The 2024 Election Democrat Conundrum, and The Down Card, Part II

"It doesn’t frighten me that Joe Biden is mentally unfit. What frightens me is that millions know this and will still vote for him.” — Robin Itzler 

By Rich Kozlovich

Is there any sane person on the planet that's not aware Joe Biden is mentally unfit, stunningly corrupt, and amazingly incompetent? And he lies....a lot....and badly.  Biden says things that make no sense, he babbles incoherently, he lies unendingly, and I actually think he believes what he's saying. 

 

All politicians lie, but Joe is the worst liar to ever set foot in the White House.  The stories he makes up are ludicrous and easily proven false.  In Daniel Greenfield's article What’s Eating Joe? Biden talks about an uncle who was shot down over New Guinea and eaten by cannibals.  He claims his son was killed in Iraq, he was in a helicopter shot down in Afghanistan, and made numerous trips there to pin medals on soldiers while under fire, and it goes on.

No part of those stories were true.  

 

And the left isn't liking this idea of defining reality as it truly is rather than the myths they've been turning out, and getting away with.  Biden really is lost, irrational, and angry.  I applaud all those who are defending him saying they support him because his policies are all great and successful, he's beloved, and he's a greatest President ever, and I hope they continue.  Why?  Because it  exposes them for being either corrupt, halfwits, or both.

 

Back in April a CNN Poll claimed Trump at 49% and Biden at 43%.  Does any rational person really believe 43% of Americans support Joe Biden?  Another example of why I've not believed in polls for 30 years.    And make no mistake, even the misfits in the Biden administration don't believe this as in the coming weeks and months, the rats will be leaving that sinking ship, and after this assassination attempt I've yet to see a poll released.  Remarkable!

There's a ton of commentary on replacing Biden, including using the 25th Amendment.  That's not going to happen! That's a very complicated process, and timing is against them.  Replacing Joe is really problematic for the Democrat party.   First, he's on the ballot in some states that have deadlines to replace that name.  They'd have to get the state legislatures to create an exception for another candidate via legislation, as they did in Ohio,  as some deadlines are now passed.

Also, there's around 250 million dollars in donations for the Biden/Harris ticket.  That money is not transferable to other candidates.  If Biden drops out, Harris is the only one who can utilize all that money.   Furthermore, Democrat election rules require that once a delegate commits to a candidate, he owns that delegate's vote.   It seems to me the only one who can replace Biden is Harris, and that's only going to happen if Biden says he's dropping out and releases his delegates, and he could still finish his term.  

Since all the interviews 0r appearances he's held after the debate have been as disastrous as this one, it now appears there's a cabal of Democrat leaders who are asking him to drop out, and donors are asking for their donations to be returned.   Good luck with that.

There’s all this talk about replacing Biden, including with Michelle, with one poll claiming she would beat Trump 50 to 39, which I find laughable.  Another good reason to ignore polls.  

She’s done nothing of note, other than take massively expensive trips around the world with her family at taxpayers expense. The media and pollsters can spin that all they like, I find it difficult to believe that has any potential at all. Michelle has a great life without having had to work for it, and that’s been the reality of her entire life. 

While she's been attacked, she's not been under the gun like she would be running for President, and  a lot of stuff would start to come out of the woodwork, and in my view, she's not equipped to handle it intellectually, or psychologically. 

Replacing Joe is a can of worms the Democrat party can't endure.  When Johnson stepped down his VP, Hubert Humphrey, stepped up, and had to defend Johnson's policies.  The policies which drove him out of the race.  On immigration alone can anyone possibly justify Biden's policies with any possible sense of sanity.  And compounds that insanity to wanting expand Obamacare to cover illegal immigrants, costing billions.   And whoever took  his place wouldn't dare condemn those policies as their entire base would turn on them.   

 

The Democrat party created a monster and are now caught between a rock and a hard place, cornered like a wild animal, and have no doubt, they'll react like wild animals right up to the election, and if they lose, they'll erupt in rioting in all these degenerated, crime filled major cities run by Democrats.  

 

The thing that should be in the forefront of everyone's mind is why in the world these two dimwits were chosen in the first place.  Easy answer.  They were the least offensive running, and even then they needed an illegal national conspiracy of voter fraud conducted on a massive scale to get them into office. 

 

This isn't really about Joe or Kamala, they're merely the symptom of the pathogen infecting the Democrat party.  It's really about the depth of degradation of the Democrat party's vision for America, and those who make up the frame work of the leadership are so contemptible they're not electable without voter fraud on a massive scale.   Their bench is so shallow if they were a professional baseball team, they'd be in the basement in the standings.

The fact is if Joe doesn’t want to quit, no one can make him, and it seems to me no one but Harris can take his place if he does. While no one is saying this, but in my view all these Democrat politicians who are taking public stands against Biden continuing to run isn’t about keeping the White House. It’s all about the down card. They fear if he stays in he will lose and drag a lot of them down with him.

It’s the down card strategy from now on. 

Mark Robinson: From 'dirt poor' to lieutenant governor via viral video

First black to hold position sees grace of God in his American story

  By Art Moore October 11, 2022 

Less than five years ago, Mark Robinson was working at a furniture factory when he decided to make his views on gun control heard at a meeting of the Greensboro City Council in North Carolina. His passionate speech went viral on Facebook, and he's now the state's first black lieutenant governor, with an eye on running for North Carolina's top office in 2024. In a video interview with WND (embedded below), Robinson discusses his American dream story, which he chronicles in his newly published autobiography, "We are the Majority!"..............To Read More....

My Take - Mark Robinson is an impressive man and you might wish to view my commentary, From an Outraged Citizen to Lieutenant Governor of North Carolina, and his views on

North Carolina Lt. Gov. Mark Robinson: Insulting to Say Blacks Can’t Get a Free ID to Vote

Robert Kraychik 22 Apr 2021  22

Lt. Gov. Mark Robinson (R-NC) said on Thursday it was “preposterous” and “insulting” for Democrats to frame black Americans as incapable of obtaining a photo ID to comply with voter-ID laws.

Robinson was invited to testify as a witness before the House Judiciary Committee’s hearing entitled, “Oversight of the Voting Rights Act: The Evolving Landscape of Voting Discrimination.” Democrats and the broader left regularly frame voter-ID laws as racially discriminatory against blacks, including comparisons between such regulations and Jim Crow laws.

Robinson said:

Am I to believe that black Americans — who have overcome the atrocities of slavery, who were victorious in the civil rights moment, and now sit in the highest levels of this government — cannot figure out how to get a free ID to secure their votes?

They need to be coddled by politicians because they don’t think we can figure out how to make our voices heard

Are you kidding me? The notion that black people must be protected from a free ID to secure their votes is not just insane, it is insulting.

Robinson observed the subtext of Democrat narratives regarding voter-ID laws:.................“H.R. 1 [is] despicable,” he stated. “The entire thing is designed to keep one party in power and make sure they stay there indefinitely. … They plan to do that by taking away the rights of states given by the Constitution to govern their own elections.”  He concluded, “[H.R. 1 would use] government dollars to fund campaigns in order to give an advantage to one party, mandating that felons are allowed to vote — including illegal immigrants on voter rolls — and of course, trying to banish states from having voter ID.”...........To Read More.....

My Take - Mark Robinson came to my attention in an article with this video.  He's an impressive man.

From an Outraged Citizen to Lieutenant Governor of North Carolina

By Rich Kozlovich

One of my favorite writers is Andrea Widburg, who on February 4, 2021 posted this piece: North Carolina's lt. governor shows how to fight back against a corrupt media, with what has to be the video for all time, along with these thoughts. 

Mark Robinson, currently North Carolina's Lieutenant Governor shows how to fight back against a corrupt media Mark Robinson stood up before the city council in Greensboro, North Carolina and gave an impassioned defense of the Second Amendment.

Since he's clearly not playing by the rules laid down by leftists and Republican invertebrates regarding how our children are being indoctrinated with leftist race dogma,  a local media outlet accused him, and the entire state Republican party, as being KKK entities.  He didn't like that at all, and when a local paper published this cartoon:

They were calling the entire North Carolina Republican party a KKK entity, including Robinson.  Well, he didn't like it and went after them with a level of vigor that needs to be tranfused into the entire Republican party.  He "ferociously attacked the newspaper for its dishonesty and ignorance"  He makes it clear, "I'm not going to go along to get along.  I'm going to call them out every time. "That's what every Republican should say when the media goes low"

To quote the author, "this man is no shrinking violet." To see his video taped response to this cartoon and these charged, to the original article as I can't duplicate it here.  

Unlike the MSM I feel it's important to tell the whole story, so, in all fairness, I feel I should note her comments about his anti-Semitic views, but as Andrea notes: 

When it comes to Robinson, as with Majorie Taylor Green's ill informed statements about Jews, it's important to recognize that neither she nor Robinson backs his statements with active malevolence.  Unlike the anti-Semitic Democrats in Congress, neither has shown hostility to the Jewish state (so far as I know), and both support American values.

As Sally Zelikovsky said, the answer is to educate, not destroy, those Republicans who need a new understanding of Jews and Judaism.  The fact is that we have almost no fighters in the Republican Party.  We shouldn't jettison the ones we have because they're flawed.  We should, instead, work with them to make them better.

An even more extensive piece appeared in the Washington Free Beacon quoting Robinson saying:

"The system of government that we have in this nation is not systemically racist; in fact, it is not racist at all," he said. "To say that this is a racist nation—that is not true. And when we write standards that point to that direction in any way, we are doing our students a disservice."

He's not opposed to education discussing the complex racial issues in America but to second graders?  He wisely notes: 

"I don't think that these things that we have included have been for the benefit of the students,"...... "There's no reason why we should be trying to teach second graders about the complex issues of race. Those children have enough on their plate learning how to read, and write, and do mathematics."

The author notes that "Robinson is working to build an opposition to the curriculum, which he characterizes as divisive and anti-American. In a petition—that by Wednesday afternoon had nearly 30,000 signatures—he argued that the courses are designed to "indoctrinate our students against our great country."

In short, he's not against education, he's against propaganda and the indoctrination of leftist views into very young and malleable minds.    

To be or to do.  Which way will you go? - Col. John Boyd

Diversity Without Accomplishment is Philosophy Without Form and Incompetence Without Consequence - Rich Kozlovich