By Rich Kozlovich
Well, it turns out the debate didn't matter
after all. The world in general felt Trump won, and the Pravda media
assures us Kamala "destroyed" Trump! But, tell me, did anyone think they would say
anything different? You can't breath the fumes of the leftist fever
swamps for so long and still be sane, but, in spite of the leftist fever swamps, the polls remain
the same.
Why?
The nation knows what Trump stands
for, so it was incumbent on Kamala to explain her views on the economy,
which the Biden/Harris has done all they can to destroy, and in no way
could she show how America is better off now than it was four years ago, and
their unending harping about the "right" to murder the innocent unborn
isn't going to move people.
My personal view is abortion is absolutely
vile, and this excuse being used by heretics claiming while they personally
don't support abortion but they will "respect" others right to murder
the innocent unborn is rank gutless hypocrisy, and heresy, so, for the most part they're silent, and silence denotes agreement.
Trump and JD Vance should have the courage to stand up as a massive rocks in current
of public opinion and tell the world abortion is unacceptable, and why, destroying the lies, challenging their false narratives, and it's not all that hard, which I intend to demonstrate here.
That's not being
pragmatic? Well, there's a time for pragmatism, but not on abortion. How about this. Would saying, "I'm personally opposed to slavery, but it's okay if my neighbors have slaves," be acceptable? I'm betting not!
In Arizona there's a drive
to make abortion legal via an abortion "rights" bill, and the pro-abortion forces are upset the pamphlet being put out "can refer
to an embryo or fetus as
an "unborn human being," and sued. The Arizona Supreme Court disagreed with the abortionists saying that wording would stand, and what was the response
from abortion supporters? The voter's will see through attempts to say the unborn are people! I'll tell you what, we'll come back to that.
Nancy Pelosi, that self proclaimed devout Catholic,
has declared, before she stabbed Biden in the back, that if he won
(transfer that to Kamala) and they take the Congress, they will enshrine Roe v. Wade and eliminate the filibuster for abortion in the Senate. Remember this is the crowd that screams Trump will make abortion illegal via federal law, so, why is that wrong and this right? Pelosi's view of those who don't support abortion? They don't respect the dignity and worth of every person. Imagine that, but murdering unborn children shows dignity and respect for every person. Person....that's the key, and ask yourself, how can that be construed as anything except pure evil, and she's not alone.
Obama asked for God’s blessing upon Planned Parenthood and the abortion industry. Stacey Abrams claims she’s pro-abortion, and according to her she's a devout follower of Christ, and claims this isn't a religious or moral issue. It's a medical issue! And her faith helped her come to that conclusion.
Amazing!
I remember when Dennis Kucinich, who for all of his life opposed abortion, then all of sudden he had an epiphany that abortion wasn't so bad after all, when he stupidly believed in 2008 Democrats might vote for him as their nominee as President.
If
there ever was a more ignorant, less intelligent, or more
corrupt group of minds in the world than the nitwits and The View, it would have to be the United Nations. Whoopi Goldberg,
with her vast knowledge and understanding of the Bible claims the
Sixth Commandment "you shall not kill" isn't applicable as an argument
against abortion because we go to war and kill people all the time. The
problem for Whoopi, and so many other Biblical illiterates, is the Hebrew
word used in the Sixth Commandment means murder, not kill, and the
ancient texts make that distinction, and abortion is murder. And the rape or incest argument doesn't alter that. Why must the be baby murdered for the crimes of adults? Now let's address their unending go to argument in support of abortion, claiming that abortion must be legal in cases where the
mother's life is at risk. Well, first off, the choice is the "potential" death of a
mother, versus the "actual" death of an unborn child. That's defined clearly
and correctly. But the question that absolutely must be raised is: How often does that
occur?
"After all the screeching that 'women will die' without abortion, where are the dead women? ...........Another report here
and again, no number of deaths. If there were many, we would certainly
know".........And another report saying three times as many mothers will
die and yet again no actual number of deaths........I am skeptical of
any report that just gives percentages without giving actual numbers.
We also never see the number of deaths of viable children
in late term abortions. That would be a good number to know. We just
get told there are very few". But no matter how many that may be, we do know, those numbers do exist versus their claims regarding the deaths of women, which not exist, because if there was just one, they would tout that unendingly, and they're not. "I bet there are at least three times the
number of viable children who die in states with unlimited abortions as
those who die where there are limits."
On April 30, 2024 Ingrid Skop Apr 30, 2024, a board-certified obstetrician who has delivered over 5000 babies stated that she has never had to perform an abortion to save a woman's life.
So, if that's true, and I do believe it is, so, what we have here is a
slippery slop to promote the murder of the innocent unborn with scams of
"whataboutism"! And we can be assured that's the goal as American College of OBGYNs calls for no limits on abortion. What a vile, and corrupt group of moral degenerates. Skop's rebuttal to that?
We are witnessing, in real time, a vocal, political takeover of a
scientific community that represents the most honorable and beautiful
profession, responsible for safely bringing new life into the world. I
wish ACOG would realize that their promotion of elective abortion
without limits isn’t reflective of the views of their own members,
considering 86-93 percent of practicing obstetricians will not perform
an elective abortion.
So the question that must be in
everyone's mind is if that's not the view of their members, how can
their trade association (and make no mistake about it, that's what ACOG
is) take such a stand?
I owned by own pest control company for over 30
years, and was heavily involved in my industry's affairs and I can
assure you trade associations go off in directions that are unacceptable because the
choices for large trade associations leadership are rigged, especially if they're a national organization, such as this one.
No
person with the grit to be the rock in the current will ever be in
charge, except rarely, and if any did take charge and fix things, after they're gone, the invertebrates will be back in charge and undo all the good
done. It's the go along to get along crowd who are in charge, and
that's an affliction that's universal.
Part II: Abortion is Satanic
I've been writing about abortion for many
years, and all that's going on right now makes it clear I need to focus
on this subject far more than I have, here are recent pieces.
-
Defining Leftist Moral Boundaries. That's Easy, They Don't Exist!
- Abortion: We Really Do Need Clarity!
- When it Comes to Abortion, There's Only One Choice
- Abortion in America is a Covenant of Death
- Nancy Pelosi: Morality, Free Will and Corruption of Thought
- Abortion is Satanic: Get Over It!
I've
had discussions, and read discussions about the value of the politically
pragmatic approach to end abortion. And truthfully, I understand their
views, I just don't agree with them. Let me amend that. I seriously
don't agree with them.
One person stated we have to change the
culture to change the politics, and they cite the leftist long march through America's institutions, including the military, which took more than 125 years in America, and
further back for the institutions of the rest of the western world,
especially education. They're suggesting a conservative long march.
Foundationally I agree, except that long march argument is a logical
fallacy. Accepting a long march
approach to fix abortion means a massive number of the innocent unborn
children are going to being murdered, and who knows what accommodations
will be acceptable at the end of that march. And there will be
exceptions, make no mistake about that. How do I know that? Simple,
I've read a history book or two, and that's a pattern that's plays out
over and over again.
Tucker Carlson had an interview with Naomi Wolfe on his website, here.
In the interview, starting at about the 30 minute mark, Wolfe and
Carlson start talking about something I think needs to be considered...a
lot... the influence of Satan (spiritual evil) on recent world
events. I didn’t expect to hear anyone say this, let alone two people,
on a popular program. It happens to be what I believe, but not what I
would expect anyone else to be thinking about or expressing concern
about.
According to Wolfe, "the worldwide scale of the pandemic reaction argues
against any kind of conscious conspiracy. There are too many people
involved from places that have different cultures, languages, and
traditions. There is no way that many people with such disparate
backgrounds could be compelled to act against their own interests in the
same way without some kind of malign spiritual influence (Satan.)"
This reflects my own views. Think about it. We have all these
misanthropic movements all over the world. Environmentalism, population control monsters who want to eliminate five to six billion people, and those the moderates among them, abortion, covid insanity with lockdowns, and
false vaccines. Massive levels of divorce and single parent families, the combination of multiple anti-life movements, and they all have one common denominator. They
represent destructive forces impacting mankind. Is it so irrational to
think there's a master mind behind all this?
Part III The Corruption is Far, Deep, Wide, and Heartbreaking
They've
twisted every word, every law, and every principle of morality in order to achieve their vile goals. Virginia Democrats already pushing abortion-on-demand amendment
Ensuring the death of unborn children is their first priority, and a state judge in North Dakota claims women have a fundamental right to abortion under the state constitution and overturned the law passed by the state legislature.
In New York the Carmelite nuns had to lead the fight against New York's abortion mandate, which is a good indicator we've abandoned the concept of religious morality, unless their "religious requirements" justify them murdering the innocent unborn. So, shouldn't we call that human sacrifice? Why
is the is any different than the ancient pagans who threw their young
children into the fire pits sacrificing them to Baal, burning them
alive. I find this
heart breaking. America is now voting in support of murder, and the Biden administration is trying to impose abortion rules on employers none of which are Constitutional by twisting laws in ways never intended.
In one court another corrupt judge would not allow the defense to say ‘infanticide,’ ‘abortion,’ or ‘innocent lives’, because than might lend a sense of morality to their arguments. In short, if it involves abortion, the rule of law and criminal procedure is thrown out the window.
Our taxes are going to support abortion groups to the tune of billions of dollars. Remember the slippery slope? This is next story is disgusting, it's vile, it's real, it's legal, and this is evidence of how vile the abortionists are! Two gay men decided they wanted a family, as in children, and so they "rented a uterus", in effect buying a child, but the woman had medical issues and decided to deliver a little boy early. The "buyers" objected, and demanded she abort the child. She refused, and it gets worse. Under California's surrogacy laws these misfits had the "right" to withhold treatment needed to save the child's life, and he died. Does that seem Satanic in anyone besides me? At least this poor innocent child will not be in the clutches of these monsters.
Remember Kermit Gosnell the abortionist monster who not only murdered the innocent unborn, he murdered any who survived by removing the babies from the mother's wombs, sniping their spinal cord, and drowning them in a toxic fluid, while they were alive, making them legal American citizens with rights under the Constitution. As the story played out it got even worse, but here was the bigger issue. He's not alone out there. Abortionists claimed he was just a rogue operator, but undercover recordings show murdering those who survived an abortion is far more common that was known before. This corruption is so broad even America’s top Catholic health network partners with abortionists.
I'm flabbergasted at the praise RFK, Jr.'s getting from the conservative media. Pay Attention! He's a Kennedy, and he's a far left wing nutroll, as he bounced back and forth on abortion.
In Arizona, the
Abortion ban failed because one mentally corrupt Republican voted with Democrats, and as an Ohioan I'm really upset at this.
Barbarian buckeyes, as now according to this account Ohio "has has become the nation’s most
pro-abortion venue in the union."
Abortion, is a sickness that corrupts the character of a people.
This is nothing short of unabashed
paganism of American culture and will be the nation’s undoing. I would rather lose
on the issue of abortion than support the intentional killing of an innocent
baby. No matter what trimester it occurs in, abortion remains a gruesome
procedure resulting in death.
All who voted for this travesty in Ohio are
accomplices to a crime against humanity. There was a time when America actually believed the ten commandments and
Judaic/Christian values were foundational to American culture. We're now
"pragmatic" desiring to win elections at the cost of our fundamental
values. But if we no longer have a value system that clearly understands abortion is
the murder of the innocent unborn, what values and principles do we have we're
willing to stand up for? If we can throw our values out of the window for abortion, which ones won't we throw out the window?
I
keep hearing this
"we were misled" argument, and how there was vast amounts of money
poured into this crime against humanity vote by infanticide supporters.
But it still comes down to this. It isn't about money and you can't
mislead anyone into believing that murdering
the unborn innocent has benefits, or deprives a family of their
"rights". It's murder, it's that simple, and that's the foundational
moral issue. America is in serious need of a moral compass that actually
points north.
Part IV: Not All Are On Board
Indiana was the first State to pass a near total ban on Abortion, and what happens, Eli Lilly turns on Indiana because it wants abortions for its employees. "To its credit, the company kept quiet
during the abortion debate, but now it’s stated that it no longer sees
its future in the state that’s been its home for 146 years.
Even when they get things right the get them wrong, and in this case where a federal court ended mail-order abortion pills but upholds FDA approval. Does the term cognitive dissonance come to mind?
Another federal judge got it right, as he halted enforcement of the “Deceptive Practices of Limited Services Pregnancy Centers Act,” "a bill passed in Illinois
recently that targets pregnancy resource centers’ advertising and
outreach. During the case National Institute of Family Life Advocates et al v. Raoul, U.S. District Judge Iain Johnston halted the bill, saying, “The bill is painfully and blatantly a violation of the First Amendment.” Signed by Illinois Democratic Gov. J.B. Pritzker late last month,
the law prohibits so-called “deceptive practices” in pregnancy centers.
The law prompts legal scrutiny of pregnancy centers for “false
pretense” and “misrepresentation,” while also blocking pro-life speech
outside of abortion centers. Up to $50,000 in fines await violators of
the act."
"Pregnancy centers offer a variety of free parenting and pregnancy
support services for women and families in need – from material
necessities such as clothing, diapers, strollers, cribs, and car seats
to educational material about parenting. Pregnancy centers seek to help
vulnerable or impoverished pregnant women. Many often offer free medical
services such as ultrasounds, pregnancy tests, and STD testing...."
Another unconstitutional effort to censor those with opposing opinions, calling it misinformation. Very convenient. It seems clear to me, and I'm betting it would have seemed clear to the founders, the 14th Amendment's Equal Protection Clause covers this:
No State
shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or
immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive
any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of
the laws.
The founders would have viewed "person(s)" to include persons, born and unborn, but
most certainly those once born, are persons with rights under the
Constitution. It should not be up to a corrupt medical profession to
decide, nor should it be up to confused state legislatures who will go
back and forth on this issue deciding if it's murder one day and a legal
medical procedure on another day.
For
Trump to declare the decision by SCOTUS leaving abortion up to the states is correct thinking, and then state he would veto any Congressional law that bans
abortion nationally, is vile. To show just how idiotic this is, think about this. The federal government decides how much
water can be flushed down our toilets, and the states have no say in that,
and the list of federal imperatives is massive forcing states to comply, yet we're supposed to think, and accept the idea it's up to the states to decide the legality of murdering the innocent unborn, and the federal government should stay out of it. Does the term cognitive dissonance come to mind?
Abortion is blatantly unconstitutional and should be treated as such. It really is that simple.
Update, 12:26 PM -
Mr. Mistake. This appeared in the Canada free press, and it's a true story, and it should touch your heart, if it doesn't, you have no heart.
As I read this it took my mind back to the two gays in my article who chose to let that small child die, a child that under the Constitution had rights. Rights that were violated to appease two selfish, warped, vile men, and a corrupt medical staff in fear of a corrupt state law. But that was a federal violation, and that should have overridden their "rights" to murder that poor child. Why weren't they and all the hospital staff prosecuted for murder? That child was born and had rights they violated.
That's what happens when we abandon foundational moral values.
