Search This Blog

De Omnibus Dubitandum - Lux Veritas

Showing posts with label Parler. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Parler. Show all posts

Friday, January 22, 2021

Democrats Outsource Political Repression to Corporate Monopolies

@ Sultan Knish Blog

The repression will be televised. It will go better with Coke, it will promise to clear up your bad breath and make your toilet shine. It will be in the cloud, it will be digitized and monetized.

It will have a trademark, a brand, and it will be outsourced to the private sector.

Democrats love public-private partnerships and they outsourced political repression to the private sector. The Constitution has inconvenient things to say about freedom of speech and so the Democrat government of elected and unelected officials outsourced the problem of censoring and suppressing speech to the handful of Big Tech monopolies of the internet.

That same old document written by old white dead men, not to mention centuries of jurisprudence and tradition, prevents the government from kicking down your door in the middle of the night for wrongthink. But nothing keeps corporations from firing you for wrongthink, for being related to someone who committed wrongthink, or for insufficient political correctness.

The public-private partnership between big government and big monopolies is based on Democrats and corporations doing the dirty work of repressing each other’s opponents.

Corporations can’t write regulations that suppress competition from upstart rivals, and so the government steps in and keeps the marketplace under the control of a few cartels. And the government can’t censor, deplatform, fire, bankrupt, and bar its political opponents from speaking, flying, and doing business. But the monopolies it’s been partnering with can and do.

This political Strangers on a Train arrangement goes much more swimmingly because both the government Guy and the corporate Bruno are eager to take care of each other’s dirty business.

Democrats knock off Amazon’s rivals and Amazon knocks off Republicans. The Washington Post, owned by Amazon CEO Bezos, goes after President Trump. Amazon’s AWS takes out Parler and makes it more likely to get back its $10 billion military cloud contract from Biden.

You know, that contract which Amazon thought it had before President Trump took it away.

Big Tech monopolies like Amazon are also government contractors. Microsoft has 6,860 federal subcontracts, Amazon has 477, Google has 384, Facebook has 172, and that's just in military and law enforcement. And Big Tech employees pour millions into Democrat campaigns.

Google employees gave the Democrats $21 million, Microsoft gave $12 million, Amazon $9 million, and Apple and Facebook $6 million. But that’s just the official cash coming from employees. Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg spent $400 million to buy the 2020 election.

Not to mention the priceless in-kind contribution of Facebook censoring stories about Hunter Biden’s ties to China and the FBI money laundering investigation right before the election.

The monopolies give Democrats cash and get government contracts worth a thousand times more. The corps suppress Republicans and Democrats suppress their corporate competition.

Everyone makes more money and gets more power.

The public-private totalitarian partnership between a one-party state and oligarchs who carry on its propaganda, enrich its officials, and suppress its enemies is a familiar one in China, Russia, Turkey and other hellholes that the Democrats seem bent on using as models for their utopia.

But it’s not just a simple economic ecosystem. Like the Communists and Nazis of Weimar Germany, socialists and monopolies claim to hate each other while secretly allied together.

Democrats let monopolies take over the internet and by extension much of the economy because they can then run against the abuses of “capitalism” and push socialism. And the monopolies can retort that it’s a choice between them and AOC’s version of socialism.

Pick your poison.

Like the Communists and Nazis of Weimar Germany whose political polarization convinced the public it had to choose between them even while Hitler and Stalin were privately allied against the liberals and moderates behind the scenes, economic polarization brings together socialists and monopolies to ally against the free market and offer a choice of two unpalatable dystopias.

But you don’t actually have to choose because we get both for the inflated price of one.

Google and AOC join together in jumping up and down on the bleeding corpse of the free market while the dumber sort of Republican pretends that they’re two different sides. (Google employees were AOC’s second-biggest donors. Amazon and Apple were the fourth and fifth.)

Americans get an inept kleptocratic government that’s socialist in all but name and a dystopia of cartels. The hybrid system is destroying jobs and the middle class at a record pace. The socialists tax and regulate to keep the competition down and the monopolies offshore jobs.

Those rights that the government can’t take from you, yet, Google, Amazon, and Facebook will.

The public-private totalitarian nightmare is mediated by the media and non-profits which act as the interface between the government and the cartels. The media and the activists tell tech firms, banks, and superstore whom to ban, which rights to eliminate, and how to virtue signal. The industries fund and own the media outlets and organizations that coordinate their activities.

In the wake of the Capitol riot, these middlemen have come up with wonderful ideas like banning conservatives, cutting off corporate political contributions to conservatives, and firing anyone who questions a massively rigged election, which the corps are implementing.

All of this really got underway once it was clear that Democrats would control the Senate.

Big Business was not about to turn up the machine of political repression to eleven on behalf of the Democrats until it was really sure that they would have sole control of the government.

The public-private partnership for tyranny is a balance of power and of terror.

Democrats keep threatening to break up the monopolies because that gives them direct leverage. They don’t really mean it, but as they radicalize into socialism, they will. And then they’ll nationalize the monopolies, toss the Bill of Rights in the trash, and then they won’t need to outsource repressing political dissidents to corporate middlemen for plausible deniability.

The monopolies need some Republicans around to protect them from the socialists. Just not the kind of Republicans who would be bad for business by breaking up monopolies, bringing jobs back from China, restricting immigration, and rebuilding the economy for the middle class.

And the Democrats need to protect themselves from monopolies so powerful that they can erase their opponents, like President Trump, from the marketplace of ideas, a power so dreadful that it has longtime international foes of Trump in the European Union fearful of this Death Star.

The public-private totalitarian partnership is also a rivalry.

America is being consolidated into a handful of monopolies, not only in the tech industry, but in retail, entertainment, medicine, publishing, household brands, and anything you can think of.

These rising monopolies dominate the economy and are the country’s next biggest power bloc.

The biggest power bloc is government. Not so much the government of the people you vote for, but the massive administrative state which writes its own regulations, has its own politics, and runs most of the country without input from elected officials, let alone little people like you.

Some call it the deep state or the administrative state. A better name is just socialism.

The full scope of the beast encompasses not just the official employees, elected and unelected, but the lobbyists, contractors, public universities, government grant recipients, and operatives who have made D.C.’s bedroom counties into some of the wealthiest places in America.

These two blocs are entwined by class, geography, and economic relationships. And by power.

Their partnership allows them to overcome the legal limits of the current system, one in which Comcast or Google can’t directly legislate, and in which the Democrats can’t directly destroy your life by using each other as middlemen to expand the limits of their power over America.

Only America could recreate Soviet political repression and Maoist culture wars using Target, Disney, and Coca Cola. Your commissar is a diversity consultant at Goodyear, you will be doxxed on Twitter, your life will be destroyed by a paper owned by Amazon’s CEO, and your neighbor will turn you in on an app built into a $1,000 Apple smartphone. Only in America.com.


Daniel Greenfield, a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the Freedom Center, is an investigative journalist and writer focusing on the radical Left and Islamic terrorism.

This article first appeared exclusively at Front Page Magazine.
 

Tags: , ,  

Author Image

About Daniel Greenfield
Daniel Greenfield is a journalist investigating Islamic terrorism and the Left. He is a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the David Horowitz Freedom Center

Sunday, January 17, 2021

Parler CEO John Matze, Family Forced Into Hiding Due to Death Threats, Security Breaches: Filing

By Zachary Stieber January 16, 2021

Parler’s CEO has gone into hiding with his family after receiving death threats, according to a new court filing.  CEO John Matze “has had to leave his home and go into hiding with his family after receiving death threats and invasive personal security breaches,” the filing in Parler v. Amazon states.

Parler sued Amazon Web Services (AWS) after the company refused to continue working with the social media company. Parler went offline on Monday as a result and continues to be offline.

Amazon asked the court on Tuesday to redact names, job titles, and descriptions from court documents.

“Redaction of the employee identifying information is necessary to protect their safety and security and to prevent potential harassment,” Amazon said. “These employees’ safety concerns are well-founded in light of significant and repeated threats of physical violence against AWS, its facilities, and its employees in the wake of AWS’s decision to suspend its cloud hosting agreement with Parler.”

The motion included screenshots of posts that appeared to be from Parler in which users threatened to carry out violence against Amazon workers, executives, and facilities.

District Judge Barbara Rothstein, a Carter nominee, granted the motion. She said AWS and its employees “have demonstrated a well-founded concern for the safety and security of their employees based on threatening and violent content.”

In Parler’s new filing, lawyers said the company’s employees have been harassed and threatened. “Many Parler employees are suffering harassment and hostility, fear for their safety and that of their families, and in some cases have fled their home state to escape persecution,” Parler said, before noting that Matze himself has gone into hiding...........To Read More.....

Saturday, August 1, 2020

It's Time to Parler

By Rich Kozlovich

I belong to an eclectic e-mail group that discusses every social issue under the sun, daily. Some just read the comments, some contribute and comment regularly, some occasionally, and those who comment occasionally can be surprising with the comments.

But it's a closed forum with people who are direct, intelligent, knowledgeable and polite, and other than myself, they're all educated. I consider this to be a unique and special group, and lucky! Not often you can get that kind of interaction in such a diverse group. Of course we often disagree, but at some point we will disagree to the point there's nothing left but personal attacks, as we so often see in comments sections of online articles. and we're absolutely not going down that road, so we just walk away from it.

One of the latest issues that's come to the fore is Twitter, Facebook and LinkedIn and their publication policies.

Let's start here:
As Twitter checks Trump, Khamenei account left alone, despite plea from Israel
Comment from a member: Twitter, Google, Facebook, YouTube are all vile when it comes to their policies and actions on this sort of thing. They're blatantly bigoted, and grossly discriminating against conservatives, Jews, and Republicans. Not to mention seriously meddling in the upcoming election.
Breitbart News Appeals Twitter Account Suspension, ‘Review’ Drags Out Beyond 48 Hours
Twitter Suspends PragerU, Prominent Conservatives, and Doctors for Commenting on HCQ
Comment from a member:  This is truly outrageous.  Now twitter, google, YouTube etc., thinks that they are doctors who somehow have the right to say what people can and cannot hear about a treatment in the middle of a pandemic.  Because, of course, we're too stupid to decide for ourselves with our real doctors what we do or do not want to try or do for a possibly deadly condition.
Over the years there's been a lot of discussion over this, but the question really is what can be done about this? I think it’s blatantly obvious LinkedIn, Twitter and Facebook are in no way impartial.  They're now part of the left wing media conspiracy, and their goal is to destroy conservatives, Christians, Republicans, Jews, Israel and whites. 

So what?  No matter how outraged I might become over this I still contend it's their right to be stupid.   This is America, we have a right to be stupid, it’s Constitutional!  We have more kinds of stupidity here than any nation on the Earth!   Why?   Because we have a system that permits it, and an economy that allows for that kind of commitment, no matter how stupid.   This is unlike other nations.  Especially those dominated by Muslims.  The only kind of stupid they’re allowed to embrace is Islam.  Any other kind of stupid, or even any kind of intelligent for that matter, gets you killed.  

But my big bone of contention with these people is they’re dishonest, just like the rest of the left wing media, whether it’s TV, magazines, newspapers or Hollywood for that matter.  The difference is no one can tell these news sources what they can or cannot print.  Who they support or who they hate.  Why should we think we can do it with these groups? Admittedly, they're not the press, and so the argument is they have no First Amendment protection.  Really? I'm not so sure that's a slippery slope. 

In decades gone by I really liked the way newspapers worked.  Many, many decades ago.  They were openly partisan.  They would call themselves the name of the city and who they supported.  Such as the New Haven Republican, or the New Haven Democrat, etc.  Those names are made up by the way,  but that was the trend.  You knew where they were from and where they stood.

Now the main stream media is finally coming out into the open and demonstrating their corruption, and so too should these social media sites.  And once they've done that, leave them alone.  I’ve contended what needs to be done is develop competition with these openly left wing lunatics with an openly conservative site, or at the very least an honest open dialogue site.  And now there is one, and it’s called Parler!  But get this.  Conservatives can be an odd lot.   Parler isn't attracting conservatives as it should. Why?

One conservative writer I personally know complained that posting on Parler was like preaching to the choir, and a waste of time.   Does anyone really think posting on Twitter, LinkedIn and Facebook will change the thinking of leftist ideologues to any real degree, and is a better use of time?

Preaching to the choir is a good thing because it provides information conservatives can use to support  their own views, challenge opposing views, and do it intelligently.  Also, it makes it clear to conservatives they're not alone, and that the social sea they're swimming in is filled with intelligent, reasonable and rational people.  That's an excellent use of time!

By the way, it amazes me how often I can search for something on Google but it won't show up, clearly they're orchestrating what can be found.  All the Breitbart articles I linked suffered that kind of fate.  So I often use Quant as my search engine, and it never fails to deliver. 


Saturday, June 6, 2020

Twitter gets some competition that promises to welcome conservative voices

Certainly sounds as if a social media gauntlet has been thrown down by Parler

 By —— Bio and Archives--June 5, 2020 @ Canada Free Press

There’s a new, well, newer, social media outlet in town and the folks behind it are looking for a scalp named Twitter. It’s Parler, founded in 2018 and which bills itself as “the People-driven social platform,” claiming a user base of a million people. That’s undoubtedly chicken feed compared to the number of folks being forced currently into Twitter’s liberal gulag, but it’s also nothing at which to sneeze.
Twitter’s liberal gulag
It appears to be a pretty pugnacious platform, too. I’d never heard of Parler before the company sent out a series of press releases last week, one of which condemned Twitter’s labelling of a couple of President Donald Trump’s tweets as “misleading information.” Twitter, you may remember, got all a-twitter over the President pointing out that mail-in voting – a scheme being pushed hard currently by Democrats who’ll do anything to get the world back to its headlong rush toward socialism – heightened the risk of election fraud.

So, to show the unwashed masses just how credible Twitter is, the Twits in charge enlisted fake news Washington Post and CNN as their credible sources. It is to laugh.

Oddly enough (to those incapable of conscious thought), Twitter appears to see no problem with Antifa or other left wing groups and, to the best of my knowledge as of the time of this writing, isn’t inserting its own editorial slant and censorship to the folks who appear to ride the same ideological train as the Twits.

Seems, then, that Twitter isn’t any kind of public square, town hall, or place for the open and free exchange of information and ideas. And that’s fair enough: Twitter can do what it wants with its platform. I only object to the feigned non-partisanship – the same crap being spewed by most of the mainstream media, with its constant barrage of left-wing indoctrination pushed as actual balanced information.
Technofascists...........To Read More.....