this isn't it? If these babies are capable of being in communication with their mothers, as they're claiming, and vise versa, then doesn't that make them sentient beings with rights?  

Let's face it, if abortion isn't murder, as these mass murderers claim, then why is there any need to expiate the guilt for murdering them in the first place?  This twisted psychobabble doesn't expiate anyone's guilt for the murder of all this innocent blood they've shed, and will shed.  

Their own arguments condemn them.