Search This Blog

De Omnibus Dubitandum - Lux Veritas

Showing posts with label RINO Cowardice. Show all posts
Showing posts with label RINO Cowardice. Show all posts

Thursday, March 16, 2023

Mike Pence destroys his remaining goodwill among MAGA Republican

As Vice President, Mike Pence was reviled by the D.C. Democrat establishment and their P.R. wing that masquerades as the news media. Pence is religious, conservative, and pro-life.  He also believes in marital fidelity and traditions.  He seems to stand for everything that liberals abhor. They disparaged Pence as anachronistic and misogynistic because he revealed that he never dines alone with a woman other than his wife, nor does he attend any event where alcohol is served unless his wife is present.........

It must be remembered that as vice president, Pence wasn't actually averse to the swamp.

It was Mike Pence as vice president who complained about Trump's first national security adviser, Michael Flynn, lying to him about his contacts with the Russians, which led to Flynn's firing.  Flynn was among those who had pledged to drain the swamp, so with Flynn gone weeks after Trump was inaugurated, the possibility of reforming national security agencies was dropped.

Pence was in charge of the COVID-19 response that allowed Fauci and others to hijack the proceedings.  Even after leaving office, Pence's conduct was suspicious..........Pence had expressed similar sentiments about Trump in his book, claiming that Trump's "reckless words had endangered my family and all those serving at the Capitol."............Perhaps Pence and his advisers are delusional. Perhaps Pence is delusional, and his advisers are merely looking to make some easy money before Pence disappears into the night.........For issues that really mattered, there was not much difference among the Bushes, Clinton, and Obama.  It's hard to say if Pence is a useful idiot for the Democrats or if he was an establishment Republican pretending to be a MAGA Republican.....To Read More...

Monday, July 11, 2022

New York Republicans Crumple on Abortion

To model “principled loserdom” while indulging in a “kink for losing”: this is the establishment Republican’s beating heart. And on July 1, Republicans in the New York Senate wore their hearts on their sleeves.   The week before, the Supreme Court ruled in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health that states are free to regulate abortion. The Constitution is once again considered to be “scrupulously neutral” on abortion, as Justice Brett Kavanaugh put it. And so, after fifty years, the legal funhouse of mirrors that began with Roe v. Wade came to an end. 

Allowing abortion is the worst thing America ever has done. It has been far worse than slavery. There were four million slaves in 1860 out of 31 million people living in America. That’s one in eight. Today, when the American economy struggles with an aging population that for fifty years has failed to replenish itself with a minimum of new births, one in five of the few pregnancies that still occur here end in abortion. Since Roe was decided in 1973, more than 63 million American children -- that’s a fifth of America’s present-day population -- have died in abortions. The slaves we freed. The slaughtered babies we discarded in blue plastic bags and then burned. ...........To Read More....

Friday, March 4, 2022

Here it is! 'Widespread election fraud' revealed in report

Wisconsin investigation charges multiple problems with 2020 presidential election

Thursday, February 10, 2022

McConnell joins Cheney and Kinzinger in giving aid and comfort to the swamp's denizens

February 10, 2022 By David Zukerman

Mitch McConnell obviously has never met a conservative populist (a/k/a Trump supporter) he ever liked.  That clearly is indicated by his gratuitous defense of GOP turncoats Cheney and Kinzinger.  Republican National Committee chair Ronna McDaniel, in what was an effective statement on McConnell's  harsh words for the GOP base,  indicated by her closing paragraphs, how egregious were McConnell's harsh words for the MAGA patriots. Via TownHall:.........To Read More....

My Take - Ole Mitch says he's not worried about being Senate leader if the Republicans retake the Senate.  Really?  What can we glean from that?  He's delusional.  As for Kevin McCarthy, he's always been...at best....a leaky vessel.  And when the Republicans take over the House they need to find someone else to be Speaker.  My pick?  Jim Jordan of Ohio. 

Thursday, April 22, 2021

As rabid Dems run rampant, George Bush decides that now's the time to attack the Republican Party

By Monica Showalter

George Bush has quite the gift for timing. Just as Democrats whip up riots, threaten juries, plot to pack the Supreme Court, beaver away to end the filibuster, force Critical Race Theory down schoolchildren's throats, open the border to a cartel profit bonanza with untold migrant misery, and spend up a storm, out he comes, loudly criticizing his own party. mAccording to Politico:

Former President George W. Bush described the modern-day GOP as "isolationist, protectionist, and to a certain extent, nativist" in an interview Tuesday that was packed with implicit criticism of the most recent Republican president.

"It's not exactly my vision" for the party, Bush told NBC's "Today" show in a rare live TV appearance. "But, you know, I'm just an old guy they put out to pasture." He also threw in this:

As for the Jan. 6 insurrection perpetrated by supporters of former President Donald Trump, "it did make me sick. I felt ill. And I just couldn't believe it," Bush said.

"What's really troubling is how much misinformation there is and the capacity of people to spread all kinds of untruth," he added. "And I don't know what we're going to do about that."

Well, leftists do.  They're censoring conservative thinking of all stripes on social media and creating a cancel culture that makes any American with a viewpoint different from the wokesters into pariahs, silencing them, keeping them out of schools and jobs, cutting off their access to e-commerce, expelling them from retail contracts, tearing down statues, rewriting history to their leftist specifications, imitating Mao Zedong on brainwashing and re-education, and doing everything possible to make the idea of free speech and open debate a sorry joke. 

Bush?  He just likes the result, even if he can't quite bring himself to demonstrate the kind of brazen "courage" the leftists have to say so openly.  Any question as to why people despise him?.......To Read More...

Friday, April 9, 2021

Rules of the Game

Are we willing to get down and dirty with Marxist elitists and fight by their rules, or not?

By ——--April 8, 2021

Cover Story | 0 Comments | Reader Friendly | Subscribe | Email Us

We all learned as children that for any game we played, to be fair, all players must accept the official rules of that game.  That simple fact assured that each player had an equal opportunity to win that game.  The key element was that everyone agreed to abide by the official rules.  

This is a small scale model of how a civilized free society is supposed to work: One set of rules to define how the game is to be played.  If one player in the game unilaterally decides they want to ignore the official rules, we call that cheating.  If one or more other players choose not to confront the cheating player, the rules followers will invariably lose the game.  I believe this is a fairly simple concept to grasp.

As a Vietnam veteran, I saw how having players using two sets of rules worked in real life.  The American and allied governments made a decision to limit the rules under which their forces fought the war.  The end result was these limitations made it impossible for the allies to provide freedom for the South Vietnamese people.  The allies were fighting a limited war, but the North Vietnamese were fighting an unlimited war.  The North Vietnamese didn’t cheat; they fought a stupid enemy that refused to use all the rules.  Once again, this is an easy concept to grasp.........To Read More....

 

Friday, March 19, 2021

Rep. Eric Swalwell Escapes Effort to Kick Him Off Intel Committee

Rebecca Downs Rebecca Downs Mar 18, 2021

Thursday night was a busy day for the U.S. House of Representatives. In addition to passing two amnesty bills, the House also voted to allow Rep. Eric Swalwell (D-CA) on the House Select Committee on Intelligence, in a resolution introduced by House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-CA). The party line vote was 218-200, with Reps. Kelly Armstrong (R-ND), David Joyce (R-Ohio) and Michael Guest (R-Miss.) voting present............To Read More.....

 

Monday, January 11, 2021

Why Cowardly Republicans Got Hysterical about the Capitol Riots

Over the last six months, Black Lives Matter (BLM) and Antifa riots caused two billion dollars in property damage, killed at least 25 people, and injured over 2,000 police officers.  Rioters occupied and burned a police station in Minneapolis.  They attacked a federal courthouse in Portland every night for months.  In Seattle, Antifa set up an "autonomous zone" where five people were murdered, including two teenagers shot to death when they drove "too fast" near an armed checkpoint.

Senator Kamala Harris applauded the rioters.  In June, amid the burning and looting of large swaths of Minneapolis, she said the riots were "not going to let up, and they should not, and we should not."  Then she raised money to bail rioters out of jail.

Seattle mayor Jenny Durkan called Seattle's Antifa autonomous zone a "summer of love" before five people died.  Two months after the riots began, Congresswoman Ayanna Pressley called for more "unrest in the streets."  Vice President Joe Biden did not condemn the rioting for weeks.

Along the way, "progressive" district attorneys have avoided prosecuting rioters. "Insignificant" crimes like arson, looting, and assaulting a police officer will not land a rioter in jail.  Often, D.A.s refuse even to charge them. When serial rioters commit more serious crimes, such as throwing a Molotov cocktail at a police officer, charges are reduced or dropped.

In short, Democrat politicians have condoned, rationalized, or ignored rioting by their supporters.  It's no surprise that these riots continue.  On the night of January 6, Antifa punched the Portland mayor, attacked a county courthouse, and smashed local businesses for the third time this year.

The BLM/Antifa riots are important context for the Capitol riots and the response of Republican leadership. 

On the morning of January 6, many thousands of President Trump's supporters gathered near the Capitol.  After a speech by the president, they marched to the Capitol grounds.  Many stayed there, protesting outside.  But several hundred people (including some with Antifa links) pushed past barriers and into the Capitol itself.  Along the way, they assaulted dozens of police officers, smashed windows and cabinets, and looted several pieces of property, including a podium and a laptop.

Police officer Brian Sicknick died of injuries after a clash with a rioter.  An unarmed Trump-supporter, Ashli Babbitt, died after an officer shot her in the neck.  That shooting was questionable — a barrier separated the officer from Ms. Babbitt, and other officers were only a few feet behind her when he fired. 

It's worth noting that while some Trump-supporters were rioting, others were merely protesting.  Capitol police officers recognized this fact and opened the doors to the Capitol, saying they respected Trump-supporters' "right [to protest]."

The occupation of the Capitol led Congress to evacuate its chambers, interrupting the certification of Electoral College votes.  When police cleared the Capitol several hours later, Congress reconvened and completed the certification that same night.

The Capitol riots were serious and violent.  But by any measure — death, injury, destruction, criminality — the BLM/Antifa riots were much worse.

The left avoids direct comparisons between the riots and instead implies that Trump-supporters are particularly despicable because they occupied a government building during a formal electoral ceremony.

The problem is that BLM and Antifa often attack public buildings.  In June, leftists celebrated reports that rioters near the White House forced Trump into a bunker.  Democrats also stormed the Senate building during Justice Kavanaugh's confirmation hearings and occupied the Wisconsin capitol in an attempt to block legislation.  Finally, the Capitol riots were not particularly disruptive.  Trump-supporters delayed the electoral certification for a few hours.  It was, at most, a symbolic gesture.

Now, after months of encouraging and rationalizing BLM and Antifa riots, Democrats condemn Trump-supporters and the Capitol riots in the harshest possible terms.  "Treason," "coup," "insurrection," "sedition," "terrorism" — there has been plenty of hysteria. 

This is wild hypocrisy.  But hypocrisy is normal.  Bias or bad faith often leads partisans to condemn opponents for the same behavior they excuse in their supporters.

What is more interesting — and concerning — is Republican leadership's own hysterical response.  Borrowing from Democrats, Ted Cruz called Capitol rioters and protesters "terrorists."  Tom Cotton and Mitt Romney said they were insurrectionists.  Lindsey Graham called for the arrest of everyone who entered the Capitol and raised the possibility of sedition charges.  The RNC's communications director called the riots "domestic terrorism."

These statements are overbroad and melodramatic.  They fail to distinguish between rioters and protesters.  They also falsely imply that anyone who smashed a window is a terrorist, cheapening the term.

What explains Republicans' eagerness to join the left's hysteria?  It stems, at least in part, from a basic failure to identify with their voters.

Many Democrats identify with BLM/Antifa rioters and see their violence as, at worst, justifiable anger that goes a step too far — in other words, a matter of bad tactics.  

Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez explained rising violent crime in New York by citing parents' need to "shoplift bread" for their children.  As for the BLM/Antifa riots, the congresswoman said that "[i]f you are calling for an end to this unrest ... but you are not calling for the end of the conditions that created the unrest, you are a hypocrite."  In a similar vein, Congresswoman Pressley justified BLM/Antifa riots by explaining that "unrest in our lives" caused "unrest in the streets."

Many Republican leaders seem incapable of relating to their supporters' anger.  Based on video and initial arrest reports, most protesters were white, and most were from outside D.C.  Some were contractors, some owned small restaurants, others were low-level employees — all people whom lockdowns have harmed.  

Most people at the Capitol were normal Americans with legitimate questions about election irregularities.  These people have a deep loyalty to a president who is not ashamed to call them his supporters and has consistently put working- and middle-class Americans first on issues of immigration, international trade, and foreign policy.

These Trump-supporters are rightly fearful that Democrats — and many Republicans — are eager for a return to the pre-Trump era in which both parties joined in selling out to China, flooding America with foreign workers, and draining our treasury to fight for someone else's democracy.

Trump-supporters' fears do not justify riots.  But they do justify vocal protest.  Perhaps that's why a snap poll on the night of January 6 found that a plurality of Republicans approved the "storming" of the Capitol.

After four years of the president's record-setting popularity with rank-and-file Republicans, leaders like Ted Cruz, Tom Cotton, and Lindsey Graham still cannot grasp Trump's appeal and his supporters' concerns.  Perhaps it's because they spend too much time in the D.C. bubble.  Perhaps it's a class issue.

Whatever their issue, they need to fix it.  Quickly.  A good first step is working to understand the Republican base.  A good second step is refusing to echo the left by calling everyone at the Capitol "terrorists."

Republican leaders must do the following with respect to the protests and riots at the Capitol:

First, condemn violence and call for the prosecution of anyone who attacked police or damaged property.

Second, describe the riots and protests in sane, measured tones.  Point out that Capitol Police recognized many of those on the Capitol grounds as legitimate protestors.  Object to the prosecution of anyone who did nothing more than walk through the building.  Stop labeling protesters "domestic terrorists."  Demand an investigation into the killing of Ashli Babbitt.

Third, acknowledge Trump-supporters' anger and assure them that the Republican Party will fight for its base.  People are suffering and scared — scared of never-ending lockdowns, a changing economy, an all-powerful Democrat party that calls them deplorable, and a weak Republican party that seems eager to abandon them.

Fourth, constantly point out the difference between Republicans' and Democrats' responses to political violence.  Republicans issued quick and forceful denunciations of their supporters' rioting.  Many Democrats still refuse to do likewise.

Forty-five percent of Republicans approved of the events at the Capitol.  Republican leaders thus have the political capital to discuss both the protests and riots in accurate and measured terms.  They just need to find the courage.

Jack R. Carlsson is an attorney from Boise, Idaho. Follow him on Twitter at @jackrcarlsson.

 

Tuesday, September 24, 2013

Medved Misses in Attack on Cruz, Conservative Opposition

by Joel B. Pollak 23 Sep 2013
I enjoy and admire Michael Medved, so it is with some reluctance that I attack his op-ed in today’s Wall Street Journal, which is both cringing and cringeworthy, and represents much that is wrong with the mentality of today’s GOP establishment.  Medved warns that Republican resistance to the immigration reform bill, and ongoing GOP efforts to defund Obamacare, raise “false hopes among the base” but ensure the party’s self-destruction.
He labors under the very simple misconception that a government shutdown would be “wildly unpopular,” that there is some reservoir of public trust in the government that would reward Republicans for making it work according to Obama’s design. That leads Medved to nonsensical arguments, such as that Obamacare can be “fixed,” or that the rule of law can be “extended” to those aliens who have defied it (while others obeyed it).
In fact, a recent Rasmussen poll shows that a majority of Americans would prefer to see a partial government shutdown rather than suffering the implementation of Obamacare, a law that is costing both money and jobs. And opinion polls have consistently shown that while the public supports a “path to citizenship” for illegal immigrants, Americans want border security first--to know with certainty that this amnesty really will be the last.....To Read More...