Boxer wants to redo bipartisan deal on toxics law

Sen. Barbara Boxer opposes the deal by the late Sen. Frank Lautenberg because she says it usurps California laws on toxic chemicals.

By Carolyn Lochhead

July 18, 2013

Washington -- Before he died last month, Sen. Frank Lautenberg, a liberal New Jersey Democrat, had negotiated a bipartisan deal to replace a law signed by President Gerald Ford that for nearly 40 years has prevented the federal government from assessing the safety of tens of thousands of industrial chemicals in everyday use.

After Lautenberg died of pneumonia June 3 at age 89, Sen. Barbara Boxer, D-Calif., who chairs the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee, began to derail the bill he had spent years working on, saying it would usurp California's rules on toxic chemicals…..To Read More….

My Take – I love this.  Since when has Boxer or any of her loony green friends ever been concerned with local or state laws regarding pesticides or any other chemical for that matter?  Now all of a sudden they're concerned that state law will be pre-empted.  All of a sudden state law should take precedence over federal law.  What a change of heart.  Is it possible they would be willing to apply that thinking to every state over every issue? 

The thing that everyone really needs to understand is the greenies have no love of facts or consistency of thought.  They will passionately take a position and just a passionately take the reverse position if it suits their immediate needs.   

Why would we listen to people such as this?   

These people are irrational, misanthropic and morally defective.  We have plenty of history to show their programs harm humanity and the environment.  So why is that so hard to understand these people are insane? 

Shock: Chemical industry stands up to Senate bullies

Posted on November 30, 2011 by Steve Milloy on JunkScience.com.   

Apparently even the squishy and often-greenwashing chemical industry has its limits.  Environment and Energy Daily reports, a testy exchange at a recent hearing on a bill to reform the country’s chemical regulations has driven a significant wedge between a major industry group and Democrats just as Sen. Frank Lautenberg (D-N.J.) prepares to move his landmark legislation.

The feud spawned from a Senate Environment and Public Works Committee hearing earlier this month on Lautenberg’s “Safe Chemicals Act” (S. 847), which would overhaul the 1976 Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA).

Responding to a question from Lautenberg, American Chemistry Council (ACC) President Cal Dooley said his organization would not provide specific legislative language as an alternative to several parts of the bill to which it objects.

The remark sparked shouting from Democratic Sens. Ben Cardin of Maryland, Tom Udall of New Mexico and Sheldon Whitehouse of Rhode Island, all of whom charged that ACC needed to provide specifics. Otherwise, they argued, the trade association was only working to defeat the bill.

Two weeks after the hearing, the rift only appears to be widening…The doddering Frank Lautenberg needs ACC buy-in to convince Senate and House Republicans to go along with his planned destruction of the chemical industry.  ACC seems finally to be balking — no easy thing for the Democrat Cal Dooley to do.

But no matter, it should be a safe bet that House Republicans will not go along with Senate Democrats in screwing the chemical industry — even if the industry asks for it.

But we should keep in mind that the Newt Gingrich-led house voted unanimously to approve the Food Quality Protection Act of 196 which has led to the restriction of pesticide use and expansion of EPA efforts on so-called endocrine disrupters.

So Republicans need to be closely monitored.


###