On the media’s attempt to explain away mob violence.
May 28, 2020 by
Since last we met, the revolution foretold this time last year in these pages (see “Revolutionism redux” in The New Criterion
of September 2019) has reached its kinetic phase, as everyone except
the media can plainly see. Actually, the media can see it too, but,
acting on the time-honored Marxist-Leninist principle that “truth” is
whatever serves the revolution, they find it expedient to deny that the
active revolutionaries in the streets of several major cities are
anything but “mostly peaceful” protesters. Who are you going to believe,
them or your lying eyes? “Violent protests are not the story. Police
violence is,” insisted Vox at the end of May,
at the beginning of what we were not to call rioting, originally
inspired by the death of George Floyd under the knee of the
then-policeman Derek Chauvin in Minneapolis on Memorial Day. And the
rest of the media took up the cry: “Two Crises Convulse a Nation: A
Pandemic and Police Violence,” wrote Jack Healy and Dionne Searcey for The New York Times,
echoing their colleagues Shaila Dewan and Mike Baker who reported that,
“Facing Protests Over Use of Force, Police Respond With More Force.”..........To Read More...
No comments:
Post a Comment