Search This Blog

De Omnibus Dubitandum - Lux Veritas

Showing posts with label Media Hypocrisy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Media Hypocrisy. Show all posts

Wednesday, July 6, 2022

Possibly the Worst Person Ever

Derek Hunter Derek Hunter Jun 30, 2022 

Everyone knows someone who is just awful – horrible to the people they date or their friends or strangers, the elderly, children, animals, whatever, or some combination of all of them. We usually remove them from our lives as quickly as possible, but sometimes we can’t. Sometimes, no matter how terrible they are you have a friend who still likes them or a family member who still dates them. You don’t seek them out, but you can’t rid yourself of them completely either. I’d imagine that’s how Ana Navarro’s family feels about her.

Navarro is a horrible creature. Honestly, how she lives with herself isn’t that big of a surprise – those people I described above live with themselves without issue. The real question is how anyone else lives with them. 

Last week, after the Supreme Court decision overturning Roe v. Wade, Navarro, who hilariously describes herself as a devout Catholic, let her inner CNN show when she expressed outrage over the decision. She said she’s a “Catholic in church,” whatever the hell that means, and presumably a pile of hypnotical human garbage outside church. That last part is required to maintain a CNN contract and to get on The View.

In the course of her rant, Navarro lamented that her parents hadn't aborted her brother because he has special needs and the childless Ana views him as a burden. ...........To Read More....

 My Take - I gets worse as you read this, and her husband is allegedly a conservative activist.  But here's the thing, the difference between her and most of the media is she's openly disgusting.  I guess that's a plus? Maybe?  

One more thing.  What is it with these "devout Catholics" on the left who openly support policies that are condemned by their religion?  This is America, you can believe what you please, but if you oppose the teachings of your religion you're not a "devout" practicer of that religion.   

Why is that so hard to understand?  The answer to that is easy.  They're heretics attempting to justify their heresy, having sold themselves for 12 silver pieces.   

 

Friday, February 11, 2022

The Associated Press Has Quietly Come Around on a Drug It Once Used to Scorch Ron DeSantis

Seems the Associated Press would have reported on this development after it took a hard line against its promotion.

By Brad Slager Dec 21, 2021  

There seems to be a side-effect emerging from the new outbreak of the Omicron variant this winter. You may have experienced dizziness, confusion, or bouts of speechlessness – not from this COVID strain, but from the radical 180-degree shift experienced in the press. Suddenly, we see journalists saying things that mere months ago were grounds for de-platforming, or possibly being rounded up and placed in state custody, like a Down Under lock up.

Seemingly overnight and barely a week since Twitter forbade such discourse members of the press were freely commenting how people who were double-vaxxed and even boosted could contract COVID. Then we saw Brian Stelter, of all people, come out and push for kids to go back to school by saying things such as, "Shouldn't we be doing more to protect children by letting them live normal lives? Or, to pose the Q another way, are we really going to close schools again and let kids suffer even more?" Ron DeSantis was basically called a child-killer last summer when he said the very same type of things.

And on the subject of Florida's governor, the Associated Press had a curious report about the Omicron surge. In detailing what may lie ahead, the news syndicate indicated how the new strain could render some existing treatments as ineffective in battling the virus. Omicron may sideline two leading drugs against COVID-19, touts the headline. That word leading is what jumps out here, considering the drugs being covered. Next, there is this quote.

For more than a year antibody drugs from Regeneron and Eli Lilly have been the go-to treatments for early COVID-19, thanks to their ability to head off severe disease and keep patients out of the hospital.

This is a deeply curious development. Because four months ago, this same news outlet had taken Governor Ron DeSantis to task for his promoting Regeneron as a treatment for those who contract COVID. That article suggested the main reason he was pushing so hard for it was that a hedge fund with heavy investments in the drugmaker was a campaign donor. The wheels came off of this report in short order.

 

Thursday, September 16, 2021

Thought For the Day

That a black gubernatorial candidate can have eggs thrown at him by a white woman in a gorilla mask, with zero condemnation or coverage, tells you all you need to know about the left and their media allies.  Everything is racist, unless racism targets a Republican.  Congressman Dan Crenshaw

 

Google et al. Take Hypocrisy On Racism To Yet A Whole New Level

In the field of racial “equity,” the gap between the talk of woke American corporations and their actions grows wider every time you look. Nowhere is that gap wider than at Google.

As readers here know, I was involved for decades in the efforts of a major law firm to recruit, hire and retain increasing numbers of blacks and other minorities. From that experience, I know that this is a difficult, long-term and often frustrating process. A large dose of humility is in order. No one company or institution, no matter how big, will create utopia in a day.

Well, the giant tech companies don’t do humility. After all, they started from nothing just twenty or thirty years ago, and today they are worth trillions. Obviously, their leaders are geniuses, and therefore qualified to lecture everyone else about proper woke morality and how to perfect the world by some time tomorrow afternoon. And proper woke morality of this moment focuses on “antiracism” and “diversity, equity and inclusion.”

Christopher Rufo is the Manhattan Institute guy who is doing more than anyone else to shine light on the hysterical and racist “diversity” initiatives that are increasingly infesting American institutions. Yesterday he posted an article at City Journal on the subject of race training at Google. The title is “Don’t Be Evil: A Google employee program claims that America is a ‘system of white supremacy’ and that all Americans are ‘raised to be racist.’”

It seems that Rufo has gotten hold of materials currently being used at Google in a “racial re-education” program going by the name “Allyship in Action.” Included in the program is a series of interviews with stars of the Critical Race Theory movement, including Nikole Hannah-Jones and Ibram Kendi. Rather than characterizing the materials, Rufo mostly just quotes from them and lets them speak for themselves. Here are some choice excerpts:

From the Hannah-Jones interview: “If you name anything in America, I can relate it back to slavery” . . . “If you’re white in this country, then you have to understand that whether you personally are racist or not, whether you personally engage in racist behavior or not, you are the beneficiary of a 350-year system of white supremacy and racial hierarchy.”

From the Kendi interview: “‘To be raised in the United States, is to be raised to be racist, and to be raised to be racist is to be raised to almost be addicted to racist ideas.’ . . . Denying one’s complicity in racism, Kendi argued, is only further proof of a person’s racism. ‘For me, the heartbeat of racism is denial and the sound of that denial is “I’m not racist,”’ he says. Ultimately, Kendi argued that policymakers should deem any racial disparities the result of racist policies—and work to undo the deep-seated racism that permeates every institution in our society.”

And finally, from an internal Google document headed “Anti-racism resources” (created by Google diversity, equity, and inclusion lead Beth Foster): “One graphic in the document claims that ‘colorblindness,’ ‘[American] exceptionalism,’ ‘Columbus Day,’ ‘weaponized whiteness,’ and ‘Make America Great Again’ are all expressions of ‘covert white supremacy.’ Another graphic, titled ‘The White Supremacy Pyramid,’ advances the idea that conservative commentator Ben Shapiro represents a foundation of ‘white supremacy’ and that Donald Trump is moving society on a path toward ‘mass murder’ and ‘genocide.’”

Now you might think that before endorsing the statement that “any racial disparities [are] the result of racist policies” Google would have been sure that it had fixed the problem of “racial disparities,” at least within its own ranks. So let’s check. As I have noted in previous posts (including here), starting in 2014 Google and other big tech companies succumbed to pressure from Jesse Jackson to publish annual “diversity reports,” revealing the breakdown of their workforces by racial and gender categories. That June 2020 post linked to Google’s Diversity Annual Report for 2019. And here is Google’s Diversity Annual Report for 2021, that just came out in July 2021.

A good summary of the 2021 Report is dozens of pages of public relations happy talk all designed to snow you in the hope that you never make it to the damning statistical tables at the end. A few randomly selected quotes from the happy talk part: “We’re listening, learning, and taking action”! . . . “Hiring changes drove our best year yet for women in tech globally and Black+ and Latinx+ people in the U.S.”! . . . “We’re expanding access to hiring opportunities for underrepresented groups in many parts of the world by centering racial equity across every part of our hiring process.” Blah, blah, blah-de-di-blah-blah-blah.

On to the tables. Workforce representation of blacks, company-wide: 4.4%. That’s all the way up from 2.4% in 2014. Blacks among “leadership” (however they define that): 3.0%, up from 1.7% in 2014. And blacks among “tech” workers: 2.9%, versus 1.5% in 2014.

They don’t say how they define “tech” workers. You can be sure that they have taken every possible liberty with the definition to get as many blacks as possible into the pool. How about a category limited to software developers and programmers? They won’t tell you. You can be sure that that percent for blacks in that category would be way below the 2.9% for all “tech” workers.

Well, Google, you are the one who endorsed and promulgated the statement that “any racial disparities [are] the result of racist policies.” How can you even justify staying in business at this point?

While we’re at it, perhaps we should check into the annual diversity reports of the other big tech companies, like Facebook, Microsoft and Apple. Here is the Facebook 2021 Diversity Update, released on July 15. It’s shorter than the Google Report, but with the same basic approach — lots of PR baloney before getting at the very end to some charts that they hope you won’t read. In that chart at the end, in the teensiest possible print, it is revealed that the percent of black “tech” workers at Facebook is now 3.1%. Hey, it’s more than the 2.9% at Google.

Microsoft here says that it won’t publish its 2021 diversity data until “fall 2021.”

Apple? They may be the worst of the bunch. Here’s their most recent Report, which doesn’t have an issue date, but says that it includes data from January to December 2020. This Report is even more filled with PR platitudes than the others. (Excerpt: “Across Apple, we’ve strengthened our long-standing commitment to making our company more inclusive and the world more just. Where every great idea can be heard. And everybody belongs.” Excuse me while I puke.). When you finally get to the chart at the end, it does not display all data at the same time, but requires you to click various options to get different pieces one at a time. If you make the effort, here’s what you will find. The percent of black employees in “tech” was 6% in 2014. By 2016 it had moved up to 8%. And in 2020 it was back down to 6%. As with Google and the others, I would have no doubt that they have taken every possible liberty with the definition of “tech” workers to get the percentage as high as possible.

I would be inclined to have some sympathy for these companies if they would just have a little humility and stop lecturing the rest of us and accusing us of being “white supremacists” and “structural racists.” As it is, they deserve to be held to their own standards, as Saul Alinsky advised. The next Republican administration should investigate them all for racism. If they are proclaiming to the world and to their own workforces that “any racial disparities [are] the result of racist policies,” what is their defense?