Vaccine Mandates: Truth and Consequences

By Rich Kozlovich

Let me start out again by saying it appears Robert F. Kennedy is behind the site I'm linking below.  Now let me say this:   My contempt for Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has no bounds, he is, among other unpleasant things, and anti-vax nutcase, and for the most part that contempt extends to the rest of the Kennedy clan.

So why do I link articles in this site?  I only link the ones I know are presenting valid information based on information from multiple sites and that which is in harmony with my conclusions based on all the reading I've done.  If that changes, I'll stop linking the posts.

I support vaccinations and always have, but let's try and get this right once and for all.  These shots are not vaccinations. For decades for something to be called a vaccination in America required the drug to immunize the person receiving the shot and prevent transmission.  These drugs do neither, so the CDC went Orwellian and changed the definition to accommodate this insane mandate fiasco, and the FDA approved them for use after less than two years of testing.  Normally it takes ten to twelve years.  

These are not vaccinations, they're treatments, and more importantly, they're experimental treatments, and based on so much evidence being presented, they don't work, at least not very well.  Ireland has an almost entirely vaccinated population (around 97%) and yet has a very high rate of infection.  Why?  One thing we absolutely know is this.  They can't blame the unvaccinated, who probably have natural or acquired immunity, which based on "an Israeli study of more than 700,000 people, natural immunity from infection confers 27 times more protection than the jab."  Can they?

So, the question that needs asked and answered:  If they're all vaccinated then who are the people getting this virus?  Unless of course these drugs don't work, or don't work very well requiring booster shots, and how many, and for how long?  And all this when "the survival rate is estimated at between 97% and 99.75%. ................ It's true that COVID is very contagious, but so is the common cold, and no one ever thought of shutting down the world before to prevent people from catching the sniffles."

Personally, I'm of the opinion they may very well make a great many people more susceptible to not only this virus, but the variants also.  And we now have abundant evidence of bad, and even deadly, reactions to these experimental shots. 

So were now going to experiment on our children by forcing them to be treated with these potential elixirs of death when in fact children are rarely effected by this virus.  Does anyone besides me think that's insane?  Make no mistake about this: There may be huge long term negative consequences to our children's health as a result. 

CHD to Sue FDA for ‘Recklessly Endangering’ Children if Agency Authorizes Pfizer Vaccine for Children 5 to 11 Years Old, By Children's Health Defense Team  - An advisory committee to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration will meet Tuesday to consider emergency authorization of Pfizer’s COVID vaccine for young children. In a letter to the FDA, Children’s Health Defense outlines why such a move would be reckless. Children’s Health Defense (CHD) today said it will take legal action against the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) if the agency grants Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) for the Pfizer-BioNTech SARS-CoV-2 vaccine for children aged 5-11................

Urgent: Send This Letter Today to Congress Outlining Threat COVID Vaccines Pose to the Health of Our Nation’s Young Children - By Children's Health Defense Team -  In a letter to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Children’s Health Defense highlighted peer-reviewed research showing children have virtually zero risk of hospitalization and death from COVID, and outlined the vaccine’s risks. Please send the letter to your members of Congress.  Each member of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee (VRBPAC) today received a letter from Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and Dr. Meryl Nass, on behalf of Children’s Health Defense (CHD).  The letter highlights the latest peer-reviewed research showing children have virtually zero risk of hospitalization and death from the COVID-19 virus. Furthermore, it outlines the serious known risks of immediate harm and the unknown long-term risks from the vaccines to children............

10 Red Flags in FDA’s Risk-Benefit Analysis of Pfizer’s Plan to Inject Young American Children With COVID ‘Vaccine’- By Toby Rogers, Ph.D.-  Where to even begin with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) preposterous risk-benefit analysis of Pfizer’s mRNA COVID-19 “vaccine” in children ages 5 to 11? Let’s start with my bona fides.............. My research focus is on corruption in the pharmaceutical industry so I’ve read scientific studies in connection with vaccines nearly every day for five years. Earlier in my career, I worked professionally tearing apart shoddy cost-benefit analyses prepared by corporations that were trying to get tax breaks, contracts and other concessions from local government. Suffice it to say I’ve thought a lot about risk-benefit analysis and I’m better equipped than most to read one of these documents. The FDA’s risk-benefit analysis in connection with Pfizer’s Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) application to inject children ages 5 to 11 with their COVID-19 vaccine is one of the shoddiest documents I’ve ever seen....................